The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological motives and political orientation--The left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003).
Abstract
Presenting an impressive model based on a large body of evidence, J. T. Jost, J. Glaser, A.W. Kruglanski, and F. J. Sulloway (2003) proposed that political conservatism uniquely serves epistemic, existential, and ideological needs driven by fears and uncertainties. The authors offer an alternative view based on conceptual considerations, historical events, features of communist ideology and practice, and additional social science research not reviewed by Jost et al. (2003). First, the authors take issue with Jost et al.'s (2003) description of the two core components of political conservatism. Second, they propose that the motives in the model are equally well served by rigid adherence to any extreme ideology regardless of whether it is right wing or left wing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 21×
“Jost et al. (2003) stated that " rigidity and closed-mindedness were consistently associated more with conservative thinking styles than with their alternatives " (p. 352).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.
Greenwald, A. G. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.7.603 · Cited by 1,942
Toward a self‐evaluation maintenance model of social behavior
Tesser, A. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60227-0 · Cited by 1,878
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60328-7 · Cited by 1,296
Self-citation
Cited by
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · Cited by 3,173
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 · Cited by 2,125
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650
Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories
van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Pollet, T. V. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614567356 · Cited by 626
Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12337 · Cited by 491
Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America
Noel, H. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139814775 · Cited by 365
A Function of Form: Terror Management and Structuring the Social World.
Landau, M. J., Johns, M., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Martens, A., Goldenberg, J. L., & Solomon, S. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.190 · Cited by 275
Hennes, E. P., Nam, H. H., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2012) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669 · Cited by 245
Death Goes to the Polls: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Effects on Political Attitudes
Burke, B. L., Kosloff, S., & Landau, M. J. (2013) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12005 · Cited by 209
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2009) · Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.015 · Cited by 207
Motivated Closed‐Mindedness Mediates the Effect of Threat on Political Conservatism
Thórisdóttir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2011) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00840.x · Cited by 202
Metacognitive Failure as a Feature of Those Holding Radical Beliefs
Rollwage, M., Dolan, R. J., & Fleming, S. M. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.053 · Cited by 193
The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies: theory, evidence, and future directions
Zmigrod, L. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.016 · Cited by 162
Toner, K., Leary, M. R., Asher, M. W., & Jongman-Sereno, K. P. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613494848 · Cited by 141
Nisbet, E. C., Hart, P. S., Myers, T., & Ellithorpe, M. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12040 · Cited by 137
Emotional Responses to the Charlie Hebdo Attacks: Addressing the Authoritarianism Puzzle
Vasilopoulos, P., Marcus, G. E., & Foucault, M. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12439 · Cited by 137
Krouwel, A., Kutiyski, Y., van Prooijen, J.-W., Martinsson, J., & Markstedt, E. (2017) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v5i2.745 · Cited by 137
“Even though there are substantial differences between these ideologies, political psychologists have noted that extreme left- and right-wing ideologies may share a similar underlying psychological pattern (Greenberg & Jonas, 2003).”
InfluentialThe authoritarian-conservatism nexus
Nilsson, A., & Jost, J. T. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.003 · Cited by 101
Dogmatism manifests in lowered information search under uncertainty
Schulz, L., Rollwage, M., Dolan, R. J., & Fleming, S. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2009641117 · Cited by 76
Vail III, K. E., Arndt, J., Motyl, M., & Pyszczynski, T. (2009) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01190.x · Cited by 38
Deep Alignment with Country Shrinks the Moral Gap Between Conservatives and Liberals
Talaifar, S., & Swann, W. B. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12534 · Cited by 23
Vail, K. E., Courtney, E., & Arndt, J. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12579 · Cited by 23
What’s Not to Like? Facebook Page Likes Reveal Limited Polarization in Lifestyle Preferences
Praet, S., Guess, A. M., Tucker, J. A., Bonneau, R., & Nagler, J. (2022) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2021.1994066 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 376-382
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W1964916112
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 29.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
