Cited by 129Language Development and DisordersCognitive Abilities and TestingNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Disentangling the relationship between working memory and language: the roles of short-term storage and cognitive control.

Open access
Engel de Abreu, Pascale Marguerite Josiane, Gathercole, Susan Elizabeth, Martin, Romain·2011·Learning and Individual Differences

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.002

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both studies, the authors attributed the transfer to reading to the strong relation of complex span tasks to reading ability and memory retrieval.

    “In both studies, the authors attributed the transfer to reading to the strong relation of complex span tasks to reading ability (e.g., Daneman and Merikle, 1996; Engel de Abreu et al., 2011) and memory retrieval (Unsworth and Engle, 2006).”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Engel de Abreu et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Alloway, T. P. (2007). Automated working memory assessment. London: Pearson Assessment. Translated and reproduced by permission of Pearson Assessment.
  2. Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Spooner, A. L. R. (2003). The reading decision test. Brighton: Psychology Press. Working memory, and language 14
  3. GoldWave Inc. (2004). GoldWave digital audio editor software (5 ed.): GoldWave Inc, St.
  4. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equational modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engel de Abreu, P. M. J., Gathercole, S. E., & Martin, R.
Affiliations
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
569-574
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171740449
Cited by
129
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
working memory, language acquisition, short-term storage, cognitive control, multilingual children, vocabulary development, syntactic development, early reading development, rhyme awareness, fluid intelligence, young children, complex span

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review