The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 22 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.
Open accessAbstract
This experiment tested whether proximal goal setting could cultivate competencies, self-percepts of efficacy, and intrinsic interest.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
71 Own result · 31 No basis given · 21 Own interpretation · 10 Own method · 4 Not checked yet · 3 Sources not found · 2 No full text of the sources · 1 Supported so far
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“intrinsic interest in arithmetic activities that initially held little attraction for them”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The number of subtraction problems children solved under permissive choice conditions is a valid measure of their intrinsic interest in arithmetic.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“developed a sense of personal efficacy”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The children's substantial quantitative deficiencies were further confirmed by standardized measures of their mathematical ability obtained from the school district on three subtests of the Metropolitan Achievement Test (Durost, Bixler, Wrightstone, Prescott, & Balow, 1970).They occupied the bottom percentile ranks in computation (22), concepts (27), and problem solving (22).”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Mathematical performance test.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Durost, Bixler, Wrightstone, Prescott, & Balow, 1970
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Distal goals had no demonstrable effects.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Perceived self-efficacy was positively related to accuracy of mathematical performance”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“goal proximity fostered veridical self-knowledge of capabilities as reflected in high congruence between judgments of mathematical self-efficacy and subsequent mathematical performance.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pilot work in the development of the test procedures revealed that children who do not fully comprehend subtraction operations fail to grasp the nature of their deficiency because they faithfully apply an erroneous algorithm.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Mathematical performance test.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Perceived self-efficacy was positively related to accuracy of mathematical performance and to intrinsic interest in arithmetic activities.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The number of subtraction problems children solved under permissive choice conditions is a valid measure of their intrinsic interest in arithmetic.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“achieved substantial mastery of mathematical operations”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Perceived self-efficacy was accompanied by high-performance attainments and perseverence under conditions in which such a relationship would be expected to obtain.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Probably not a substantial claim. 13
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Self-percepts of efficacy can affect people's choice of activities, how much effort they expend, and how long they will persist in the face of difficulties (Bandura, 1977a;Brown & Inouye, 1978;Schunk, 1981).”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bandura, 1977a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Brown & Inouye, 1978 source
- Supportedcites Schunk, 1981 source
The article text following the Abstract states that perceived self-efficacy influences choice of activities, effort expenditure, and persistence in the face of difficulties. This directly supports the attributed paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Under proximal subgoals, children progressed rapidly in self-directed learning”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The selected sample of children indeed exhibited gross deficits; one third could not solve a single problem, and another third could only solve one.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Mathematical performance test.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Contrasts between the means of the different treatment conditions show the children in the proximal condition to be much more skilled than those in the distal (p < .01),no-goals (p < .01),or control (p < .01),conditions.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Mathematical Performance
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“whereas the controls, who solved only 5% of the problems in pretest and only 8% in posttest, remained grossly deficient in this regard.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Mathematical Performance
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In most instances the children erred by overestimating their capabilities.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Congruence Between Self-Efficacy Judgment and Performance
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Those who had the benefit of proximal subgoals substantially increased their perceived self-efficacy and exhibited even further gains following the performance posttest.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Perceived Self-Efficacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, children in the other conditions generally expressed self-doubts concerning their capabilities and showed little spontaneous interest in solving arithmetic problems.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Standardized measures of mathematical competence, based on the Metropolitan Achievement Test, did not predict rate of skill acquisition or degree of self-efficacy enhancement.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Correlational Analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analyses of intragroup changes presented in Table 1 show that the increased perseverence of the proximally self-motivated children and the diminished effort of the controls are highly significant.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Persistence
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although interest was positively related to self-percepts of efficacy derived from performance attainments in treatment, it was uncorrelated with the performance attainments themselves.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Correlational Analyses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Children oriented toward distal goals displayed a moderate increase in selfefficacy but a small decline after the posttest.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Perceived Self-Efficacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Multiple comparisons among groups in the posttest assessment disclose that children in each of the treatment conditions, although not differing from each other, were all significantly more persevering than were the controls (Table 1).”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Persistence
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Children in all groups performed a comparable number of digit-symbol items and did not differ in this respect (F = 0.77).”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Intrinsic Interest
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The more competent children were at mathematical computation, r(38) = .42,p < .01,and problem solving, r(38) = .58,p < .001, the more subtraction problems they completed in the free-choice situation.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Correlational Analyses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By the end of the four sessions, the percentage of the total instructional material completed was 74% in the proximal condition, 55% in the distal condition, and 53% in the condition involving no goals.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Progress in Self-Directed Learning
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, 90% of the children who developed their arithmetic skill through the aid of proximal subgoals performed subtraction problems under the free-choice conditions; whereas only about 40% of the children in the other groups did so.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Intrinsic Interest
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analysis of persistence on the easy arithmetic items revealed no differences except for the controls, who were significantly less persevering (-31%) when tested again.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Persistence
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Children who gain high self-efficacy through skill acquisition solve problems readily and therefore need not spend much time on them.
- Rests on an assumption: An aggregate measure of persistence spanning the entire range of difficulty is not too meaningful because long perseverence times on hard problems are offset by rapid solutions of less difficult ones.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Table 1 shows that in accurateness of self-appraisal, the proximally self-motivated children exceed other experimental groups, which do not differ significantly from each other.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Congruence Between Self-Efficacy Judgment and Performance
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Children in the distal condition also exceeded the controls in self-efficacy, but they did not differ significantly from those who set no goals for themselves.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Perceived Self-Efficacy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both instructional performance, r(28) = .33,p < .05,and strength of self-efficacy, r(38) = .42,p < .01,were moderately related to the children's facility in using subtractive operations.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Correlational Analyses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but both groups outperformed the controls.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Mathematical Performance
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inspection of Table 1 shows that children in the proximal subgoal condition exceeded all three comparison groups, which did not differ from each other.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Intrinsic Interest
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Correlation of the latter measures shows that variations in mean strength of self-efficacy covaried with interest in the control and the no-goals conditions, r(18) = .39,p < .05,but not in the goal-setting treatments.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Correlational Analyses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the activities that people enjoy doing for their own sake originally had little or no interest for them.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The instructions, format, and materials for the self-directed study were identical across treatment conditions except for variations in goal setting.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Treatment Conditions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Under conditions in which external imperatives are minimal and discontinuous, people must partly serve as agents of their own motivation and action.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By having children in different treatments pursue separately the self-directed learning in the same setting at the same time, social and situational factors that might otherwise vary were comparable across treatment conditions.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Procedure for Self-Directed Learning
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although results are somewhat variable, the usual finding is that rewards given regardless of quality of performance tend to reduce interest, whereas rewards for performances signifying competence sustain high interest (Boggiano & Ruble, 1979;Enzle & Ross, 1978;Lepper & Greene, 1979;Ross, 1976).”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Children were assigned randomly to one of three treatment conditions or to a nontreated control group.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Treatment Conditions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To control for any possible bias, the testers had no knowledge of the conditions to which the children had been assigned.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Posttreatment Assessment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Operative competence thus requires flexible orchestration of multiple subskills.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both forms were administered in a counterbalanced order to a sample of 17 children who were not participants in the formal study.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Posttreatment Assessment
plainn = 17- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, through favorable continued involvement, almost any activity can become imbued with consuming significance.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The controversy over the effects of extrinsic rewards on preexisting high interest has led to a neglect of the issue of how intrinsic interest is developed when it is lacking.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This form of self-motivation, which operates largely through internal comparison processes, re-quires personal standards against which to evaluate ongoing performance.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Children who set themselves attainable subgoals progressed rapidly in self-directed learning, achieved substantial mastery of mathematical operations, and heightened their perceived self-efficacy and interest in activities that initially held little attraction for them.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The link between boosts in perceived self-efficacy and sustained involvement in challenging activities is now well established across a wide range of behavioral domains (Bandura, 1981;Brown & Inouye, 1978;Weinberg, Gould, & Jackson, 1979;Schunk, 1981;Condiotte & Lichtenstein, in press).”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Discussion
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consequently, interest fails to develop, even though skills are being acquired in the process.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Judgments of one's capabilities can affect rate of skill acquisition, and performance mastery, in turn, can boost self-efficacy in a mutually enhancing process.”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The number of subtraction problems children solved under permissive choice conditions is a valid measure of their intrinsic interest in arithmetic.
“The number of subtraction problems the children solved under these permissive choice conditions constituted the measure of intrinsic interest.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Children who gain high self-efficacy through skill acquisition solve problems readily and therefore need not spend much time on them.
“Children who gain high self-efficacy through skill acquisition solve problems readily and, therefore, need not spend much time on them.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An aggregate measure of persistence spanning the entire range of difficulty is not too meaningful because long perseverence times on hard problems are offset by rapid solutions of less difficult ones.
“An aggregate measure of persistence spanning the entire range of difficulty is not too meaningful because long perseverence times on hard problems are offset by rapid solutions of less difficult ones.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Performances that are readily achieved suggest a higher level of self-ability than do analogous attainments gained through slow, heavy labor.
“Performances that are readily achieved suggest a higher level of self-ability than do analogous attainments gained through slow, heavy labor.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The influence of perceived self-efficacy on perseverence is best revealed on problems that cannot be solved however hard one tries.
“The influence of perceived self-efficacy on perseverence is, of course, best revealed on problems that cannot be solved however hard one tries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Children who doubt their capabilities quit sooner than those who believe they can eventually master the task should they persevere.
“Children who doubt their capabilities quit sooner than those who believe they can eventually master the task should they persevere.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Research on intrinsic interest has centered primarily on how extrinsic incentives affect high interest when it is already present rather than on how to develop it when it is lacking.
“Research on intrinsic interest has centered primarily on how extrinsic incentives affect high interest when it is already present rather than on how to develop it when it is lacking.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The problem of developing interest when it is lacking presents major challenges, especially when avoidance of activities essential for self-development reflects antipathy arising from repeated failure rather than mere disinterest.
“It is the latter problem that presents major challenges, especially when avoidance of activities essential for self-development reflects antipathy arising from repeated failure rather than mere disinterest.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Judgment of mathematical self-efficacy by children just beginning to understand the requisite cognitive skills is no simple matter.
“Judgment of mathematical self-efficacy by children just beginning to understand the requisite cognitive skills is no simple matter.”
The paper relies on this without support.
With very brief exposure to sample items, it is hard to discriminate among different levels of task difficulty.
“With very brief exposure to sample items, it is hard to discriminate among different levels of task difficulty.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The complexity of some of the subtractive operations is not instantly apparent from what is most readily observable.
“This is because the complexity of some of the subtractive operations is not instantly apparent from what is most readily observable.”
The paper relies on this without support.
When complex operations are imbedded in seemingly easy problems, appearances can be quite misleading.
“When complex operations are imbedded in seemingly easy problems, which is often the case, appearances can be quite misleading.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Solving problems typically requires applying multiple operations.
“Moreover, solving problems typically requires applying multiple operations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Judgment of personal capabilities for a given type of task is complicated if some of the constituent operations are thoroughly mastered and others are only partially understood.
“Even if they were readily recognizable, judgment of personal capabilities for a given type of task is complicated if some of the constituent operations are thoroughly mastered and others are only partially understood.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Selective attention to mastered elements highlights competencies, whereas focus on what is less well understood highlights shortcomings.
“Selective attention to mastered elements highlights competencies; whereas focus on what is less well understood highlights shortcomings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Even equal attentiveness to all aspects of the task will produce some variance in judgments of self-efficacy, depending on how much weight is given to the differentially mastered operations.
“Even equal attentiveness to all aspects of the task will produce some variance in judgments of self-efficacy, depending on how much weight is given to the differentially mastered operations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The evaluative standards against which ongoing performances are appraised constitute an additional factor that determines how well people judge their capabilities.
“The evaluative standards against which ongoing performances are appraised constitute an additional factor that determines how well people judge their capabilities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Performances that draw on only a few skills reduce the likelihood of overestimating personal capabilities by overweighting a mastered subpart.
“Performances that draw on only a few skills reduce the likelihood of overestimating personal capabilities by overweighting a mastered subpart.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In activities that depend on diverse subskills, knowledge of some of them, especially the more directly observable ones, raises the level of assurance that one might be able to perform successfully.
“In activities that depend on diverse subskills, knowledge of some of them, especially the more directly observable ones, raises the level of assurance that one might be able to perform successfully.”
The paper relies on this without support.
When progress is gauged against distal goals, similar accomplishments may prove disappointing because of wide disparities between current performance and lofty future standards.
“When progress is gauged against distal goals, similar accomplishments may prove disappointing because of wide disparities between current performance and lofty future standards.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, for many procrastinators, most tasks and assignments that need completion will probably be experienced as unrewarding, war-ranting treatment interventions that specifically target the value of performing the correct actions (Bandura & Schunk, 1981).”
From Understanding and Treating Procrastination: A Review of a Common Self-Regulatory Failure (2014) · cites this paper as Bandura & Schunk, 1981
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“as Bandura and Schunk (1981) concluded, self-motivation can best be created and sustained by attainable sub-goals that lead to larger goals”
From Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis (2000) · cites this paper as Bandura and Schunk (1981)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The higher self-efficacy, the more likely we will take on a task (Bandura and Schunk, 1981).”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Bandura and Schunk, 1981
In the citing paper
“Such facets of co-creation will likely nurture intrinsic motivation26, which is constructive for the development of self-efficacy30.”
From Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Statistics that don’t add up
Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
“r(8) = .61,p < .001”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Correlational Analyses
Reported p < .001 · recomputed p = .061
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“r(18) = .39,p < .05”
§ Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation > Correlational Analyses
Reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .089
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Doesn’t add upr(8) = 0.61reported p < .001 · recomputed p = .061The two fall on opposite sides of .05
“r(8) = .61,p < .001”
- Doesn’t add upr(18) = 0.39reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .089
“r(18) = .39,p < .05”
- Not confirmedr(28) = 0.42reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .021
“r(28) = .42,p < .01”
- Not confirmedr(28) = 0.32reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .085
“r(28) = .32,p < .05”
- Not confirmedr(28) = 0.33reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .075
“r(28) = .33,p < .05”
- Not confirmedr(38) = 0.49reported p < .001 · recomputed p = .001
“r(38)= .49,p < .001”
- Not confirmedr(28) = 0.4reported p < .025 · recomputed p = .029
“r(28) = .40,p < .025”
- Not confirmedr(28) = 0.25reported p < .1 · recomputed p = .183
“r(28) = .25,p < .10”
- Not confirmedr(8) = 0.63reported p = .025 · recomputed p = .051
“r(8) = .63,p = .025”
- Not confirmedr(38) = 0.27reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .092
“r(38) = .27,p < .05”
- ConsistentF(3, 36) = 10.13reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(3, 36) = 10.13,p < .001”
- ConsistentF(6, 72) = 5.96reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(6, 72) = 5.96, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(3, 36) = 12.8reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(3, 36) = 12.80, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(3, 36) = 12.55reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(3, 36) = 12.55, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(3, 36) = 5.67reported p < .005 · recomputed p = .003
“F(3, 36) = 5.67, p < .005”
- ConsistentF(3, 36) = 3.57reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .023
“F(3, 36) = 3.57, p < .05”
- ConsistentF(1, 27) = 3.94reported p < .1 · recomputed p = .057
“F(1, 27) = 3.94, p < .10”
- ConsistentF(1, 27) = 5.44reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .027
“F(1, 27) = 5.44, p < .05”
- ConsistentF(1, 27) = 3.66reported p < .1 · recomputed p = .066
“F(1, 27) = 3.66, p < .10”
- ConsistentF(1, 27) = 4.67reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .040
“F(1, 27) = 4.67, p < .05”
- ConsistentF(3, 36) = 3.06reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .040
“F(3, 36) = 3.06, p < .05”
- Consistentr(38) = 0.42reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .007
“r(38) = .42,p < .01”
- Consistentr(38) = 0.51reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“r(38) = .51,p < .001”
- Consistentr(38) = 0.58reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“r(38) = .58,p < .001”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Self-citationKytle, J., & Bandura, A. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065952 · Cited by 25,422
Self-citationSelf-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1978) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4 · Cited by 10,586
Self-citationDeci, E. L. (1975) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9 · Cited by 2,911
Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives
Locke, E. A. (1968) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4 · Cited by 2,409
New directions in attribution research
Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., & Kidd, R. F. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,994
Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change.
Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.35.3.125 · Cited by 1,392
Self-citationAnalysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01663995 · Cited by 1,338
Self-citationDissonance processes as self-affirmation.
Steele, C. M., & Liu, T. J. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.5 · Cited by 785
Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis.
Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.93 · Cited by 781
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [5]5. Bandura, A. The self and mechanisms of agency. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol.
- [6]6. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, in press.
- [18]18. Jeffery, K. M. The effects of goal-setting on self-motivated persistence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1977.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,701–1,800 of 2,552
Barbosa, S. D., Fayolle, A. J.-C., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
The Effect of a Constructivist-Based Approach on Fifth Grade Reading Achievement.
Harkness, L. M. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 3
Transition to University - A Self-Regulatory Approach.
Doring, A., Bingham, B., & Bramwell-Vial, A. (1997) · Cited by 3
Female academics in Vietnam: What helps and hinders career advancement
Vu, H. T. V. (2018) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) · Cited by 3
Cury, F., & Sarrazin, P. G. (1993) · INSEP-Éditions eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.insep.1433 · Cited by 3
Taheri, M. (2020) · FIU - Digital Commons (Florida International University) · doi:10.25148/etd.fidc009212 · Cited by 2
Promoting students' learning through constructive feedback strategies
Rezk, Y. (2021) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20409202 · Cited by 3
Fostering Intrinsic Motivation and Mental Well-being in Today’s SystemsPreprint
Qureshi, F. H., Khawaja, S., Sokić, K., Bach, M. P., & Meško, M. (2024) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202405.1568.v1 · Cited by 3
A study of multidimensional physical self-concept and values among adolescent boys and girls
Klomsten, A. T. (2006) · BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) · Cited by 3
Baczurik, A. C. (2012) · TigerPrints (Clemson University) · Cited by 3
Children's Social Comparison and Goal Setting in Achievement Contexts.
Schunk, D. H. (1984) · Cited by 3
Self-citationMandell, B. E. (2013) · doi:10.13021/mars/4218 · Cited by 3
First-Generation and Non-First-Generation Students
McCain, J. L., Hawthorne, M. J., Young-Jones, A. D., Pierce, B. H., & Smith, T. (2018) · Journal of College Orientation Transition and Retention · doi:10.24926/jcotr.v25i2.2118 · Cited by 2
“Given that self-efficacy and competence can be both directly and indirectly linked (e.g., Bandura, 2012; Bandura & Schunk, 1981), a lack of self-efficacy can be particularly consequential within academia.”
Research-based training for undergraduate mathematics tutors
Johns, C. (2022) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2022.2153759 · Cited by 3
“Productive beliefs about oneself as a mathematics learner, such as self-efficacy, value of discipline, and growth mind-set (NRC, 2001), influence the way one approaches learning and, therefore, the learning that takes place (Bandura & Schunk, 1981; Schunk, 1985).”
Social foundations of motivation: A pathway forward
Wentzel, K. R. (2025) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102840 · Cited by 2
Rasch Analysis of General Self-Efficacy Among Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities
Park, E. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15121639 · Cited by 2
“Self-efficacy affects the way of thinking that determines the choice of behavior, the extent of effort exerted, the length of effort until the behavior is completed, and emotional responses (Bandura, 1977; Bandura & Schunk, 1981; Bandura et al., 1980).”
Mannonen, J., Hooshyar, D., Urrutia, F., Hämäläinen, R., Araya, R., & Lehesvuori, S. (2025) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-02-2024-0070 · Cited by 5
Interest, Self-efficacy, and Belonging in Classroom Learning
Renninger, K. A., Barton, L. K., Bautista, G., Garcia-Barrios, M., Ogunyinka, I., & Riley, K. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10102-7 · Cited by 7
“How - ever, a moderate level of self-efficacy may be needed for a person to develop an inter - est in an activity (Bandura & Schunk, 1981).”
InfluentialShakespeare's Romeo and Juliet in an EFL Life Science Course
Maune, J. F. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.138 · Cited by 2
Lee, J., August, R., October, R., & October, A. (2009) · THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN EDUCATION · doi:10.22804/jke.2009.36.3.001 · Cited by 2
Lee, G.-Y., & Kim, A.-C. (2016) · Journal of Digital Convergence · doi:10.14400/jdc.2016.14.2.509 · Cited by 2
“학업적 자 기효능감이 높은 학생일수록 도전적인 과제를 선정하고 [10] 그 과제를 성공적으로 수행하기 위해 다른 학생에 비해 더 많은 노력을 한다[11].”
Prevalence of Self-Efficacy and Self-Esteem among Bankers in Select Southwest States in Nigeria
Uzonwanne, F. C., & Uzonwanne, G. C. (2014) · IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science · doi:10.9790/0837-1981110119 · Cited by 2
김명희 (2013) · FoodService Industry Journal · doi:10.22509/kfsa.2013.9.3.012 · Cited by 2
Kim, E. I. (2020) · Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society · doi:10.5762/kais.2020.21.1.665 · Cited by 2
Sinclair, E. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57389-8_7 · Cited by 2
Who You Know Does Matter in Engineering Self Efficacy
Amato-Henderson, S., Mariano, J., Cattelino, P. J., & Hannon, B. (2021) · ASEE North Midwest Section Conference · doi:10.18260/1-2-1114-36161 · Cited by 2
Hall, S. W., & Beck, M. S. (2021) · Nursing Education Perspectives · doi:10.1097/01.nep.0000000000000786 · Cited by 2
“The researchers for the current study used the “self-efficacy theory,”which acknowledges that how people think and behave can influence their motivation to learn (Bandura & Schunk, 1981).”
MethodDeveloping a Story Writing Attitude Scale for Secondary School Students
Özen, N. E., & Duran, E. (2021) · International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research · doi:10.33200/ijcer.788115 · Cited by 2
Stewardson, O. L. (2013) · Cited by 2
Interfered by unaccomplished academic tasks: The role of success expectations
Brassler, N. K., Grund, A., Dedic, M., Wilmer, E., & Fries, S. (2021) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101763 · Cited by 2
Contributions of Doctoral Educational Leadership Programs to the Development of Leader Self-Efficacy
Kall, L. (2022) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1879163 · Cited by 2
Agah, J. J., Oguguo, B. C. E., Ene, C. U., et al. (2022) · Interchange · doi:10.1007/s10780-022-09481-5 · Cited by 2
“Kunal (2008) also observed that students who spent more time studying were very successful in their desired careers.”
BackgroundResultOgbuanya, T. C., & Arilesere, O. M. (2021) · Journal of e-learning Research · doi:10.33422/jelr.v1i4.190 · Cited by 2
Online teaching and students’ perceived level of math anxiety during covid-19 pandemic
Grecu, A.-E. (2022) · Journal of Educational Sciences · doi:10.35923/jes.2022.2.04 · Cited by 2
Christensen, R. W., & Knezek, G. (2022) · EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING · doi:10.3280/exioa2-2022oa15077 · Cited by 2
Students Arts Participation Increases STEM Motivation via Self-Efficacy
Dahlem, S. (2023) · STEAM · doi:10.5642/steam.sbzn9958 · Cited by 2
Lindemann, L., Volkmann, T., & Jochems, N. (2023) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3603555.3608545 · Cited by 2
“• Challenges (mechanic) can promote the perception of competence [7] and therefore self-efficacy [6].”
BackgroundDu, X., Yuan, L., & Liu, J. (2023) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2023.2280449 · Cited by 2
“Perceived self-competence prompts individuals to produce positive emotional experiences (Bandura, 1997) and stimulates intrinsic motivation through the satisfaction gained from performance and mastery (Bandura & Schunk, 1981).”
BackgroundNiu, C., Gutierrez, G. M., Cossette, L., Sadeghi, S., Portugal, M., Zeng, S., & Zhāng, P. (2024) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923647.2024.2303324 · Cited by 2
Managing careers of academics in higher education institutions: A moderated mediation model
Kozhakhmet, S., & Молдашев, К. (2024) · Higher Education Quarterly · doi:10.1111/hequ.12549 · Cited by 2
Enhancing nurse competence in early recognition of cardiotoxicity
Kolbus, J., Adeola, M. T., Tipton, J. M., et al. (2024) · Cardio-Oncology · doi:10.1186/s40959-024-00261-x · Cited by 2
On the experience of goals: Differentiating goal‐generic value from goal‐specific value
Converse, B. A., Roberts, A. R., Hennecke, M., & Fishbach, A. (2024) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.70006 · Cited by 2
An audience segmentation study of native plant gardening behaviors in the United States
Champine, V. M., Tamlyn, K. A., Jones, M. S., Balgopal, M. M., Bruyere, B. L., Solomon, J. N., & Niemiec, R. M. (2024) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105272 · Cited by 5
Fousiani, K., Scheibe, S., & Michelakis, G. (2025) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/ijcma-01-2025-0013 · Cited by 2
Zhu, Y., Lai, Y. K., Xie, Q., Wang, J. Z., You, F., & Zhao, X. (2025) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2025.2526020 · Cited by 3
“…using health IT to fulfill core self-regulation functions, such as self-monitoring (Bandura, 1991b; Collins, 1984; Silver et al., 1989), goal-setting (Bandura, 1991a; Locke & Latham, 1990; Wood & Bandura, 1989), and sustaining interest in health activities (Bandura & Schunk, 1981; Collins, 1984).”
Essential in the Middle: Training, Preparation, and Development of Child Protection Middle Managers
Jeffrey, J. R. (2016) · Fisher Digital Publications (St. John Fisher College) · Cited by 2
Cai, S. (2019) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 2
Using Students’ Perceptions of Online Teaching and Learning to Inform Faculty Development
Smith, T. W., Maiden, E., & Abinader, M. (2019) · International journal on e-learning · doi:10.70725/504382cwkrld · Cited by 2
The Impact of Social-Support, Self-efficacy and APP on MBI
Lin, S.-M., Lo, L., Liu, C.-Y., Liu, C., & Chiou, W. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49913-6_12 · Cited by 4
Aging and the Cost of Inactivity
Puleo, J. (2017) · Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/tgr.0000000000000131 · Cited by 2
Orakçı, Ş., & Durnalı, M. (2022) · Advances in mobile and distance learning book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8077-6.ch008 · Cited by 2
Are law students’ individual differences in the post-pandemic world related to performance?
Pilotti, M., Hassan, S. A. M., Alaoui, K. E., & Aldossary, F. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.1064392 · Cited by 2
“It has also been found to be linked to persistence (Pajares, 1996), motivation and engagement (Bandura and Schunk, 1981).”
BackgroundExploring the motivational orientations of graduate students in distance education programs
Nolot, S. K. (2011) · Cardinal Scholar (Ball State University) · Cited by 2
Clarke, O. D. (2013) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 2
Hashemi, S. M., & Nadi, H. K. (2012) · International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research · Cited by 2
Impulse aus der Sportpsychologie: Bewegung für die Zukunft der Führung?
Mayer, J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31052-2_32 · Cited by 2
Acee, T. W. (2009) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · Cited by 2
Sánchez-Castro, O., & Mrowa‐Hopkins, C. (2012) · Australian Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/aral.35.1.03san · Cited by 2
“…of learning in particular, indicates that learners’ beliefs about their own academic capabilities have a significant impact on actual performance (Bandura & Schunck, 1981), emotions (Stumpf, Brief & Hartman, 1989; Perry, Hechter, Menec & Weinberg, 1993), selection of behaviour (Betz & Hackett,…”
BackgroundÁrea curricular de "Estudo Acompanhado" : contributos para a discussão de uma metodologia
Luís, P. R. S. (2001) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 2
Sariolghalam, N., & Noruzi, M. R. (2011) · doi:10.3968/j.mse.1913035x20100404.017 · Cited by 2
“People with strong self-efficacy beliefs exert greater efforts to master a challenge while those with weak self-efficacy beliefs ar e likely to reduce their e fforts or even quit (Bandura & Schunk, 1981; Brown & Inouyne, 1978; Schunk, 1981; Weinberg, Gould & Jackson, 1979; Staples et al, 2005).”
BackgroundThe undergraduate research laboratory as a method of enhancing science–practice integration
Heesacker, M., Higley, B. P., & Elimelech, N. T. (2015) · Counselling Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1080/09515070.2015.1041454 · Cited by 2
“…likely to endorse the pro-social goals that are oriented towards benefiting career, society, and family than their more extrinsically oriented counterparts (Bandura & Schunk, 1981; Lee, McInerney, Liem, & Ortiga, 2010; Lüftenegger et al., 2012; Murad, Coto-Yglesias, Varkey, Prokop, & Murad, 2010).”
BackgroundCukierman, D., Thompson, D. M., Guloy, S., et al. (2014) · Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/2597959.2597976 · Cited by 2
Cheong, J. Y., Kim, M. J., Kim, Y. A., & Ly, S. Y. (2014) · Korean Journal of Human Ecology · doi:10.5934/kjhe.2014.23.4.709 · Cited by 2
“에 대한 불안감이 적고 효과적인 학습 전략을 사용할, 수 있으며 조절능력이 뛰어나다고 하였다(Bandura & Schunk, 1981; Pintrich & DeGroot, 1990; Schunk, 학업적 효능감의 하위요인인 과제수준선호 자기1982).”
Measurement of legal empowerment through the subjective perceptions of individuals
Porter, R. (2014) · Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal · doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.927556 · Cited by 2
“…(enactive mastery), seeing others attempt the task (vicarious mastery), how they feel when they attempt the task (affective state) and reports from others on their likelihood, or otherwise, or completing the task (verbal persuasion) (Bandura 1977, 1982b; Bandura & Schunk 1981; Bandura et al. 1982).”
BackgroundInfluentialDevelopment and initial validation of an instrument measuring athletes’ volition
Proios, M., & Proios, I. M. (2014) · Journal of Human Sport and Exercise · doi:10.14198/jhse.2014.94.03 · Cited by 2
“Bandura and colleagues maintained that persistence is a skill affected by expectations of self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977; Bandura, Adams, & Beyer, 1977; Bandura & Schunk, 1981).”
BackgroundSelf-Efficacy Appraisals and Test-Taking Behavior of Students from Culturally Diverse Populations
Birenbaum, M., & Alhija, F. N.-A. (2013) · ISRN Education · doi:10.1155/2013/839657 · Cited by 2
The relationship between general self-efficacy belief and burnout level among Turkish academicians
Sevindi, T. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.5897/err2013.1649 · Cited by 2
“As mentioned shortly, such goals have motivational effects (Bandura and Schunk 1981).”
BackgroundACTION RESEARCH: EFFECTS OF SELF-EFFICACY TRAINING ON LOW ACHIEVING FRESHMEN
Haselden, P. G., Sanders, M. S., & Sturkie, L. M. (2012) · The Canadian Journal of Action Research · doi:10.33524/cjar.v13i1.28 · Cited by 2
An Inexpensive Workplace Initiative to Motivate High-Risk Individual Health Improvement
Kirchner, A. T., Ladd, D. A., Elshaw, J., & Schlub, J. F. (2013) · Military Medicine · doi:10.7205/milmed-d-13-00065 · Cited by 2
An exploration of the conative domain among engineering students
Paimin, A. N., Hadgraft, R. G., & Prpic, J. K. (2009) · Acquire (CQUniversity) · Cited by 2
Virtual Peers Help Increase Learner Self-Efficacy
Kim, Y. A., & Quan, W. (2006) · EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology · Cited by 2
Carrick-Simpson, B., & Armatas, C. (2003) · Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) · Cited by 2
Monitoring of text comprehension within a self -regulation framework: The effects of goal setting
Patterson, A. S. (2008) · NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries) · Cited by 2
Andrews, H. (2010) · NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) · Cited by 2
Hall, E. (2014) · International journal of evidence based coaching and mentoring · doi:10.1177/174183051401200207 · Cited by 2
Effects of Project-based Practice on Self-efficacy and the Pursuit of Engineering Studies
Lucas, B., & Barge, S. (2010) · Cited by 2
The Role of Contextual Support in Increasing Information Systems Enrollments
Akbulut-Bailey, A. Y. (2011) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22603-8_9 · Cited by 2
조상미, & 박인희 (2010) · Ewha Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.16935/ejss.2010.23..002 · Cited by 2
Baek, Y.-A., 유태순, & 정연 (2015) · Journal of Korea Design Forum · doi:10.21326/ksdt.2015..49.020 · Cited by 2
Self-Organizing Students Viability in Cultural Education Environment of Technical University
Дмитриенко, Н. А., Ershova, S. I., Serbinovskaya, N. V., et al. (2016) · Indian Journal of Science and Technology · doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i16/91511 · Cited by 2
Chapter 10 Female Faculty of Color: Successful Strategies in Academia
Bass, L. R., & Faircloth, S. C. (2011) · Diversity in higher education · doi:10.1108/s1479-3644(2011)0000010014 · Cited by 3
Widjanarko, B., Widyastari, D. A., Ginandjar, P., et al. (2016) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s108466 · Cited by 2
Hanifin, L. E., & Lee, R. (2015) · ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.24307 · Cited by 2
Gray, M., & Lundy, C. (2017) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2212-6.ch003 · Cited by 2
Theoretical Foundation and Previous Studies of Motivational Regulation
Li, K. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-93118-7_2 · Cited by 3
MIHLADIZ, G., Duran, M., I?IK, H., et al. (2011) · DSpace Repository · Cited by 2
Aspects of Motivation and Self-efficacyDepending on Academic Performances in TOEIC
신미영 (2013) · The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature · doi:10.18853/jjell.2013.55.4.014 · Cited by 2
Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., Levenson, E. S., et al. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49232-2_3 · Cited by 2
Head, E., & Hynes, M. M. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--18487 · Cited by 2
Addressing Teacher's Personal Concerns in Staff Development Efforts.
Marsh, D. D., & Jordan‐Marsh, M. (1985) · Cited by 2
Petrelli, H. M. W. (2017) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3132-6.ch021 · Cited by 2
Oh, Y. E., & Lee, J. (2017) · The Korean Journal of Community Living Science · doi:10.7856/kjcls.2017.28.4.561 · Cited by 2
Promoting Multiple-Text Comprehension Through Motivation In The Classroom
Guthrie, J. T. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315627496-22 · Cited by 2
신선임 (2017) · The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology · doi:10.18205/kpa.2017.22.2.004 · Cited by 2
Vědecké myšlení a metakognitivní monitorování studentů učitelství pro 1. stupeň základní školy
Nováková, A., Chytrý, V., & Říčan, J. (2018) · Scientia in educatione · doi:10.14712/18047106.1041 · Cited by 2
LİSE ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN ÖZYETERLİK DÜZEYLERİ: ELAZIĞ İLİ ÖRNEĞİ
Gökyer, N. (2019) · Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.18069/firatsbed.538659 · Cited by 2
REVISITING THE DETERMINANTS OF STUDENTS' SUCCESS IN CONDUCTING CREATIVITY PROGRAM
Sumaryanto, S., Kasse, T., & Putro, N. H. P. S. (2019) · Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan · doi:10.21831/cp.v38i1.22916 · Cited by 2
“…construct has been long believed as a vital condition for creative productivity and the acquisition of new knowledge (Tierney & Farmer, 2002) since it influences individuals’ intention to engage in specific behavior (Bandura & Wessels, 1994) and to search of certain tasks (Bandura & Schunk, 1981).”
BackgroundThe Development of a Method for Studying Goal Setting in Psychotherapy
Kiselnikova, N. V., Spiridonov, V. F., Lavrova, E. V., et al. (2019) · Психология Журнал Высшей школы экономики · doi:10.17323/1813-8918-2019-2-357-377 · Cited by 2
“Numerous studies show that the efficiency of the activity and the effectiveness of achieving goals depend on the characteristics of goal setting (Bandura & Schunk, 1981; Zimmerman & Kitsantas, 2002; Locke & Latham, 2002, 2006).”
BackgroundDo My Students Know I Don't Like Writing? Shifting Attitudes and Instruction
Hall, A. H., & White, K. M. (2019) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1002/trtr.1850 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Schunk, Dale H.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1981-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 586-598
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2144190976
- Cited by
- 2,675
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 114 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 123 · 2015: 115 · 2014: 134 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 123
- FWCI
- 36.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- libres.uncg.edu
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- self-motivation, self-efficacy, intrinsic interest, self-directed learning, children, mathematics achievement, goal proximity, competence development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
