The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Counterfactual thinking.
Abstract
Counterfactuals are mental representations of alternatives to the past and produce consequences that are both beneficial and aversive to the individual. These apparently contradictory effects are integrated in a functionalist model of counterfactual thinking. The author reviews research in support of the assertions that (a) counterfactual thinking is activated automatically in response to negative affect, (b) the content of counterfactuals targets particularly likely causes of misfortune, (c) counterfactuals produce negative affective consequences through a contrast-effect mechanism and positive inferential consequences through a causal-inference mechanism, and (d) the net effect of counterfactual thinking is beneficial.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Labaien et al. generate contrastive explanations for time-series data [141].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
In the citing paper
“On the one hand, visual explanations for non-visual input data (i.e., datasets containing continuous or categorical featurevalue pairs) plot feature-value pair dependencies [134], [141], [142].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 999
Vanclay, F. M. (2013) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.837998 · Cited by 47
“In European policy circles, this is called the ‘counterfactual’ (EVALSED, 2012) – a term borrowed from psychology where it has a slightly different meaning, that is, a mental representation or image of an alternative trajectory, past or future (ROESE, 1997).”
BackgroundRadke, S., Güroğlu, B., & de Bruijn, E. R. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031491 · Cited by 45
Highlighting the Contextual Nature of Interpersonal Relationships
McNulty, J. K. (2016) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.02.003 · Cited by 47
Did I Get the Best Discount? Counterfactual Thinking of Tourism Products
Park, J., & Jang, S. S. (2016) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287516680775 · Cited by 49
“Previous literature has suggested that receiving a large price promotion is beneficial for both customers and retailers (Rothschild and Gaidis 1981; Cotton and Babb 1978).”
BackgroundVerbruggen, M., & van Emmerik, H. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318801998 · Cited by 49
“When people then do not actualize the desired change, these prefactual thoughts tend to evolve into counterfactual thoughts—in other words, thoughts about “what could have been” if they would have realized the desired change (McCloy & Byrne, 2000; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundAmsterlaw, J., Lagattuta, K. H., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2009) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01249.x · Cited by 48
“In general, people are far more likely to seek reasons for their failures than for their successes (see Roese, 1997; Roese & Hur, 1997; Weiner, 1985).”
BackgroundLaurent, V., & Balleine, B. W. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.044 · Cited by 45
Tykocinski, O. E., & Steinberg, N. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.12.001 · Cited by 50
Dishonestly increasing the likelihood of winning
Shalvi, S. (2012) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002266 · Cited by 46
“The theoretical idea behind the finding that more rolls lead to more lying is that observing desired counterfactual outcomes (upward counterfactuals; Roese, 1997; Epstude & Roese, 2008; Markman, Gavanski, Sherman, & McMullen, 1993), in the form of higher values appearing on non-relevant for pay rolls, changes the way…”
The neural basis of regret and relief during a sequential risk-taking task
Liu, Z., Li, L., Zheng, L., Hu, Z., Roberts, I. D., Guo, X., & Yang, G. (2016) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.04.018 · Cited by 47
Cheung, W.-Y., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2018) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2017.1346129 · Cited by 47
“Individuals who engage in upward counterfactual thinking often experience negative affect, whereas individuals who engage in downward counterfactual thinking often experience relief (Epstude & Roese, 2008; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundMiller, A. K., Handley, I. M., Markman, K. D., & Miller, J. H. (2010) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801210382874 · Cited by 47
“However, we do not wish to underemphasize the theoretically important role that negative affect plays in activating these cognitions (Roese, 1997; Roese & Hur, 1997; Roese & Olson, 1997) as substantiated by our structural equation model.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSmallman, R., & McCulloch, K. C. (2012) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1858 · Cited by 45
Moral emotions and the envisaging of mitigating circumstances for wrongdoing
Piazza, J. R., Russell, P. S., & Sousa, P. (2012) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.736859 · Cited by 45
Counterfactuals, coping strategies and psychological distress among breast cancer patients
Gilbar, O., & Hevroni, A. (2007) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615800701384439 · Cited by 45
“, the mental simulation of alternative outcomes) is an automatic response mainly to a negative event (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialAn Examination of the Legal Liability Associated with Outsourcing and Offshoring Audit Procedures
Lyubimov, A., Arnold, V., & Sutton, S. G. (2012) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-50354 · Cited by 44
People avoid situations that enable them to deceive others
Shalvi, S., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.015 · Cited by 47
“They compare and evaluate alternative states andpossible scenarios (Roese 1997), consider whether they should take responsibility for the fate and outcomes of their prospective interdependent other (Handgraaf et al.”
Personality, counterfactual thinking, and negative emotional reactivity
Allen, M. S., Greenlees, I. A., & Jones, M. V. (2013) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.10.011 · Cited by 44
Roh, S. (2017) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.004 · Cited by 43
VonDras, D. D., Schmitt, R. R., & Marx, D. (2007) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-007-9119-0 · Cited by 44
“Noting that counterfactual attributions provide a window with which to understand mental life (Roese, 1997) and involves explanatory dimensions shown to be important in alcohol prevention (e.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInaction Inertia in the Stock Market1
Tykocinski, O. E., Israel, R., & Pittman, T. S. (2004) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02001.x · Cited by 44
Raajpoot, N. A., & Sharma, A. K. (2006) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/08876040610679936 · Cited by 44
Chen, J., Chiu, C., Roese, N. J., Tam, K., & Lau, I. Y. (2006) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022105282296 · Cited by 45
“Counterfactuals furnish benchmarks against which actual events are fully comprehended, counterfactuals influence emotions both in magnitude and in kind, and counterfactuals influence a range of judgments, such as blame, likelihood, suspicion, and decision making (see Roese, 1997, for review).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning Inhibition in the Monty Hall Problem
Petrocelli, J. V., & Harris, A. K. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211410245 · Cited by 43
“Given that our data suggest that counterfactual thinking can serve as a detriment to learning, memory, and functional decision making, they run counter to the conclusions of other researchers who have endorsed the functional view of counterfactual thinking (Epstude & Roese, 2008; Kray et al., 2009; Markman et al., 199…”
Result‘I wish I had a regular job’: An exploratory study of entrepreneurial regret
Hsu, D. K., Shinnar, R. S., & Anderson, S. E. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.006 · Cited by 45
SCOTT: Self-Consistent Chain-of-Thought Distillation
Wang, P., Wang, Z., Li, Z., Gao, Y., Yin, B., & Ren, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.304 · Cited by 119
Individual differences in counterfactual production
Jasper, J. D., Barry, K., & Christman, S. D. (2008) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.026 · Cited by 42
Mensah, E. K., Asamoah, L. A., & Jafari‐Sadeghi, V. (2021) · Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation · doi:10.7341/20211711 · Cited by 58
“While this may be the case, as discussed in the cognition theory elsewhere (Landman et al., 1995; Roese, 1997), the reverse implication is pervasive in the entrepreneurial literature due to its importance with respect to the process of causal inference—efforts (Baron, 2000; Gaglio, 2004)).”
BackgroundMemory and decision making interact to shape the value of unchosen options
Biderman, N., & Shohamy, D. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24907-x · Cited by 44
How Surveillance Begets Perceptions of Dishonesty: The Case of the Counterfactual Sinner.
Miller, D. T., Visser, P. S., & Staub, B. D. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.117 · Cited by 41
The Mildly Depressed Experience More Post–Decisional Regret Than the Non–Depressed
Monroe, M. R., Skowronski, J. J., MacDonald, W. L., & Wood, S. E. (2005) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2005.24.5.665 · Cited by 42
“Research demonstrates that thinking about how outcomes could have been better (the generation of upward counterfactuals – see Roese, 1997) is, indeed, linked to feelings of regret (Johnson, 1986; Landman, 1987).”
BackgroundBillionaires in World Politics
Hägel, P. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.001.0001 · Cited by 43
Grand Challenges of Smart Technology for Older Adults
Zhou, J., Salvendy, G., Boot, W. R., Charness, N. H., Czaja, S. J., Gao, Q., Holzinger, A., Ntoa, S., Rau, P. P., Rogers, W. A., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2457003 · Cited by 54
“…relevant approach is the one of providing the possibility of asking questions of “why” (Pearl, 2019), and this can be further extended to a so-called counterfactual questioning (“what would happen if”) (Guidotti, 2024; Metsch et al., 2024; Prosperi et al., 2020; Roese, 1997; Suffian et al., 2022).”
Counterfactual thinking and psychological distress following recurrent miscarriage
Callander, G., Brown, G. P., Tata, P. R., & Regan, L. (2007) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646830601117241 · Cited by 40
“Counterfactual thoughts are more likely to be generated after traumatic experiences (Taylor & Schneider, 1989) and goal failure (Roese, 1997; Byrne, 2002), with upward, self-referent counterfactuals most commonly generated following negative events (Dalgleish, 2004).”
BackgroundSocial distancing and wellbeing: conceptualizing actor distance and actor safe zone for pandemics
Finsterwalder, J. (2020) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2020.1841753 · Cited by 42
Jung, H., Bae, J., & Kim, H. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.024 · Cited by 41
Choosing remedies after accidents: Counterfactual thoughts and the focus on fixing “human error”
Morris, M. W., Moore, P. C., & Sim, D. L. H. (1999) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03212966 · Cited by 40
Bad is freer than good: Positive-negative asymmetry in attributions of free will.
Feldman, G., Wong, K. F. E., & Baumeister, R. (2016) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.03.005 · Cited by 30
“That conclusion dovetails well with the research on counterfactual thinking: People engage in counterfactual thinking by reflecting on bad actions and bad outcomes, and the benefits of such thinking are derived from thinking about how one could have acted differently (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundModeling Downward Counterfactual Events: Unrealized Disasters and why they Matter
Lin, Y. C., Jenkins, S. F., Chow, J. R., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Earth Science · doi:10.3389/feart.2020.575048 · Cited by 40
“Downward counterfactual thought, an analysis of what might have been worse compared to what has actually transpired, according to experts in psychology, is more challenging than its optimistic foil, upward counterfactual thought, where one reimagines a better outcome than the one that has transpired (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundNatural Experimentation Is a Challenging Method for Identifying Headache Triggers
Houle, T. T., & Turner, D. P. (2013) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.12075 · Cited by 39
Patrick, V. M., Lancellotti, M. P., & Hagtvedt, H. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0119-8 · Cited by 40
“…the extant literature: (1) counterfactual theory that explains how missing an opportunity results in upward counterfactuals (“If only I had done it,” Roese 1997) that have been linked to feelings of regret (Gleicher et al. 1995; Zeelenberg et al. 1998) and, most importantly, can act as a key…”
BackgroundMindfulness Limits Compliance with the That's-Not-AU Technique
Pollock, C. L., Smith, S., Knowles, E. S., & Bruce, H. J. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672982411002 · Cited by 39
“This counterfactual implied that the target was now getting something for less money than the default price (Roese, 1997; Roese & Olson, 1997).”
BackgroundDo Conditional Hypotheses Target Rare Events?
McKenzie, C. R. M., Ferreira, V. S., Mikkelsen, L. A., McDermott, K. J., & Skrable, R. P. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2947 · Cited by 40
“Interestingly, research has shown that people’s counterfactual statements, which are often conditionals (“If only . . . , then . . .”), mention common, not rare, events (for a review, see Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundCoombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2010) · doi:10.1002/9781444314885.ch8 · Cited by 40
A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments for physical eventsPreprint
Gerstenberg, T., Goodman, N. D., Lagnado, D. A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7zj94 · Cited by 40
“It predicts that people use a mental model of the situation to simulate what would have happened in different counterfactual contingencies (Chater & Oaksford, 2013; Gerstenberg, Peterson, et al., 2017; Kahneman & Tversky, 1982; Roese, 1997; Waskan, 2003).”
BackgroundEvaluative stance and counterfactuals in language and literature
Harding, J. R. (2007) · Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics · doi:10.1177/0963947007079109 · Cited by 39
“For helpful overviews of the psychological dimensions of counterfactual thinking, see for examples Landman (1993) and Roese (1997).”
BackgroundCounterfactuals, Control, and Causation
Gilbert, E. A., Tenney, E. R., Holland, C. R., et al. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215572137 · Cited by 39
Relationship Expectations and Relationship Quality
Lemay, E. P., & Venaglia, R. B. (2016) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000066 · Cited by 51
“Research on counterfactual thinking suggests that comparing current circumstances to a more positive alternate reality may motivate people to strive for this reality in the future (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundHagmayer, Y., & Engelmann, N. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01303 · Cited by 38
“Research on counterfactual thinking has provided confirmatory evidence for these predictions (cf. Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundBeyond rationality: Counterfactual thinking and behavior regulation
Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07002634 · Cited by 38
“Most people do not imagine how the world might be different after every event: they tend to think “if only” after something bad happens (Roese 1997).”
Self-citationRegret and the negative evaluation of decision outcomes in major depression
Chase, H. W., Camille, N., Michael, A., Bullmore, E. T., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. (2010) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.10.3.406 · Cited by 40
Hafner, R. J., White, M. P., & Handley, S. J. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.022 · Cited by 39
Kim, J. W., Magnusen, M., & Kim, Y. (2014) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.2013-0084 · Cited by 38
Mental Contrasting and Transfer of Energization
Sevincer, A. T., Busatta, P. D., & Oettingen, G. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213507088 · Cited by 39
It's what's inside that counts: The role of counterfactual content in intention formation
Smallman, R. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.004 · Cited by 44
FairGap: Fairness-Aware Recommendation via Generating Counterfactual Graph
Chen, W., Wu, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhuang, F., He, Z., Xie, R., & Xia, F. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3638352 · Cited by 40
A model of regret, investor behavior, and market turbulence
Qin, J. (2015) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2015.08.010 · Cited by 38
“Regret and Regret Theory According to psychology studies such as Kahneman and Tversky (1982), Kahneman and Miller (1986), Landman (1987b), Landman and Manis (1992), and Roese (1997), regret arises from counterfactual thinking.”
BackgroundThe proximity heuristic in judgments of accident probabilities
Teigen, K. H. (2005) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712605x47431 · Cited by 37
Near‐wins and near‐losses in gambling: A behavioral and facial EMG study
Wu, Y., van Dijk, E., & Clark, L. (2014) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12336 · Cited by 38
“Our design was based upon a “single-shot” game by Wohl and Enzle (2003) in which participants experiencing a near-loss were more likely to bet on a second risky prospect.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSchizophrenia involves impairment in the activation of intentions by counterfactual thinking
Roese, N. J., Park, S., Smallman, R., et al. (2007) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2007.05.006 · Cited by 37
“Counterfactual thinking in healthy individuals is associated with effective problem-solving, behavioral regulation, and performance improvement (Camille et al., 2004; Ursu & Carter, 2005; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEffect of counterfactual and factual thinking on causal judgements
Mandel, D. R. (2003) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780343000231 · Cited by 36
“…and factual thinking have similar effects on causal judgement, contrary to contemporary accounts of the causal judgement process that have emphasised the special role of counterfactual thinking (e.g., Branscombe et al., 1996; Lipe, 1991; Roese, 1997; Roese & Olson, 1995a; Wells & Gavanski, 1989).”
BackgroundResultA palace fit for the future: Desirability in temporal work
Alimadadi, S., Davies, A. C., & Tell, F. (2021) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/14761270211012021 · Cited by 39
Celar, L., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2023) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-023-01407-5 · Cited by 45
Fantasy proneness and counterfactual thinking
Bacon, A. M., Walsh, C. R., & Martin, L. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.023 · Cited by 36
Striatal sensitivity to personal responsibility in a regret-based decision-making task
Camille, N., Pironti, V. A., Dodds, C. M., Aitken, M. R. F., Robbins, T. W., & Clark, L. (2010) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.10.4.460 · Cited by 35
“This phenomenon is known as counterfactual thinking (Roese, 1994, 1997; Zeelenberg, van Dijk, van der Pligt, et al., 1998).”
BackgroundTo Choose or to Reject: The Effect of Decision Frame on Food Customization Decisions
Nagpal, A., Lei, J., & Khare, A. (2015) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2014.12.001 · Cited by 37
Feeling happier when paying more: Dysfunctional counterfactual thinking in consumer affect
Yoon, S., & Vargas, P. T. (2010) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20374 · Cited by 36
“Upward and downward counterfactuals trade off immediate affect and preparation for the future, thus the net effect of CFT appears to be beneficial (Roese, 1997).”
Virtual morality in the helping professions: Simulated action and resilience
Francis, K., Gummerum, M., Ganis, G., Howard, I. S., & Terbeck, S. (2017) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12276 · Cited by 38
Causal judgments about atypical actions are influenced by agents' epistemic states
Kirfel, L., & Lagnado, D. A. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104721 · Cited by 37
Counterfactual thinking as a prebunking strategy to contrast misinformation on COVID-19
Bertolotti, M., & Catellani, P. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104404 · Cited by 40
“One of the processes involved in the persistence of belief in misinformation is counterfactual thinking (Roese, 1997), which allows individuals to uphold factually incorrect beliefs by mentally simulating the conditions under which those false facts could have been true (Effron, 2018).”
BackgroundStupnisky, R. H., Stewart, T. L., Daniels, L. M., et al. (2010) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.06.004 · Cited by 36
Knobe, J. (2009) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.03.009 · Cited by 34
“• The first principle says that people are inclined to consider counterfactuals in which events of statistically unusual types are replaced by events of statistically usual types (Kahneman & Tversky 1982; Roese 1997).”
BackgroundTime to Move On? When Entity Theorists Perform Better Than Incremental Theorists
Park, D., & Kim, S. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215578028 · Cited by 43
“Counterfactual thoughts are typically activated by a failed task, and they specify what might have been done differently to have succeeded in that task (Epstude & Roese, 2008; Markman, Gavanski, Sherman, & McMullen, 1993; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundDuckworth, A. L., & Eskreis-Winkler, L. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.26087-x · Cited by 36
Counterfactual thinking in patients with amnesia
Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2014) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22323 · Cited by 32
“…the normative, predictable changes that people make in nonepisodic CF tasks are also evident for personal past episodes (Kahneman and Tversky, 1982; Roese, 1997; Byrne, 2002), presumably because it is our first-hand experience of our own cognitive response to a similar situation that guides our…”
BackgroundMethod“What’s Up with the Weather?” Public Engagement with Extreme Event Attribution in the United Kingdom
Ettinger, J., Walton, P., Painter, J., Osaka, S., & Otto, F. E. L. (2021) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-20-0155.1 · Cited by 33
“That the counterfactual component of EEA stuck out to participants mirrors decades of research in psychology around the importance of counterfactual thinking—‘‘mental representations of alternatives to the past’’ (Roese 1997, p. 133)—as part of human cognition (Kahneman and Tversky 1982).”
BackgroundGottschalck, N., Branner, K., Rolan, L., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2021) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1080/00472778.2021.2002878 · Cited by 40
“Counterfactual thinking, which corrects past mistakes by developing knowledge structures to avoid repeating those mistakes (Roese, 1997), serves as a learning experience that may help small business owners act differently in similar situations in the future and build their resilience accordingly.”
BackgroundDebiasing NLU Models via Causal Intervention and Counterfactual Reasoning
Tian, B., Cao, Y., Zhang, Y., & Xing, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21389 · Cited by 34
“Counterfactual means “counter to the facts” (Roese 1997), which assigns the “clash of worlds” combination of values to variables.”
BackgroundIt's Better on TV: Does Television Set Teenagers Up for Regret Following Sexual Initiation?
Martino, S. C., Collins, R. L., Elliott, M. N., Kanouse, D. E., & Berry, S. H. (2009) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/4109209 · Cited by 35
Massad, P. M., & Hulsey, T. L. (2006) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/0033-3204.43.2.201 · Cited by 34
Counterfactual thought in reasoning and performance
Smallman, R., & Summerville, A. L. (2018) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12376 · Cited by 35
Temporal and causal order effects in thinking about what might have been
Segura, S., Fernández‐Berrocal, P., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980244000125 · Cited by 35
Hoppen, T. H., Heinz-Fischer, I., & Nexhmedin Morina, B. (2020) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008198.2020.1737453 · Cited by 31
“Several authors have suggested that people should be more likely to engage in upward CFT as opposed to downward CFT after experiencing negative events (Haynes et al., 2007; Kahneman & Miller, 1986; Roese, 1994, 1997; Roese & Olson, 1997).”
BackgroundLiu, Z., Li, L., Liu, S., Sun, Y., Li, S., Yi, M., Zheng, L., & Guo, X. (2020) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa111 · Cited by 35
“In addition, rumination is also associated with counterfactual thinking (Spellman and Mandel, 2010; Epstude and Roese, 2017), the comparison between ‘what is’ and ‘what might have been’ (Roese, 1994, 1997).”
Background“If only” counterfactual thoughts about exceptional actions
Dixon, J., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2011) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0101-4 · Cited by 33
“, “if he’d been driving faster, other people would have been killed as well” (Markman, Gavanski, Sherman & McMullen, 1993; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialLü, P., Yang, H., Li, H., Li, M., & Zhang, Z. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106725 · Cited by 36
Naquin, C. E., & Kurtzberg, T. R. (2003) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.12.001 · Cited by 33
Modelling industrial dynamics with “History-friendly” simulations
Garavaglia, C. (2010) · Structural Change and Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2010.07.001 · Cited by 33
Wang, A. W., Chang, S., Chang, C., Chen, S., Chen, D., Fan, F., Antoni, M. H., & Hsu, W. (2017) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4522 · Cited by 34
“In our study, disturbance related to BCa treatment was a strong independent predictor of regret—in accordance with the view that negative outcomes fuel counterfactual thinking, amplifying experience of regret.(16,30) Failure to take into account treatment‐related disturbances may obscure the relationship between the d…”
ResultLara, K. H., Lagattuta, K. H., & Kramer, H. J. (2017) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12994 · Cited by 32
“; German, 1999; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundLocked Into Gambling: Anticipatory Regret as a Motivator for Playing the National Lottery
Wolfson, S., & Briggs, P. (2002) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1023/a:1014548111740 · Cited by 33
“Upward counterfactuals can serve a very positive function, such as providing an opportunity to learn from a mistake (Roese, 1994) or ‘illuminate a path to success’ (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundCaterson, J., Lewin, A., & Williamson, E. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076241272657 · Cited by 40
“38 This is favourable to allow non-technical audiences to conceptualise unknown modelling processes by associating change of input with output.”
BackgroundHow Far to the Road Not Taken? The Effect of Psychological Distance on Counterfactual Direction
Rim, S., & Summerville, A. L. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213513304 · Cited by 31
Framing effects in justice perceptions: Prospect theory and counterfactuals
Ganegoda, D. B., & Folger, R. G. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.002 · Cited by 40
“Fairness theory and counterfactual thinking Counterfactuals can be defined as ‘‘mental representations of alternatives to the past’’ (Roese, 1997, p. 133).”
BackgroundInfluentialCounterfactual thinking in moral judgment: an experimental study
Migliore, S., Curcio, G., Mancini, F., & Cappa, S. F. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00451 · Cited by 32
“ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 20 May 2014 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00451 Counterfactual thinking in moral judgment: an experimental study”
BackgroundInfluentialGerlach, K. D., Dornblaser, D. W., & Schacter, D. L. (2013) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.779381 · Cited by 37
“People frequently engage in counterfactual think- ing by flexibly reshaping their memory of past events and constructing mental simulations of how past events might have turned out differently (e.g., Byrne, 2005; Epstude & Roese, 2008; Roese, 1997).”
Counterfactual Analysis of Runaway Volcanic Explosions
Aspinall, W. P., & Woo, G. (2019) · Frontiers in Earth Science · doi:10.3389/feart.2019.00222 · Cited by 32
“Psychologists of counterfactual thinking (Roese, 1997) observe that upward counterfactual thoughts are much more common than downward ones.”
Twisted Pair: Counterfactual Thinking and the Hindsight Bias
Roese, N. J. (2004) · doi:10.1002/9780470752937.ch13 · Cited by 33
Self-citationHow Communication “Failed” or “Saved the Day”: Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors
Street, R. L., Petrocelli, J. V., Amroze, A., Bergelt, C., Murphy, M. R., Wieting, J. M., & Mazor, K. M. (2020) · Journal of Patient Experience · doi:10.1177/2374373520925270 · Cited by 31
“Although asking respondents to engage in counter-factual thinking may produce accounts susceptible to hind-sight bias (13), these stories nevertheless represent the reality understood by patients and families regarding the role of communication in contributing to or preventing medical errors.”
BackgroundMolden, D. C. (2012) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00424.x · Cited by 30
“Overall, research on counterfactual thinking has generally suggested that subtractive counterfactuals are more common and that mistaken actions inspire more regret (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Roese, N. J.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roese, Neal J.
- ORCID
- Roese, Neal J.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-148
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W4246855866
- Cited by
- 1,156
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- counterfactual reasoning, counterfactuals, negative affect, contrast effects, causal inference, misfortune, functionalism
- MeSH terms
- Anger, Depression, Humans, Internal-External Control, Motivation, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review