The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio
Abstract
Evidence is presented showing that body fat distribution as measured by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is correlated with youthfulness, reproductive endocrinologic status, and long-term health risk in women.Three studies show that men judge women with low WHR as attractive.Study 1 documents that minor changes in WHRs of Miss America winners and Playboy playmates have occurred over the past 30-60 years.Study 2 shows that college-age men find female figures with low WHR more attractive, healthier, and of greater reproductive value than figures with a higher WHR.In Study 3, 25-to 85-year-old men were found to prefer female figures with lower WHR and assign them higher ratings of attractiveness and reproductive potential.It is suggested that WHR represents an important bodily feature associated with physical attractiveness as well as with health and reproductive potential.A hypothesis is proposed to explain how WHR influences female attractiveness and its role in mate selection.Evolutionary theories of human mate selection contend that both men and women select mating partners who enable them to enhance reproductive success.Differential reproductive conditions and physiological constraints in men and women, however, induce different gender-specific sexual and reproductive strategies.In general, a woman can increase her reproductive success by choosing a high-status man who controls resources and, hence, can provide material security to successfully raise her offspring.A man, on the other hand, can increase his reproductive success by choosing a woman who is receptive, highly fecund, and has characteristics suggestive of being a successful mother.The reproductive value of a man, as a rule, can be easily assessed because high status is usually achieved through competition with other members of the social and economic hierarchy.The reproductive value of a woman, however, cannot be as readily and accurately assessed because it is concealed.In the absence of any direct signals of ovulation or fertility, the man is forced to use indirect cues such as physical attractiveness to assess the reproductive value of the woman.It is the fundamental assumption of all evolution-based theories of human mate selection that physical attractiveness is largely a reflection of reliable cues to a woman's reproductive success (Buss, 1987;
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“So, although previous studies have assumed that a particular body shape signals a particular composition (Singh, 1993; Maisey et al., 1999; Fan et al., 2005; Hönekopp et al., 2007; Gardner and Brown, 2010; Sell et al., 2017), this is likely a false assumption.”
From The degree to which the cultural ideal is internalized predicts judgments of male and female physical attractiveness (2022) · cites this paper as Singh, 1993
Citations
Cites
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites?
Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7123238 · Cited by 3,733
The evolution of human sexuality
Wilson, G. (1980) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(80)90074-4 · Cited by 2,505
Socioeconomic Status and Obesity: A Review of the Literature
Sobal, J., & Stunkard, A. J. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.260 · Cited by 2,346
Frisch, R. E., & McArthur, J. W. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4155.949 · Cited by 1,412
Cultural Expectations of Thinness in Women
Garner, D. M., Garfinkel, P. E., Schwartz, D. M., & Thompson, M. (1980) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1980.47.2.483 · Cited by 1,174
Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape.
Fallon, A. E., & Rozin, P. (1985) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.94.1.102 · Cited by 981
Cunningham, M. R. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925 · Cited by 782
Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling
Schiffman, S. S. (1981) · Cited by 550
The role of the mass media in promoting a thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women
Silverstein, B., Perdue, L., Peterson, B., & Kelly, E. (1986) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/bf00287452 · Cited by 543
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x · Cited by 5,531
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 · Cited by 2,429
An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003196 · Cited by 1,381
Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science
Buss, D. M. (1995) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0601_1 · Cited by 1,198
Renovating the Pyramid of Needs: Contemporary Extensions Built Upon Ancient Foundations
Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610369469 · Cited by 1,132
Disgust: evolved function and structure
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0030778 · Cited by 810
Swami, V., Frederick, D. A., Aavik, T., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Anderson, D., Andrianto, S., Arora, A., Brännström, Å., Cunningham, J., et al. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209359702 · Cited by 731
Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why.
Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468 · Cited by 699
Allen, N. B., & Badcock, P. B. T. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.887 · Cited by 494
Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms.
Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P., & Butner, J. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.3 · Cited by 358
Sexual strategies theory: historical origins and current status
Buss, D. M. (1998) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499809551914 · Cited by 354
Marković, S. (2012) · i-Perception · doi:10.1068/i0450aap · Cited by 346
Physical Attractiveness and Health in Western Societies: A Review.
Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.635 · Cited by 301
Sexual selection and human life history
Geary, D. C. (2003) · Advances in Child Development and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80039-8 · Cited by 136
Visual perception of male body attractiveness
Fan, J., Dai, W., Liu, F., & Wu, J. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2922 · Cited by 96
Supermodels: stick insects or hourglasses?
Tovée, M. J., Mason, S. M., Emery, J. L., McCluskey, S. E., & Cohen-Tovée, E. M. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)64238-9 · Cited by 83
The Value of Integrating Evolutionary and Sociocultural Perspectives on Body Image
Frederick, D. A., & Reynolds, T. A. (2022) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-021-01947-4 · Cited by 54
Cue-based estimates of reproductive value explain women's body attractiveness
Andrews, T. M., Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., & Bleske-Rechek, A. (2017) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.04.002 · Cited by 52
Ridley, B. J., Cornelissen, P. L., Maalin, N., Mohamed, S., Kramer, R. S. S., McCarty, K., & Tovée, M. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.980277 · Cited by 18
“Such indices include: the waist-to-hip ratio [Waist-to Hip Ratio (WHR); (Singh, 1993; Lassek and Gaulin, 2016; Bovet, 2019)], shoulderto-waist ratio [Shoulder-to-Waist Ratio (SWR); (Anderson et al., 2004; Andrews et al., 2017; Burch and Johnsen, 2020)], and body size/mass, indexed by BMI as a proxy…”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, D.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Singh, Devendra
- ORCID
- Singh, Devendra
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-307
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4245383502
- Cited by
- 1,334
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 47
- FWCI
- 20.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Keywords
- waist-to-hip ratio, female physical attractiveness, mate choice, reproductive value, body fat distribution, evolutionary psychology, sexual selection, reproductive strategies, health risks, fertility cues
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anthropometry, Beauty, Body Constitution, Body Weight, Female, Hip, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review