Cited by 1,214Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesMathematics Education and PedagogyMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra

Sweller, John, Cooper, Graham A.·1985·Cognition and Instruction

Abstract

The knowledge required to solve algebra manipulation problems and procedures designed to hasten knowledge acquisition were studied in a series of five experiments. It was hypothesized that, as occurs in other domains, algebra problem-solving skill requires a large number of schemas and that schema acquisition is retarded by conventional problem-solving search techniques. Experiment 1, using Year 9, Year 11, and university mathematics students, found that the more experienced students had a better cognitive representation of algebraic equations than less experienced students as measured by their ability to (a) recall equations, and (b) distinguish between perceptually similar equations on the basis of solution mode. Experiments 2 through 5 studied the use of worked examples as a means of facilitating the acquisition of knowledge needed for effective problem solving. It was found that not only did worked examples, as expected, require considerably less time to process than conventional problems, but that subsequent problems similar to the initial ones also were solved more rapidly. Furthermore, decreased solution time was accompanied by a decrease in the number of mathematical errors. Both of these findings were specific to problems identical in structure to the initial ones. It was concluded that for novice problem solvers, general algebra rules are reflected in only a limited number of schemas. Abstraction of general rules from schemas may occur only with considerable practic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students learn more efficiently and more robustly when more frequent study of worked examples is interleaved with problem solving practice as opposed to practice that is all problem solving.

    “Students learn more efficiently and more robustly when more frequent study of worked examples is interleaved with problem solving practice as opposed to practice that is all problem solving.”
  • More complex variable-variable KCs imply instruction that includes comparison/blocking and more worked example study.

    “More complex variable-variable KCs (e.g., designing a controlled experiment, see Table 2) imply instruction that includes comparison/blocking (Gick & Holyoak, 1983;Gentner, et al., 2009) and more worked example study (Sweller & Cooper, 1985).”
  • Students work through interleaved worked examples and problems more quickly and perform better on corresponding problems in a posttest.

    “Students work through the interleaved worked examples and problems more quickly and perform better on corresponding problems in a posttest.”
  • Alternating worked examples with standard problems leads to more efficient and more effective learning than having students solve all the problems in the set.

    “Sweller and Cooper (1985) demonstrated that alternating worked examples with standard problems leads to more efficient and more effective learning than having students to solve all the problems in the set”
  • Sweller and Cooper (1985) found that worked examples aided in reducing acquisition time and improved achievement on the test phase of the experiments.

    “Throughout the experiments, Sweller and Cooper (1985) also found that worked examples aided in reducing the acquisition time and improved achievement on the test phase of the experiments.”

    From Worked Example Mid-Semester Intervention in College Algebra (2022) · cites this paper as Sweller and Cooper (1985)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Cognition and Instruction
Published
1985-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
59-89
ISSN
  • 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-690X
OpenAlex
W2046675442
Cited by
1,214
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 53
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognition and Instruction (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSW Department of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Keywords
worked examples, algebraic problem solving, schema acquisition, solution time, mathematical errors, mathematics learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review