Cited by 502Personality Traits and PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 373 of the 373 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Personal-space—where we now stand

Hayduk, Leslie A.·1983·Psychological Bulletin

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.293

Cites

373 of 373 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 502

Metadata

Authors
Hayduk, L. A.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Hayduk, Leslie A.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1983-09
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
293-335
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2053190739
Cited by
502
References
373
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
personal space, interpersonal distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review