Cited by 1,945Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEthics in Business and Education

How (and where) does moral judgment work?

Greene, Joshua, Haidt, Jonathan·2002·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Moral psychology has long focused on reasoning, but recent evidence suggests that moral judgment is more a matter of emotion and affective intuition than deliberate reasoning. Here we discuss recent findings in psychology and cognitive neuroscience, including several studies that specifically investigate moral judgment. These findings indicate the importance of affect, although they allow that reasoning can play a restricted but significant role in moral judgment. They also point towards a preliminary account of the functional neuroanatomy of moral judgment, according to which many brain areas make important contributions to moral judgment although none is devoted specifically to it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greene, J., & Haidt, J.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
  • Greene, Joshua
  • Haidt, Jonathan
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-12
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
517-523
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119659537
Cited by
1,945
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 127 · 2012: 117
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
moral judgment, moral reasoning, affect, moral cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review