The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ease of retrieval as information: another look at the availability heuristic
Open accessAbstract
Es wird von drei Experimenten berichtet, die zeigen, daß Individuen subjektiv erlebtes Erinnerungsvermögen als Information bei der Bewertung der Bedeutung des Erinnerten benutzen. Besonders diejenigen Testpersonen, die sich an Situationen erinnern sollten, in denen sie sich positiv verhielten und sich wohlfühlten, schätzten sich im Rückblick positiver ein als Personen, die sich Situationen ins Gedächtnis rufen sollten, in denen sie sich nicht positiv verhielten und sich unsicher fühlten. Dieser Effekt der Wertigkeit der Erinnerung bestand jedoch nur bei denjenigen Testpersonen, die sich an sechs Beispiele der betreffenden Wertigkeit erinnern sollten, was ihnen leichtfiel. Wenn sich die Personen an zwölf Beispiele erinnern sollten, was sie schwierig fanden, kehrte sich die Wirkung der Wertigkeit ins Gegenteil um. In diesem Fall berichteten die Testpersonen eher von einem positiven Gefühl bei der Erinnerung an Beispiele negativen als an Beispiele positiven Verhaltens. Offensichtlich kamen sie zu dem Schluß, daß die Verhaltensweisen, an die sie sich erinnerten, nicht häufig oder typisch sein konnten, wenn sie nur schwierig ins Gedächtnis zu rufen waren (Experimente 1 und 2). In Übereinstimmung mit dieser Interpretation wurde die Wirkung des erlebten Erinnerungsvermögens ausgeschaltet, wenn die Testpersonen ihre subjektiven Erfahrungen irrigerweise auf die Wirkung vorübergehender äußerer Einflüsse zurückführen konnten (Experiment 3). Diskutiert werden die Konsequenzen für das Wirken besonders der Verfügbarkeitsheuristik und der Funktionen subjektiver Erfahrungen als Information im allgemeinen. (ICAübers)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While these challenges do not negate the applicability of LLMs in psychological research, they do highlight the need for robust, standardized methods akin to those used in traditional human research (124, 127).”
From Perils and opportunities in using large language models in psychological research (2024) · cites this paper as [127]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513 · Cited by 4,952
Self-citationWyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315807102 · Cited by 4,211
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
(1967) · Cited by 3,831
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.110.3.306 · Cited by 2,562
New directions in attribution research
Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., & Kidd, R. F. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,994
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Gabrielcik, A , & Fazio, R. H. (1984). Priming and frequency estima tion: A strict test of the availability heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 10. 85-89.
- Higgins, E. T., & Bargh, J. A. (19E7). Social cognition and social per ception. Annual Review o f Psychology, 38. 369-425.
- Schwarz, N" & Clore, G. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? Informative functions of afTective states. In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (Eds), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 25-43). Toronto, Ontario, Can ada; Hogrefe International
- Sherman, S. J, & Corty, E. (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds). Handbook o f social cognition (Vol. I, pp. 189-286).
- Zillman, D. (1978). Attribution and misattribution of excitatory reac tions. In J. H. Harvey W I. Ickes, 4. R. E Kidd (Eds), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 335-368). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
Leboe, J. P., & Ansons, T. L. (2006) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.596 · Cited by 50
Belli, R. F., Winkielman, P., Read, J. D., Schwarz, N., & Lynn, S. J. (1998) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03212958 · Cited by 50
Self-citationDesigned to fail: Effects of the default option and information complexity on student loan repayment
Cox, J. C., Kreisman, D., & Dynarski, S. (2020) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104298 · Cited by 49
The virtues of opaque prose: How lay beliefs about fluency influence perceptions of quality
Galak, J., & Nelson, L. D. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.002 · Cited by 49
Subjective Probability as Sampling Propensity
Icard, T. (2015) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-015-0283-y · Cited by 54
Ascher, T. J., Wilson, R. S., & Toman, E. (2012) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf12026 · Cited by 49
How Enjoyable Was It? Remembering an Affective Reaction to a Previous Consumption Experience
Cowley, E. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/520072 · Cited by 51
Sources of Male and Female Students’ Belonging Uncertainty in the Computer Sciences
Höhne, E., & Zander, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01740 · Cited by 53
Social and Contextual Constraints on Embodied Perception
Schnall, S. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616660199 · Cited by 50
The effect of knowledge and ignorance assessments on perceived risk
Buratti, S., & Allwood, C. M. (2018) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1459795 · Cited by 48
Guinote, A. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.03.003 · Cited by 48
Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Gopinath, M. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.562 · Cited by 48
Moods and Attitude Judgments: A Comment on Fishbein and Middlestadt
Schwarz, N. (1997) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0601_06 · Cited by 48
Self-citationMoghaddam, F. M., Stolkin, A. J., & Hutcheson, L. S. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167297237007 · Cited by 48
When Recollective Experiences Matter: Subjective Ease of Retrieval and Stereotyping
Dijksterhuis, A., Macrae, C. N., & Haddock, G. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167299025006010 · Cited by 48
Sherman, S. J., Cialdini, R. B., Schwartzman, D. F., & Reynolds, K. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.006 · Cited by 46
Being Human: How Anthropomorphic Presentations Can Enhance Advertising Effectiveness
Hart, P. M., & Stafford, M. R. (2017) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2017.1291381 · Cited by 52
Loosening the GRIP (Gender Roles Inhibiting Prosociality) to Promote Gender Equality
Croft, A., Atkinson, C., Sandstrom, G. M., Orbell, S., & Aknin, L. B. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868320964615 · Cited by 55
The Reputational Consequences of Failed Replications and Wrongness Admission among Scientists
Fetterman, A. K., & Sassenberg, K. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143723 · Cited by 47
Like Goes with Like: The Role of Representativeness in Erroneous and Pseudo-Scientific Beliefs
Gilovich, T. D., & Savitsky, K. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.036 · Cited by 50
Inferences from decision difficulty
Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.007 · Cited by 46
Legal blame: how jurors think and talk about accidents
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2417 · Cited by 46
Schuldt, J. P., & Roh, S. (2014) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2014.32.3.217 · Cited by 45
The Use of Heuristics in Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty
Raue, M., & Scholl, S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_7 · Cited by 51
Konrath, S., Falk, E. B., Fuhrel-Forbis, A., Liu, M., Swain, J. E., Tolman, R. M., Cunningham, R. M., & Walton, M. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137585 · Cited by 52
Schofield, P., Coromina, L., Camprubí, R., & Kim, S. (2020) · Journal of Destination Marketing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100463 · Cited by 44
Breaking Gender Barriers: Experimental Evidence on Men in Pink-Collar Jobs
Delfino, A. (2024) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20220582 · Cited by 43
The role of meta-cognitive processes in emotional intelligence.
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Rucker, D. D. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 43
Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand Compatibility, Relationship Power, and Life Satisfaction
Brick, D. J., Fitzsimons, G. M., Chartrand, T. L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx079 · Cited by 43
How Person-Organization Fit Impacts Employees' Perceptions of Justice and Well-Being
Roczniewska, M. A., Retowski, S., & Higgins, E. T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02318 · Cited by 43
Recognizing Heuristics and Bias in Clinical Decision-making
Hughes, T. M., Dossett, L. A., Hawley, S. T., & Telem, D. A. (2020) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000003699 · Cited by 43
Kunstman, J. W., Plant, E. A., Zielaskowski, K., & LaCosse, J. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033082 · Cited by 51
Remarks on Support Theory: Recent Advances and Future Directions
Brenner, L. A., Koehler, D. J., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.029 · Cited by 45
Escaping Paternalism: Rationality, Behavioral Economics, and Public Policy
Rizzo, M. J., & Whitman, G. (2019) · Cited by 42
Religious beliefs are factual beliefs: Content does not correlate with context sensitivity
Levy, N. L. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.012 · Cited by 55
Contextualized Attitude Change
Gawronski, B., Rydell, R. J., Houwer, J. D., Brannon, S. M., Ye, Y., Vervliet, B., & Hu, X. (2017) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.06.001 · Cited by 41
Unintended consequences of framing a utility-value intervention in two-year colleges
Canning, E. A., Priniski, S. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.001 · Cited by 46
Why process matters: A social cognition perspective on economic behavior
Crusius, J., van Horen, F., & Mussweiler, T. (2011) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.004 · Cited by 45
Processing Fluency as the Source of Experiences at the Fringe of Consciousness
Reber, R., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Winkielman, P. (2002) · Cited by 42
Cervone, D., & Scott, W. D. (1995) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10169-013 · Cited by 41
Comparing two perceived characteristics of autobiographical memory: Memory detail and accessibility
Ritchie, T. D., Skowronski, J. J., Walker, W. R., & Wood, S. E. (2006) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210500478434 · Cited by 45
Trading off environmental attributes in food consumption choices
Bauw, M. D., Franssens, S., & Vranken, L. (2022) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102338 · Cited by 42
Use of experienced retrieval ease in self and social judgments
Caruso, E. M. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.11.003 · Cited by 41
Goal Pursuit, Now and Later: Temporal Compatibility of Different versus Similar Means
Etkin, J., & Ratner, R. K. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/667203 · Cited by 42
Zane, D. M., Smith, R. W., & Reczek, R. W. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucz035 · Cited by 41
Using metacognitive cues to amplify message content: a new direction in strategic communication
Shulman, H. C., & Bullock, O. M. (2019) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1570472 · Cited by 44
Tolochko, P., Song, H., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2019) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1631919 · Cited by 49
A Person by Situation Account of Motivated System Defense
Banfield, J. C., Kay, A. C., Cutright, K. M., Wu, E. C., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2010) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550610386809 · Cited by 41
Cretenet, J., & Dru, V. (2004) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.4.3.282 · Cited by 47
LeBoeuf, R. A., & Estes, Z. (2004) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.22.6.607.54817 · Cited by 40
A Comparative Analysis of the Nature of Stock Return Volatility in BRICS and G7 Markets
Muguto, L., & Muzindutsi, P. (2022) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm15020085 · Cited by 39
On The Parameters of Human Judgment
Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Erb, H., & Chun, W. Y. (2007) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39005-3 · Cited by 39
Meiser, T., Sattler, C., & von Hecker, U. (2006) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210600875215 · Cited by 39
Topolinski, S. (2011) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2011.640078 · Cited by 40
Metacognitive Experiences and Hindsight Bias: It's Not Just the Thought (Content) That Counts!
Sanna, L. J., & Schwarz, N. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.185 · Cited by 39
Self-citationThe Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences
Gilovich, T. D., Vallone, R. P., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.035 · Cited by 39
Koriat, A. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch12 · Cited by 40
Metaphor and analogy in everyday problem solving
Keefer, L. A., & Landau, M. J. (2016) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1407 · Cited by 38
Ridley, M. (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24889 · Cited by 61
Project managers’ overconfidence: how is risk reflected in anticipated project success?
Fabricius, G., & Büttgen, M. (2015) · BuR - Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-015-0022-3 · Cited by 50
Cognitive accessibility in judgments of household energy consumption
Schley, D. R., & DeKay, M. L. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.004 · Cited by 38
(Pre)occupations: A data-driven model of jobs and its consequences for categorization and evaluation
Imhoff, R., Koch, A. S., & Flade, F. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.001 · Cited by 38
Distinguishing Constructs from Variables in Designing Research
Calder, B. J., Brendl, C. M., Tybout, A. M., & Sternthal, B. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1204 · Cited by 38
Influence of unilateral motor behaviors on the judgment of valenced stimuli
Dru, V., & Cretenet, J. (2007) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2006.11.004 · Cited by 38
When promoting a charity can hurt charitable giving: A metacognitive analysis
Smith, R. W., & Schwarz, N. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.01.001 · Cited by 37
Self-citationRisk Perception and Movies: A Study of Availability as a Factor in Risk Perception
Sjöberg, L., & Engelberg, E. (2009) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01335.x · Cited by 38
Sundar, A., Kardes, F. R., & Wright, S. A. (2015) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1045154 · Cited by 38
Stenling, A., Ivarsson, A., Hassmén, P., & Lindwall, M. (2017) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.03.002 · Cited by 45
Fazendeiro, T. A., Winkielman, P., Luo, C. R., & Lorah, C. (2005) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03195314 · Cited by 38
Illusions of Knowing: The Link between Knowledge and Metaknowledge
Koriat, A. (1998) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446279212.n2 · Cited by 38
Managing the Threat of Impending Implicit Attitude Feedback
Howell, J. L., Collisson, B., Crysel, L. C., Garrido, C. O., Newell, S. M., Cottrell, C. A., Smith, C. T., & Shepperd, J. A. (2013) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550613479803 · Cited by 36
When good = better than average
Moore, D. A. (2007) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000607 · Cited by 34
Swaminathan, V., Gürhan‐Canlı, Z., Kubat, U., & Hayran, C. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucv006 · Cited by 37
Borgonovi, F., & Pokropek, A. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000280 · Cited by 31
How to study cognitive decision algorithms: The case of the priority heuristic
Fiedler, K. (2010) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s193029750000200x · Cited by 36
Are (some) reports of attitude strength context dependent?
Haddock, G., Rothman, A. J., & Schwarz, N. (1996) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/0008-400x.28.4.313 · Cited by 37
Self-citationConsumer Attitudes towards Food Preservation Methods
Guzik, P., Szymkowiak, A., Kulawik, P., & Zając, M. H. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11091349 · Cited by 39
Intuitive judgments of social statistics: How exhaustive does sampling need to be?
Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.07.004 · Cited by 39
Greifeneder, R., Alt, A., Bottenberg, K. M., Seele, T., Zelt, S., & Wagener, D. (2010) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550610368434 · Cited by 36
Claypool, H. M., Mackie, D. M., & Garcia‐Marques, T. (2015) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12179 · Cited by 36
A processing fluency-account of funniness: Running gags and spoiling punchlines
Topolinski, S. (2014) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.863180 · Cited by 37
What's Not to Like? Preference Asymmetry in the False Consensus Effect
Gershoff, A. D., Mukherjee, A., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/524416 · Cited by 36
Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2008) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.4.447 · Cited by 36
The eureka error: Inadvertent plagiarism by misattributions of effort.
Preston, J. L., & Wegner, D. M. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.575 · Cited by 36
Puente‐Díaz, R., & Cavazos‐Arroyo, J. (2018) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.384 · Cited by 35
Consequences of Cultural Fluency
Mourey, J. A., Lam, B. C. P., & Oyserman, D. (2015) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2015.33.4.308 · Cited by 36
Inclusion-exclusion of positive and negative past selves: Mood congruence as information.
Gebauer, J. E., Broemer, P., Haddock, G., & von Hecker, U. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012543 · Cited by 35
We are, therefore they aren’t: Ingroup construal as a standard of comparison for outgroup judgments
Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Banse, R. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.11.002 · Cited by 35
Finn, B., & Tauber, S. K. (2015) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9331-5 · Cited by 35
Varying Metacognition Through Public Opinion Questions: How Language Can Affect Political Engagement
Shulman, H. C., & Sweitzer, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x17707557 · Cited by 34
Khenfer, J., Shepherd, S., & Trendel, O. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.010 · Cited by 36
Hoss, T., Ancina, A., & Kaspar, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642616 · Cited by 34
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Perspective Taking in Groups
Caruso, E. M., Nicholas Epley, A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(06)08010-8 · Cited by 34
Are within-subjects designs transparent?
Lambdin, C., & Shaffer, V. A. (2009) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500001133 · Cited by 33
Price Font Disfluency: Anchoring Effects on Future Price Expectations
Mead, J. A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2017) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2017.09.003 · Cited by 34
From comparative studies to interdisciplinary research on metacognition
Proust, J. (2019) · Animal Behavior and Cognition · doi:10.26451/abc.06.04.10.2019 · Cited by 36
Predictors of Radical Intentions among Incels
Moskalenko, S., Kates, N., González, J. F.-G., & Bloom, M. M. (2022) · Journal of Online Trust and Safety · doi:10.54501/jots.v1i3.57 · Cited by 33
Implicit Affect Primes Effort: Basic Processes, Moderators, and Boundary Conditions
Gendolla, G. H. E. (2015) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12208 · Cited by 38
Emotional Intelligence Abilities and Traits in Different Career Paths
Kafetsios, K. G., Μαριδάκη-Κασσωτάκη, Α., Zammuner, V., Zampetakis, L. A., & Vouzas, F. (2009) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/1069072709334233 · Cited by 33
Memory for musical tones: the impact of tonality and the creation of false memories
Vuvan, D. T., Lewandowska, O. P., & Schmuckler, M. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00582 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A.
- Affiliations
- Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (DE)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-202
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2147792648
- Cited by
- 1,412
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 85
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ssoar.info
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Keywords
- availability heuristic, ease of retrieval, subjective experience, self-assessment, positive and negative memories, typicality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review