The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Counterfactual thinking.
Abstract
Counterfactuals are mental representations of alternatives to the past and produce consequences that are both beneficial and aversive to the individual. These apparently contradictory effects are integrated in a functionalist model of counterfactual thinking. The author reviews research in support of the assertions that (a) counterfactual thinking is activated automatically in response to negative affect, (b) the content of counterfactuals targets particularly likely causes of misfortune, (c) counterfactuals produce negative affective consequences through a contrast-effect mechanism and positive inferential consequences through a causal-inference mechanism, and (d) the net effect of counterfactual thinking is beneficial.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Labaien et al. generate contrastive explanations for time-series data [141].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
In the citing paper
“On the one hand, visual explanations for non-visual input data (i.e., datasets containing continuous or categorical featurevalue pairs) plot feature-value pair dependencies [134], [141], [142].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–999 of 999
The AI Family: The Information Security Managers Best Frenemy?
de Nobrega, K. M., & Rutkowski, A. F. (2022) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.022 · Cited by 1
Werth, L., Denzler, M., & Mayer, J. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53897-5_6 · Cited by 2
Researches about Counterfactual Thinking
樊, 斌. (2019) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.12677/ap.2019.95116 · Cited by 1
The Tragedy of the Commune: Learning from Worst-Case ScenariosPreprint
Mäuse, K. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.618742 · Cited by 1
“…safeguard against unpleasant experiences and subsequent “counterfactual thinking” on past outcomes (“If only I had. . .”), which both can be very instructive for future decision-making behavior (Roese, 1997), it seems a more clever method to engage directly in considering future possible outcomes.”
Culture, Lay Science, and Analogies: Westerners think X -> Y, Easterners think X :: Y
Gilbert, E. A. (2016) · doi:10.18130/v34g4w · Cited by 1
The need for retroductive thinking in implementation sciencesPreprint
Mukumbang, F. C. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.2.24309/v1 · Cited by 1
“The basic question that goes through one's mind when applying counterfactual thinking is 'what might have been' [24].”
BackgroundThe trajectory of counterfactual simulation in developmentPreprint
Kominsky, J. F., Gerstenberg, T., Pelz, M. C., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vq32j · Cited by 1
Culture, lay science, and analogies: Westerners think X -> Y, Easterners think X :: YPreprint
Gilbert, E. A. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/v3dnr · Cited by 1
Battling Bias: Can Two Implicit Bias Remedies Reduce Juror Racial Bias?Preprint
Ruva, C. L., Sykes, E. C., Smith, K. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/hj9e2 · Cited by 1
Mensah, E. K., Asamoah, L. A., & Jafari‐Sadeghi, V. (2018) · doi:10.31124/advance.7291277 · Cited by 1
Park, S., & Kim, S. (2019) · doi:10.2196/preprints.14746 · Cited by 1
Głaz, A. (2023) · doi:10.32388/m24w7d · Cited by 1
Пономарев, Н., Игоревич, Б. К., Александрович, К. К., & Рябинин, К. (2023) · doi:10.24108/preprints-3112665 · Cited by 1
Moir, B. H. (2014) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17006566.v1 · Cited by 1
Thinking ET : A discussion of exopsychology
Döbler, N. A., & Raab, M. H. (2021) · doi:10.20378/irb-51691
Huang, S., Faul, L., Parikh, N., et al. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5a24b · Cited by 1
Evaluating Use of Evidence in U.S. State Governments: A Conjoint AnalysisPreprint
Xu, C., Yuan, C., Wang, S., et al. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4693327 · Cited by 1
Local post-hoc interpretability for black-box classifiers
Laugel, T. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/afa1c80bz1e1fz4930zb0eaz215e7bb5bf65 · Cited by 1
Justice Violations, Emotional Reactions, and Justice-Seeking Responses
Bembenek, A. F., Beike, D. R., & Schroeder, D. A. (2007) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-466-320251004 · Cited by 1
Song, E. C., Bernstein, M. H., SHEPPARD, B. L., Bruno, M. A., & Baird, G. L. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.05.20.26353717 · Cited by 2
Stocks Repurchase and Sophistication of Individual InvestorsPreprint
Magron, C., & Merli, M. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1927228
Chu, K.-C., & Kwon, K. (2014) · Review of European Studies · doi:10.5539/res.v6n1p34
“One significant issue in counterfactual thinking is that upward counterfactual thought often results in a high level of negative emotions because such thoughts focus on imagined outcomes that are better than the outcome actually obtained (Gleicher et al., 1990; McConnell et al., 2000; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundThe Influence of UGC on Consumers’ Information Process on Service Failure
Chung, T.-L. D. (2012) · International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications · doi:10.4018/jesma.2012100103
Counterfactual thought and causal inference: Facilitation effect and dissociation of activation
Neto, S., & Senos, J. (2014) · Psychologica · doi:10.14195/1647-8606_56_6
Judgements vs affective evaluations of counterfactual outcomes
Terum, J. A., & Svartdal, F. (2012) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2012.739098
“Kahneman & Tversky, 1982; Macrae, Milne & Griffiths, 1993), but frequently help us learn from past experience and to evaluate our progress towards future goals (Byrne, 2007; Epstude & Roese, 2008; Roese, 1997; Roese, Sanna & Galinsky, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialVaccines: Where Inertia, Innovation, and Revolution Create Value, Simultaneously and Quietly
Morgon, P. A., & Nawi, H. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9783527693405.ch13
Saito, K. (2009) · International Journal of Marketing & Distribution · doi:10.5844/jsmd.12.2_23
Jonathan, S., 서보경, 김성수, et al. (2009) · Journal of Korea Service Management Society · doi:10.15706/jksms.2009.10.4.004
Counterfactuals in Logic Programming
Pereira, L. M., & Saptawijaya, A. (2016) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29354-7_6
Smith, M. A. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-61692-892-6.ch002
“In her review of the literature, Roese (1997) concluded that negative emotional experience is the “chief determinant of the… activation of counterfactual processing” (p. 135).”
BackgroundSignificant Moral Facets Amenable to Logic Programming
Pereira, L. M., & Saptawijaya, A. (2016) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29354-7_3
Examining L2 acquisition of the Spanish pluperfect subjunctive
Botero, D. P. (2016) · Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/resla.29.2.05bot
Shin, J., Sohn, Y. W., & Lee, S. (2016) · Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.24230/ksiop.29.2.201605.107
The Research of Regret Psychology Based on the Perspective of Counterfactual Thinking
刘, 琴. (2017) · Advances in Social Sciences · doi:10.12677/ass.2017.63029
Anthropic Perils and Man-Made Risks
Woo, G. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59297-8_8
When Trauma Isn’t a Given (When an Event That Should Produce Trauma, Doesn’t)
Tafoya, D. W. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60726-9_5
Counterfactual Problem Solving and Situated Cognition
Glebkin, V. V., Kovtunenko, A., & Krysova, Y. A. (2017) · Cultural-Historical Psychology · doi:10.17759/chp.2017130205
Counterfactual Thinking About In-Group Versus Out-Group Others
Choi, H., & Choi, H. (2017) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-017-9709-2
“Through the mechanism of affective contrast (e.g., Epstude and Roese 2008; Markman and McMullen 2003; Roese 1997), imagining better alternatives to reality (i.e., upward counterfactuals) often elicits negative feelings such as regret and disappointment (e.g., a silver medalist feels worse after…”
BackgroundMethods for cultivating hopeful disposition in the elementary moral education
추병완, Lee, S.-I., & jeong, C. Y. (2016) · Journal of Moral & Ethics Education · doi:10.18338/kojmee.2016..52.147
Kokavec, V. M., & Cramer, K. (2018) · Athens Journal of Law · doi:10.30958/ajl.4.2.2
Flor, N. V. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91521-0_19
YANGYOON, & 정예랑 (2018) · The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology · doi:10.21074/kjlcap.2018.19.3.483
Szeto, A. C. H., Sorrentino, R. M., Yasunaga, S., et al. (2009) · doi:10.4087/pqjw1150
“Counterfactuals are thoughts about how events might have turned out differently, and are generated as a way to prepare for the future (Mandel & Lehman, 1996; Roese, 1994, 1997; Roese & Olson, 1995).”
BackgroundTruth or Truthiness? How Desires Influence Truth Associations (2015) [Dissertation]Preprint
Lai, C. K., & Forestier, J. M. L. (2017) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/54jy2
Limited focus in dynamic games
Perea, A., & Tsakas, E. (2018) · International Journal of Game Theory · doi:10.1007/s00182-018-0642-x
“• A fourth trait is exhibited by people who have a tendency to disregard—at least some—counterfactual events (for a review of this literature, see Roese 1997).”
BackgroundBroemer, P., & Grabowski, A. (2018) · Polish Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.24425/119493
“…should find it easier to mentally undo or mutate stereotypical evidence that is caused by the situation (Kray, George, Liljenquist, Galinsky, Telock, & Roese, 2010; Levy, Stroessner, & Dweck, 1998; N’gbala & Branscombe, 1995; N’gbala & Branscombe, 2003; Roese, 1997; Roese, Morrison, 2009).”
BackgroundThe Effect of Counterfactual Thinking on the Sunk Cost Effect
Fan-yu, Y. (2019) · Journal of Psychology Research · doi:10.17265/2159-5542/2019.03.001
“Thus, the effects of CT are seemingly beneficial when upward CT and downward CT are employed interchangeably (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundThe effect of downward counterfactual thinking on organizational citizenship behavior
Shin, J., Lee, S., & Sohn, Y.-W. (2016) · Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.24230/kjiop.v29i2.107-131
Vyshedskiy, A. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/166520 · Cited by 4
Elements of a design theory of nano-viral messages: a case study of #solar nanovirals
Flor, N. V. (2019) · Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research · doi:10.1080/15228053.2019.1627717
“Finally, we know that people constantly engage in counterfactual thought, and that it can result in negative emotions like anger and regret (Epstude & Roese, 2008; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundSummerville, A. L., Kirkmeyer, B., & Blue, J. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--30098
Heuristics and the Problem of Pure Economics Loss
Szczerbowski, J. J. (2018) · Principia · doi:10.4467/20843887pi.18.001.9884
Improving Confidence in the Estimation of Values and Norms
Siebert, L. C., Mercuur, R., Dignum, V., van den Hoven, J., & Jonker, C. M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72376-7_6 · Cited by 1
“Ambiguity Reduction via Counterfactuals (AR-C) Counterfactuals are mental representations of alternatives to events that have already occurred [24], frequently represented by conditional propositions related to questions in the “what if” form.”
BackgroundDesing, R. M. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--32235
When Choosing is Painful: A Psychological Opportunity Cost ModelPreprint
Gabillon, E. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2223976
“Psychology studies also find that people’s conterfactual thinking is more oriented toward what could have been better than toward what could have been worse (Gilovich 1983; Roese 1997; Epstude & Roese 2008).”
حرب, س. ح. س. ا. (2020) · مجلة جامعة الفيوم للعلوم التربوية والنفسية · doi:10.21608/jfust.2021.41185.1080
The Structural Context for Billionaires
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0003
The Political Agency of Billionaires
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0004
Bounded rational counterfactuals
Marwala, T. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820676-8.00012-0
Estetinės formos harmonizavimas intuityvaus pažinimo aspektu
Žukas, J. (2021) · doi:10.20334/2021-031-m · Cited by 1
Feicology: functions and types of counterfactual artistic practices
Sushynskyi, O. (2021) · Contemporary Art · doi:10.31500/2309-8813.17.2021.248466
“Контрафактуальне мислення — це, як стверджується, протидія фактам» [1].”
Towards robust inference against distribution shifts in computer vision
Tang, K. (2021) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/154119
Diéguez, S. (2020) · Cerveau & Psycho · doi:10.3917/cerpsy.122.0070
Mashek, D. J., & Hammer, E. Y. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9781444395341.index
Drones and Support for the Use of Force
Walsh, J. I., & Schulzke, M. (2018) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book.62752 · Cited by 5
АЛТЕРНАТИВНА МЕДИЈСКА СЛИКА СТВАРНОСТИ: ИЗВЈЕШТАВАЊЕ О ПАНДЕМИЈИ ВИРУСА КОРОНА
Максимовић, С. С. Л. (2022) · Filozofski fakultet u Nišu eBooks · doi:10.46630/jkaj.2022.26
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0001
Recker, J. (2021) · Progress in IS · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85436-2_4
(2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203932070.bmatt
Smith, A. C. T. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-57895-2_2
التفکیر المغایر لدى طلبة الکلیات العملیة والنظریة بجامعة الزقازیق
(2020) · دراسات تربوية ونفسية مجلة کلية التربية بالزقازيق · doi:10.21608/sec.2020.163744
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0008
Glăveanu, V. P. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52082-3_2
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0006
Byrne, R. M. J. (2013) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0017
Hägel, P. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.003.0005
Elements of a Design Theory of Nano-Viral Messages: A Case Study of #Solar NanoviralsPreprint
Flor, N. V. (2019) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/rwxkc
Computational mechanisms underlying latent inverse value updating of unchosen actionsPreprint
Ben-Artzi, I., Kessler, Y., Nicenboim, B., & Shahar, N. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/sxjez
Counterfactual Thinking, Trading, and Market InefficiencyPreprint
Qin, J. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4103501
Counterfactual Thinking Made in a Relevant Choice and Negative Consequences
Muñoz-Olano, J. F., & Ruiz-Zapata, G. J. (2022) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340136
Do women who blame rape victims consequently engage in risk reduction strategies?
Reynolds, J. J. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03541-w
“…is consistent with theory and research that finds that counterfactuals are automatically activated from negative affect, there is an association between counterfactuals and blame, and coun-terfactual thinking can be used in risk reduction (Roese, 1997; Roese & Epstude, 2017; Smallman et al., 2022).”
Constructing One's Reality: Perceived Control and Counterfactual Thinking in a Post-Truth Era
McCreery, M. P. (2019) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1428496
Bacos, C. A. (2019) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1428781
Tainted NudgePreprint
Alempaki, D., Isoni, A., & Read, D. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4123540
Do children live in a fantasy world?
Harris, P. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866509.003.0004
Harris, P. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866509.003.0010
Harris, P. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866509.003.0001
Can we trust children’s memory?
Harris, P. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866509.003.0006
Harris, P. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866509.003.0002
Do children understand emotion?
Harris, P. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866509.003.0007
Are children natural psychologists?
Harris, P. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866509.003.0005
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866509.002.0006
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866509.002.0003
Is developmental psychology ethnocentric?
Harris, P. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866509.003.0011
How do children tell right from wrong?
Harris, P. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866509.003.0008
Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been
Byrne, R. M. J. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01974-5 · Cited by 282
McConnell (2000) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(200004)17:4
Metadata
- Authors
- Roese, N. J.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roese, Neal J.
- ORCID
- Roese, Neal J.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-148
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W4246855866
- Cited by
- 1,156
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- counterfactual reasoning, counterfactuals, negative affect, contrast effects, causal inference, misfortune, functionalism
- MeSH terms
- Anger, Depression, Humans, Internal-External Control, Motivation, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review