The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Abstract
Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent that rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, since moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change 11 – 13 , a parallel literature on moral cognition makes a different prediction: insofar as punishment is a method of restoring justice following a moral violation, punitive preferences should be less susceptible to group influence.”
From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The behaviour of individuals living in communities is regulated by moral norms and values 158-162 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [159]
In the citing paper
“Haidt [26], for example, has argued that quick, automatic processes drive moral judgment while reflective processes play a more ad hoc role.”
From Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Research from social psychology suggests that when individuals encounter others who use fundamentally different moral philosophies to guide behavior, we tend to judge those others as immoral, rather than simply using a different moral perspective (Haidt, 2001(Haidt, , 2012)).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Haidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Influential theories in psychology maintain that our moral sense is shaped by the social world (1)”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Most existing research takes a dyadic perspective to study the social transmission of morality; typically, one person (such as a child) is exposed to another's ideas (e.g., parent) through behavior or communication (1,2).”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As noted, other research suggests that moral judgments are often based on moral intuitions or heuristics [1], leading to quick and simple judgments.”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, disgust also affects our moral judgment [38,40,42].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This caveat might have contributed to the similar results in the meta-analyses on moral cognition and on ToM (rather than on empathy), given that emotion processing is thought to play a paramount role in real-world moral cognition (Krebs 2008; Tangney et al. 2007; Haidt 2001).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Haidt 2001
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,850
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 7×
“To say that moral reasoning is a conscious process means that the process is intentional, effortful, and controllable and that the reasoner is aware that it is going on (Bargh, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Black, 1998, Neuronal plasticity and the developing brain., 31
- Chen, 1999, The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context., 73
- D'Andrade, 1984, Cultural meaning systems., 88
- Darwin, 1998, The descent of man.
- de Waal, 1982, Chimpanzee politics.
- Frijda, 1986, The emotions.
- Hare, 1993, Without conscience.
- Harrison, 1967, Ethical objectivism., Vols. 3-4, 71
- Huttenlocher, 1994, Synaptogenesis, synapse elimination, and neural plasticity in human cerebral cortex., Vol. 27, 35
- Kagan, 1984, The nature of the child.
- Kant, 1959, Foundation of the metaphysics of morals (L. W. Beck. Trans.).
- Kohlberg, 1969, Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization., 347
- Lapsley, 1996, Moral psychology.
- Margolis, 1987, Patterns, thinking, and cognition.
- Mednick, 1982, Biology and violence., 21
- Mischel, 1976, A cognitive social-learning approach to morality and self-regulation., 84
- Newcomb, 1943, Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community.
- Pavlov, 1927, Conditioned reflexes.
- Perkins, 1983, Difficulties in everyday reasoning., 177
- Premack, 1995, Origins of human social competence., 205
- Rozin, 2000, Disgust., 637
- Shweder, 1997, The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering., 119
- Singer, 1994, Rethinking life and death.
- Solomon, 1993, The philosophy of emotions., 3
- Solomon, 1991, A terror management theory of social behavior., 93
- Williams, 1967, Rationalism., Vols. 7-8, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,401–3,500 of 8,792
Entstehung und Wirkung moralischen Belastungserlebens bei Pflegefachpersonen
Goldbach, M., Riedel, A., & Lehmeyer, S. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-67049-1_2 · Cited by 11
Mosley, A. J., Bharj, N., & Biernat, M. (2023) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-023-01414-5 · Cited by 11
The Multiple Roles of Emotion in Interpretation and Memory of Sexual Consent
Davis, D., Cano, J., Miller, G. D., & Loftus, E. F. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12691 · Cited by 11
Connecting human behaviour, meaning and nature
Anderies, J. M., & Folke, C. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0314 · Cited by 11
Individualistic and social motives for justice judgments
van Prooijen, J. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12143 · Cited by 11
Ethics Education of Business Leaders
Culham, T. E. (2013) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-62396-348-4 · Cited by 11
Nietzsche and Moral Psychology
Telech, D., & Leiter, B. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118661666.ch7 · Cited by 11
ARE EVOLUTIONARY/COGNITIVE THEORIES OF RELIGION RELEVANT FOR PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION?
Peterson, G. R. (2010) · Zygon® · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01112.x · Cited by 11
Maxwell, B., & Beaulac, G. (2013) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2013.818530 · Cited by 11
Ease of Retrieval and the Moral Circle
Laham, S. M. (2012) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000099 · Cited by 11
Gender and Politics Among Anthropologists in the Units of Selection Debate
Yaworsky, W., Horowitz, M., & Kickham, K. (2014) · Biological Theory · doi:10.1007/s13752-014-0196-5 · Cited by 11
Derryberry, W. P., Jones, K. L., Grieve, F. G., & Barger, B. D. (2007) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240701688036 · Cited by 11
Behavioral Ethics Meets Legal Ethics
Robbennolt, J. K. (2015) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121631 · Cited by 11
EXPLORING MORAL ACTION: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF INTEGRATIVE MODELS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
Rajeev, P. N. (2011) · Cited by 11
Homo homini lupus? Morality, the Social Instincts, and our Fellow Primates
de Waal, F. Β. Μ. (2005) · Research and perspectives in neurosciences · doi:10.1007/3-540-29803-7_3 · Cited by 11
From Understanding to Utilizing: Theory of Mind and Children’s Distributive Justice
Wang, S., & Su, Y. (2013) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2013.01242 · Cited by 11
The Self-Transformation Puzzle: On the Possibility of Radical Self-Transformation
Kemp, R. S. (2015) · Res Philosophica · doi:10.11612/resphil.2015.92.2.11 · Cited by 11
On taking the theoretical substance of outcomes seriously: a meta-conversation
Smith‐Crowe, K., & Zhang, T. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316338827.003 · Cited by 11
Virtue ethics in the medieval period
Porter, J. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cco9780511734786.005 · Cited by 11
Anxious and Avoidant Attachment to God Predict Moral Foundations beyond Adult Attachment
Njus, D. M., & Okerstrom, K. L. (2016) · Journal of Psychology and Theology · doi:10.1177/009164711604400305 · Cited by 11
Integrated Moral Conviction Theory of Student Cheating: An Empirical Test
Roberts, F., Thomas, C. H., Novičević, M. M., Ammeter, A. P., Garner, B. L., Johnson, P., & Popoola, I. T. (2017) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562917710686 · Cited by 11
In Search of Greene's Argument
Paulo, N. (2018) · Utilitas · doi:10.1017/s0953820818000171 · Cited by 11
The Moral Myopia Model: Why and how reasoning matters in moral judgment
Landy, J. F., & Royzman, E. B. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315460178-10 · Cited by 11
The role of elevation in moral judgment
Klebl, C., Dziobek, I., & Diessner, R. (2019) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2018.1550635 · Cited by 11
The Normativity of Meaning Revisited
Glock, H. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190846466.003.0015 · Cited by 11
Semper, J. V. O., Akrivou, K., & Scalzo, G. R. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00139 · Cited by 11
Nadarevic, L., & Kroneisen, M. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104156 · Cited by 11
Exploring antecedents and consequences of managerial moral stress
Ames, J. B., Gaskin, J. E., & Goronson, B. (2020) · Business Ethics A European Review · doi:10.1111/beer.12272 · Cited by 11
Rationalization as representational exchange: Scope and mechanism
Cushman, F. A. (2020) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x19003261 · Cited by 11
Morality and Perception of Corruption
Leite, R. D. O., Dias, R. S., & Mendes, L. (2020) · Latin American Business Review · doi:10.1080/10978526.2020.1777558 · Cited by 11
Nachhaltigkeit im Unterricht berufsbildender Schulen
Schütt-Sayed, S. (2020) · doi:10.3278/6004723w · Cited by 11
Not Whodunit But Whydunit: Story Characters’ Motivations Influence Audience Interest in Services
Hamby, A. M., & van Laer, T. (2019) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705211003672 · Cited by 11
The moral identity picture scale (MIPS): Measuring the full scope of moral identity
Goranson, A., O’Fallon, C., & Gray, K. J. (2021) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2021.1990118 · Cited by 11
Engelsen, S. (2022) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies7020042 · Cited by 11
Just wrong? Or just WEIRD? Investigating the prevalence of moral dumbfounding in non-Western samples
McHugh, C., Zhang, R., Karnatak, T., Lamba, N., & Khokhlova, O. (2023) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-022-01386-z · Cited by 11
Development and Validation of a Scale to Assess Moral Disengagement in High-Carbon Behavior
Stoll‐Kleemann, S., Franikowski, P., & Nicolai, S. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15032054 · Cited by 11
Heras, E., Calle, A. M. C., León, V. D., & Pichasaca, C. (2023) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2023.2191180 · Cited by 11
Wu, T.-L., & Liu, H.-T. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15075772 · Cited by 11
Leong, M. Q., Yu, Z., Tsikandilakis, M., & Tong, E. M. W. (2023) · Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1037/ebs0000333 · Cited by 11
For whom will the Bayesian agents vote?
Caticha, N., Cesar, J. E. D. S., & Vicente, R. (2015) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2015.00025 · Cited by 11
Tanida, S., & Yamagishi, T. (2010) · Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science · doi:10.5178/lebs.2010.8 · Cited by 11
Hitting a robot vs. hitting a human
Lee, S.-L., & Lau, I. Y. (2011) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/1957656.1957724 · Cited by 11
Goodyear, K., Lee, M. R., O’Hara, M., Chernyak, S. V., Walter, H., Parasuraman, R., & Krüeger, F. (2015) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2015.1037463 · Cited by 11
Non-convex fuzzy data and fuzzy statistics: a first descriptive approach to data analysis
Calcagnì, A., Lombardi, L., & Pascali, E. (2013) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-013-1164-x · Cited by 11
An Ethical Decision-Making Model for Operational Psychology
Stephenson, J. A., & Staal, M. A. (2007) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508420701310091 · Cited by 11
Do strong value-based attitudes influence estimations of future events?: Table 1
Juth, N., & Lynöe, N. (2010) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.2009.033506 · Cited by 11
Arıdağ, N. Ç., & Yüksel, A. (2010) · Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS · Cited by 11
Fostering the ethical sensitivity of beginning clinicians.
Moffett, L. A., Becker, C.-L. J., & Patton, R. G. (2014) · Training and Education in Professional Psychology · doi:10.1037/tep0000054 · Cited by 11
Martins, N., Mares, M., Malacane, M., & Peebles, A. L. (2016) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650216644016 · Cited by 11
Expressivism, Motivation Internalism, and Hume
Joyce, R. (2009) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230281158_2 · Cited by 11
Neuroticism predisposes to donation more than agreeableness: An fMRI study.
Pinazo, D., Barrós‐Loscertales, A., Peris, R., Ventura‐Campos, N., & Ávila, C. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/npe0000054 · Cited by 11
Intuitive and Counterintuitive Morality
Kahane, G. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717812.003.0002 · Cited by 11
Ethical learning: releasing the moral unicorn
Chugh, D., & Kern, M. C. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316338827.017 · Cited by 11
Bleeding-heart conservatives and hard-headed liberals: The dual processes of moral judgements
Lane, D., & Sulikowski, D. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.045 · Cited by 11
Mudrack, P. E., & Mason, E. S. (2016) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650316681556 · Cited by 11
Re-Tweet Count Matters: Social Influences on Sharing of Disaster-Related Tweets
Li, H., & Sakamoto, Y. (2015) · Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management · doi:10.1515/jhsem-2014-0081 · Cited by 11
Outcome-focused judgements of moral dilemmas in schizophrenia
McGuire, J., Brüne, M., & Langdon, R. A. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.04.004 · Cited by 11
Lynch, R., Palestis, B. G., & Trivers, R. L. (2017) · Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/s40806-017-0103-y · Cited by 11
Political Identity and Economists’ Perceptions of Capitalist Crises
Horowitz, M., & Hughes, R. (2017) · Review of Radical Political Economics · doi:10.1177/0486613416670961 · Cited by 11
Can Cartoons Influence Americans' Attitudes Toward Bailouts?
Abdel-Raheem, A. (2017) · Visual Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15551393.2016.1230472 · Cited by 11
Moral Judgment and Empathic/Deontological Guilt
Migliore, S., D’Aurizio, G., Parisi, F., Maffi, S., Squitieri, B., Curcio, G., & Mancini, F. (2018) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294118787500 · Cited by 11
Buller, T. (2018) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180118000087 · Cited by 11
“There’s Life in the Old Dog Yet”: The Homo economicus model and its value for behavioral ethics
Schreck, P., van Aaken, D., & Homann, K. (2019) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-019-00964-z · Cited by 11
Hauskeller, M. (2006) · Ethical Perspectives · doi:10.2143/ep.13.4.2018710 · Cited by 11
Morality in Tele-immersive Environments
Segovia, K. Y., Bailenson, J. N., & Monin, B. (2009) · International ICST Conference on Immersive Telecommunications (IMMERSCOM) · doi:10.4108/icst.immerscom2009.6574 · Cited by 11
Confucius meets cognition: new answers to old questions
Reber, R., & Slingerland, E. (2011) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2011.598329 · Cited by 12
14 Space and the Language-Cognition Interface
Anna Papafragou, A. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0014 · Cited by 11
One function of gesture is to make new ideas
Nathan, M. J. (2017) · Gesture studies · doi:10.1075/gs.7.09nat · Cited by 11
Moral Severity is Represented as a Domain-General Magnitude
Powell, D., & Horne, Z. (2017) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000354 · Cited by 11
On the normative insignificance of neuroscience and dual-process theory
Königs, P. (2018) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-018-9362-y · Cited by 11
Thrasher, J. (2018) · Social Philosophy and Policy · doi:10.1017/s0265052518000055 · Cited by 11
The Ethical Distinctiveness of Emotion-Oriented Technology: Four Long-Term Issues
Goldie, P., Döring, S. A., & Cowie, R. (2010) · Cognitive technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15184-2_39 · Cited by 11
The Mind as an Intuitive Pollster: Frugal Search in Social Spaces
Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0009 · Cited by 11
Ethics, Law and the Challenge of Cognitive Science
Mahlmann, M. (2007) · German Law Journal · doi:10.1017/s2071832200005800 · Cited by 11
Felony Convictions and Program Admissions: Theoretical Perspectives to Guide Decision-Making
Leedy, M. G., & Smith, J. E. (2005) · NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) · doi:10.71889/5fylantbak.30804869 · Cited by 11
Fortin, M., Nadisic, T., Bell, C. M., Crawshaw, J. R., & Cropanzano, R. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2823-x · Cited by 11
Ethical leadership in firms: Antecedents and consequences
Li, C. (2015) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.2220.9444 · Cited by 11
How Do Rights Revolutions Occur? Free Speech and the First AmendmentPreprint
Chen, D. L., & Yeh, S. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2740546 · Cited by 11
Capraro, V., & Cococcioni, G. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2559182 · Cited by 11
Enseñanza de la Biología y pensamiento crítico: la importancia de la metacognición
Galli, L. G. (2019) · Revista de Educación en Biología · doi:10.59524/2344-9225.v22.n2.28528 · Cited by 11
Nietzsche’s Naturalistic Moral Psychology
Leiter, B. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198871712.013.7 · Cited by 10
Bernal, A. B. (2022) · Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho · doi:10.22201/iij.24487937e.2022.16.17038 · Cited by 10
Dumbfounded by the Facts? Understanding the Moral Psychology of Sexual Relationships
Kronqvist, C., & Elgabsi, N. (2023) · Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0031819123000013 · Cited by 10
Su, W., & Hahn, J. (2025) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-01-2024-0034 · Cited by 10
Morality across time and space
Atari, M., & Zewail, A. (2025) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2025.2500839 · Cited by 10
The Socio‐Cultural and Spiritual Dimensions on Non‐Marketed Environmental Valuation
Halkos, G., & Aslanidis, P. C. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.70178 · Cited by 10
Klotz, K., Heidenreich, T., Haug, P. M., Feinauer, S., & Riedel, A. (2025) · Ethik in der Medizin · doi:10.1007/s00481-025-00887-0 · Cited by 10
The effect of weight controllability beliefs on prejudice and self-efficacy
Thorsteinsson, E., Loi, N. M., & Breadsell, D. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.1764 · Cited by 10
Rhétorique et cognition . Rhetoric and Cognition
manière, D. C., de la rhétorique, L. R. E. U. A. O. U. T. –. P. Q. S. –. C. B. D. T. O. R. L. P. S., de discours, Q. S. D. À. T. D. G., le délibératif, l'épidictique, L. J. E., l'agora, L. R. D. L. S., le tribunal, antiques, L. C. M. L. D. D. E. S. C. D. L. D. F. A. L. À. U. T. S. U. F. A. C. Q. A. A. D. L. M. L. T. R., le sait, O., Tisias, S. L. I. P. C. D. C. D. L. O. L. À. L. C. P.-J. M. F. U. R. Q.-C. Q. E. S. D. L. O. D. L. C. A. M. A. P. N. P. B. L. J. D. C. E., et al. (2014) · doi:10.3726/978-3-0352-0271-7 · Cited by 11
Practically wise ethical decision‐making: An ethnographic application to the UNE‐Millicom merger
Díez, D., & Córdoba, M. D. P. R. (2019) · Business Ethics A European Review · doi:10.1111/beer.12226 · Cited by 10
The Evolution of Morals Under Indirect Reciprocity
Gaudeul, A., Keser, C., & Müller, S. S. W. (2019) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2021.01.004 · Cited by 10
Brain Activation Imaging in Emotional Decision Making and Mental Health: A Review—Part 2
Collura, T. F., & Bonnstetter, R. J. (2020) · Clinical EEG and Neuroscience · doi:10.1177/1550059420916642 · Cited by 10
Nowak, E., Barciszewska, A., Lind, G., Hemmerling, K., & Taradi, S. K. (2021) · ETHICS IN PROGRESS · doi:10.14746/eip.2021.1.9 · Cited by 10
Palmeira, M. M., Koo, M., & Sung, H.-A. (2021) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-09-2020-0659 · Cited by 10
Tarai, S., Qurratul, Q. A., Ratre, V., & Bit, A. (2022) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-022-02528-w · Cited by 10
Animatronic dolphins as the new authentic? posthuman reflections of ‘light’ tourism on the move
Fennell, D. A. (2022) · Journal of Ecotourism · doi:10.1080/14724049.2022.2099409 · Cited by 10
Intercultural Ethics for Digital Well-Being: Identifying Problems and Exploring Solutions
Dennis, M., & Clancy, R. F. (2022) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-022-00006-2 · Cited by 10
Theoretical models and neural mechanisms of prosocial risky behavior
Zhan, Y., Liu, C., Xiao, X., Tan, Q., & Fu, X. (2022) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/tb-2022-0699 · Cited by 10
Banks, J., Koban, K., & Haggadone, B. A. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3572036 · Cited by 10
Deviancy Aversion and Social Norms
Gollwitzer, A., Martel, C., Heinecke, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221131378 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidt, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haidt, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Haidt, Jonathan
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814-834
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2123791568
- Semantic Scholar
- b74e8da297574fd071d4b48b7aa94ea16861aea6
- Cited by
- 8,048
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 365 · 2025: 479 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 447 · 2022: 497 · 2021: 468 · 2020: 535 · 2019: 511 · 2018: 405 · 2017: 401 · 2016: 408 · 2015: 416 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 433 · 2012: 369
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03da012606-01)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (1-RO3-DA12606-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- moral judgment, moral reasoning, social intuitionism, moral intuitions, automated assessment, evolutionary psychology of morality
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Morals, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Social Values, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review