The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, in practice people frequently fail to process contradictory information deeply; in particular, they attend much more to evidence that supports their beliefs than evidence that contradicts them (e.g., Galotti, 1989).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Galotti, 1989
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Axten, N., Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063712 · Cited by 6,886
Newell, A. (1972) · Cited by 6,222
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,658
How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process
Bugg, E. G., & Dewey, J. (1934) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415632 · Cited by 5,344
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) · Cited by 5,190
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications
Anderson, J. R. (2014) · Cited by 4,121
The nature of human intelligence
Fuilford, J. P. (1967) · McGraw-Hill eBooks · Cited by 3,864
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–323 of 323
Kotseruba, I., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192844835.003.0009
What Are Cognitive Architectures?
Kotseruba, I., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192844835.003.0002
Evaluating Cognitive Architectures
Kotseruba, I., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192844835.003.0011
Inquiry science: Issues in the implementation of a community of learners
Watters, J. J., & Ginns, I. (2000) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)
A Reflection on Three Web-Based Teaching Critical Thinking: Toward A Compromise Approach
Bakhtiar, S. V. (2006) · DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Montmasson, S. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/ee3235adz2aa7z4f10z9520z5dd5f2014a92
Dyson, L. L., Crawford, P., Frey, S., & Dykstra, S. (2013) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-61735-867-820251060
Heuristics and biases in charity and voting
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0007
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0006
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0012
General psychological biases as counter-norms
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0003
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0011
Self-interest vs. altruistic motivation
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0005
Moralism, paternalism, manipulation, freedom
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0010
Baron, J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.001.0001 · Cited by 1
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0013
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0008
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0002
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0001
Deontology and the role of fallacious reasoning
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0004
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0009
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.002.0004
Moral Intuition Versus Moral Reasoning In the Brain
Ljungström, A. (2014) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Metadata
- Authors
- Galotti, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Carleton College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Galotti, Kathleen M.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1989-05
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-351
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W1986884366
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- formal reasoning, everyday reasoning, reasoning, problem solving, cognitive psychology of reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
