The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Salience describes the phenomenon that when one’s attention is directed toward a particular portion of the environment, that portion will be elevated regarding judgment and action.25”
From An Intervention Utilizing the Salience Principle to Reduce Pharmacy Students’ Psychological Attraction to Smartphones (2022) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man
Levine, S., & McLuhan, M. (1964) · American Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2711172 · Cited by 12,221
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process
Ross, L. (1977) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60357-3 · Cited by 4,170
From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424
Why People Use Health Services
Rosenstock, I. M. (2005) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00425.x · Cited by 2,329
Judged frequency of lethal events.
Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.551 · Cited by 1,539
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.609 · Cited by 2,290
“For example, Frey & Eagly (1993) attempted to understand why vivid messages typically are either no more effective than pallid messages or are sometimes less effective (see Taylor & Thompson 1982).”
BackgroundHerr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208570 · Cited by 2,142
Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profit When All Traders Are Above Average
Terrance Odean, B. (1998) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00078 · Cited by 1,995
Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109 · Cited by 1,875
Salience Theory of Choice Under Risk
Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2012) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjs018 · Cited by 1,343
“As Taylor and Thompson (1982) put it: “Salience refers to the phenomenon that when one’s attention is differentially directed to one portion of the environment rather than to others, the information contained in that portion will receive disproportionate weighting in subsequent judgments.””
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-181
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2087531239
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Keywords
- memory vividness, memory retrieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
