The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Counterfactual thinking.
Abstract
Counterfactuals are mental representations of alternatives to the past and produce consequences that are both beneficial and aversive to the individual. These apparently contradictory effects are integrated in a functionalist model of counterfactual thinking. The author reviews research in support of the assertions that (a) counterfactual thinking is activated automatically in response to negative affect, (b) the content of counterfactuals targets particularly likely causes of misfortune, (c) counterfactuals produce negative affective consequences through a contrast-effect mechanism and positive inferential consequences through a causal-inference mechanism, and (d) the net effect of counterfactual thinking is beneficial.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Labaien et al. generate contrastive explanations for time-series data [141].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
In the citing paper
“On the one hand, visual explanations for non-visual input data (i.e., datasets containing continuous or categorical featurevalue pairs) plot feature-value pair dependencies [134], [141], [142].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought
Watkins, E. R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163 · Cited by 2,421
“…Gavanski, Sherman, & McMullen, 1993; Niedenthal, Tangney, & Gavanski, 1994; Sanna, 1997), and can have constructive consequences, such as generating inferences about the causes of previous difficulties, guiding effective preparative and preventive behavior (Mandel & Lehman, 1996; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundConsumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718 · Cited by 2,239
How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather Than Direct Causation
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868307301033 · Cited by 1,874
“From an authoritative review of the literature, Roese (1997) concluded that emotion, specifically negative emotional experience, is the “chief determinant of the mere activation of counterfactual processing” (p. 135).”
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762
Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice.
Schwartz, B. N., Ward, A. C., Monterosso, J. R., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178 · Cited by 1,920
Keil, F. C. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100 · Cited by 1,350
Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship
Baron, R. A. (1998) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00031-1 · Cited by 1,321
The cognitive perspective: a valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic “why” questions
Baron, R. A. (2003) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(03)00008-9 · Cited by 1,167
Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0708 · Cited by 1,009
Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality
Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2012.651387 · Cited by 1,008
“2Because humans can easily entertain counterfactuals (Roese, 1997), attempted harm also fits a dyadic template (e.”
BackgroundThe psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion.
Anderson, C. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.139 · Cited by 1,119
“Counterfactual thoughts are alternative representations of events (i.e., outcomes that could have occurred but did not; Roese, 1997, 1999), such as “If I had chosen to quit smoking 5 years ago as I planned, perhaps I would not be diagnosed with lung cancer today.””
BackgroundA Theory of Regret Regulation 1.0
Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1701_3 · Cited by 1,084
“Put differently, regret is a counterfactual emotion (Kahneman & Miller, 1986; Roese, 1997; Zeelenberg, Van Dijk, Van der Pligt, et al., 1998) that heavily relies on comparison processes (E. Van Dijk & Zeelenberg, 2005; Zeelenberg & Van Dijk, 2005).”
BackgroundCulpable control and the psychology of blame.
Alicke, M. D. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.556 · Cited by 1,062
Value from hedonic experience and engagement
Higgins, E. T. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.439 · Cited by 949
“It can vary depending on which mental account the context suggests is appropriate for calculating its value (Thaler, 1999) or on what the context suggests is normal (Kahneman & Miller, 1986) or might have happened instead (Kahneman & Tversky, 1982; Markus & Nurius, 1986; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundFischhoff, B., & de Bruin, W. B. (1999) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199906)12:2 · Cited by 217
The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking
Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308316091 · Cited by 905
“…to goals and are a component of regulatory mechanisms that keep behavior on track, particularly within social interactions (Epstude & Roese, in press; Johnson & Sherman, 1990; Markman & McMullen, 2003; Roese, 1997, 2001; Roese & Olson, 1997; Roese, Sanna, & Galinsky, 2005; Segura & Morris, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationUnbiased Scene Graph Generation From Biased Training
Tang, K., Niu, Y., Huang, J., Shi, J., & Zhang, H. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00377 · Cited by 810
“It means “counter to the facts” [46], and takes one step further that assigns the “clash of worlds” combination of values to variables.”
Development and validation of the anger rumination scale
Sukhodolsky, D. G., Golub, A., & Cromwell, E. N. (2001) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00171-9 · Cited by 755
Ucbasaran, D., Shepherd, D. A., Lockett, A., & Lyon, S. J. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312457823 · Cited by 804
“On balance, Roese (1997) argues that CFT produces net beneficial effects for individuals.”
BackgroundProcrastination and the Priority of Short-Term Mood Regulation: Consequences for Future Self
Sirois, F., & Pychyl, T. (2013) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12011 · Cited by 696
“Upward counterfactuals can makes us feel worse as we ponder what we should have done but did not (Roese, 1997), and can therefore play a role in correcting future behavior by highlighting actions that can improve future outcomes (Boninger, Gleicher, & Strathman, 1994; Gleicher, Boninger, Strathman, Armor, & Ahn, 1995;…”
BackgroundThe Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships
Crawford, N. C. (2000) · International Security · doi:10.1162/016228800560327 · Cited by 691
The Importance of Goal Disengagement in Adaptive Self-Regulation: When Giving Up is Beneficial
Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Schulz, R. (2003) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860309021 · Cited by 698
Application of Fairness Theory to Service Failures and Service Recovery
McColl‐Kennedy, J. R., & Sparks, B. (2003) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670502238918 · Cited by 651
“…in more negative emotions when it is easy to think of alternative actions (conduct) that could have been implemented by the organization, when it is feasible to implement alternative actions, and when other options are likely to result in a much better outcome for the customer (see Roese 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03193858 · Cited by 682
“We may perform mental simulations in order to generate forecasts or to plan future activities (Kahneman & Tversky, 1982b), and we may also need to simulate possibilities, in order to decide whether we believe conditional statements (Evans & Over, 2004), or to engage in counterfactual thinking about what might have bee…”
BackgroundMethodBaumeister, R. F., Zhang, L., & Vohs, K. D. (2004) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.111 · Cited by 564
“Negative emotions in particular stimulate retrospective analysis, including counterfactual thinking (e.g., Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundEmotion and Rationality: A Critical Review and Interpretation of Empirical Evidence
Pham, M. T. (2007) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.155 · Cited by 552
“In addition, the counterfactual outcome comparisons that underlie emotional experiences of regret, rejoicing, disappointment, or elation may help people learn from their failures and successes (Roese, 1997), whereas social comparisons with other’s welfare may support norms of justice and equity that seem broadly desir…”
BackgroundInventors and New Venture Formation: the Effects of General Self–Efficacy and Regretful Thinking
Markman, G. D., Balkin, D. B., & Baron, R. A. (2002) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/1540-8520.00004 · Cited by 552
“Regretful thinking is important because such strong sentiments may have profound effects on entrepreneurs’ mood, understanding of cause-effect relationships, decisionmaking, and task performance (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundJustified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior
Shalvi, S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.02.001 · Cited by 515
“Past work indeed reveals that considering upward counterfactuals ''that are evaluatively better than actuality'' (Roese, 1997, p. 134), influences people's (emotional) interpretation of factual reality (Mandel & Dhami, 2005; Zeelenberg et al., 1998) and their subsequent decisions (Markman,…”
BackgroundWhat do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation.
Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Xu, H. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.493 · Cited by 536
“Research on counterfactual reasoning has found that individuals engage in valuable counterfactual thinking as a result of negative affect and misfortune (e.g., Galinsky, Seiden, Kim, & Medvec, 2002; Lipe, 1991; Roese, 1997).”
Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., & Wolfe, M. T. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0102 · Cited by 511
Entrepreneurship and leadership: common trends and common threads
Vecchio, R. P. (2003) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/s1053-4822(03)00019-6 · Cited by 484
“Alternatively, it may lead to an analysis of the causes of failure and, thereby, lead to improved future performance (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundThe Effects of Emotional Ambivalence on Creativity
Fong, C. T. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22798182 · Cited by 499
Are perseverance and self-efficacy costless? Assessing entrepreneurs' regretful thinking
Markman, G. D., Baron, R. A., & Balkin, D. B. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.305 · Cited by 473
“Indeed, research shows that taking responsibility for unfavorable events can engender disappointment and blame (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundByrne, R. M. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249 · Cited by 467
“…intentions to carry out activities that will ensure a better outcome in the future, compared to those who create a downward counterfactual and imagine how things could have turned out worse, or who do not imagine how things could have turned out differently (e.g., Markman et al. 2008, Roese 1997).”
BackgroundRoese, N. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612454303 · Cited by 457
“Counterfactuals are thoughts of what might have been, of what could have happened if some past action had been different (Roese, 1997).”
Self-citationImagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation
Moulton, S. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0314 · Cited by 421
“For example, Roese (1997) defined simulation as ‘imaginative mental construction’ (p. 134), Buckner et al .”
Ambivalence in Organizations: A Multilevel Approach
Ashforth, B. E., Rogers, K. M., Pratt, M. G., & Pradies, C. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0909 · Cited by 462
“And research on counterfactual thinking indicates that reflecting on “what could have been” (Roese 1997, as cited in Fong 2006, p. 1017) may introduce, for individuals and collectives alike, an oppositional stance into otherwise positive events (“it could have been better”) and negative events (“it…”
BackgroundPerson as scientist, person as moralist
Knobe, J. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000907 · Cited by 385
Regulatory focus and temporal distance
Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00058-1 · Cited by 379
Self-citationStepin, I., Alonso, J. M., Catala, A., & Pereira-Farina, M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3051315 · Cited by 376
“Cognitive scientists refer to such mental representations of alternatives to past events as counterfactuals (‘‘contrary-to-fact’’) [15].”
BackgroundWhat We Regret Most... and Why
Roese, N. J., & Summerville, A. L. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205274693 · Cited by 407
“Recent research on regret has pinpointed numerous cognitive consequences, including effects on blame, expectancies, superstition, suspicion, and ongoing behavior (Connolly & Zeelenberg, 2002; Roese, 1997, 2005).”
BackgroundSelf-citationZou, X., Tam, K.-P., Morris, M. W., Lee, S.-L., Lau, I. Y.-M., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016399 · Cited by 369
“Additive counterfactuals simulate the event turning out differently by inserting an additional factor into the causal chain, whereas subtractive counterfactuals do so by deleting a factor that was present in the actual causal chain (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundThe Role of Mental Simulations and Counterfactual Thinking in the Opportunity Identification Process
Gaglio, C. M. (2004) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00063.x · Cited by 358
The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model
van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., & de Liver, Y. N. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308324518 · Cited by 343
“Regret is considered to be a consequence of a decision that lead to an unwanted outcome and, thus, counterfactual thinking about what might have been (Epstude & Roese, 2008; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundA Reflection and Evaluation Model of Comparative Thinking
Markman, K. D., & McMullen, M. N. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0703_04 · Cited by 344
“…been the subject of numerous theories in the areas of counterfactual thinking (e.g., Kahneman & Miller, 1986; McMullen, Markman, & Gavanski, 1995; Roese, 1997), social comparison (e.g., Festinger, 1954; Kruglanski & Mayseless, 1990; Taylor & Lobel, 1989), temporal comparison (e.g., Albert, 1977;…”
BackgroundInfluentialBrasel, K. R., Doxey, M. M., Grenier, J. H., & Reffett, A. B. (2016) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-51380 · Cited by 320
Experientialism, Materialism, and the Pursuit of Happiness
Van Boven, L. (2005) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.132 · Cited by 318
“Similarly, if we had considered different types of purchases, then the imperfections of what we actually have may prompt us to make counterfactual comparisons with what we could have had, producing disappointment and regret (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundOn the impact of mood on behavior: an integrative theory and a review
Gendolla, G. H. E. (2000) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.4.378 · Cited by 320
“…are customary strategies for regulating negative feeling states (M. S. Clark & Isen, 1982; Forgas et al., 1998; Klinger, 1982; Parkinson & Totterdell, 1999; Roese, 1997; Thayer et al., 1994), this suggests that people who focus on themselves in a reflexive way try to regulate their mood states.”
BackgroundCounterfactual thinking and venture formation
Baron, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(98)00024-x · Cited by 310
Self-Enhancement and Learning from Performance Feedback
Jordan, A., & Audia, P. G. (2012) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0108 · Cited by 310
“By shifting to counterfactual thinking (see Byrne, 2005; Epstude & Roese, 2008; Roese, 1997), decision makers can justify their performance by comparing it to what would have happened had they employed different strategies.”
BackgroundShepherd, D. A., Zacharakis, A. L., & Baron, R. A. (2003) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(02)00099-x · Cited by 296
Psychological Perspectives on Entrepreneurship
Baron, R. A. (2000) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00050 · Cited by 290
“For instance, recent findings indicate that they are less likely than other persons to engage in counterfactual thinking—imagining outcomes or events different from those that actually occurred (e.g., Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundDistinction Bias: Misprediction and Mischoice Due to Joint Evaluation.
Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.680 · Cited by 294
Morris, M. W., & Moore, P. C. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667018 · Cited by 268
Learning Agility: In Search of Conceptual Clarity and Theoretical Grounding
DeRue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., & Myers, C. G. (2012) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01444.x · Cited by 308
“Counterfactual thinking has a strong effect on individual cognition and enhances learning and application in a variety of ways (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundThe inaction effect in the psychology of regret.
Zeelenberg, M., van den Bos, K., van Dijk, E., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.314 · Cited by 267
“They have both been called counterfactual emotions, both have negative valence, both are common experiences, and both are the result of decisions with unfortunate outcomes (Landman, 1993; Loomes & Sugden, 1982, 1987; Roese, 1997; Roese & Olson, 1997; Zeelenberg, Van Dijk, Manstead, & Van der Pligt, 1998; Zeelenberg, V…”
BackgroundFictive Reward Signals in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
Hayden, B. Y., Pearson, J. M., & Platt, M. L. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168488 · Cited by 246
Gimbar, C., Hansen, B., & Ozlanski, M. E. (2016) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-51382 · Cited by 246
The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking
(2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203963784 · Cited by 257
Entrepreneurial Imaginativeness in New Venture Ideation
Kier, A. S., & McMullen, J. S. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0395 · Cited by 259
“Consistent with Roese (1997), we view counterfactual thinking as a subset of mental simulation (Roese, 1997), or the imaginative mental construction of scenarios (Kahneman & Tversky, 1982; Taylor & Schneider, 1989).”
BackgroundMethodCounterfactual Thinking: The Intersection of Affect and Function
Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1997) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60015-5 · Cited by 254
Self-citationFactors influencing online shoppers’ repurchase intentions: The roles of satisfaction and regret
Liao, C., Lin, H.-N., Luo, M. M., & Chea, S. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.12.005 · Cited by 268
The Distinctive and Inclusive Domain of Entrepreneurial Cognition Research
Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L. W., Lant, T. K., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A., & Smith, J. B. (2004) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00061.x · Cited by 233
“Roese (1997) Creative cognition is usually the An understanding of the basic reflection of the balance between mental operations of creativity. novelty and familiarity.”
BackgroundThe Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking: New Evidence, New Challenges, New Insights
Roese, N. J., & Epstude, K. (2017) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.001 · Cited by 255
Self-citationThe probability of causal conditionals
Over, D. E., Hadjichristidis, C., Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Sloman, S. A. (2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.05.002 · Cited by 229
Using the realist interview approach to maintain theoretical awareness in realist studies
Mukumbang, F. C., Marchal, B., Belle, S. V., & van Wyk, B. E. (2019) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794119881985 · Cited by 202
“The counterfactual conditions were meant to foster our judgments of greater explanatory power (Bhaskar, 2009) of greater explanatory power (Bhaskar, 2009) of causality in the functional theory that was developing (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundTeam Reflexivity as an Antidote to Team Information-Processing Failures
Schippers, M. C., Edmondson, A. C., & West, M. A. (2014) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496414553473 · Cited by 258
“In this way, counterfactual reconstructions of the past can pave the way for future improvement (Markman, Gavanski, Sherman, & McMullen, 1993; Roese, 1994; 1997; Taylor & Schneider, 1989; for a review see Ellis, et al., 2014).”
BackgroundRising from the Ashes: Cognitive Determinants of Venture Growth after Entrepreneurial Failure
Yasuhiro Yamakawa, B., Peng, M. W., & DEEDS, D. L. (2013) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12047 · Cited by 224
“" This is highly relevant because such thinking can have a profound effect on entrepreneurs' understanding of cause-and-effect relationships, decision making, and task performance (Markman, Balkin, & Baron, 2002; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundAgency and Motivation in Adulthood and Old Age
Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2018) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103043 · Cited by 236
“(Roese 1997).”
BackgroundPeople systematically overlook subtractive changes
Adams, G. S., Converse, B. A., Hales, A. H., & Klotz, L. E. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03380-y · Cited by 256
Opportunity Evaluation as Rule‐Based Decision Making
Wood, M. S., & Williams, D. W. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12018 · Cited by 217
“As one considers possible outcomes, emotions such as fear can creep in (Roese, 1997), and negative emotions such as fear, impact entrepreneurs’ evaluations of opportunities negatively (cf. Grichnik et al., 2010; Welpe et al., 2012).”
BackgroundLooking Forward to Looking Backward
Gilbert, D. T., Morewedge, C. K., Risen, J. L., & Wilson, T. D. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00681.x · Cited by 212
“So, for example, when one misses an airplane by just a few minutes or a gold medal by just a few meters, it is all too easy to imagine how a small change in one’s own behavior might have changed the outcome (Miller & Gunasegaram, 1990; Roese, 1997).”
Background(The Feeling of) Meaning-as-Information
Heintzelman, S. J., & King, L. A. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868313518487 · Cited by 240
“Counterfactual thinking involves imagining how actual outcomes might have been altered if the antecedents to an event had been different (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundRemembering what could have happened: Neural correlates of episodic counterfactual thinking
Brigard, F. D., Addis, D. R., Ford, J. H., Schacter, D. L., & Giovanello, K. S. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.015 · Cited by 206
“…is worth noting that, although research on the cognitive neuroscience of counterfactual thinking – broadly defined as thoughts of what may have been (Roese, 1997; Byrne, 2002; Epstude & Roese, 2008) – is growing, most studies focus on the simulation of counterfactual alternatives to impersonal…”
BackgroundRuminative coping and post-event processing in social anxiety.
Kocovski, N. L., Endler, N. S., Rector, N., & Flett, G. (2005) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.015 · Cited by 226
Liu, D., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T., Holtom, B. C., & Hinkin, T. R. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0920 · Cited by 208
“When the work environment generates social cues contradictory to a person’s experience, he or she may be prompted to engage in counterfactual thinking and imagine alternative realities (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundGalinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1409 · Cited by 203
A quasi-experimental study of after-event reviews and leadership development.
DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Workman, K. M. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028244 · Cited by 204
“Thus, the self-explanation and data verification components help individuals more effectively learn from experience by clarifying the causal link between behavior and outcomes, and they promote more counterfactual thinking (Barsalou, 2008; Cheng, 1997; Chi, de Leeuw, Chiu, & Lavancher, 1994; Roese, 1997; Spellman, 199…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Self-Talk Scale: Development, Factor Analysis, and Validation
Brinthaupt, T. M., Hein, M. B., & Kramer, T. E. (2008) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890802484498 · Cited by 220
“…in relation to several social-cognitive and self-related phenomena such as rumination and goal progress (Conway, Csank, Holm, & Blake, 2000; Martin & Tesser, 1996), counterfactual thinking (Roese, 1997), and the certainty or clarity of the self-concept (Baumgardner, 1990; Campbell et al., 1996).”
BackgroundLagattuta, K. H., & Wellman, H. M. (2002) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.564 · Cited by 178
Wrosch, C., Bauer, I. E., & Scheier, M. F. (2005) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.657 · Cited by 174
Visual and verbal processing strategies in comprehension and judgment
Wyer, R. S., Hung, I. W., & Jiang, Y. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2008.09.002 · Cited by 174
Cognitive Dissonance in Technology Adoption: A Study of Smart Home Users
Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2020) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-020-10042-3 · Cited by 189
“Counterfactual thinking refers to the ruminations about alternative decisions and potential consequences (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundEncoding Under Trust and Distrust: The Spontaneous Activation of Incongruent Cognitions.
Schul, Y., Mayo, R., & Burnstein, E. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.668 · Cited by 167
Nieuwland, M. S., & Martin, A. E. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.09.001 · Cited by 169
“had never developed its Apollo Project? Would the Soviet Union have ‘won’ the Space Race? Would Neil Armstrong ever have coined his famous words strolling across the moonscape? Counterfactual reasoning, our ability to consider this hypothetical scenario, is pervasive in everyday life (e.g., Byrne, 2002; Kahneman & Mil…”
Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00033.x · Cited by 172
“Praise and blame may sometimes be phrased as a counterfactual inference (Roese, 1997), which may also be self-serving: ‘‘If not for me, we would have failed’’ or ‘‘If only she had tried harder, we would have succeeded’’ (Roese & Olson, 1993).”
Self-citationDesigning Price Contracts for Boundedly Rational Customers: Does the Number of Blocks Matter?
Lim, N., & Ho, T. (2007) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0271 · Cited by 147
Praise for regret: People value regret above other negative emotions
Saffrey, C., Summerville, A. L., & Roese, N. J. (2008) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9082-4 · Cited by 173
“Counterfactual thinking itself has been shown to bring benefits in terms of subsequent problem-solving and performance enhancement (Epstude and Roese in press; Markman et al. 2008; Roese 1994, 1997).”
BackgroundSelf-citationTo do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation
Zhou, Z., Yu, R., & Zhou, X. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.010 · Cited by 168
Evans, J. S. B. T., Over, D. E., & Handley, S. J. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.4.1040 · Cited by 160
Counterfactual thinking, persistence, and performance: A test of the Reflection and Evaluation Model
Markman, K. D., McMullen, M. N., & Elizaga, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.001 · Cited by 165
“One is the affective function (e.g., McMullen, 1997; Roese, 1997; Taylor & Schneider, 1989), whereby a given outcome will be judged more favorably to the extent that a less desirable alternative is salient.”
BackgroundMethodWhen and Why We See Victims as Responsible
Niemi, L., & Young, L. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216653933 · Cited by 169
Spontaneous versus Controlled Influences of Stimulus-Based Affect on Choice Behavior
Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2977 · Cited by 156
OB and entrepreneurship: The reciprocal benefits of closer conceptual links
Baron, R. A. (2002) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24007-1 · Cited by 157
Entertainment is Emotion: The Functional Architecture of the Entertainment Experience
Tan, E. S. (2008) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213260701853161 · Cited by 164
“Such emotions may stimulate simulating counterfactuals, that is, better or worse courses of events than actually met, especially when they arise in response to imagined events (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundRetroductive Theorizing: A Contribution of Critical Realism to Mixed Methods Research
Mukumbang, F. C. (2021) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/15586898211049847 · Cited by 155
“Abduction also involves the application of counterfactual thinking (creating possible alternatives to events) to identify positive and negative outcomes (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundDoing Better but Feeling Worse: The Paradox of Choice
Schwartz, B. N., & Ward, A. C. (2004) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470939338.ch6 · Cited by 163
Higgins, E. T., & Cornwell, J. F. M. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.04.005 · Cited by 162
Galinsky, A. D., Seiden, V. L., Kim, P. H., & Medvec, V. H. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202282012 · Cited by 143
“Roese (1997) and Roese and Hur (1997) have suggested that negative affect is the primary driver of counterfactual thinking and that event normality affects the content but not the activation of counterfactual thoughts.”
BackgroundJohnson, D. E., Erez, A., Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.808 · Cited by 156
“Because negative cues are often more salient than positive cues (Pyszczynski & Greenberg, 1981; Roese, 1997; Wong & Weiner, 1981), if an employee enacts helpful actions but has a bad reputation, his or her negative reputation should stand out.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Roese, N. J.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roese, Neal J.
- ORCID
- Roese, Neal J.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-148
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W4246855866
- Cited by
- 1,156
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- counterfactual reasoning, counterfactuals, negative affect, contrast effects, causal inference, misfortune, functionalism
- MeSH terms
- Anger, Depression, Humans, Internal-External Control, Motivation, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review