The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning.
Abstract
Humans appear to reason using two processing styles: System 1 processes that are quick, intuitive, and effortless and System 2 processes that are slow, analytical, and deliberate that occasionally correct the output of System 1. Four experiments suggest that System 2 processes are activated by metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency during the process of reasoning. Incidental experiences of difficulty or disfluency--receiving information in a degraded font (Experiments 1 and 4), in difficult-to-read lettering (Experiment 2), or while furrowing one's brow (Experiment 3)--reduced the impact of heuristics and defaults in judgment (Experiments 1 and 3), reduced reliance on peripheral cues in persuasion (Experiment 2), and improved syllogistic reasoning (Experiment 4). Metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency appear to serve as an alarm that activates analytic forms of reasoning that assess and sometimes correct the output of more intuitive forms of reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alter et al. (2007) demonstrated that metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency activate more analytical reasoning processes.”
From Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance (2025) · cites this paper as Alter et al. (2007)
In the citing paper
“Manipulating the activation of these heuristics (e.g., via priming) can be used to improve metacognitive control: increasing subjective processing difficulty (e.g., by using a degraded font) stimulates more metacognitive control and thereby improves participants' performance on reasoning tasks that benefit from a more analytic processing style [7].”
From The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Sloman, S. A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 · Cited by 3,942
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).
Forgas, J. P. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39 · Cited by 3,470
In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012 · Cited by 2,397
First Impressions: Making Up Your Mind After a 100-Ms Exposure to a Face
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x · Cited by 2,300
The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90013-r · Cited by 1,866
Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making
Schwarz, N. (2004) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_2 · Cited by 1,391
Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008 · Cited by 1,390
Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment.
Nicholas Epley, A., Keysar, B., Leaf Van Boven, A., & Gilovich, T. D. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327 · Cited by 1,316
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-5974 · Cited by 1,076
Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings.
Stepper, S., & Strack, F. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.211 · Cited by 662
Mood and Persuasion: Affective States Influence the Processing of Persuasive Communications
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Bohner, G. (1991) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60329-9 · Cited by 560
Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1001 · Cited by 557
The psychology of proof: deductive reasoning in human thinking
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1231 · Cited by 532
Persuasion by a Single Route: A View From the Unimodel
Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pl100201 · Cited by 520
Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference
Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R. A., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80006-5 · Cited by 484
Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process.
Gilbert, D. T. (1989) · Cited by 476
An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning
Osman, M. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196730 · Cited by 444
Schwarz, N. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_2 · Cited by 432
Oppenheimer, D. M. (2005) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1178 · Cited by 368
Self-citationPredicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601071103 · Cited by 340
Self-citationDissociation of mechanisms underlying syllogistic reasoning
Goel, V., Buchel, C., Frith, C., & Dolan, R. J. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0636 · Cited by 325
Birds of a Feather Flock Conjointly (?): Rhyme as Reason in Aphorisms
McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00282 · Cited by 320
The role of facial response in the experience of emotion.
Tourangeau, R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.9.1519 · Cited by 255
The Warm Glow Heuristic: When Liking Leads to Familiarity.
Monin, B. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1035 · Cited by 245
Intuitive confidence: Choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives.
Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.409 · Cited by 228
Gill, M. J., Jr. Swann William, B., & Silvera, D. H. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1101 · Cited by 144
A 4.0-T fMRI study of brain connectivity during word fluency in first-episode schizophrenia
Boksman, K., Théberge, J., Williamson, P., Drost, D. J., MALLA, A. K., Densmore, M., Takhar, J., Pavlosky, W. F., Menon, R. S., & Neufeld, R. W. J. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.025 · Cited by 144
Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart)
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. P. (2003) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00009-3 · Cited by 139
Feature and Conjunction Errors in Recognition Memory: Evidence for Dual-Process Theory
Jones, T. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2001) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2761 · Cited by 135
Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (1999) · Cited by 133
Depth of processing, belief congruence, and attitude-behavior correspondence.
Ajzen, I., & Sexton, J. D. (1999) · Cited by 118
On the dialectics of discrimination: Dual processes in social stereotyping
Bodenhausen, G. V., Macrae, C. N., & Sherman, J. S. (1999) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 93
Tetlock, P. E., & Lerner, J. S. (1999) · Cited by 71
Self-Anchoring in Conversation: Why Language Users Do Not Do What They “Should”
Keysar, B., & Barr, D. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.010 · Cited by 67
An inferential approach to the knew-it-all-along phenomenon
Werth, L., & Strack, F. (2003) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210244000586 · Cited by 53
Judgments of remembering: The revelation effect in children and adults
Guttentag, R. E., & Dunn, J. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0965(03)00135-8 · Cited by 24
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309341564 · Cited by 1,821
Self-citationEfklides, A. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538645 · Cited by 1,211
Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings
Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., et al. (2018) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245918810225 · Cited by 944
Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13544 · Cited by 805
Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories
Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006 · Cited by 726
Metadata
- Authors
- Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-576
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2138921773
- Cited by
- 844
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (051811; SES0241544)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- metacognition, analytical thinking, intuitive thinking, heuristics, syllogistic reasoning, persuasion, peripheral cues, cognitive effort, dual-process theory
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Judgment, Pilot Projects, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
