The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Abstract
Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent that rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, since moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change 11 – 13 , a parallel literature on moral cognition makes a different prediction: insofar as punishment is a method of restoring justice following a moral violation, punitive preferences should be less susceptible to group influence.”
From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The behaviour of individuals living in communities is regulated by moral norms and values 158-162 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [159]
In the citing paper
“Haidt [26], for example, has argued that quick, automatic processes drive moral judgment while reflective processes play a more ad hoc role.”
From Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Research from social psychology suggests that when individuals encounter others who use fundamentally different moral philosophies to guide behavior, we tend to judge those others as immoral, rather than simply using a different moral perspective (Haidt, 2001(Haidt, , 2012)).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Haidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Influential theories in psychology maintain that our moral sense is shaped by the social world (1)”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Most existing research takes a dyadic perspective to study the social transmission of morality; typically, one person (such as a child) is exposed to another's ideas (e.g., parent) through behavior or communication (1,2).”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As noted, other research suggests that moral judgments are often based on moral intuitions or heuristics [1], leading to quick and simple judgments.”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, disgust also affects our moral judgment [38,40,42].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This caveat might have contributed to the similar results in the meta-analyses on moral cognition and on ToM (rather than on empathy), given that emotion processing is thought to play a paramount role in real-world moral cognition (Krebs 2008; Tangney et al. 2007; Haidt 2001).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Haidt 2001
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,850
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 7×
“To say that moral reasoning is a conscious process means that the process is intentional, effortful, and controllable and that the reasoner is aware that it is going on (Bargh, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Black, 1998, Neuronal plasticity and the developing brain., 31
- Chen, 1999, The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context., 73
- D'Andrade, 1984, Cultural meaning systems., 88
- Darwin, 1998, The descent of man.
- de Waal, 1982, Chimpanzee politics.
- Frijda, 1986, The emotions.
- Hare, 1993, Without conscience.
- Harrison, 1967, Ethical objectivism., Vols. 3-4, 71
- Huttenlocher, 1994, Synaptogenesis, synapse elimination, and neural plasticity in human cerebral cortex., Vol. 27, 35
- Kagan, 1984, The nature of the child.
- Kant, 1959, Foundation of the metaphysics of morals (L. W. Beck. Trans.).
- Kohlberg, 1969, Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization., 347
- Lapsley, 1996, Moral psychology.
- Margolis, 1987, Patterns, thinking, and cognition.
- Mednick, 1982, Biology and violence., 21
- Mischel, 1976, A cognitive social-learning approach to morality and self-regulation., 84
- Newcomb, 1943, Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community.
- Pavlov, 1927, Conditioned reflexes.
- Perkins, 1983, Difficulties in everyday reasoning., 177
- Premack, 1995, Origins of human social competence., 205
- Rozin, 2000, Disgust., 637
- Shweder, 1997, The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering., 119
- Singer, 1994, Rethinking life and death.
- Solomon, 1993, The philosophy of emotions., 3
- Solomon, 1991, A terror management theory of social behavior., 93
- Williams, 1967, Rationalism., Vols. 7-8, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,501–2,600 of 8,792
“I won't let you down:” Personal ethical lapses arising from women’s advocating for others
Kouchaki, M., & Kray, L. J. (2018) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.06.001 · Cited by 23
Exploring and Comparing Cognitive Moral Reasoning of Millennials and Across Multiple Generations
Weber, J., & Elm, D. R. (2018) · Business and Society Review · doi:10.1111/basr.12151 · Cited by 23
Moral humility: In life and at work
Smith, I. H., & Kouchaki, M. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.12.001 · Cited by 23
In the Heart of a Storm: Leveraging Personal Relevance Through “Inside-Out” Research
Bishop, D. G., Eury, J. L., Gioia, D. A., Treviño, L. K., & Kreiner, G. E. (2019) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2018.0089 · Cited by 23
Brożek, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695084 · Cited by 23
Reasons or rationalizations: The role of principles in the moral dumbfounding paradigm
McHugh, C., McGann, M., Igou, E. R., & Kinsella, E. L. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2167 · Cited by 23
Is Opposition to Genetically Modified Food “Morally Absolutist”? A Consequence-Based Perspective
Royzman, E. B., Cusimano, C., Metas, S., & Leeman, R. F. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619873550 · Cited by 23
A systematic review of moral reasoning measures
Vilar, M. M., Escrig-Espuig, J. M., & Merino‐Soto, C. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01519-8 · Cited by 23
The Evolutionary Rationality of Social Learning
McElreath, R. L., Wallin, A., & Fasolo, B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0014 · Cited by 23
Cojuharenco, I., & Sguera, F. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2259-8 · Cited by 23
Who believes that identification with all humanity is ethical
McFarland, S. G., & Brown, D. (2008) · Psicología Política · Cited by 23
McCoyd, J. L. M. (2013) · Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.3109/0167482x.2012.757590 · Cited by 23
Helping students to see for themselves that ethics matters
Jagger, S., & Volkman, R. (2013) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2013.04.001 · Cited by 23
Merely opting out of a public good is moralized: An error management approach to cooperation.
Delton, A. W., Nemirow, J., Robertson, T. E., Cimino, A., & Cosmides, L. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033495 · Cited by 23
Punitiveness and U.S. Elite Support for the 1991 Persian Gulf War
Liberman, P. (2007) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002706294328 · Cited by 23
Chapman, M. V., Hall, W. J., Colby, R., & Sisler, L. (2013) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/1473325013496597 · Cited by 23
Political realism and moral corruption
McQueen, A. (2016) · European Journal of Political Theory · doi:10.1177/1474885116664825 · Cited by 23
Decision Making, Morality, and Machiavellianism: The Role of Dispositional Traits in Gist Extraction
Carre, J. R., & Jones, D. N. (2016) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000093 · Cited by 23
Optimality bias in moral judgment
Freitas, J. D., & Johnson, S. G. B. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.011 · Cited by 23
Moral Cognition and Moral Emotions
Báez, S., García, A. M., & Santamaría‐García, H. A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68421-5_8 · Cited by 23
Mallon, R. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668779.013.14 · Cited by 23
Metaethical cognition and epistemic reasoning development in adolescence
Krettenauer, T. (2004) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1080/01650250444000180 · Cited by 23
Sadler‐Smith, E. (2015) · Advances in Developing Human Resources · doi:10.1177/1523422315601087 · Cited by 23
Morality (in Handbook of Social Psychology)Preprint
Kesebir, S., & Haidt, J. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 23
Self-citationThe Prototype Model of Blame: Freeing Moral Cognition From Linearity and Little Boxes
Schein, C., & Gray, K. J. (2014) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2014.901903 · Cited by 23
The Logic of Attraction: Outline of a Theory of Soft PowerPreprint
Vuving, A. L. (2020) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3637662 · Cited by 23
Reynolds, C. J., Makhanova, A., Ng, B. K. L., & Conway, P. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109632 · Cited by 22
Herman, B. C., Poor, S., Clough, M. P., Rao, A., Kidd, A., De Jesús, D., & Varghese, D. (2024) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21934 · Cited by 22
Evolutionary theory and the classification of crime
Durrant, R. (2020) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2020.101449 · Cited by 22
A Welfarist Approach to Manipulation
Baron, J. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Behavior · doi:10.1561/107.00000018 · Cited by 22
Paradigm assumptions about moral behavior: An empirical battle royal.
Walker, L. J., Frimer, J. A., & Dunlop, W. L. (2011) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/13091-015 · Cited by 22
Regulating other people’s moral behaviors: Turning vicious cycles into virtuous cycles
van Nunspeet, F., & Ellemers, N. (2023) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302231159577 · Cited by 22
Zhang, S., Mo, S., & Liu, W. (2023) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2756 · Cited by 22
Moral thin-slicing: Forming moral impressions from a brief glance
Freitas, J. D., & Hafri, A. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104588 · Cited by 22
National politics ignites more talk of morality and power than local politics
Dillion, D., Puryear, C., Li, L., Chiquito, A., & Gray, K. J. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae345 · Cited by 22
Human-robot dynamics: a psychological insight into the ethics of social robotics
Boch, A., & Thomas, B. R. (2024) · International Journal of Ethics and Systems · doi:10.1108/ijoes-01-2024-0034 · Cited by 22
Anger, Anxiety and Corruption Perceptions: Evidence from France
Birch, S., Allen, N. J., & Sarmiento-Mirwaldt, K. (2017) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321717691294 · Cited by 22
Moral Judgments and Social Stereotypes
Chu, Q., & Grühn, D. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617711226 · Cited by 22
The “MelArete” Project: Educating children to the Ethics of Virtue and of Care
Mortari, L., & Ubbiali, M. (2017) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.269 · Cited by 22
Developing Moral Muscle in a Literature-Based Business Ethics Course
Brokerhof, I. M., Sucher, S. J., Bal, P. M., Hakemulder, F., Jansen, P. G. W., & Solinger, O. N. (2022) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2020.0072 · Cited by 22
Framing Climate Change Impacts as Moral Violations: The Pathway of Perceived Message Credibility
Huang, J., Yang, J. Z., & Chu, H. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19095210 · Cited by 22
Broek, T. A. V. D., Langley, D., Ehrenhard, M., & Groen, A. J. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1604 · Cited by 22
Mindfully outraged: Mindfulness increases deontic retribution for third-party injustice
Kay, A. A., Masters-Waage, T. C., Reb, J. M., & Vlachos, P. A. (2023) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104249 · Cited by 22
Generalized morality culturally evolves as an adaptive heuristic in large social networks.
Jackson, J. C., Halberstadt, J. B., Takezawa, M., Liew, K., Smith, K. M., Apicella, C. L., & Gray, K. J. (2023) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000358 · Cited by 22
ChatGPT's performance before and after teaching in mass casualty incident triage
Gan, R. K., Uddin, H., Gan, A. Z., Yew, Y. Y., & González, P. I. A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-46986-0 · Cited by 22
Ferráns, S. D., Selman, R. L., & Feigenberg, L. F. (2012) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.82.4.4u5v1n8q67332v03 · Cited by 22
Calcagnì, A., & Lombardi, L. (2014) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.049 · Cited by 22
de Achával, D., Villarreal, M. F., Salles, A. L. F., Bertomeu, M. J., Costanzo, E. Y., Goldschmidt, M., Castro, M. N., van der Poel, I., Nemeroff, C. B., & Guinjoan, S. M. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.12.018 · Cited by 22
Carlo, G., McGinley, M. M., Davis, A. N., & Streit, C. (2012) · New Directions for Youth Development · doi:10.1002/yd.20040 · Cited by 22
Shepherd, L., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2013) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1971 · Cited by 22
The Complicated Relationship Between Media and Morality
Bilandzić, H. (2011) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000032 · Cited by 22
An item analysis of the Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression.
DeSimone, J. A., & James, L. R. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000026 · Cited by 22
Defeasible reasoning with legal conditionals
Castañeda, L. E. G., & Knauff, M. (2015) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0574-7 · Cited by 22
The Development of Moral Imagination
Narvaez, D. F., & Mrkva, K. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137333544_2 · Cited by 22
Construal Level Theory and Moral Judgments: How Thinking Abstractly Modifies Morality
Mårtensson, E. (2017) · Journal of European Psychology Students · doi:10.5334/jeps.413 · Cited by 22
Ethical decision-making in Australian SMEs: a field study
Savur, S. G., Provis, C., & Harris, H. (2018) · Small Enterprise Research · doi:10.1080/13215906.2018.1480414 · Cited by 22
Threats to human rights: A general review
Carriere, K. R. (2019) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v7i1.897 · Cited by 22
Who Deserves Faulty Products? How Blaming the Victim Prevents Consumer Punitive Action
Reich, B. J., Campbell, T. H., & Madrigal, R. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1124 · Cited by 22
Debunking (the) Retribution (Gap)
Kraaijeveld, S. R. (2019) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00148-6 · Cited by 22
Towards a Discourse-Based Understanding of Sustainability Education and Decision Making
Meisert, A., & Böttcher, F. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11215902 · Cited by 22
Nudging and the choice architecture of offending decisions
Pogarsky, G., & Herman, S. (2019) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12470 · Cited by 23
Understanding and Managing Responsible Innovation
Bennink, H. (2020) · Philosophy of Management · doi:10.1007/s40926-020-00130-4 · Cited by 22
Caulfield, J. L., Baird, C. A., & Lee, F. K. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04597-z · Cited by 22
Comunello, F., Rosales, A., Mulargia, S., Ieracitano, F., Belotti, F., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2020) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x20001312 · Cited by 22
Moral Foundations Theory: An Exploratory Study with Accounting and Other Business Students
Andersen, M. L., Zuber, J. M., & Hill, B. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2362-x · Cited by 22
The role of the affect heuristic in moral reactions to climate change
Seabright, M. A. (2010) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449621003701410 · Cited by 22
Moral judgments and the role of social harm: Differences in automatic versus controlled processing
Usoof-Thowfeek, R., Janoff‐Bulman, R., & Tavernini, J. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.016 · Cited by 22
On the Psychological Origins of Dualism: Dual-Process Cognition and the Explanatory Gap*
Fiala, B., Arico, A. J., & Nichols, S. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794393.003.0005 · Cited by 22
Mindreading and Dispositional Inference: MIM Revised and Extended
Reeder, G. D. (2009) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400902868565 · Cited by 22
Hierarchical Motive Structures and Their Role in Moral Choices
Bagozzi, R. P., Sekerka, L. E., & Hill, V. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0601-3 · Cited by 22
Morality Goes Beyond Mind Perception
Monroe, A. E., Guglielmo, S., & Malle, B. F. (2012) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2012.668271 · Cited by 22
Making Professional Decisions in Research: Measurement and Key Predictors
Antes, A. L., Chibnall, J. T., Baldwin, K. A., Tait, R. C., Wal, J. S. V., & DuBois, J. M. (2016) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2016.1171149 · Cited by 22
Giving, Fast and Slow: Reflection Increases Costly (but Not Uncostly) Charitable Giving
Mrkva, K. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2023 · Cited by 22
How Cognitive and Neurobiological Sciences Inform Values Education for Creatures Like us
Narvaez, D. F. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6184-4_7 · Cited by 22
Defining and Evaluating Perceptions of Victim Blame in Antigay Hate Crimes
Cramer, R. J., Nobles, M. R., Amacker, A. M., & Dovoedo, L. (2013) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260513488687 · Cited by 22
Schnall, S. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00597-2 · Cited by 22
Correction: Harming Ourselves and Defiling Others: What Determines a Moral Domain?
Chakroff, A., Dungan, J. A., & Young, L. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/annotation/38818ce6-1b40-4965-aa64-b7943d2711ed · Cited by 22
Why we dehumanize illegal immigrants: A US mixed-methods study
Markowitz, D. M., & Slovic, P. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257912 · Cited by 21
The Effects of Social Perception on Moral Judgment
Jin, W. Y., & Peng, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557216 · Cited by 21
Russell, P. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cco9780511734786.006 · Cited by 21
Niu, R., Eng, N., Zhao, Y., & Jin, Y. (2025) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/1468-5973.70054 · Cited by 21
A Cognitive Tool for Ethical Decision Making: A Case for ACED IT
Stenmark, C. K., & Kreitler, C. M. (2016) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2016.1176566 · Cited by 21
New Issues for New Methods: Ethical and Editorial Challenges for an Experimental Philosophy
Polonioli, A. (2016) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9838-2 · Cited by 21
Handelsman, M. M. (2017) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628317712789 · Cited by 21
Intuitions and Arguments: Cognitive Foundations of Argumentation in Natural Theology
Cruz, H. D., & Smedt, J. D. (2017) · European Journal for Philosophy of Religion · doi:10.24204/ejpr.v9i2.1934 · Cited by 21
Feminising Politics to Close the Evidence‐Policy Gap: The Case of Social Policy in Scotland
Cairney, P., & Rummery, K. (2018) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12266 · Cited by 21
The Coalescence of Being: A Model of the Self-Actualisation Process
Fabian, M. (2019) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-019-00141-7 · Cited by 21
Human-Directed Empathy and Attitudes Toward Animal Use: A Survey of Spanish Veterinary Students
Menor-Campos, D. J., Knight, S., Sánchez-Muñoz, C., & López-Rodríguez, R. (2019) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.1080/08927936.2019.1621518 · Cited by 21
Silva, E. (2020) · BJPsych Bulletin · doi:10.1192/bjb.2020.14 · Cited by 21
On moral grounds: Moral identity and moral disengagement in relation to military deployment
de Graaff, M. C., Giebels, E., & Verweij, D. E. M. (2020) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1080/08995605.2020.1774321 · Cited by 21
Zeng, K., Wang, D., Huang, W., Li, Z., & Xianwei, Z. (2021) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2021.1875829 · Cited by 21
Hahn, L. (2021) · Journal of Children and Media · doi:10.1080/17482798.2021.1943475 · Cited by 21
Kim, D., Lee, J. S., Jang, W., & Ko, Y. J. (2021) · International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship · doi:10.1108/ijsms-09-2020-0161 · Cited by 21
Lütge, C., & Uhl, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864776.001.0001 · Cited by 21
Philosophy instruction changes views on moral controversies by decreasing reliance on intuition
Oktar, K., Lerner, A., Malaviya, M., & Lombrozo, T. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105434 · Cited by 21
Position paper – CFT for psychosis
Heriot-Maitland, C. (2023) · Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/papt.12490 · Cited by 21
Gevorkova, V., Sangiorgi, I., & Vogt, J. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05585-9 · Cited by 21
Turning a Blind Eye to Team Members’ Unethical Behavior: The Role of Reward Systems
Hu, Q., Adam, H., Desai, S. D., & Mo, S. (2024) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05598-4 · Cited by 21
Oanh, L. V. L., Tettamanzi, P., Minh, D. T., Comoli, M., Mouloudj, K., Murgolo, M., & Hien, M. D. T. (2024) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci14090200 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidt, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haidt, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Haidt, Jonathan
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814-834
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2123791568
- Semantic Scholar
- b74e8da297574fd071d4b48b7aa94ea16861aea6
- Cited by
- 8,048
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 365 · 2025: 479 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 447 · 2022: 497 · 2021: 468 · 2020: 535 · 2019: 511 · 2018: 405 · 2017: 401 · 2016: 408 · 2015: 416 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 433 · 2012: 369
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03da012606-01)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (1-RO3-DA12606-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- moral judgment, moral reasoning, social intuitionism, moral intuitions, automated assessment, evolutionary psychology of morality
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Morals, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Social Values, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
