Cited by 631Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAnthropological Studies and Insights

Death, Hope, and Sex: Life-History Theory and the Development of Reproductive Strategies [and Comments and Reply]

Chisholm, James S., Ellison, Peter T., Evans, Jeremy, Lee, P. C., Lieberman, Leslie Sue, Pavlik, Zdenek, Ryan, Alan S., Salter, Elizabeth M. +2 more·1993·Current Anthropology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/204131

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chisholm, J. S., Ellison, P. T., Evans, J., Lee, P. C., Lieberman, L. S., Pavlik, Z., Ryan, A. S., Salter, E. M., Stini, W. A., & Worthman, C. M.
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
1993-02
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
1-24
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
OpenAlex
W2240265228
Cited by
631
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 22
FWCI
32.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
Keywords
life history theory, reproductive strategies, death, hope, sex, human reproduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review