The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, in practice people frequently fail to process contradictory information deeply; in particular, they attend much more to evidence that supports their beliefs than evidence that contradicts them (e.g., Galotti, 1989).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Galotti, 1989
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Axten, N., Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063712 · Cited by 6,886
Newell, A. (1972) · Cited by 6,222
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,658
How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process
Bugg, E. G., & Dewey, J. (1934) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415632 · Cited by 5,344
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) · Cited by 5,190
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications
Anderson, J. R. (2014) · Cited by 4,121
The nature of human intelligence
Fuilford, J. P. (1967) · McGraw-Hill eBooks · Cited by 3,864
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
“However, an important subset of these evaluations are made with respect to virtues or goods that are applied to everyone in the society (e.g., fairness, honesty, or piety in some cultures), or to everyone in a certain social category (e.g., chastity for young women in some cultures or generosity…”
BackgroundInfluentialKuhn, D. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571350 · Cited by 2,094
How (and where) does moral judgment work?
Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9 · Cited by 1,945
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543063001001 · Cited by 1,393
“accessing knowledge that have been studied by such researchers as Gick and Holyoak (1983), Ross (1987), and Catrambone and Holyoak (1989) are crucial to understanding how people respond to anomalous data.”
BackgroundA rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection.
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.608 · Cited by 1,065
“In our view, theories of everyday inference (Galotti, 1989) will involve how factors such as probabilities and utilities interact with reasoning processes (see also Gigerenzer & Hug, 1992).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Galotti, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Carleton College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Galotti, Kathleen M.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1989-05
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-351
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W1986884366
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- formal reasoning, everyday reasoning, reasoning, problem solving, cognitive psychology of reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
