The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self-generated reality.
Abstract
It is often assumed that persons accept the validity of the social realities they construct simply because they do not realize that they have constructed them. Two experiments were conducted to determine whether perceivers tend to infer correspondent attitudes when an actor expresses opinions that t
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
(1967) · Cited by 3,831
Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
JONES, E. E. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,760
Self-citationFrom acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424
Self-citationThe “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-x · Cited by 3,139
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 335
Impact of Celebrity Endorsement on a BrandPreprint
Malhotra, S. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2361693 · Cited by 10
Neuroanthropological Perspectives on Culture, Mind, and Brain
Lende, D. H., & Downey, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.014 · Cited by 10
Lying and Deception in Politics
Robinson, P., Miller, D., Herring, E., & Bakir, V. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.42 · Cited by 10
Lacewing, M. (2018) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.2018.0015 · Cited by 9
The Belief in Majority Determination of Group Decision Outcomes
Allison, S. T., Beggan, J. K., McDonald, R. A., & Rettew, M. L. (1995) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1603_7 · Cited by 9
Beyond the Fundamental Attribution Era
Fein, S. (2001) · Cited by 9
Johnson, J. T., Struthers, N. J., & Bradlee, P. M. (1988) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1988.6.4.319 · Cited by 9
Lying and Computational Linguistics
van Deemter, K., & Reiter, E. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.32 · Cited by 10
Understanding and Counteracting Genocide Denial
Bilali, R., Iqbal, Y., & Freel, S. H. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190685942.003.0011 · Cited by 9
Reframing of moral dilemmas reveals an unexpected "positivity bias" in updating and attributions
Kim, M. J., Theriault, J. E., Hirschfeld-Kroen, J., & Young, L. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104310 · Cited by 8
Mutual Constitution of Culture and the Mind
Kitayama, S., & Yu, Q. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.006 · Cited by 9
McHoskey, J. W., & Miller, A. G. (1994) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167294203004 · Cited by 8
Meibauer, J. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.19 · Cited by 7
Kirmayer, L. J., Worthman, C. M., & Kitayama, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.028 · Cited by 8
Attribution as a Gateway to Social Cognition
Reeder, G. D. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730018.013.0006 · Cited by 9
“First, a person may not realize the infl uence that he or she has on other persons (Heider, 1958, p. 55; Gilbert & Jones, 1986).”
BackgroundAlceste, F., Crozier, W. E., & Strange, D. M. (2018) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.08.005 · Cited by 7
Neurodiversity as a Conceptual Lens and Topic of Cross-Cultural Study
Cascio, M. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.027 · Cited by 7
Dysphoria and valence of attributions for others' behavior
Sullivan, M. J. L., & Conway, M. A. (1991) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01205173 · Cited by 7
“The tendency to infer correspondent dispositional causation for observed behavior has been demonstrated even under conditions where an actor's behavior is obviously constrained by situational factors ( Gilbert & Jones, 1986; Jones, 1979).”
BackgroundCompassion and the fundamental attribution error: A reply to Rolfe & Gardner
Paley, J. (2014) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.013 · Cited by 6
“similar results include: Gilbert and Jones (1986), Ross et al. (1977), Kunda and Nisbett (1986).”
ResultInfluentialKirmayer, L. J., Gómez-Carrillo, A., Langlois‐Thérien, T., Ramstead, M. J. D., & Gold, I. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.012 · Cited by 6
Lackey, J. A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.18 · Cited by 6
Beier, K. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.15 · Cited by 6
The Science of PsychoanalysisPreprint
Lacewing, M. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2281751 · Cited by 6
“The existence and falsehood of the fundamental attribution error is supported by evidence for a ‘correspondence bias’ (Gilbert & Jones, 1986), our tendency to infer from someone’s behavior that it was motivated by a corresponding disposition.”
BackgroundCultural Priming Effects and the Human Brain
Han, S., & Northoff, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.011 · Cited by 5
Kirmayer, L. J., Worthman, C. M., & Kitayama, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.002 · Cited by 6
Effects of legal culture on lay judgment of self-defense
성유리, Meyersburg, C. A., Park, K., & 김종한 (2013) · 한국심리학회지 사회및성격 · doi:10.21193/kjspp.2013.27.2.005 · Cited by 5
“(Gilbert & Jones, 1986; Snyder & Jones, 1974).”
Classic Philosophical Approaches to Lying and Deception
Mahon, J. E. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.2 · Cited by 6
Development of Lying and Cognitive Abilities
Talwar, V. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.30 · Cited by 7
Ritual and Religion as Social Technologies of Cooperation
Kavanagh, C. M., Jong, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.016 · Cited by 7
Pjesivac, I., Spasovska, K., & Imre, I. (2017) · Global Media and Communication · doi:10.1177/1742766517705682 · Cited by 5
“previous studies have found that when understanding others’ behaviour observers mainly based their attributions on actors’ personalities (Gilbert and Jones, 1986; Jones and Harris, 1967; Ross et al., 1977; Voakes, 1997), they did it mainly in the experimental setting and did not delve deeper into how audiences approac…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Cultural Brain as Historical Artifact
Boddice, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.018 · Cited by 6
The dramaturgic perspective: Implications for the study of person perception
Babcock, M. K. (1989) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420190404 · Cited by 5
Category‐Based and Feature‐Based Cognitive Processes in Job Impressions
Jacobs, S. L., Kulik, C. T., & Fichman, M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01030.x · Cited by 5
Linguistic Approaches to Lying and Deception
Hardin, K. J. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.4 · Cited by 4
Culturally Based Story Understanding
Awad, H. M. (2013) · Cited by 4
Does it matter how you deny it?: The role of demeanour in evaluations of criminal suspects
Douglass, A. B., Ray, J. L., Hasel, L. E., et al. (2013) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1111/lcrp.12042 · Cited by 4
Determining the Internal Consistency of Attitude Attributions
Jennings, K. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 4
Jary, M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.8 · Cited by 4
The Reward of Musical Emotions and Expectations
Gold, B. P., & Zatorre, R. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.021 · Cited by 4
Kim, T. (2012) · Cited by 4
Francis, fatalism and the fundamental attribution error: A reply to Philip Darbyshire
Paley, J. (2014) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.014 · Cited by 4
Forsyth, D. R. (2004) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-004-1007-0 · Cited by 4
“…had no choice whatsoever in selecting the position taken in the essay, the perceiver still attributes essay-consistent attitudes to the writer (Gilbert & Jones, 1986; Jones, 1979, 1990; Jones & Berglas, 1976; Jones & Harris, 1967; Jones, Worchel, Goethals, & Grumet, 1971; Snyder & Jones,…”
BackgroundJohnson, J. T. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(89)90038-3 · Cited by 4
Correspondence Bias in Performance Evaluation: Why Grade Inflation WorksPreprint
Francesca Gino, B., Moore, D. A., Swift, S. A., et al. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.728627 · Cited by 4
Revisiting Spontaneous Trait Inferences: Questions, Challenges, and Intradisciplinary Connections
Degner, J. (2025) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.70072 · Cited by 3
Lying, Testimony, and Epistemic Vigilance
Michaelson, E. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.16 · Cited by 3
Nishimura, F. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.45 · Cited by 3
Worthman, C. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.007 · Cited by 3
A Counter Intuitive View of the Role of the Communication Medium in Leadership and Change
Fischer, O., & Heracleous, L. (2012) · Research in organizational change and development · doi:10.1108/s0897-3016(2012)0000020005 · Cited by 3
Demonstrating the Correspondence Bias
Howell, J. L., & Shepperd, J. A. (2011) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628311421320 · Cited by 3
“The newer term denotes the perception that others’ behavior corresponds with their dispositions (Gilbert & Jones, 1986).”
BackgroundACTORS AND OBSERVERS: DIVERGENT ATTRIBUTIONS OF CONSTRAINED UNFRIENDLY BEHAVIOR
Hansen, E. M., Kimble, C. E., & Biers, D. W. (2001) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2001.29.1.87 · Cited by 3
Improving Juror Comprehension of Judicial Instructions on the Entrapment Defense1
Morier, D. M., Borgida, E., & Park, R. C. (1996) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00102.x · Cited by 3
Beyond Belief: How Implicit Beliefs Influence TrustPreprint
Haselhuhn, M. P., Schweitzer, M. E., & Kray, L. J. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1124591 · Cited by 3
“…has found that individuals tend to make dispositional attributions for behavior when informed that an actor was under strong situational constraints (Gilbert & Jones, 1986; Ross, 1977), but make situational attributions for behavior when they believe that an actor may have had ulterior motives.”
Lying, Metaphor, and Hyperbole
Claridge, C. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.28 · Cited by 2
Mann, S. A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.31 · Cited by 2
Kümmerling‐Meibauer, B. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.44 · Cited by 2
Capturing Context Is Not Enough
Lemelson, R., & Tucker, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.023 · Cited by 2
Psychological disorder diagnosis is no cure for trait inferences bias
Jacinto, S., Braga, J. N., Ferreira, M. S., Collins, E. C., Krendl, A. C., & Lewis, C. C. (2021) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12821 · Cited by 2
“Literature has also shown that people often neglect situational factors and automatically attribute behaviors to personality (the correspondence bias; Gilbert, 2002; Gilbert & Jones, 1986; Gilbert & Malone, 1995; Jones & Harris, 1967).”
BackgroundStendel, M. S., Ramstead, M. J. D., & Veissière, S. P. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.026 · Cited by 2
Psycholinguistic Approaches to Lying and Deception
Bott, L. A., & Williams, E. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.5 · Cited by 2
McGlone, M. S., & Baryshevtsev, M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.24 · Cited by 2
Serra-García, M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.39 · Cited by 2
DePaulo, B. M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.33 · Cited by 2
Attribution to Deviant and Nondeviant Social Roles
Rohlman, J. E. (1999) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · doi:10.12794/metadc2178 · Cited by 2
Correspondence bias and attitude toward abortion: Effects of information from others
Lawson, T. J., & Miller, A. G. (1996) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02686922 · Cited by 2
“It occurs in the attribution of attitudes (Jones, 1979), general knowledge (Ross, Amabile, & Steinmetz, 1977), personality traits (Miller, Jones, & Hinkle, 1981), and political orientation ( Gilbert & Jones, 1986 ).”
BackgroundJONES, E. E. (1993) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167293195016 · Cited by 2
Self-citationSong, F. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.604524 · Cited by 2
Fundamental Attribution Error/Correspondence Bias
Reeder, G. D. (2013) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0114 · Cited by 2
Lying, Deception, and the Brain
Decker, A., Disney, A., D’elia, B., & Keenan, J. P. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.6 · Cited by 1
The Neural Mechanisms Underlying Social Norms
Mu, Y., & Gelfand, M. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.015 · Cited by 2
The Cultural Psychology of Social Cognition
Kitayama, S., & Berg, M. K. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197763414.013.33 · Cited by 1
Separate and unequal: Moral domains differ in corresponding social judgments of others
Adams, S., & Ybarra, O. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0338026 · Cited by 1
“To do this, we synthesized a list of moral domains based on existing literature and utilized measures of correspondent inferences [21] to capture judgments of social targets following behaviors in line with and in violation of these domains.”
Kellow, J. T., & Dukes, L. L. (2008) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-008-9057-z · Cited by 1
“Using a framework grounded in attribution theory ( Gilbert and Jones 1986; Heider 1985), Giordano suggests that minor or moderate violations of accepted codes of conduct likely may be ascribed to situational circumstances for these offenders and thus viewed less harshly.”
MethodDO PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS OF PUBLIC POLICY INCREASE TRUST IN AUTHORITY'S INTENTION?
Ohana, K., & HIROSE, Y. (2008) · Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu D · doi:10.2208/jscejd.64.557 · Cited by 1
Alicke, M. D., LoSchiavo, F. M., & Buckingham, J. T. (2000) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2000.18.1.1 · Cited by 1
Better Safe than Sorry: Situational Correction in Interpersonal Competition
Li, Y.-M., Murata, K., & Li, S. (2010) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.4.465 · Cited by 1
FTC GUIDeLINes ON eNDORseMeNTs AND ONLINe CONsUMeR ReVIeWs: BIAsING CONsUMeRs' INTeNT TO BUY
Cole, A. C. (2010) · Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science · Cited by 1
Wright, S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.7 · Cited by 1
Staffel, J. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.17 · Cited by 1
Cities, Psychosis, and Social Defeat
Sayanvala, F., Bornstein, L., Choudhury, S., Shah, J. L., Weinstock, D., & Gold, I. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.025 · Cited by 1
Culture, Mind, and Brain in Human Evolution
Stout, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.005 · Cited by 1
Liminal Brains in Uncertain Futures
Choudhury, S., & Berson, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.020 · Cited by 1
Carson, T. L. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.36 · Cited by 1
Social Roles and Social Judgment: How an Impression Conveyed Influences an Impression Formed
Alicke, M. D., & Klotz, M. L. (1993) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167293192007 · Cited by 1
Aicher, T. J. (2010) · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · Cited by 1
Caregivers' Perceptions of an Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease in African Americans
Jackson, S. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 1
Better Think Before Agreeing Twice. Mere Agreement: A Similarity-Based Persuasion MechanismPreprint
Pandelaere, M., Briers, B., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1148126 · Cited by 1
On the Robustness and Generality of the Correspondence BiasPreprint
Sharek, Z. S., Swift, S. A., & Moore, D. A. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2305876 · Cited by 1
Coherent Attributions with Co-occurring and Interacting Causes
Jennings, K. E. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
On the Robustness and Generality of the Correspondence BiasPreprint
Moore, D. A., Schatz, D., Sharek, Z. S., Swift, S. A., & Francesca Gino, B. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ur4wt · Cited by 1
Wpływ struktury informacji o sytuacji kryzysowej w przedsiębiorstwie na jego reputację
Gorbaniuk, O., & Łubnicka, J. (2013) · Psychologia Ekonomiczna · doi:10.14659/pjoep.2013.04.04
Goldberg, A. (2011) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Rohlman, J. E. (2001) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.2001.88.1.3
Inferring abilities after influencing performance
Aronson, J. M., & JONES, E. E. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(92)90056-p · Cited by 1
Self-citationKakuno, M., & Ura, M. (2008) · THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY · doi:10.2130/jjesp.47.105
“2008, Vol. 47, No. 2, 105–117 〔原 著〕 態度帰属における対応推論の促進・抑制要因の検討: 日本語の一人称代名詞と正確な判断の教示に注目して 角 野 充 奈 浦 光 博 広島大学生物圏科学研究科 広島大学総合科学部 要 約 人々には,他者の言動に対応した属性を推論する傾向があり(対応推論),その傾向は,他者の言動が社会 的に拘束されていると知っていても生じることが明らかにされている(対応バイアス)。対応バイアスは,容 易には消失しないことから,非常に強固な現象であると捉えられているが,それゆえに,対応バイアスやそ…”
'Better Think Before Agreeing Twice' - Mere Agreement: A Similarity-Based Persuasion MechanismPreprint
Pandelaere, M., Briers, B., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1531118
Kay, M. B. (2013) · DukeSpace (Duke University)
O paradigma de atribuição de atitudes
Hagá, S. (2013) · Laboratório de Psicologia · doi:10.14417/lp.680
“…lerem a opinião emitida, o enviesamento correspondente é maior (Jones, Riggs, & Quattrone, 1979) Papel do observador Não foi encontrada moderação (Gilbert & Jones, 1986) (mero observador vs. indutor de constrangimento) Qualidade da opinião expressa Independentemente das composições ou discursos…”
Background11 . IMPACT OF SOCIAL COMPETENCE ON DEVELOPMENT OF YOUNG TECHNOCRATS: AN APPENDAGE TO ONESELF
Nyamsogoro, G. D., Hossain, M. M., Anam, S., Gezimu, G., Berehe, G., Shaik, S. B., Vijaya, R., Rao, A., Bishayee, S. K., Krishan, B., et al. (2012) · International journal of research in commerce, economics and management
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbert, D. T., & Jones, E. E.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- ORCID
- Gilbert, Daniel T.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1986-02
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 269-280
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2042257098
- Semantic Scholar
- 46f18c7c66db45d6d8885023ccdc49e0adc86344
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 39.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Keywords
- construal level, social construction of reality, self-perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review