The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural priming: A critical review.
Open accessAbstract
Repetition is a central phenomenon of behavior, and researchers have made extensive use of it to illuminate psychological functioning. In the language sciences, a ubiquitous form of such repetition is structural priming, a tendency to repeat or better process a current sentence because of its structural similarity to a previously experienced ("prime") sentence (J. K. Bock, 1986). The recent explosion of research in structural priming has made it the dominant means of investigating the processes involved in the production (and increasingly, comprehension) of complex expressions such as sentences. This review considers its implications for the representation of syntax and the mechanisms of production and comprehension and their relationship. It then addresses the potential functions of structural priming, before turning to its implications for first language acquisition, bilingualism, and aphasia. The authors close with theoretical and empirical recommendations for future investigations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“There is also laboratory evidence for syntactic priming, with speakers’ likelihood of using a given structure increasing after recent experience of that structure. This holds in particular for relatively infrequent structures”
From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Pickering & Ferreira, 2008
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These encoding mechanisms can be facilitated by priming effects from the student's own previous performances as well by the lexical items and syntactic constructions in their partner's speech (McDonough & Trofimovich, 2009;Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
From TASK REPETITION AND SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH PROCESSING (2017) · cites this paper as Pickering & Ferreira, 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
The interaction of TIGIT with PVR and PVRL2 inhibits human NK cell cytotoxicity
Stanietsky, N., Simic, H., Arapovic, J., Toporik, A., Levy, O., Novik, A., Levine, Z., Beiman, M., Dassa, L., Achdout, H., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0903474106 · Cited by 3,524
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000056 · Cited by 2,678
Self-citationThe functions of structural priming
Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, K. (2006) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960600824609 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 201
- Altmann GTM, Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition. 1999;73:247–264. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00059-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Arai M, Van Gompel RPG, Scheepers C. Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology. 2007;54:218–250. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Barr DJ. Establishing conventional communication systems: Is common knowledge necessary? Cognitive Science. 2004;28:937–962. [Google Scholar]
- Bates E, MacWhinney B. Functionalist approaches to grammar. In: Wanner E, Gleitman LR, editors. Language acquisition: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. pp. 173–218. [Google Scholar]
- Berndt RS. Sentence production. In: Rapp B, editor. The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind. New York: Psychology Press; 2001. pp. 375–396. [Google Scholar]
- Bernolet S, Hartsuiker RJ, Pickering MJ. Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2007;33:931–949. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Bever TG, McElree B. Empty categories access their antecedent during comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry. 1988;19:35–43. [Google Scholar]
- Biber D. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Bock JK. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology. 1986;18:355–387. [Google Scholar]
- Bock JK. Coordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In: Ellis A, editor. Progress in the psychology of language. Vol. 3. London: Erlbaum; 1987. pp. 337–390. [Google Scholar]
- Bock K. Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition. 1989;31:163–186. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90022-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Bock K. Structure in language: Creating form in talk. American Psychologist. 1990;11:1221–1236. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.45.11.1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Bock K, Dell GS, Chang F, Onishi KH. Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition. 2007;104:437–458. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Bock K, Griffin ZM. The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental: General. 2000;129:177–192. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.2.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- Bock JK, Kroch AS. The isolability of syntactic processing. In: Carlson GN, Tanenhaus MK, editors. Linguistic structure in language processing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer; 1989. pp. 157–196. [Google Scholar]
- Bock K, Loebell H. Framing sentences. Cognition. 1990;35:1–39. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90035-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Bock K, Loebell H, Morey R. From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review. 1992;99:150–171. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Branigan HP, McLean JF, Jones MW. A blue cat or a cat that is blue? Evidence for abstract syntax in young children’s noun phrases. In: Brugos A, Clark-Cotton MR, Ha S, editors. The proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University conference on language development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press; 2005. pp. 109–121. [Google Scholar]
- Branigan HP, Pickering MJ, Cleland AA. Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1999;6:635–640. doi: 10.3758/bf03212972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Branigan HP, Pickering MJ, Cleland AA. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition. 2000a;75:B13–B25. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00081-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Branigan HP, Pickering MJ, Liversedge SP, Stewart AJ, Urbach TP. Syntactic priming – Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1995;24:489–506. [Google Scholar]
- Branigan HP, Pickering MJ, McLean JF. Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2005;31:468–481. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Branigan HP, Pickering MJ, McLean JF, Cleland AA. Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue. Cognition. 2007;104:163–197. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Branigan HP, Pickering MJ, McLean JF, Stewart AJ. The role of global and local syntactic structure in language production: Evidence from syntactic priming. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2006;21:974–1010. [Google Scholar]
- Branigan HP, Pickering MJ, Stewart AJ, McLean JF. Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference. Memory & Cognition. 2000b;28:1297–1302. doi: 10.3758/bf03211830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Branigan HP, Pickering MJ, Tanaka M. Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua. 2008;118:172–189. [Google Scholar]
- Brennan SE, Clark HH. Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1996;22:1482–1493. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.6.1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Bresnan J, Kaplan RM. Introduction: Grammars as mental representations of language. In: Bresnan J, editor. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1982. pp. xvii–lii. [Google Scholar]
- Brooks PJ, Tomasello M. Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology. 1999;35:29–44. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.1.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Bühler K. Sprachtheorie. Jena, Germany: Fischer Verlag; 1934. [Google Scholar]
- Cameron R, Flores-Ferrán N. Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context. 2004;1:41–65. [Google Scholar]
- Caramazza A, Hillis AE. Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature. 1991;349:788–790. doi: 10.1038/349788a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Carey PW, Mehler J, Bever TG. Judging the veracity of ambiguous sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1970;9:243–254. [Google Scholar]
- Carlson K. The effects of parallelism and prosody in the processing of gapping structures. Language and Speech. 2001;44:1–26. doi: 10.1177/00238309010440010101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Chambers CG, Smyth R. Structural parallelism and discourse coherence: A test of centering theory. Journal of Memory and Language. 1998;39:593–608. [Google Scholar]
- Chang F. Symbolically speaking: A connectionist model of sentence production. Cognitive Science. 2002;26:609–651. [Google Scholar]
- Chang F, Bock JK, Goldberg A. Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? Cognition. 2003;90:29–49. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00123-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Chang F, Dell GS, Bock K. Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review. 2006;113:234–272. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- Chang F, Dell GS, Bock JK, Griffin ZM. Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2000;29:217–229. doi: 10.1023/a:1005101313330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Chomsky N. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris; 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Chomsky N. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger; 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Christianson K, Hollingworth A, Halliwell JF, Ferreira F. Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology. 2001;42:368–407. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- Christianson K, Ferreira F. Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word-order language (Odawa) Cognition. 2005;98:105–135. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Clark E. The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In: MacWhinney B, editor. Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1987. pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
- Clark HH. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Cleland AA, Pickering MJ. The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language. 2003;49:214–230. [Google Scholar]
- Cleland AA, Pickering MJ. Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations? Journal of Memory and Language. 2006;54:185–198. [Google Scholar]
- Corley M, Scheepers C. Syntactic priming in English sentence production: Categorical and latency evidence from an internet-based study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2002;9:126–131. doi: 10.3758/bf03196267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Culicover PW, Jackendoff R. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Cuetos F, Mitchell DC. Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition. 1988;30:73–105. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Cuetos F, Mitchell DC, Corley MMB. Parsing in different languages. In: Carreiras M, Garca-Albea J, Sabastian-Galles N, editors. Language processing in Spanish. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1996. pp. 145–187. [Google Scholar]
- Desmet T, Declercq M. Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information. Journal of Memory and Language. 2006;54:610–632. [Google Scholar]
- Deutsch A, Bentin S. Attention mechanisms mediate the syntactic priming effect in auditory word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1994;34:595–607. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.3.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Dooling DJ. Rhythm and syntax in sentence perception. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1974;13:255–264. [Google Scholar]
- Estes Z. Attributive and relational processes in nominal combination. Journal of Memory and Language. 2003;48:299–349. [Google Scholar]
- Estes Z, Jones LL. Priming via relational similarity: A copper horse is faster when seen through a glass eye. Journal of Memory and Language. 2006;55:89–101. [Google Scholar]
- Estival D. Syntactic priming of the passive in English. Text. 1985;5:7–21. [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira F, Clifton C. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language. 1986;25:348–368. [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira VS. The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying ‘that’ is not saying ‘that’ at all. Journal of Memory and Language. 2003;48:379–398. [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira VS, Bock JK, Wilson M, Cohen NJ. Structural persistence in anterograde amnesia: Evidence for implicit learning. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society; Toronto, Canada. 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Fisher C. The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: A reply to Tomasello (2000) Cognition. 2002;82:259–278. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Fodor JA, Bever TG, Garrett MF. The psychology of language. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Ford M. Sentence planning units: Implications for the speaker’s representation of meaningful relations underlying sentences. In: Bresnan J, editor. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1982. pp. 797–827. [Google Scholar]
- Ford M, Holmes VM. Planning units and syntax in sentence production. Cognition. 1978;6:35–53. [Google Scholar]
- Fox Tree JE, Meijer PJA. Building syntactic structure in speaking. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1999;28:71–90. doi: 10.1023/a:1023239604158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Frazier L. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In: Coltheart M, editor. Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum; 1987. pp. 559–586. [Google Scholar]
- Frazier L, Fodor JD. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition. 1978;6:291–325. [Google Scholar]
- Frazier L, Munn A, Clifton C., Jr Processing coordinate structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2000;29:343–371. doi: 10.1023/a:1005156427600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Frazier L, Rayner K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology. 1982;14:178–210. [Google Scholar]
- Frazier L, Taft L, Clifton C, Roeper T, Ehrlich K. Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension. Memory & Cognition. 1984;12:421–430. doi: 10.3758/bf03198303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Frisch S, beim Graben P, Schlesewsky M. Parallelizing grammatical functions: P600 and P345 reflect different costs of reanalysis. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos. 2004;14:531–549. [Google Scholar]
- Gagné CL. Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2001;27:236–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gagné CL. Lexical and relational influences on the processing of novel compounds. Brain and Language. 2002;81:723–735. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Gagné CL, Shoben EJ. Priming relations in ambiguous noun-noun combinations. Memory & Cognition. 2002;30:637–646. doi: 10.3758/bf03194965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Gagné CL, Spalding TL, Ji H. Re-examining evidence for the use of independent relational representations during conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language. 2005;53:445–455. [Google Scholar]
- Galantucci B. An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science. 2005;29:737–767. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Garrett MF. The analysis of sentence production. In: Bower GH, editor. The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press; 1975. pp. 133–177. [Google Scholar]
- Garrod S, Anderson A. Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition. 1987;27:181–218. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90018-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Garrod S, Clark A. The development of dialogue co-ordination skills in schoolchildren. Language and Cognitive Processes. 1993;8:101–126. [Google Scholar]
- Garrod S, Doherty G. Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition. 1994;53:181–215. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90048-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Garrod S, Pickering MJ. Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004;8:8–11. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- Gazdar G, Klein E, Pullum G, Sag I. Generalized phrase structure grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Giles H, Coupland N, Coupland J. Accomodation theory: Communication, context and consequences. In: Giles H, Coupland J, Coupland N, editors. Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. pp. 1–68. [Google Scholar]
- Goldberg AE. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Gollan TH, Kroll JF. The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind/brain. Hove, England: Psychology Press; 2001. Bilingual lexical access; pp. 321–345. [Google Scholar]
- Gries STh. Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2005;34:365–399. doi: 10.1007/s10936-005-6139-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Griffin ZM, Weinstein-Tull J. Conceptual structure modulates structural priming in the production of complex sentences. Journal of Memory and Language. 2003;49:537–555. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Grober EH, Beardsley W, Caramazza A. Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment. Cognition. 1978;6:117–133. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(78)90018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Hare ML, Goldberg AE. Structural priming: Purely syntactic? In: Hahn M, Stones SC, editors. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1999. pp. 208–11. [Google Scholar]
- Hartsuiker RJ, Bernolet S, Schoonbaert S, Speybroeck S, Vanderelst D. Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language in press. [Google Scholar]
- Hartsuiker RJ, Kolk HHJ. Syntactic facilitation in agrammatic sentence production. Brain and Language. 1998a;62:221–254. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Hartsuiker RJ, Kolk HHJ. Syntactic persistence in Dutch. Language and Speech. 1998b;41:143–184. doi: 10.1177/002383099804100202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Hartsuiker RJ, Kolk HHJ, Huiskamp P. Priming word order in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1999;52A:129–147. [Google Scholar]
- Hartsuiker RJ, Pickering MJ. Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta Psychologica. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.005. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Hartsuiker RJ, Pickering MJ, Veltkamp E. Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science. 2004;15:409–414. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Hartsuiker RJ, Westenberg C. Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition. 2000;75:B27–B39. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00080-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Haywood S, Pickering MJ, Branigan HP. Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue? Psychological Science. 2005;16:362–366. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Heydel M, Murray WS. Conceptual effects in sentence priming: A crosslinguistic perspective. In: De Vincenzi M, Lombardo V, editors. Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer; 2000. pp. 227–254. [Google Scholar]
- Hirsh-Pasek K, Golinkoff RM. The origins of grammar: Evidence from early language comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Huttenlocher J, Vasilyeva M, Shimpi P. Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language. 2004;50:182–195. [Google Scholar]
- Jackendoff RS. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson JS, Newport EL. Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology. 1989;21:60–99. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- Johnson-Laird PN. Mental Models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Kantola L, Van Gompel RPG. Between- and within-language priming is the same: Evidence for shared bilingual syntactic representations. 2008 doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0016-5. Unpublished manuscript. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Kaschak MP. What this construction needs is generalized. Memory & Cognition. 2006;34:368–379. doi: 10.3758/bf03193414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Kaschak MP. Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition. 2007;35:925–937. doi: 10.3758/bf03193466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Kaschak MP, Borregine KL. Is long-term structural priming affected by patterns of experience with individual verbs? Journal of Memory and Language. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.002. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Kaschak MP, Glenberg AM. This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2004;133:450–467. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Kaschak MP, Loney RA, Borregine KL. Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming. Cognition. 2006;99:B73–B82. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Kempen G. Conceptualizing and formulating in sentence production. In: Rosenberg S, editor. Sentence production: Developments in research and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1977. pp. 259–274. [Google Scholar]
- Kroch A. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change. 1989;1:199–244. [Google Scholar]
- Lambrecht K. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Lashley KS. The problem of serial order in behavior. In: Jeffress LA, editor. Cerebral mechanisms in behavior. New York: Wiley; 1951. pp. 112–136. [Google Scholar]
- Ledoux K, Traxler MJ, Swaab TY. Syntactic priming in comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychological Science. 2007;18:135–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01863.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Leech R, Mareschal D, Cooper RP. Analogy as relational priming: A developmental and computational perspective on the origins of a complex cognitive skill. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X08004469. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Levelt WJM. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Levelt WJM, Kelter S. Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology. 1982;14:78–106. [Google Scholar]
- Levelt WJM, Roelofs A, Meyer AS. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1999;22:1–75. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99001776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Loebell H, Bock K. Structural priming across languages. Linguistics. 2003;41:791–824. [Google Scholar]
- Luka BJ, Barsalou LW. Structural facilitation: Mere exposure effects for grammatical acceptability as evidence for syntactic priming in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 2005;52:436–459. [Google Scholar]
- McClelland JL, St John M, Taraban R. Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach. Language and Cognitive Processes. 1989;4:287–335. [Google Scholar]
- MacDonald MC, Pearlmutter NJ, Seidenberg MS. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review. 1994;101:676–703. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- McDonough K. Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 2006;28:179–207. [Google Scholar]
- McNamara TP. Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. Hove, England: Psychology Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Meeuwissen M, Roelofs A, Levelt WJM. Naming analog clocks conceptually facilitates naming digital clocks. Brain and Language. 2004;90:434–440. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00454-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Mehler J, Carey P. Role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1967;6:335–338. [Google Scholar]
- Mehler J, Carey P. The interaction of veracity and syntax in the processing of sentences. Perception & Psychophysics. 1968;3:109–111. [Google Scholar]
- Meijer PJA, Fox Tree JE. Building syntactic structures in speaking: A bilingual exploration. Experimental Psychology. 2003;50:184–195. doi: 10.1026//1617-3169.50.3.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Melinger A, Dobel C. Lexically-driven syntactic priming. Cognition. 2005;98:B11–B20. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Meyer DE, Schvaneveldt RW. Facilitation in recognising pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1971;90:227–234. doi: 10.1037/h0031564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Miller GA, Isard SD. Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1963;2:217–228. [Google Scholar]
- Myers-Scotton C. Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Naigles LR. Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language. 1990;17:357–374. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900013817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Noppeney U, Price CJ. An fMRI study of syntactic adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004;16:702–713. doi: 10.1162/089892904323057399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Novick J, Kim AE, Trueswell J. Studying the grammatical aspects of word recognition: Lexical priming, parsing and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2003;32:57–75. doi: 10.1023/a:1021985032200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Pardo JS. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2006;119:2382–2393. doi: 10.1121/1.2178720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Pickering M, Barry GD. Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes. 1991;6:229–259. [Google Scholar]
- Pickering MJ, Branigan HP. The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language. 1998;39:633–651. [Google Scholar]
- Pickering MJ, Branigan HP. Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1999;3:136–141. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01293-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Pickering MJ, Branigan HP, McLean JF. Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. Journal of Memory and Language. 2002;46:586–605. [Google Scholar]
- Pickering MJ, Garrod S. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2007;11:105–110. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Pickering MJ, McLean JF, Branigan HP, Cheung YT, Peacock AK. Do bilinguals inhibit the syntax of the non-target language? 2007 Unpublished manuscript. [Google Scholar]
- Pickering MJ, Traxler MJ. Grammatical repetition and garden-path effects: Syntactic priming in on-line sentence comprehension. 2008 Unpublished manuscript. [Google Scholar]
- Pickering MJ, Van Gompel RPG. Sentence processing. In: Gernsbacher MA, Traxler MJ, editors. Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press; 2006. pp. 455–503. [Google Scholar]
- Pollard C, Sag IA. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Potter MC, Lombardi L. Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language. 1998;38:265–282. [Google Scholar]
- Raffray CN, Pickering MJ, Branigan HP. Priming the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Memory and Language. 2007;57:380–395. [Google Scholar]
- Rawson KA. Exploring automaticity in text processing: Syntactic ambiguity as a test case. Cognitive Psychology. 2004;49:3330369. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Roelofs A. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition. 1992;42:107–142. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Roelofs A. Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs. Cognition. 1993;47:59–87. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90062-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Roelofs A, Meyer AS. Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1998;24:922–938. [Google Scholar]
- Saffran EM, Martin N. Effects of structural priming on sentence production in aphasics. Language and Cognitive Processes. 1997;12:877–882. [Google Scholar]
- Salamoura A, Williams JN. Lexical activation of cross-language syntactic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2006;9:299–307. [Google Scholar]
- Salamoura A, Williams JN. Processing verb argument structure across languages: Evidence for shared representations in the bilingual lexicon. Applied Psycholinguistics. 2007;28:627–660. [Google Scholar]
- Savage C, Lieven E, Theakston A, Tomasello M. Testing the abstractness of children’s linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science. 2003;6:557–567. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Savage C, Lieven E, Theakston A, Tomasello M. Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: The persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development. 2006;2:27–50. [Google Scholar]
- Scheepers C. Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition. 2003;89:179–205. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00119-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Scheepers C, Crocker MW. Constituent order priming from listening to comprehension: A visual-world study. In: Carreiras M, Clifton C Jr, editors. The online study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs, and beyond. New York: Psychology Press; 2004. pp. 167–185. [Google Scholar]
- Scherre MMP, Naro A. Marking in discourse: ‘Birds of a feather’. Language Variation and Change. 1991;3:23–32. [Google Scholar]
- Schober MF. Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition. 1993;47:1–24. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90060-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Schenkein J. A taxonomy for repeating action sequences in natural conversation. In: Butterworth B, editor. Language production. Vol. 1. London: Academic Press; 1980. pp. 21–47. [Google Scholar]
- Schoonbaert S, Hartsuiker RJ, Pickering MJ. The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language. 2007;56:153–171. [Google Scholar]
- Schütze C. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Selten R, Warglien M. The emergence of simple languages in an experimental communication game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104:7361–7366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702077104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Sevald CA, Dell GS. The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition. 1994;53:91–127. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90067-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Sevald CA, Dell GS, Cole JS. Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory and Language. 1995;34:807–820. [Google Scholar]
- Sheldon A. The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1974;13:272–281. [Google Scholar]
- Shimpi PM, Gámez PB, Huttenlocher J, Vasilyeva M. Syntactic priming in 3- and 4-year-old children: Evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. Developmental Psychology. 2007;43:1334–1346. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Smith M, Wheeldon L. Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production: An online study. Cognition. 2001;78:123–164. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00110-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Smyth R. Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1994;23:197–229. [Google Scholar]
- Snyder W. An experimental investigation of syntactic satiation effects. Linguistic Inquiry. 2000;31:575–582. [Google Scholar]
- Steedman MJ. The syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Stevenson RJ, Nelson AWR, Stenning K. The role of parallelism in strategies of pronoun comprehension. Language and Speech. 1995;38:393–418. [Google Scholar]
- Szmrecsanyi B. Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 2005;1:113–149. [Google Scholar]
- Szmrecsanyi B. Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English: A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Tanenhaus MK, Spivey-Knowlton MJ, Eberhard KM, Sedivy JC. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science. 1995;268:1632–1634. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- Tannen D. Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language. 1987;63:574–605. [Google Scholar]
- Tannen D. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Thothathiri M, Snedeker J. Give and Take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Cognition. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.012. in press-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Thothathiri M, Snedeker J. Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children. Journal of Memory and Language in press-b. [Google Scholar]
- Tomasello M. Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition. 2000;74:209–253. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00069-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Travis C. Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change. 2007;19:101–135. [Google Scholar]
- Traxler MJ. Lexically independent priming in online sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2008;15:149–155. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Traxler MJ. Structural priming among prepositional phrases: Evidence from eye-movements. Memory & Cognition. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.3.659. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Traxler MJ, Tooley KM. Lexical mediation and context effects in sentence processing. Brain Research. 2007;1146:59–74. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Traxler MJ, Tooley KM. Priming in on-line sentence comprehension: Strategic or syntactic? Language and Cognitive Processes. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.770892. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Traxler MJ, McElree B, Williams RS, Pickering MJ. Context effects in coercion: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language. 2005;53:1–25. [Google Scholar]
- Trueswell JC, Kim AE. How to prune a garden path by nipping it in the bud: Fast priming of verb argument structure. Journal of Memory and Language. 1998;39:102–123. [Google Scholar]
- Trueswell JC, Tanenhaus MK, Garnsey SM. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language. 1994;33:285–318. [Google Scholar]
- Trueswell JC, Tanenhaus MK, Kello C. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1993;19:528–553. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Ullman T. The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: the declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2001;4:105–122. [Google Scholar]
- van Dijk TA, Kintsch W. Strategies in discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press; 1983. [Google Scholar]
- van Gompel RPG, Pickering MJ, Pearson J, Jacob G. The activation of inappropriate analyses in garden-path sentences: Evidence from structural priming. Journal of Memory and Language. 2006;55:335–362. [Google Scholar]
- Vasilyeva M, Huttenlocher J, Waterfall H. Effects of language intervention on syntactic skill levels in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology. 2006;42:164–174. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Watson M, Pickering MJ, Branigan HP. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2004. Alignment of reference frames in dialogue. [Google Scholar]
- Weiner EJ, Labov W. Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics. 1983;19:29–58. [Google Scholar]
- Wheeldon LR, Smith MC. Phrase structure priming: A short lived effect. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2003;18:431–442. [Google Scholar]
- Whitehurst GJ, Ironsmith M, Goldfein M. Selective imitation of the passive construction through modeling. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1974;17:288–302. [Google Scholar]
- Wicha NYY, Orozco-Figueroa A, Reyes I, Hernandez A, de Barreto LG, Bates EA. When zebras become painted donkeys: Grammatical gender and semantic priming interact during picture integration in a spoken Spanish sentence. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2005;20:553–587. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Wisniewski EJ, Love BC. Relations versus properties in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language. 1998;38:177–202. [Google Scholar]
200 of 201 shown
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 736
Integrated, Not Isolated: Defining Typological Proximity in an Integrated Multilingual Architecture
Putnam, M. T., Carlson, M. T., & Reitter, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02212 · Cited by 74
“…evidence that both languages are, to various degrees, simultaneously active in the mind of bilinguals (e.g., Hartsuiker et al., 2004; Deuchar, 2005; Pickering and Ferreira, 2008; Coppock, 2010; Hsin et al., 2013; Kroll and Gollan, 2014; Melinger et al., 2014; Starreveld et al., 2014; de Groot,…”
BackgroundFraundorf, S. H., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.006 · Cited by 62
Persistence in phonological and morphological variation
Tamminga, M. (2016) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394516000119 · Cited by 52
Bunger, A., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.002 · Cited by 52
“…has shown that speakers can be induced (or ‘‘primed’’) to repeat particular structures in controlled settings as well (e.g., Bock, 1986; Bock & Loebell, 1990; Hartsuiker, Kolk, & Huiskamp, 1999; Pickering & Branigan, 1998; Potter & Lombardi, 1998; see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for an overview).”
BackgroundThe comprehension of anomalous sentences: evidence from structural priming.
Ivanova, I., Pickering, M., Branigan, H., McLean, J., & Costa, A. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.013 · Cited by 52
“That is, at least part of the structural priming effect appears to be driven by repetition of syntactic structure and cannot be fully accounted for by repetition of other representational levels (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
Self-citationSyntactic priming in comprehension: Parallelism effects with and without coordination
Sturt, P., Keller, F., & Dubey, A. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.01.001 · Cited by 52
“It has been observed that priming effects in comprehension appear to be weaker, or more difficult to obtain, than corresponding priming effects in production (Pickering & Ferreira, 2008), in line with the findings in the present paper.”
ResultGrammatical Encoding and Learning in Agrammatic Aphasia: Evidence from Structural Priming
Cho-Reyes, S., Mack, J. E., & Thompson, C. (2016) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.02.004 · Cited by 51
“Given that numerous studies of healthy speakers have reported reliable implicit priming effects (Pickering & Ferreira, 2008), the limited priming effects for control speakers in Hartsuiker and Kolk (1998)'s study make the comparison with agrammatic speakers difficult to interpret.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialStructural Priming Across Cognitive Domains
Scheepers, C., Sturt, P., Martin, C. J., Myachykov, A., Teevan, K., & Viskupova, I. (2011) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611416997 · Cited by 51
“This could reflect an inverse-preference effect (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008), whereby priming magnitudes tend to be smaller for generally preferred linguistic structures.”
BackgroundCollaborative Syntactic Priming Activities and EFL Learners’ Production of Wh -questions
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2010) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.66.6.817 · Cited by 50
“(For an overview of structural priming, see Pickering and Ferreira, 2008.)”
BackgroundStructural priming within and across languages: a corpus-based perspective*
Gries, S., & Kootstra, G. (2016) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728916001085 · Cited by 50
“1 We follow Pickering and Ferreira (2008) and use the term structural”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe role of the verb in grammatical function assignment in English and Korean.
Hwang, H., & Kaiser, E. M. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0036797 · Cited by 47
“One of the central issues in production research is how speakers decide which entity to assign to which grammatical function (Blumenthal, 1970; Bock & Ferreira, in press; Bock & Levelt, 1994; Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundConnected Text Reading and Differences in Text Reading Fluency in Adult Readers
Wallot, S., Hollis, G., & van Rooij, M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071914 · Cited by 50
“If this was merely an isolated oddball finding then it might be of little consequence, but all simple reading tasks reveal such complicated patterns of interaction among the factors that reading scientists study (see [8,9] for reviews and discussions).”
BackgroundDeterminants of structural choice in visually situated sentence production.
Myachykov, A., Garrod, S., & Scheepers, C. (2012) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.006 · Cited by 50
How abstract is syntax? Evidence from structural priming
Ziegler, J., Bencini, G. M. L., Goldberg, A. E., & Snedeker, J. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104045 · Cited by 75
Thematic emphasis in language production
Vernice, M., Pickering, M., & Hartsuiker, R. (2012) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.572468 · Cited by 49
“Most of the evidence for structural priming suggests that syntactic choices are persistent, independent of whether there is overlap in other linguistic representations (Pickering & Ferreira, 2008 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationLin, Z., & Lei, L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12156058 · Cited by 62
The Primacy of Priming in Grammatical Learning and Intervention: A Tutorial
Leonard, L. (2010) · Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0122 · Cited by 48
Structural priming during comprehension: A pattern from many pieces
Tooley, K. M. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02209-7 · Cited by 47
“…structural representation and processing has advanced considerably in the past few decades, thanks in large part to structural priming studies (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for a review), and the various paradigms they have contributed (e.g., Arai et al., 2007; Bock, 1986; Branigan et al.,…”
BackgroundThe priming of word order in second language German
Jackson, C., & Ruf, H. T. (2017) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716416000205 · Cited by 47
“Structural priming has been documented in many languages with a wide variety of structures (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for review), using both experimental techniques and through the analysis of more naturalistic corpus data (Gries, 2005; Weiner & Labov, 1983).”
BackgroundMethodShared and distinct mechanisms in deriving linguistic enrichment
Bott, L. A., & Chemla, E. (2016) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.004 · Cited by 67
“The results of priming experiments have been used to argue for the existence of representations that are abstracted away from superficial properties of the sentence (e.g., Bock, 1986; Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodDiessel, H., & Hilpert, M. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.120 · Cited by 103
“If speakers can choose between alternative structures, and if one of these structures has been previously activated, they are likely to reuse this structure in the unfolding discourse (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for a review of research on structural priming).”
BackgroundPersistent structural priming and frequency effects during comprehension.
Pickering, M., McLean, J., & Branigan, H. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0029181 · Cited by 46
Self-citationBilingual Grammar: Toward an Integrated Model
López, L. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108756181 · Cited by 147
Explaining interactive alignment: A multimodal and multifactorial account
Oben, B., & Brône, G. (2016) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.002 · Cited by 43
Bidirectional Syntactic Priming across Cognitive Domains: From Arithmetic to Language and Back
Scheepers, C., & Sturt, P. (2014) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.873815 · Cited by 45
“In the current paper, we examine the nature of shared representations across cognitive domains through the use of the structural priming technique, a behavioural method that is widely used within psycholinguistics (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for a review).”
MethodShared information structure: Evidence from cross-linguistic priming*
Fleischer, Z., Pickering, M., & McLean, J. (2012) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728911000551 · Cited by 44
“Since Bock (1986), researchers have known that speakers repeat syntactic form across utterances (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBeyond syntactic priming: Evidence for activation of alternative syntactic structures
Vasilyeva, M., & Waterfall, H. (2011) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000911000055 · Cited by 44
“…due to an increasing focus on the patient, then ‘‘speakers should describe target pictures with any sort of structures in which patients are prominent (e.g. the church is burning), and not just passive structures specifically (the church was hit by lightning) ’’ (Pickering & Ferreira, 2008: 429).”
BackgroundInfluentialTalk to Me on My Level – Linguistic Alignment for Chatbots
Spillner, L., & Wenig, N. (2021) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) · doi:10.1145/3447526.3472050 · Cited by 42
“While the most commonly used term in the literature is syntactic alignment, ‘structural priming’ is the terminology preferred by Pickering and Ferreira [51].”
BackgroundAmbridge, B., Bidgood, A., Pine, J., Rowland, C., & Freudenthal, D. (2015) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/cogs.12277 · Cited by 43
“Many adult studies (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008; for a review) have shown that hearing a passive sentence increases the likelihood of subsequently producing a passive sentence, regardless of the particular verb used (and regardless of its consistency with Pinker’s proposed semantic constraint).”
BackgroundAre non-native structural preferences affected by native language preferences?
Flett, S., Branigan, H., & Pickering, M. (2013) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728912000594 · Cited by 43
“…fact, recent evidence using structural priming paradigms has suggested that bilingual speakers who are proficient in both of their languages do have shared representations for syntactic structures that are sufficiently similar between their two languages (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationvan Hell, J. G., Fernandez, C. B., Kootstra, G. J., Litcofsky, K. A., & Ting, C. Y. (2017) · Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/lab.16010.van · Cited by 46
“Data from this technique are typically used to test theories on priming and interactive alignment between interlocutors in dialogue (see e.g., Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for more information).”
MethodZiegler, J., Snedeker, J., & Wittenberg, E. (2018) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/cogs.12687 · Cited by 42
Messenger, K., Branigan, H., & McLean, J. (2012) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000911000377 · Cited by 42
“Syntactic priming is the tendency to repeat aspects of syntactic structures across otherwise unrelated sentences, such that prior processing of a particular syntactic structure facilitates subsequent processing of the same structure (see Branigan, 2007; Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for reviews).”
BackgroundReuter, T., Feiman, R., & Snedeker, J. (2018) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12858 · Cited by 41
“…appears to facilitate subsequent construction of the same form, even when the referents and lexical content changes (Bock, 1986; Feiman & Snedeker, 2016; Huttenlocher, Vasilyeva, & Shimpi, 2004; Raffray & Pickering, 2010; Thothathiri & Snedeker, 2008; see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008 for review).”
BackgroundDoes translation involve structural priming?
Maier, R. M., Pickering, M., & Hartsuiker, R. (2017) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1194439 · Cited by 41
Self-citationDialogic resonance and intersubjective engagement in autism
Bois, J. W. D., Hobson, R. P., & Hobson, J. A. (2014) · Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cog-2014-0025 · Cited by 61
Speech Planning at Turn Transitions in Dialog Is Associated With Increased Processing Load
Barthel, M., & Sauppe, S. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12768 · Cited by 42
“…the course of the experiment; and a binary variable indicating whether the sentence structure of the confederate turn was re-used in the response turn, since processing load might be influenced by structural priming (Pickering & Ferreira, 2008; Segaert, Menenti, Weber, Petersson, & Hagoort, 2012).”
BackgroundSource use in the story continuation writing task
Ye, W., & Ren, W. (2018) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.001 · Cited by 43
The role of alternative salience in the derivation of scalar implicatures
Rees, A., & Bott, L. A. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.024 · Cited by 66
The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition
Martín, R. M., & de León, C. M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315178127 · Cited by 109
“Such a cross-lingual analysis of scientific metaphors in translation is expanded further in Shuttleworth (2017).”
Hardy, S. M., Segaert, K., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00257 · Cited by 64
“This is in contrast to a choice syntactic priming task, in which participants are typically asked to describe pictures that could be described using multiple syntactic alternatives (Pickering and Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundResultGarraffa, M., Coco, M. I., & Branigan, H. (2015) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2013.876277 · Cited by 39
“Such syntactic priming effects appear to be based on facilitation of particular constituent structures through prior exposure (see Branigan, 2007; Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for reviews).”
BackgroundSocial Psychology and Language: Words, Utterances, and Conversations
Holtgraves, T. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002036 · Cited by 35
Prediction and embodiment in dialogue
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.663 · Cited by 58
Self-citationThe development of reasoning by exclusion in infancy
Feiman, R., Mody, S., & Carey, S. E. (2022) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101473 · Cited by 57
“Even better evidence would be if success or training on one task causally affects performance on another – a kind of structural priming approach (Pickering & Ferreira, 2008) applied to the study of infants.”
BackgroundYan, H., Martin, R. C., & Slevc, L. (2018) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.005 · Cited by 37
The Relational Luring Effect: Retrieval of Relational Information During Associative Recognition
Popov, V., Hristova, P., & Anders, R. (2017) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/xge0000305 · Cited by 37
“…no way of accounting for short-term relational priming (e.g., Estes & Jones, 2006; Popov & Hristova, 2015) and structural priming (e.g., Bock, 1986; Pickering & Ferreira, 2008; Popov & Hristova, 2014) or for the retrieval of relationally similar structures from LTM. Finally, while recent…”
BackgroundShared abstract representation of linguistic structure in bilingual sentence comprehension
Kidd, E., Tennant, E., & Nitschke, S. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0775-2 · Cited by 37
Alignment During Synchronous Video Versus Written Chat L2 Interactions: A Methodological Exploration
Michel, M. C., & Cappellini, M. (2019) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190519000072 · Cited by 36
“Also in light of theories seeing alignment as a form of implicit learning (cf. review Pickering & Ferreira, 2008), this six-turn threshold might be in need of revision.”
BackgroundInfluentialChildren with autism align syntax in natural conversation
Hopkins, Z., Yuill, N., & Keller, B. (2015) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716414000599 · Cited by 33
“We used lexical alignment as a covariate in our ANCOVA model, to correct for a phenomenon called the ‘lexical boost effect’ (Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
MethodHow Do People Construct Logical Form During Language Comprehension?
Raffray, C. N., & Pickering, M. (2010) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610375446 · Cited by 36
Self-citationInteraction, Feedback and Task Research in Second Language Learning
Mackey, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108589284 · Cited by 62
Syntactic Priming without Lexical Overlap in Reading Comprehension
Kim, C. S., Carbary, K. M., & Tanenhaus, M. (2014) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830913496052 · Cited by 35
“Since the classic demonstrations of syntactic priming in language production (e.g., Bock, 1986), numerous production studies have shown robust priming effects on syntactic choice using a variety of structures (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008 for review).”
BackgroundDo Language Models Exhibit Human-like Structural Priming Effects?
Jumelet, J., Zuidema, W. H., & Sinclair, A. J. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.04847 · Cited by 34
“Findings have shown that structural priming does not depend on the repetition of function words, thus in humans there is a clear difference between content-word and function word repetition (Bock, 1989; Tree and Meijer, 1999; Pickering and Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundLexical and phonological effects on syntactic processing: evidence from syntactic priming
Santesteban, M., Pickering, M., & McLean, J. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.07.001 · Cited by 34
“Such effects occur for many languages, with many paradigms, and for different constructions (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWarker, J. A., Xu, Y., Dell, G. S., & Fisher, C. L. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.009 · Cited by 36
Meyer, A. S. (2023) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.268 · Cited by 34
Yu, S., Gu, C., Huang, K., & Li, P. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adn7744 · Cited by 28
“Future research should examine the impact of text properties such as the sentences’ lexical and syntactic structural relationships ( 63 ) in addition to coherence in modulating model-brain alignment.”
BackgroundStructural Priming Demonstrates Abstract Grammatical Representations in Multilingual Language Models
Michaelov, J. A., Arnett, C., Chang, T. A., & Bergen, B. K. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.09194 · Cited by 33
“Structural priming effects have been observed in humans both within a given language (Bock, 1986; Ferreira and Bock, 2006; Pickering and Ferreira, 2008; Dell and Ferreira, 2016; Mahowald et al., 2016; Branigan and Pickering, 2017) and crosslin-gually (Loebell and Bock, 2003; Hartsuiker et al.,…”
BackgroundLanguage Style Matching in Romantic Partners’ Conflict and Support Interactions
Bowen, J. D., Winczewski, L. A., & Collins, N. L. (2016) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x16666308 · Cited by 46
“It has also been described as an instance of structural priming (e.g., Pickering & Ferreira, 2008; Pickering & Garrod, 2004), wherein the syntactic patterns in one interactant’s utterances are automatically and unconsciously taken up in the other interactant’s utterances.”
BackgroundLanguage recovery in aphasia following implicit structural priming training: a case study
Lee, J., & Man, G. (2017) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2017.1306638 · Cited by 33
“…implicit language learning throughout a lifespan (Bock & Griffon, 2000; Bock, Dell, Chang, & Onishi, 2007; Branigan, Pickering, Steward, & McLean, 2000; Chang, Dell, Bock, & Griffin, 2000; Chang, Dell, & Bock, 2006; see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for different accounts of structural priming).”
BackgroundMargić, B. D. (2017) · Journal of English as a Lingua Franca · doi:10.1515/jelf-2017-0006 · Cited by 33
Lampinen, A. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00525 · Cited by 32
“Humans exhibit structural priming (e.g. Pickering and Branigan, 1999; Pickering and Ferreira, 2008)— a tendency to reproduce syntactic structures that they have recently encountered.”
Effect of interactive intensity on lexical alignment and L2 writing quality
Wang, M., Gan, Q., & Boland, J. E. (2022) · System (Linköping) · doi:10.1016/j.system.2022.102847 · Cited by 32
Trott, S., Torrent, T. T., Chang, N., & Schneider, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.462 · Cited by 31
“(Pickering and Ferreira, 2008)).”
Michel, M. C., & O’Rourke, B. (2019) · System (Linköping) · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.02.009 · Cited by 32
It is there whether you hear it or not: Syntactic representation of missing arguments
Cai, Z. G., Pickering, M. J., Wang, R., & Branigan, H. P. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.017 · Cited by 34
Self-citationPriming word order by thematic roles: No evidence for an additional involvement of phrase structure
Pappert, S., & Pechmann, T. (2014) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.918632 · Cited by 32
“However, as with word order, it is a subject of debate whether speakers tend to parallel the meaning or the form of the respective constructions (for a comprehensive overview see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundThe effect of linguistic nativeness on structural priming in comprehension
Nitschke, S., Serratrice, L., & Kidd, E. (2013) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.766355 · Cited by 53
“…activation and learning are complementary facets of structural priming (Branigan, 2006; Chang, Dell, & Bock, 2006; Ferreira & Bock, 2006; Hartsuiker, Bernolet, Schoonbaert, & Speybroek & Vanderelst, 2008; Pickering & Ferreira, 2008; Reitter, Keller, & Moore, 2011; Tooley, Traxler, & Swaab, 2009).”
BackgroundVasilyeva, M., & Gámez, P. B. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.009 · Cited by 31
The Relationship between Sentence Meaning and Word Order: Evidence from Structural Priming in German
Köhne, J., Pickering, M., & Branigan, H. (2014) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.807855 · Cited by 31
“Structural priming effects, whereby speakers repeat linguistic structure across otherwise unrelated sentences, can be informative about the nature of linguistic representations and the mappings between them (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for discussion).”
BackgroundSelf-citationFemale Fertility Affects Men's Linguistic Choices
Coyle, J. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027971 · Cited by 31
“Structural priming is a robust phenomenon (see [25]), and it occurs largely outside of a speaker’s awareness [1].”
BackgroundSyntactic Variance and Priming Effects in Translation
Bangalore, S., Behrens, B., Carl, M., Ghankot, M., Heilmann, A., Nitzke, J., Schaeffer, M. J., & Sturm, A. (2015) · New frontiers in translation studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20358-4_10 · Cited by 28
Linguistic alignment in second language acquisition: A methodological review
Kim, Y., & Michel, M. C. (2023) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2023.103007 · Cited by 40
“…2008, for a comprehensive review): the largely unconscious repetition of structures (words or other linguistic representations at morphosyntactic, phonetic, pragmatic levels) that have been used in the conversation due to automatic activation of those structures (cf. Pickering & Garrod, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialLanguage model acceptability judgements are not always robust to contextPreprint
Sinha, K., Gauthier, J., Mueller, A., Misra, K., Fuentes, K., Levy, R., & Williams, A. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.08979 · Cited by 30
“They found that several autoregressive LLMs assign greater probability to sentences that are similar in structure to their prefixes across a number of diverse constructions, thereby demonstrating a pattern analogous to what is known in psycholinguistics as structural priming (Bock, 1986; Pickering and Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundKootstra, G., & Muysken, P. (2016) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728916001127 · Cited by 30
“…specific syntactic structure, they have a tendency to re-use that syntactic structure in subsequent utterances (i.e., structural priming; see e.g., Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for a review; see the JML special issue on New Approaches to Structural Priming [Dell & Ferreira, 2016], for recent…”
BackgroundUsability guidelines and evaluation criteria for conversational user interfaces
Sugisaki, K., & Bleiker, A. (2020) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3404983.3405505 · Cited by 31
“Interlocutors use what they have just understood to guide what they produce, through repeating the in-terlocutor’s words and structure [62].”
BackgroundInteractive Alignment and Lexical Triggering of Code-Switching in Bilingual Dialogue
Kootstra, G. J., Dijkstra, T., & van Hell, J. G. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01747 · Cited by 41
“…(e.g., Costa et al., 2000; Van Hell and Dijkstra, 2002; Christoffels et al., 2007; Van Assche et al., 2009), and studies on interactive alignment and structural priming (e.g., Pickering and Garrod, 2004; Hartsuiker and Pickering, 2008; Kootstra et al., 2010, 2012; Van Gompel and Arai, 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe neostriatum and response selection in overt sentence production: An fMRI study
Argyropoulos, G. P. D., Tremblay, P., & Small, S. L. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.064 · Cited by 29
“Moreover, structural priming was anticipated (and ultimately observed) in the generation task (see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008 for a recent review), originating from the sentence listening and sentence repetition task, and thus the sentences generated by participants were largely identical to those…”
Dynamic grammar in adults: Incidental learning of natural syntactic structures extends over 48 h
Luka, B. J., & Choi, H. (2011) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.001 · Cited by 34
Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation
Petré, P. (2016) · Belgian Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1075/bjl.30.06pet · Cited by 32
Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning
Sauppe, S., Choudhary, K. K., Giroud, N., Blasí, D. E., Norcliffe, E., Bhattamishra, S., Gulati, M., Egurtzegi, A., Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, I., Meyer, M. E., et al. (2021) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001038 · Cited by 31
“We specifically also controlled for (cumulative) syntactic priming, the phenomenon that the repetition of sentence structures alters and eases their subsequent processing [54,55].”
Syntactic Priming in American Sign Language
Hall, M. L., Ferreira, V. S., & Mayberry, R. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119611 · Cited by 28
“The crucial finding, now replicated many times over (for a review, see [39]) is that participants are more likely to use a passive sentence to describe the target if the prime was passive than if the prime was active.”
BackgroundSelf-citationEffect of thematic order on the comprehension of Chinese relative clauses
Lin, C. (2014) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2013.12.003 · Cited by 28
Do priming effects in dialogue reflect partner- or task-based expectations?
Ferreira, V. S., Kleinman, D., Tanya Kraljic, A., & Siu, Y. (2011) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0191-9 · Cited by 23
“Much research has investigated people’s tendency to repeat sentence structures, often called syntactic priming (for a review, see Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStructural priming of adjective-noun structures in hearing and deaf children.
van Beijsterveldt, L. M., & van Hell, J. V. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.05.002 · Cited by 28
Investigating fine temporal dynamics of prosodic and lexical accommodation
Bonin, F., Looze, C. D., Ghosh, S., Gilmartin, E., Vogel, C., Polychroniou, A., Salamin, H., Vinciarelli, A., & Campbell, N. (2013) · Interspeech · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2013-151 · Cited by 28
“Interspeaker adaptation has been termed accommodation, alignment, convergence, priming as well as synchrony, and has been reported in terms of pronunciation [1, 2], prosody [3, 4, 5, 6], lexicon [7, 8, 9] and syntax [10, 11].”
BackgroundEliciting Production of L2 Target Structures through Priming Activities
McDonough, K., Neumann, H., & Trofimovich, P. (2015) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.2023 · Cited by 27
“As summarized by Pickering and Ferreira (2008), structural priming research targeting first language (L1) speakers has investigated a wide variety of issues in psycholinguistics, ranging from the nature of syntactic representations to the occurrence of structural alignment in conversation.”
BackgroundSpeaking for seeing: Sentence structure guides visual event apprehension.
Sauppe, S., & Flecken, M. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104516 · Cited by 27
“This process may be similar to the processes underlying syntactic priming during language production (Bock, 1986; Pickering & Ferreira, 2008), where a representation stays active after recent use and influences subsequent processing.”
Ordering adjectives in referential communication
Fukumura, K. (2018) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2018.03.003 · Cited by 27
Predictive language processing revealing usage-based variation
Verhagen, V., Mos, M., Backus, A., & Schilperoord, J. (2018) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2018.4 · Cited by 26
“It also differs from priming effects (McNamara, 2005; Pickering & Ferreira, 2008), which tend to be viewed as non-targeted and rapidly decaying.”
BackgroundThe Acquisition of the Tagalog Symmetrical Voice System: Evidence from Structural Priming
Garcia, R., & Kidd, E. (2020) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2020.1814780 · Cited by 26
“Structural priming, the tendency to repeat a previously encountered syntactic structure, has been widely used as a tool to measure children’s acquisition of syntax (for reviews, see Branigan & Pickering, 2017; Kidd, 2012; Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodPrediction error and implicit learning in L1 and L2 syntactic priming
Jackson, C., & Hopp, H. (2020) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006920902851 · Cited by 26
“…while short-term priming results from residual activation of combinatorial lemma nodes (e.g. Pickering & Branigan, 1998) or from explicit memory of the prime sentence, which facilitates the retrieval and subsequent repetition of its structure (Ferreira & Bock, 2006; Pickering & Ferreira, 2008).”
BackgroundHardy, S. M., Wheeldon, L. R., & Segaert, K. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9ztrj · Cited by 3
The role of constituent order and level of embedding in cross-linguistic structural priming*
Jacob, G., Katsika, K., Family, N., & Allen, S. E. M. (2016) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728916000717 · Cited by 26
“…have shown that structural priming occurs for many different structures, in many languages, and in a variety of contexts including spontaneous speech, written text, and experiments using several different paradigms (see Branigan, 2007, and Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for comprehensive reviews).”
BackgroundReferential and Visual Cues to Structural Choice in Visually Situated Sentence Production
Myachykov, A., Thompson, D., Garrod, S., & Scheepers, C. (2012) · Front. Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00396 · Cited by 26
“…Irwin, 1980; Bates and Devescovi, 1989; Prat-Sala and Branigan, 2000), or priming aspects of structural configuration (Ferreira and Bock, 2006; Branigan, 2007; Pickering and Ferreira, 2008 for recent reviews), also exert strong influences on Subject assignment and the resulting structural choice.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFaroqi‐Shah, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Language Sciences · doi:10.3389/flang.2023.1118739 · Cited by 24
“This includes responsiveness to structural priming, a phenomenon that is well-documented in neurotypical speakers (Bock and Loebell, 1990; Pickering and Ferreira, 2008).”
Tantucci, V., & Wang, A. (2021) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amab012 · Cited by 34
Repeat After Us: Syntactic Alignment is Not Partner-Specific
Ostrand, R., & Ferreira, V. S. (2019) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.104037 · Cited by 25
Self-citationGarraffa, M., Coco, M. I., & Branigan, H. P. (2018) · Autism & Developmental Language Impairments · doi:10.1177/2396941518779939 · Cited by 45
“To address this issue, we turn to structural priming, or the tendency for people to repeat linguistic structure across otherwise unrelated sentences (see Branigan & Pickering, 2017 and Pickering & Ferreira, 2008, for reviews).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 427-459
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- PMC
- PMC2657366
- OpenAlex
- W2020046942
- Cited by
- 1,047
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 14.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-062-23-0376)
- National Institutes of Health (R01-HD051030)
- British Academy
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- structural priming, sentence production, sentence comprehension, syntactic representation, syntactic priming, first language acquisition, bilingualism, aphasia
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Humans, Language Development, Speech Perception, Verbal Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review