The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power and the Creation of Patronizing Environments: The Stereotype-Based Behaviors of the Powerful and Their Effects on Female Performance in Masculine Domains.
Abstract
This work tested the following hypothesis: When powerful men stereotype their female subordinates in masculine domains, they behave in patronizing ways that affect the performance of their subordinates. Experiment 1 examined the stereotyping tendencies and patronizing behaviors of the powerful. Findings revealed that powerful men who stereotyped their female subordinates (i.e., those who were weakness focused) gave female subordinates few valued resources but much praise. In Experiment 2, low-power participants received resources (valued or devalued positions) and praise (high or low) from a powerful man. Subordinates who were assigned to a devalued position but received high praise (i.e., the patronizing behavior mirrored from Experiment 1) were angry. However, men performed better in the anger-inspiring situation, whereas women performed worse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 9,020
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.491 · Cited by 5,202
Gray, J. A. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00013066 · Cited by 4,477
Power, approach, and inhibition.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.265 · Cited by 3,427
Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62 · Cited by 1,567
Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Women and Men
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167289154008 · Cited by 785
Davidson, R. J. (1998) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577298000134 · Cited by 646 · cited 2×
“& Sigelman, 2001), which is the motivational system posited to manage appetitive, incentive motivation and approach behavior (Gray, 1982, 1987; see also Cacioppo & Bernston, 1994; Davidson, 1998; Depue & Iacono, 1989).”
BackgroundWhy can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. E., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002) · Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.88 · Cited by 593
Vorauer, J. D., & Kumhyr, S. M. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167201276006 · Cited by 210 · cited 1×
“…low social status groups (e.g., women and Blacks) are more attentive to the subtle instances of discrimination than are members of high-power, high social status groups (e.g., White men; Dovidio, Gaertner, Kawakami, & Hodson, 2002; Dovidio, Kawakami, & Gaertner, 2002; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
Background
Cited by
7 Emotion in Organizations: A Review and Theoretical Integration
Elfenbein, H. A. (2007) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/078559812 · Cited by 1,035
Not So Subtle: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Correlates of Subtle and Overt Discrimination
Jones, K. P., Peddie, C. I., Gilrane, V. L., King, E. B., & Gray, A. L. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313506466 · Cited by 445
Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers
Logel, C., Walton, G. M., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E. C., von Hippel, W., & Bell, A. E. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015703 · Cited by 336
A Reciprocal Influence Model of Social Power: Emerging Principles and Lines of Inquiry
Keltner, D., Van Kleef, G. A., Chen, S., & Kraus, M. W. (2008) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(07)00003-2 · Cited by 281
“I think it, therefore it’s true”: Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination
Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2007) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.07.001 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M., & Hoover, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 658-672
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2008617123
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 27.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power and the Creation of Patronizing Environments: The Stereotype-Based Behaviors of the Powerful and Their Effects on Female Performance in Masculine Domains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658
- The paper
- Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M., & Hoover, A. (2005). Power and the Creation of Patronizing Environments: The Stereotype-Based Behaviors of the Powerful and Their Effects on Female Performance in Masculine Domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
