The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Counterfactual thinking.
Abstract
Counterfactuals are mental representations of alternatives to the past and produce consequences that are both beneficial and aversive to the individual. These apparently contradictory effects are integrated in a functionalist model of counterfactual thinking. The author reviews research in support of the assertions that (a) counterfactual thinking is activated automatically in response to negative affect, (b) the content of counterfactuals targets particularly likely causes of misfortune, (c) counterfactuals produce negative affective consequences through a contrast-effect mechanism and positive inferential consequences through a causal-inference mechanism, and (d) the net effect of counterfactual thinking is beneficial.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Labaien et al. generate contrastive explanations for time-series data [141].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
In the citing paper
“On the one hand, visual explanations for non-visual input data (i.e., datasets containing continuous or categorical featurevalue pairs) plot feature-value pair dependencies [134], [141], [142].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 999
Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & Higgins, T. E. (2013) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12015 · Cited by 87
Multiple reference points in investor regret
Lin, C.-H., Huang, W., & Zeelenberg, M. (2006) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2006.03.004 · Cited by 81
“This psychological process of comparing the obtained outcome with other possible outcomes has become known as counterfactual thinking (Roese, 1997).”
InfluentialOn Near Misses and Completed Tasks
Sweeny, K. M., & Vohs, K. D. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611434590 · Cited by 83
“Counterfactual thoughts arise when they instruct future behavior (Baumeister, Vohs, DeWall, & Zhang, 2007; Epstude & Roese, 2008; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundHedonomics: Bridging Decision Research With Happiness Research
Hsee, C. K., Hastie, R., & Chen, J. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00076.x · Cited by 78
The development of children's regret and relief
Weisberg, D., & Beck, S. R. (2011) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.621933 · Cited by 78
Colquitt, J. A., & Chertkoff, J. M. (2002) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630202800502 · Cited by 80
“Drawing onBlau’s (1964)discussion of expectations and research on counterfactual thinking and attributional searches (Roese, 1997; Wong & Weiner, 1981), we predicted that explanations would have the most positive effects following outcomes that were both unfavorable and unexpected.”
BackgroundEffron, D. A. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217746152 · Cited by 79
“For example, negative affect causes counterfactual thought (Roese, 1997); perhaps the cognitive dissonance experienced when facts contradict an appealing falsehood triggers thoughts about how the falsehood could have been true.”
BackgroundCounterfactual conditionals and false belief: a developmental dissociation
Perner, J., Sprung, M., & Steinkogler, B. (2004) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.12.001 · Cited by 79
Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2011) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000039 · Cited by 78
Self-citationAnticipating regret and consumers' preferences for counterfeit luxury products
Chen, J., Teng, L., Liu, S., & Zhu, H. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.012 · Cited by 78
Schwartz, B. (2015) · Positive Psychology in Practice · doi:10.1002/9781118996874.ch8 · Cited by 77
Three in-course assessment reforms to improve higher education learning outcomes
Sadler, D. R. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1064858 · Cited by 87
“The second part of this is known as ‘counterfactual reasoning’, because, although it is valid to think this way, it is essentially hypothetical, being contrary to what actually happened (Roese 1997).”
ResultCounterfactual Vision-and-Language Navigation via Adversarial Path Sampler
Fu, T.-J., Wang, X. E., Peterson, M., Grafton, S. T., Eckstein, M. P., & Wang, W. Y. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58539-6_5 · Cited by 82
“Meanwhile, humans often lack extensive experience with joint access to visual experience and accompanying language instructions for navigating novel or unfamiliar environments, yet the human mind can navigate environments despite this data scarcity by incorporating mechanisms such as counterfactual reasoning [30] and…”
BackgroundThe Real Oscar Curse: The Negative Consequences of Positive Status Shifts
Jensen, M. C., & Kim, H. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0951 · Cited by 75
Higgins, E. T. (2015) · Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0279 · Cited by 74
Regret appraisals, age, and subjective well-being
Jokisaari, M. (2003) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00033-3 · Cited by 76
Theorizing as the Thickness of Thin Abstraction
Folger, R. G., & Turillo, C. J. (1999) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553251 · Cited by 97
Neural activity associated with self, other, and object-based counterfactual thinking
Brigard, F. D., Spreng, R., Mitchell, J. P., & Schacter, D. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.075 · Cited by 59
“Further support for this view comes from studies on another kind of hypothetical thought which, up until very recently, had not received much attention in the cognitive neuroscience of mental simulation: counterfactual thinking, our tendency to think about alternative ways in which things might have occurred in the pa…”
Postdecisional Counterfactual Thinking by Actors and Readers
Girotto, V., Ferrante, D., Pighin, S., & González, M. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01931.x · Cited by 75
“Previous investigations of counterfactual thinking have found that individuals tend to alter exceptional rather than normal events, actions rather than inactions, and controllable rather than uncontrollable events (Roese, 1997), and also prefer to make minimal alterations (Byrne, 2005).”
BackgroundThe Regret Elements Scale: Distinguishing the affective and cognitive components of regret
Buchanan, J., Summerville, A. L., Lehmann, J., & Reb, J. M. (2016) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003107 · Cited by 75
“These thoughts of “what might have been” compare an actual outcome to a hypothetical outcome (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundCounterfactual thinking and decision making
Roese, N. J. (1999) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03212965 · Cited by 71
Self-citationNorm theory and the action-effect: The role of social norms in regret following action and inaction
Feldman, G., & Albarracín, D. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.009 · Cited by 75
“The perception of normality, whether a behavior is normal or abnormal, affects feelings of regret, but what is normal? Normal can be evaluated using several types of normality (Koonce, Miller, & Winchel, 2015), most notably – (1) the extent to which a behavior is similar to past behavior (sometimes referred to as intr…”
BackgroundInfluentialPark, S., & Kim, S. (2021) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/14746 · Cited by 74
“Counterfactual thinking [23] is the act of considering past events that did not happen.”
BackgroundA logic for reasoning about counterfactual emotions
Lorini, E., & Schwarzentruber, F. (2010) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2010.11.022 · Cited by 73
“making process [18], but also in the interaction between users and machines [48].”
BackgroundInfluentialWhat Do Parents Regret About Having Children? Communicating Regrets Online
Moore, J., & Abetz, J. S. (2018) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x18811388 · Cited by 71
Why we forgive what can’t be controlled
Martin, J. W., & Cushman, F. A. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.008 · Cited by 64
“This approach is consistent with a large literature indicating a crucial role for counterfactual representation in causal judgment (Byrne, 2002, 2016; Roese, 1997; Walsh & Sloman, 2011; Wells & Gavanski, 1989), especially when assigning causal responsibility to intentional actions (Lombrozo, 2010).”
ResultNieuwland, M. S. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.018 · Cited by 70
“”), which is pervasive in everyday life (e.g., Byrne, 2002; Kahneman & Miller, 1986; Roese, 1997), and considered one of the”
BackgroundGuilt in Marketing Research: An Elicitation–Consumption Perspective and Research Agenda
Antonetti, P., & Baines, P. R. (2014) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12043 · Cited by 73
The psychological representation of modality
Phillips, J., & Knobe, J. (2018) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12165 · Cited by 68
“Similarly, people almost never undo an outcome by replacing an event that does not involve a physical violations with one that does, for example, “If only Mr. Jones’s car had levitated moments before the accident...” (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialReacting aggressively to injustice at work: a cognitive stage model
Beugré, C. D. (2005) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-005-8265-1 · Cited by 68
Unlucky Victims or Lucky Survivors?
Teigen, K. H., & Jensen, T. K. (2010) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000033 · Cited by 76
Accountability for corporate injustice
Cropanzano, R., Chrobot‐Mason, D., Rupp, D. E., et al. (2004) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.006 · Cited by 69
Wang, X. (2010) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.09.007 · Cited by 80
O’Connor, E., McCormack, T., & Feeney, A. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.002 · Cited by 65
Predicting entrepreneurial intentions through self-efficacy, family support, and regret
Ahmed, I., Islam, T., & Usman, A. (2020) · Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jeee-07-2019-0093 · Cited by 86
When Silence Is Not Golden: Why Acknowledgment Matters Even When Being Excluded
Rudert, S. C., Hales, A. H., Greifeneder, R., & Williams, K. D. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217695554 · Cited by 71
“We believe that this unexpected result might have been due to counterfactual thinking (Roese, 1997): In the rules of the game it was established that half of the members of an apartment complex had to agree with the participant moving in, that is, participants in the two rejections conditions only needed one positive…”
ResultThe aftermath of rash action: Sleep-interfering counterfactual thoughts and emotions.
Schmidt, R. E., & der Linden, M. V. (2009) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0015856 · Cited by 64
Customer's angry voice: Targeting employees or the organization?
McColl‐Kennedy, J. R., Sparks, B., & Nguyen, D. (2010) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.08.004 · Cited by 68
Maximizing and Counterfactual Thinking in Academic Major Decision Making
Leach, J. K., & Patall, E. A. (2013) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/1069072712475178 · Cited by 69
The Psychology of Causal Perception and Reasoning
Danks, D. J. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279739.003.0022 · Cited by 71
“The same dimensions seem to be relevant for which factors are mentioned in the antecedent of spontaneously generated counterfactuals (Byrne 2005; Roese 1997 provide reviews).”
BackgroundGrimes, M. G., & Vogus, T. J. (2021) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877211005780 · Cited by 73
“And when mental simulations draw from first principles, the resulting counterfactuals contrast reality (what is or what was) with a mental image of what might have been or what could be (Gaglio, 2004; Roese, 1997; Sanna, 2000).”
BackgroundLong Ago It Was Meant to Be: The Interplay Between Time, Construal, and Fate Beliefs
Burrus, J. T., & Roese, N. J. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206288282 · Cited by 66
“The term that captures beliefs in the mutability of past events is counterfactual thinking (Mandel, Hilton, & Catellani, 2005; Roese, 1997), and by importing some insights from the counterfactual literature, new light may be shed on the nature of fate beliefs.”
BackgroundSelf-citationMandel, D. R., & Dhami, M. K. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.009 · Cited by 65
“Although there is support for the idea that upward counterfactuals can amplify negative aVect (Roese, 1997), valence-based accounts do not explain how counterfactual thinking may diVerentially inXuence speciWc emotions.”
BackgroundResultOn the counterfactual nature of envy: “It could have been me”
van de Ven, N., & Zeelenberg, M. (2014) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.957657 · Cited by 63
An Explainable Attention Network for Fine-Grained Ship Classification Using Remote-Sensing Images
Xiong, W., Xiong, Z., & Cui, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2022.3162195 · Cited by 72
“The output of the classifier ( · ) is expressed as follows : The essence of the counterfactual based on causal inference is “counter to the facts” [54].”
BackgroundWang, S., Kirillova, K. A., & Lehto, X. Y. (2016) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.12.008 · Cited by 64
Gilovich, T. D., & Kumar, A. (2014) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2014.10.002 · Cited by 65
“A prominent area of research in social psychology has explored the causes and consequences of this sort of counterfactual thinking (Kahneman & Miller, 1986; Markman, Klein, & Suhr, 2009; Medvec, Madey, & Gilovich, 1995; Roese, 1997; Roese & Olson, 1995a, 1995b).”
BackgroundDifferential activation of judgments in employee well‐being
Warr, P. B. (2006) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317905x52652 · Cited by 67
Scenarios and counterfactuals as modal narratives
Booth, C., Rowlinson, M., Clark, P. A., et al. (2008) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.037 · Cited by 64
A survey of barriers to screening for oral cancer among rural Black Americans
Shepperd, J. A., Howell, J. L., & Logan, H. L. (2013) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3415 · Cited by 63
“The probe items asked participants to engage in counterfactual thinking [14]; to imagine another reality, a reality where they had resources or lacked them, or where others recommended screening or did not.”
BackgroundMoral Utility Theory: Understanding the motivation to behave (un)ethically
Hirsh, J. B., Lu, J. G., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.10.002 · Cited by 67
“Experiences of moral error are highly aversive, compelling regret and negative self-focused attention (Roese, 1997).”
Otten, S., & Wentura, D. (1999) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199912)29:8 · Cited by 205
You Think Failure Is Hard? So Is Learning From It
Eskreis-Winkler, L., & Fishbach, A. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211059817 · Cited by 71
“Counterfactual thinking, more broadly, is a cognitive tool to imagine how things might have turned out better (Byrne, 2005, 2016; Epstude & Roese, 2008; FitzGibbon et al., 2021; Kahneman & Miller, 1986; Miller et al., 1990; Roese, 1997; Roese & Epstude, 2017; Summerville, 2011).”
BackgroundYoung, L., & Phillips, J. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.004 · Cited by 66
“When we judge an agent to have acted immorally, we are subsequently more likely to judge the agent to have caused the bad outcome (Alicke, 2000; Cushman, Knobe, & SinnottArmstrong, 2008; Hitchcock & Knobe, 2009; Knobe & Fraser, 2008), to have acted with knowledge and intent (Beebe & Buckwalter, 2010; Knobe, 2003), to…”
BackgroundCounterfactual thinking and regulatory fit
Markman, K. D., McMullen, M. N., Elizaga, R. A., & Mizoguchi, N. (2006) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s193029750000231x · Cited by 60
“This phenomenon — termed “counterfactual thinking” — has generated a great deal of interest over the past 25 years (for reviews, see Miller, Turnbull, & McFarland, 1990; Roese, 1997; Mandel, Hilton, & Catellani, 2005).”
InfluentialFaul, L., Jacques, P. L. S., DeRosa, J. T., Parikh, N., & Brigard, F. D. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116843 · Cited by 55
“Negative AMs were chosen since they are more likely to promote CFT (Roese, 1997), and we de fi ned them as events associated with negative valence at the time in which they occurred.”
Executive control and the experience of regret
Burns, P., Riggs, K. J., & Beck, S. R. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.003 · Cited by 58
The immorality of illegal downloading: The role of anticipated guilt and general emotions
Wang, X., & McClung, S. R. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.021 · Cited by 59
Prefactual Thoughts: Mental Simulations about What Might Happen
Epstude, K., Scholl, A., & Roese, N. J. (2016) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000064 · Cited by 60
“, & Roese, N. J. (2011). Regrets of the typical American:”
BackgroundSelf-citationThinking about threats: Memory and prospection in human threat management
Bulley, A., Henry, J. D., & Suddendorf, T. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.005 · Cited by 53
“…not only enables informational elements to be combined to construct novel future events, but also to construct novel counterfactual simulations of alternative histories using if-then conditionals (Barbey, Krueger, Grafman, & Bar, 2011; Roese, 1997; Schacter, Benoit, De Brigard, & Szpunar, 2015).”
BackgroundFeedback-conditional regret theory and testing regret-aversion in risky choice
Humphrey, S. J. (2003) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2003.09.004 · Cited by 58
When the alternative would have been better: Counterfactual reasoning and the emergence of regret
Rafetseder, E., & Perner, J. (2011) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.619744 · Cited by 58
“…between counterfactual reasoning and the feeling of regret (Gleicher et al., 1990; Kahneman & Miller, 1986; Kahneman & Tversky, 1982; Landman, 1987; Roese, 1997; Wells & Gavanski, 1989) as well as the cognitive processes and their neural bases that underlie regret (Camille et al., 2004; Coricelli…”
BackgroundMaking Sense of Failure: A Motivated Model of Hindsight Bias
Pezzo, M. V., & Pezzo, S. P. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.147 · Cited by 57
“Cognitive theorists hold that the human memory system is not so much designed to accurately reconstruct the past as it is to make sense of it in order to better anticipate the future (Roese, 1997; Wilson, Gilbert, & Centerbar, 2003).”
Competitive Sensemaking in Value Creation and Capture
Cattani, G., Sands, D. B., Porac, J., & Greenberg, J. (2018) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2018.0069 · Cited by 64
“In this view, to be plausible, counterfactual reasoning should re fl ect small deviations from reality, and, in fact, it has been demonstrated that counterfactuals are often used to renormalize deviations from normality (Roese 1997).”
Bailey, L. D., & McKeever, W. F. (2004) · Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13576500342000013 · Cited by 55
Investor reactions to derivative use and outcomes
Koonce, L. L., Lipe, M. G., & McAnally, M. L. (2007) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-007-9058-8 · Cited by 56
Z*-numbers: Augmented Z-numbers for machine-subjectivity representation
Banerjee, R., & Pal, S. K. (2015) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2015.06.026 · Cited by 60
“Sense of agency: Free will [31], being in charge of our own actions and destinies, and engage in counterfactual thinking [71, 28].”
BackgroundRegulatory Focus in a Demanding World
Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444318111.ch13 · Cited by 63
de Bruin, W. B., Dombrovski, A. Y., Parker, A. M., & Szántó, K. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1882 · Cited by 59
“Such “if only…” counterfactual thinking can help to generate strategies for improving future decisions (Roese, 1997) but can also produce crippling levels of self-blame (Davis, Lehman, Silver, Wortman, & Ellard, 1996).”
BackgroundRoese, N. J., & Maniar, S. D. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672972312002 · Cited by 55
Self-citationAttributions of responsibility and affective reactions to decision outcomes
Zeelenberg, M., van der Pligt, J., & de Vries, N. K. (2000) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00034-2 · Cited by 53
“…the claim that these mental mutations, or ``counterfactual thoughts,'' in¯uence post-decisional a ective reactions (Kahneman & Miller, 1986; Roese, 1997; Zeelenberg et al., 1998b), to our knowledge only one study tested whether these mutations are an important determinant of the actor-e…”
BackgroundThe paradox of social interaction: Shared intentionality, we-reasoning, and virtual bargaining.
Chater, N., Zeitoun, H., & Melkonyan, T. (2022) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000343 · Cited by 66
“19 A fruitful line of future research is to consider principles of counterfactual or hypothetical thinking observed in other domains, whether hypothetical reasoning about the physical world, or about individual behavior (Byrne, 2005; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundReb, J. M., & Connolly, T. (2010) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930903512168 · Cited by 52
“(For an introduction to the counterfactual thinking literature see, e.g., Mandel, Hilton, & Catellani, 2005; Roese, 1997.”
BackgroundWang, H., Liang, W. G., Shen, J., Gool, L. V., & Wang, W. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01503 · Cited by 57
“Thinking about alternative possibilities for past or future events is central to human thinking [62].”
BackgroundTowards Data-And Knowledge-Driven AI: A Survey on Neuro-Symbolic Computing
Wang, W., Yang, Y., & Wu, F. Q. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3483273 · Cited by 126
“…we hold onto the metacognitive capabilities of human beings, such as productivity, systematicity, compositionality and inferential coherence of mental thought [8], causal and counterfactual thinking [262], deductive reasoning [263], interpretability[6],[54],etc.,aswellastheirextensive,dailyuse.”
Moore, D. A. (1999) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2828 · Cited by 51
Teigen, K. H. (1998) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/135467898394193 · Cited by 51
Canceling updating in the comprehension of counterfactuals embedded in narratives
de Vega, M., Urrutia, M., & Riffo, B. (2007) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193611 · Cited by 50
“The reasoning and social psychology literature provides wide evidence of the psychological functions of counterfactual thinking (see Byrne, 2002, 2005; Roese, 1997, 2005).”
BackgroundThe Making of Might-Have-Beens
Alquist, J. L., Ainsworth, S. E., Baumeister, R. F., et al. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214563673 · Cited by 49
“A large body of research has shown that some situations invite counterfactual thinking more than others (Gavanski & Wells, 1989; Girotto, Legrenzi, & Rizzo, 1991; Johnson, 1986; Kahneman & Miller, 1986; Kahneman & Varey, 1990; Markman, Gavanski, Sherman, & McMullen, 1995; Meyers-Levy & Maheswaran, 1992; Miller & Gunas…”
Auguste, M., Mestre, N. C., Rocha, T. L., Cardoso, C., Cueff‐Gauchard, V., Bloa, S. L., Cambon‐Bonavita, M., Shillito, B., Zbinden, M., Ravaux, J., et al. (2016) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.03.024 · Cited by 48
Counterfactual Thinking and Self-Motives
Sanna, L. J., Chang, E. C., & Meier, S. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167201278009 · Cited by 51
Yu, R., & Zhou, X. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21034 · Cited by 55
“In the present study, participants could perceive the averted win as a loss and the averted loss as a win because of counterfactual comparison (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundEmotion Regulation and Performance
Jones, M. V. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199731763.013.0008 · Cited by 61
Gilbar, O., Plivazky, N., & Gil, S. (2010) · Journal of Loss and Trauma · doi:10.1080/15325020903382350 · Cited by 52
Park, J., & Hill, W. T. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.036 · Cited by 53
“Regret was chosen as the emotion of interest for several reasons: a) it has relatively clear cognitive dimensions (Roese, 1997), b) it is found to be swayed by the justification of a decision (Kahneman & Tversky, 1982), and c) it is influenced by cognitive effort (Park, Hill, & Bonds-Raacke, 2015).”
BackgroundOughton, E. J., Ralph, D., Pant, R., Leverett, É., Copic, J., Thacker, S., Dada, R., Ruffle, S., Tuveson, M., & Hall, J. W. (2019) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13291 · Cited by 53
de Bruin, W. B., Parker, A. M., & Strough, J. (2016) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000073 · Cited by 53
If only I hadn't smoked: The impact of counterfactual thinking on a smoking‐related behavior
Page, C. M., & Colby, P. M. (2003) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.10104 · Cited by 50
Kane, J., Leaf Van Boven, A., & McGraw, A. P. (2012) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1866 · Cited by 49
“Counterfactual thoughts occur within a very narrow range constrained by historical events (Kahneman & Miller, 1986; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundAntonetti, P., Baines, P. R., & Walker, L. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2015.1031266 · Cited by 50
“The consequences of negative emotional experience, irrespective of the specific emotion triggered, include (1) a heightened awareness of the issues presented and increased knowledge of the consequences of personal behaviour, (2) a change in beliefs caused by the understanding that certain if-then rules of potential be…”
BackgroundCHAPTER 4 A Psychological Advantage for the Status Quo
Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.004 · Cited by 48
The trajectory of counterfactual simulation in development.
Kominsky, J. F., Gerstenberg, T., Pelz, M. C., Sheskin, M., Singmann, H., Schulz, L., & Keil, F. C. (2021) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0001140 · Cited by 51
“…ability to consider counterfactual possibilities underlies the emotions of regret and relief (Beck et al., 2014; McCormack et al., 2016; O’Connor et al., 2012), and it has been argued that counterfactual reasoning is critical for learning, inference, and decision-making (Pearl, 2000; Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundModelling and prioritizing the factors for online apparel return using BWM approach
Kaushik, V., Kumar, A., Gupta, H., et al. (2020) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-020-09406-3 · Cited by 49
Myopic regret avoidance: Feedback avoidance and learning in repeated decision making
Reb, J. M., & Connolly, T. (2009) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.002 · Cited by 53
“A similar dilemma between short-term and long-term effects has been discussed in the closely related counterfactual thinking literature (e.g., Roese, 1997; Roese & Olson, 1995).”
BackgroundGiguère, B., Lalonde, R. N., & Taylor, D. M. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214521836 · Cited by 51
“…to this appraisal is the process of counterfactual thinking (Niedenthal, Tangney, & Gavanski, 1994), which occurs when individuals reflect on how a past event, particularly one that is non-normative, might have otherwise unfolded had some perceived causal factors been different (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialPerceived psychological contract fulfillment and job attitudes among repatriates
Chi, S.-C. S., & Chen, S. (2007) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/01437720710820008 · Cited by 49
“More recently, Roese (1997) proposes two directions of counterfactual thinking: upward and downward.”
BackgroundDo the right thing: The assumption of optimality in lay decision theory and causal judgment
Johnson, S. G. B., & Rips, L. J. (2015) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.01.003 · Cited by 42
“, Mandel & Lehman, 1996), and on some accounts, the primary function of counterfactual reasoning is to elicit corrective thinking in response to negative episodes (Roese, 1997).”
BackgroundAlmost Thinking Counterfactually: Children’s Understanding of Close Counterfactuals
Beck, S. R., & Guthrie, C. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01590.x · Cited by 44
Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2006) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2005.12.004 · Cited by 47
“If Only I Had Done Better”: Perfectionism and the Functionality of Counterfactual Thinking
Sirois, F. M., Monforton, J., & Simpson, M. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210387614 · Cited by 47
“Despite the consistent finding that thoughts about what might have been can make us feel worse as we ponder what could have occurred to improve an outcome but did not (Roese, 1997), upward counterfactuals are generally viewed as being functional (Roese, 1997).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Roese, N. J.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roese, Neal J.
- ORCID
- Roese, Neal J.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-148
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W4246855866
- Cited by
- 1,156
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- counterfactual reasoning, counterfactuals, negative affect, contrast effects, causal inference, misfortune, functionalism
- MeSH terms
- Anger, Depression, Humans, Internal-External Control, Motivation, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review