The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Abstract
Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent that rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, since moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change 11 – 13 , a parallel literature on moral cognition makes a different prediction: insofar as punishment is a method of restoring justice following a moral violation, punitive preferences should be less susceptible to group influence.”
From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The behaviour of individuals living in communities is regulated by moral norms and values 158-162 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [159]
In the citing paper
“Haidt [26], for example, has argued that quick, automatic processes drive moral judgment while reflective processes play a more ad hoc role.”
From Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Research from social psychology suggests that when individuals encounter others who use fundamentally different moral philosophies to guide behavior, we tend to judge those others as immoral, rather than simply using a different moral perspective (Haidt, 2001(Haidt, , 2012)).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Haidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Influential theories in psychology maintain that our moral sense is shaped by the social world (1)”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Most existing research takes a dyadic perspective to study the social transmission of morality; typically, one person (such as a child) is exposed to another's ideas (e.g., parent) through behavior or communication (1,2).”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As noted, other research suggests that moral judgments are often based on moral intuitions or heuristics [1], leading to quick and simple judgments.”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, disgust also affects our moral judgment [38,40,42].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This caveat might have contributed to the similar results in the meta-analyses on moral cognition and on ToM (rather than on empathy), given that emotion processing is thought to play a paramount role in real-world moral cognition (Krebs 2008; Tangney et al. 2007; Haidt 2001).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Haidt 2001
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,850
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 7×
“To say that moral reasoning is a conscious process means that the process is intentional, effortful, and controllable and that the reasoner is aware that it is going on (Bargh, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Black, 1998, Neuronal plasticity and the developing brain., 31
- Chen, 1999, The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context., 73
- D'Andrade, 1984, Cultural meaning systems., 88
- Darwin, 1998, The descent of man.
- de Waal, 1982, Chimpanzee politics.
- Frijda, 1986, The emotions.
- Hare, 1993, Without conscience.
- Harrison, 1967, Ethical objectivism., Vols. 3-4, 71
- Huttenlocher, 1994, Synaptogenesis, synapse elimination, and neural plasticity in human cerebral cortex., Vol. 27, 35
- Kagan, 1984, The nature of the child.
- Kant, 1959, Foundation of the metaphysics of morals (L. W. Beck. Trans.).
- Kohlberg, 1969, Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization., 347
- Lapsley, 1996, Moral psychology.
- Margolis, 1987, Patterns, thinking, and cognition.
- Mednick, 1982, Biology and violence., 21
- Mischel, 1976, A cognitive social-learning approach to morality and self-regulation., 84
- Newcomb, 1943, Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community.
- Pavlov, 1927, Conditioned reflexes.
- Perkins, 1983, Difficulties in everyday reasoning., 177
- Premack, 1995, Origins of human social competence., 205
- Rozin, 2000, Disgust., 637
- Shweder, 1997, The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering., 119
- Singer, 1994, Rethinking life and death.
- Solomon, 1993, The philosophy of emotions., 3
- Solomon, 1991, A terror management theory of social behavior., 93
- Williams, 1967, Rationalism., Vols. 7-8, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,801–2,900 of 8,792
The psychology of science rejection
Rutjens, B. T., & Hornsey, M. J. (2024) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2024.10.002 · Cited by 18
A large-scale investigation of everyday moral dilemmas
Yudkin, D. A., Goodwin, G. P., Reece, A., Gray, K. J., & Bhatia, S. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf119 · Cited by 18
1 Resisting the Linguistic Analogy: A Commentary on Hauser, Young, and Cushman
PRINZ, J. J. (2014) · Cited by 18
Moral judgments and impressions
Wojciszke, B., Parzuchowski, M., & Bocian, K. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.028 · Cited by 18
Moral Judgments in Russian Culture: Universality and Cultural Specificity
Arutyunova, K. R., Знаков, В. В., HAUSER, M. D., & Alexandrov, Y. I. (2013) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12342094 · Cited by 18
What Does the Modularity of Morals Have to Do With Ethics? Four Moral Sprouts Plus or Minus a Few
Flanagan, O., & Williams, R. A. (2010) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01076.x · Cited by 18
The Role of Victims’ Emotions in Preschoolers’ Moral Judgments
Weisberg, D. S., & Leslie, A. M. (2012) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0101-8 · Cited by 18
Incidental Disgust Increases Adherence to Left-Wing Economic Attitudes
Petrescu, D. C., & Parkinson, B. (2014) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-014-0221-7 · Cited by 18
Carr, D. (2014) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2014.943167 · Cited by 18
Current Trends in Moral Research
Dinh, J. E., & Lord, R. G. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721413486147 · Cited by 18
Fjær, E. G., Pedersen, W., von Soest, T., & Gray, P. S. (2015) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.002 · Cited by 18
Gelfand, S. (2015) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9721-6 · Cited by 18
Disgusted but not afraid: Feelings toward same-sex kissing reveal subtle homonegativity
Kiebel, E. M., McFadden, S. L., & Herbstrith, J. C. (2016) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2016.1184127 · Cited by 18
Judgment of moral and social transgression in schizophrenia
McGuire, J., Brüne, M., & Langdon, R. A. (2017) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.04.008 · Cited by 18
Face-to-face diplomacy social neuroscience and international relations
Holmes, M. (2019) · Cited by 18
Infants’ and Young Children’s Preferences for Prosocial over Antisocial Others
Hamlin, J. K., & de Vondervoort, J. W. V. (2018) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000492800 · Cited by 18
Evaluating Scientific Arguments with Slow Thinking
Covitt, B. A., Harris, C. B., & Anderson, C. (2013) · Science Scope · doi:10.2505/4/ss13_037_03_44 · Cited by 18
Do You Reap What You Sow? The Effect of Cyberostracism on Moral Impurity
Poon, K. (2019) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2019.1585353 · Cited by 18
Framing the outcome of moral dilemmas: effects of emotional information
Palmiotti, G. P., Cristaldi, F. D. P., Cellini, N., Lotto, L., & Sarlo, M. (2019) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2019.1607348 · Cited by 18
When the political becomes personal: Reflecting on disability bioethics
Shakespeare, T. (2019) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.12668 · Cited by 18
Maftei, A., Bostan, C. M., & Zaharia, D. V. (2019) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2019.1691512 · Cited by 18
Lee, H., Chang, D. R., & Einwiller, S. A. (2020) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-02-2019-2259 · Cited by 18
Kizilcec, R. F., & Kambhampaty, A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239766 · Cited by 18
Urgancı, B., Sevi, B., & Sakman, E. (2021) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407521995261 · Cited by 18
Vasconcelos, M. A. D. S., Viding, E. M., Sebastian, C. L., Faria, S., Almeida, P. R., Gonçalves, Ó. F., Gonçalves, R. A., Sampaio, A., & Seara‐Cardoso, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.625328 · Cited by 18
Smith, I. H., Soderberg, A. T., Netchaeva, E., & Okhuysen, G. A. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-05022-9 · Cited by 18
Moral Judgments of COVID-19 Social Distancing Violations: The Roles of Perceived Harm and Impurity
Rosenfeld, D. L., & Tomiyama, A. J. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211025433 · Cited by 18
Heinzelmann, N. C. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1762-3 · Cited by 18
Levin, S. B. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190051495.001.0001 · Cited by 18
One thought too few: An adaptive rationale for punishing negligence.
Sarin, A., & Cushman, F. A. (2024) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000476 · Cited by 18
Are There Really So Many Moral Emotions?
Fitouchi, L., André, J., & Baumard, N. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544754.013.35 · Cited by 18
(2014) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027915.001.0001 · Cited by 18
Empirically Informed Moral Theory: A Sketch of the Landscape
Levy, N. L. (2008) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-008-9146-2 · Cited by 18
The clean conscience at work: emotions, intuitions and morality
Schnall, S., & Cannon, P. R. (2012) · Journal of Management Spirituality & Religion · doi:10.1080/14766086.2012.742749 · Cited by 18
Ordinary Ethical Reasoning and the Ideal of ‘Being Yourself’
Knobe, J. (2005) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515080500177291 · Cited by 18
SIM and the City: Rationalism in Psychology and Philosophy and Haidt's Account of Moral Judgment
Clarke, S. (2008) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515080802513250 · Cited by 18
What Would Terri Want? On the Psychological Challenges of Surrogate Decision Making
Ditto, P. H. (2006) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481180500455624 · Cited by 18
The nature of moral judgements and the extent of the moral domain
Fraser, B. (2012) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/13869795.2012.647356 · Cited by 18
The Trouble with Thinking: People Want to Have Quick Reactions to Personal Taboos
Merritt, A. C., & Monin, B. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911402386 · Cited by 18
A Knowledge Base for Teaching Biology Situated in the Context of Genetic Testing
van der Zande, P., Waarlo, A. J., Brekelmans, M., Akkerman, S. F., & Vermunt, J. D. H. M. (2010) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.525797 · Cited by 18
Human values: Genetic and environmental effects on five lexically derived domains and their facets
Renner, W., Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., Spinath, F. M., & Menschik-Bendele, J. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.003 · Cited by 18
The Empirical Identity of Moral Judgment: Table 1.
Kumar, V. (2016) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqw019 · Cited by 18
Tepe, B., Piyale, Z. E., Sirin, S. R., & Rogers‐Sirin, L. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.012 · Cited by 18
Animal Ethics in Animal Research
Röcklinsberg, H., Gjerris, M., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108354882 · Cited by 18
Yang, Q., Shao, R., Zhang, Q., Li, C., Li, Y., Li, H., & Lee, T. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.020 · Cited by 18
Sharvit, G., Lin, E., Vuilleumier, P. O., & Corradi‐Dell’Acqua, C. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat4390 · Cited by 18
Embodied and Embedded Morality: Divinity, Identity, and Disgust
Looy, H. (2004) · Zygon® · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2004.00567.x · Cited by 18
Designer babies on tap? Medical students' attitudes to pre-implantation genetic screening
Meisenberg, G. (2008) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662507079374 · Cited by 18
Promoting Third-Party Prosocial Behaviour: The Potential of Moral Emotions
de Vyver, J. V., & Abrams, D. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53026-0_17 · Cited by 18
Kristjansson, K. R. (2009) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240903101374 · Cited by 18
What Are Dual Process Models? Implications for Cultural Analysis in SociologyPreprint
Stoltz, D. S., Ližardo, O., Mowry, R., Sepulvado, B., Ness, J. V., Taylor, M. A., & Wood, M. L. (2018) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/sx8b6 · Cited by 18
Elderly Well-Being and Alcohol: A Tricky Cocktail
Klausen, S. H., Engelsen, S., Christiansen, R., & Emiliussen, J. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406920931687 · Cited by 17
How the political elite make decisions
Wynn, C., Smith, L. D. G., & Killen, C. P. (2024) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12664 · Cited by 17
Assessing the Effect of Deservingness Cues on Tolerance for Administrative Burdens
Haeder, S. F. (2025) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.70043 · Cited by 17
Why Do We Do What We Do? Motivation in History and the Social Sciences
MacMullen, R. (2014) · doi:10.2478/9783110417593 · Cited by 17
Hui, P. P., Chiu, W. C. K., Pang, E., Coombes, J. E., & Tse, D. Y. P. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04876-3 · Cited by 17
Gawronski, B. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104265 · Cited by 17
Advances in Research on the Model of Intuitive Morality and Exemplars (MIME)
Eden, A., Tamborini, R., Aley, M. R., & Goble, H. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190072216.013.13 · Cited by 17
Doesn't everybody jaywalk? On codified rules that are seldom followed and selectively punished
Wylie, J., & Gantman, A. P. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105323 · Cited by 17
Analysis and Intuition Effectiveness in Moral Problems
Julmi, C. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05407-y · Cited by 17
Do contemplative practices make us more moral?
Berryman, K., Lazar, S. W., & Hohwy, J. (2023) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.07.005 · Cited by 17
Optimistic framing increases responsible investment of investment professionals
Daugaard, D., Kent, D., Servátka, M., & Zhang, L. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50965-w · Cited by 17
The importance of rebuilding trust in fisheries governance in post-Brexit England
Dixon, M., Grilli, G., Stewart, B. D., Bark, R. H., & Ferrini, S. (2024) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106034 · Cited by 17
The Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation: Opportunities and Perils
Kwon, M., & Sonday, L. (2024) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2021.0467 · Cited by 17
Alfabetización mediática y pensamiento crítico en la formación inicial de docentes
Mango-Quispe, P., Postigo, G. S. P., & Turpo-Gebera, O. (2024) · European Public & Social Innovation Review · doi:10.31637/epsir-2024-1548 · Cited by 17
Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study
Dahò, M. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15060748 · Cited by 17
AI in Neurology: Everything, Everywhere, All at Once Part 1: Principles and Practice
Rizzo, M., & Dawson, J. D. (2025) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.27225 · Cited by 18
“High” cognitive emotions in language prosody
PERLOVSKY, L. I. (2011) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.007 · Cited by 17
Can model-free reinforcement learning explain deontological moral judgments?
Ayars, A. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.002 · Cited by 17
A Study on Cyberbullying: Its Forms, Awareness and Moral Reasoning Among Youth
Asanan, Z. Z. T. (2017) · International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences · doi:10.11648/j.ijics.20170205.11 · Cited by 17
Wrong outside, wrong inside: A social functionalist approach to the uncanny feeling
Rosa, A. O. L. (2018) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.03.004 · Cited by 17
Emotion, deliberation, and the skill model of virtuous agency
Kurth, C. (2018) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12186 · Cited by 17
Sense and sensibility: The impact of visual and auditory sensory input on marketplace morality
Nenkov, G. Y., Morrin, M., Maille, V., Rank‐Christman, T., & Lwin, M. O. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.047 · Cited by 17
Malle, B. F., & Scheutz, M. J. (2018) · Springer Reference Geisteswissenschaften · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-17484-2_17-1 · Cited by 17
Greenway, T. S., Jin, J., Shepherd, A. M., & Schnitker, S. A. (2019) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764219850867 · Cited by 17
When Group Influence Is More or Less Likely: The Case of Moral Judgments
Cornwell, J. F. M., Jago, C. P., & Higgins, E. T. (2019) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2019.1666394 · Cited by 17
Vaisey, S., & Frye, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190273385.013.6 · Cited by 17
Sutton, G. W., Kelly, H. L., & Huver, M. E. (2019) · Journal of Psychology and Theology · doi:10.1177/0091647119878675 · Cited by 17
Fear and international law-making: An exploratory inquiry
Bianchi, A., & Saab, A. (2019) · Leiden Journal of International Law · doi:10.1017/s0922156519000177 · Cited by 17
The Influence of Intuition on Human Resource Officers’ Perspectives on Hiring Teachers of Color
Goings, R. B., Walker, L., & Wade, K. L. (2020) · Journal of School Leadership · doi:10.1177/1052684619896534 · Cited by 17
The Unreliable Intuitions Objection Against Reflective Equilibrium
Paulo, N. (2020) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-020-09322-6 · Cited by 17
Emotional Framing of News on Sexual Assault and Partisan User Engagement Behaviors
Lee, Y.-H., & Chen, M. (2020) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699020916434 · Cited by 17
Sharma, I., Jain, K., & Singh, G. (2020) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-03-2020-0084 · Cited by 17
Vygotskian Business Ethics: The Influence of Peers on Moral Reasoning in Business Ethics Education
Ohreen, D., Sundararajan, B., Trifts, V., & Comber, S. (2021) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562921996019 · Cited by 17
Dong, M., Spadaro, G., Yuan, S., Song, Y., Ye, Z., & Ren, X. (2021) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/00220221211025739 · Cited by 17
Holl, E. A., & Melzer, A. (2021) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000323 · Cited by 17
Motivating conservation even for widespread species using genetic uniqueness and relational values
Eyster, H. N., Olmsted, P., Naidoo, R., & Chan, K. M. A. (2022) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109438 · Cited by 17
Resting-state functional connectivity of social brain regions predicts motivated dishonesty
Pang, L., Li, H., Liu, Q., Luo, Y., Mobbs, D., & Wu, H. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119253 · Cited by 17
Situational Moral Evaluations: The Role of Rationalizations & Moral Identity
Herman, S., & Pogarsky, G. (2023) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00224278231152626 · Cited by 17
Toward an operational model of decision making, emotional regulation, and mental health impact.
Collura, T. F., Zalaquett, R. P., Bonnstetter, C. J. O., & Chatters, S. J. (2014) · PubMed · Cited by 17
Getting Involved: Context-Based Learning in Chemistry Education
Menthe, J., & Parchmann, I. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45085-7_3 · Cited by 17
To Act or Not to Act: Nonconsequentialism in Environmental Decision-Making
Tanner, C. (2009) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508420903275192 · Cited by 17
Temporal Dynamics of Disgust and Morality: An Event-Related Potential Study
Yang, Q., Yan, L., Luo, J., Li, A., Zhang, Y., Tian, X., & Zhang, D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065094 · Cited by 17
Sympathy with Adam Smith and reflexions on self
Haig, D. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.09.002 · Cited by 17
Bucciarelli, M., & Daniele, M. (2014) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2014.970230 · Cited by 17
Emotions of “higher” cognition
PERLOVSKY, L. I. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11001555 · Cited by 17
The Science of Morality and its Normative Implications
Bruni, T., Mameli, M., & Rini, R. A. (2013) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-013-9191-y · Cited by 17
Emotional Intuitions and Moral Play
Keltner, D. J., Horberg, E. J., & Oveis, C. (2006) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-006-0006-8 · Cited by 17
Dogruel, L., Joeckel, S., & Bowman, N. D. (2012) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812451571 · Cited by 17
Varieties of Moral Emotional Experience
Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911402389 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidt, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haidt, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Haidt, Jonathan
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814-834
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2123791568
- Semantic Scholar
- b74e8da297574fd071d4b48b7aa94ea16861aea6
- Cited by
- 8,048
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 365 · 2025: 479 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 447 · 2022: 497 · 2021: 468 · 2020: 535 · 2019: 511 · 2018: 405 · 2017: 401 · 2016: 408 · 2015: 416 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 433 · 2012: 369
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03da012606-01)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (1-RO3-DA12606-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- moral judgment, moral reasoning, social intuitionism, moral intuitions, automated assessment, evolutionary psychology of morality
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Morals, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Social Values, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
