Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails.

Frost, Ram·1998·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

A strong phonological theory of reading is proposed and discussed. The first claim of this article is that current debates on word recognition are often based on different axioms regarding the cognitive structures of the mental lexicon rather than conflicting empirical evidence. These axioms lead to different interpretations of the same data. It is argued that once the implicit axioms of competing theories in visual word recognition are explicated, a strong phonological model presents a viable and coherent approach. The assumptions underlying a strong phonological theory of reading are outlined, and 4 theoretical questions are examined: Is phonological recoding a mandatory phase of print processing? Is phonology necessary for lexical access? Is phonology necessary for accessing meaning? How can phonology be derived from orthographic structure? These issues are integrated into a general theory that is constrained by all of the findings.

Cites (9)

  1. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
    Plaut, David C., McClelland, James L., Seidenberg, Mark S., Patterson, Karalyn · 1996 · Psychological Review
  2. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.
    Coltheart, Max, Curtis, Brent, Atkins, Paul, Haller, Micheal · 1993 · Psychological Review
  3. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material
    Reicher, Gerald M. · 1969 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
  4. Lexical access and naming time
    Forster, Kenneth I., Chambers, Susan M. · 1973 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
  5. The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.
    Glushko, Robert J. · 1979 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
  6. A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading
    van Orden, Guy C. · 1987 · Memory & Cognition
  7. The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography.
    Treiman, Rebecca, Mullennix, John, Bijeljac-Babic, Ranka, Richmond-Welty, E. Daylene · 1995 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  8. Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading.
    Coltheart, Max, Rastle, Kathleen · 1994 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
  9. Visual detection of line segments: an object-superiority effect
    Weisstein, Naomi, Harris, Charles S. · 1974 · Science

Show all 9 references

Cited by (26)

  1. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.
    Coltheart, Max, Rastle, Kathleen, Perry, Conrad, Langdon, Robyn, Ziegler, Johannes · 2001 · Psychological Review
  2. Reading Acquisition, Developmental Dyslexia, and Skilled Reading Across Languages: A Psycholinguistic Grain Size Theory.
    Ziegler, Johannes C., Goswami, Usha · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?
    Vellutino, Frank R., Fletcher, Jack M., Snowling, Margaret J., Scanlon, Donna M. · 2004 · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  4. On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography.
    Share, David L. · 2008 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading
    Rayner, Keith, Foorman, Barbara R., Perfetti, Charles A., Pesetsky, David, Seidenberg, Mark S. · 2001 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest

See all 694

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.123.1.71
The paper
Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.123.1.71

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.