Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors.

Abstract

Research on judgment and choice has been dominated by functionalist assumptions that depict people as either intuitive scientists animated by epistemic goals or intuitive economists animated by utilitarian ones. This article identifies 3 alternative social functionalist starting points for inquiry: people as pragmatic politicians trying to cope with accountability demands from key constituencies in their lives, principled theologians trying to protect sacred values from secular encroachments, and prudent prosecutors trying to enforce social norms. Each functionalist framework stimulates middle-range theories that specify (a) cognitive-affective-behavioral strategies of coping with adaptive challenges and (b) the implications of these coping strategies for identifying empirical and normative boundary conditions on judgmental tendencies classified as errors or biases within the dominant research programs.

Cites (20)

1. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
   Baumeister, Roy F., Leary, Mark R. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
2. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
   Haidt, Jonathan · 2001 · Psychological Review
3. Status quo bias in decision making
   Samuelson, William, Zeckhauser, Richard · 1988 · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
4. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
   Lakatos, I. · 1970 · Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
5. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure
   Mischel, Walter, Shoda, Yuichi · 1995 · Psychological Review
6. How the mind works
   PINKER, STEVEN · 1999 · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
7. The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
   Steele, Claude M. · 1988 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
8. Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).
   Forgas, Joseph P. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
9. Accounting for the effects of accountability.
   Lerner, Jennifer S., Tetlock, Philip E. · 1999 · Psychological Bulletin
10. Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”
    Kruglanski, Arie W., Webster, Donna M. · 1996 · Psychological Review

Show all 20 references

Cited by (23)

1. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives.
   van Zomeren, Martijn, Postmes, Tom, Spears, Russell · 2008 · Psychological Bulletin
2. The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
   Douglas, Karen M., Sutton, Robbie M., Cichocka, Aleksandra · 2017 · Current Directions in Psychological Science
3. A theory of blame
   Malle, Bertram F., Guglielmo, Steve, Monroe, Andrew E. · 2014 · Psychological Inquiry
4. Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition
   Jones, Matt, Love, Bradley C. · 2011 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
5. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making
   Bartels, Daniel M. · 2008 · Cognition

See all 632