The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering.
Abstract
Two experiments compared collaborative and individual recall. In Experiment 1, participants encoded pictures and words with a deep or shallow processing task, then recalled them twice either individually or collaboratively. Collaborative groups recalled more than individuals, but less than nominal groups (pooled individuals), thus exhibiting collaborative inhibition. However, group recall appeared to be more stable over time than individual recall. Groups and individuals both showed a picture-superiority effect, a level-of-processing effect, and hypermnesia. In Experiment 2, participants recalled the story "War of the Ghosts" (from F. C. Bartlett, 1932), and again collaborative groups recalled more than individuals, but less than nominal groups. Both the individual and collaborative recalls were highly organized. There was evidence that the collaborative groups tended to rely on the best individual to a greater extent in story than in list recall. Possible social and cognitive mechanisms are considered.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These findings are consistent with previous research on group versus individual learning which showed that group learning is superior to individual learning for relatively complex problem-solving tasks (Laughlin et al. 2002;Laughlin et al. 2006) and that individual learning is superior to group learning for relatively simple recall tasks (e.g., Andersson and Rönnberg 1995;Meudell et al. 1992;Weld”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Weldon and Bellinger 1997
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174 · Cited by 5,604
Toward a model of text comprehension and production.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.5.363 · Cited by 5,298
Halbwachs, M., & Coser, L. A. (1992) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226774497.001.0001 · Cited by 4,939
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Paivio, A. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315798868 · Cited by 4,184
Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic Memory
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 · Cited by 4,121
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 500
Barber, S. J., & Rajaram, S. (2011) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2011.575787 · Cited by 19
“Previous studies have documented a benefit of collaboration on this post-collaborative free recall test (e.g., Basden, Basden, & Henry, 2000; Blumen & Rajaram, 2008; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
InfluentialCollaboration inflation: Egocentric source monitoring errors following collaborative remembering.
Hyman, I. E., Roundhill, R. F., Werner, K. M., & Rabiroff, C. A. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.004 · Cited by 19
Ross, M. G., Blatz, C. W., & Schryer, E. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370509-9.00174-1 · Cited by 19
Greeley, G. D., Chan, V., Choi, H., & Rajaram, S. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12639 · Cited by 21
“Interestingly, in the later individual recall, former collaborators usually recall more than participants who never collaborated (Blumen & Rajaram, 2008; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
Stewart, D. D., Stewart, C. B., Tyson, C., Vinci, G., & Fioti, T. (2004) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.3.166 · Cited by 18
Group Cognition: Collective Information Search and Distribution
Levine, J. M., & Smith, E. R. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730018.013.0030 · Cited by 18
Collaborative Group Memory: Processes, Performance, and Techniques for Improvement
Betts, K. R., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00252.x · Cited by 18
Participatory thick descriptions: a collaborative and reflective approach
Sankofa, N. (2022) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2022.2090469 · Cited by 17
“Scholars investigating collective reflection have conducted experimental memory studies finding that collaborative groups recall more information than individuals (see Weldon and Bellinger 1997).”
BackgroundAlea, N. L. (2009) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210903176486 · Cited by 18
“The reasons for silencing these memories are varied and often times strategic (see Omarzu, 2000 , for a review of self-disclosure), in an effort to avoid socially taboo topics (Zerubavel, 2006 ), and inconsistencies with conversational directions (Rime, 1995 ; Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997 ; Weldon & Bellinge…”
BackgroundThe effects of collaborative practice on statistical problem solving: Benefits and boundaries.
Pociask, S. E., & Rajaram, S. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.06.005 · Cited by 17
Individuals and dyads in a multiple-cue judgment task: Cognitive processes and performance
Olsson, A.-C., Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.01.004 · Cited by 17
Roch, S. G. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.08.003 · Cited by 16
Long-lasting positive effects of collaborative remembering on false assents to misleading questions
Rossi‐Arnaud, C., Spataro, P., Bhatia, D., Doricchi, F., Mastroberardino, S., & Cestari, V. (2019) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102986 · Cited by 16
“Following Weldon and Bellinger (1997), no specific instructions were given regarding the modalities of collaboration and turn-taking was not explicitly required, favouring free-flowing discussion.”
BackgroundCollective Memory: How Groups Remember Their Past
Abel, M., Umanath, S., Wertsch, J. V., & Roediger, H. L., III (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198737865.003.0016 · Cited by 15
Is Memory in the Brain? Remembering as Social Behavior
Manier, D. (2004) · Mind Culture and Activity · doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1104_2 · Cited by 17
“…been prominent among those who have shown renewed interest in social remembering (see Clark, Stephenson, & Kniveton, 1990; Pasupathi, 2003; Stephenson, Kniveton, & Wagner, 1991; Wegener, 1986; Wegener, Erber, & Raymond, 1991; Weldon, 2001; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997; Weldon, Blair, & Huebsch, 2000).”
Lu, Y., Rosenfeld, J. P., Deng, X., Zhang, E.-H., Zheng, H., Yan, G., Ouyang, D., & Hayat, S. Z. (2017) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13021 · Cited by 15
Lehmer, E.-M., & Bäuml, K. T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00701 · Cited by 17
“Collaborative inhibition is a robust and fairly general finding that arises with a variety of study materials, like word lists, prose texts, or pictures (Weldon and Bellinger, 1997; Finlay et al., 2000).”
BackgroundIndividual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency
Miller, A. L., & Nash Unsworth, A. (2018) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-018-0827-3 · Cited by 19
“Indeed, more recent research interested in subjective organization (e.g., Davis et al., 2003; Harrison, 2014; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997) continues to use bidirectional PF as the measure of choice.”
BackgroundCollaborative inhibition in spatial memory retrieval
Sjolund, L. A., Erdman, M., & Kelly, J. W. (2014) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0407-0 · Cited by 15
“…group members (Peker & Tekcan, 2009), whereby more-familiar group members could provide additional retrieval cues to their partner(s); social norms (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997), whereby group members may not want to interrupt the recall of their partner(s); and motivational factors (Weldon et al.,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCollaborative inhibition persists following social processing
Kelley, M. R., Reysen, M. B., Ahlstrand, K., & Pentz, C. J. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.684945 · Cited by 15
“In fact, dozens of articles on the topic of collaborative memory have demonstrated collaborative inhibition in most circumstances—that is, participants working together tend to remember less than the combined, nonredundant, output of an equal number of participants working alone (for reviews, see Andersson, Helstrup,…”
Hard to Recall But Easy to Judge: Retrieval Strategies in Social Information Processing
Garrido, M. V., Garcia‐Marques, L., & Hamilton, D. L. (2012) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.56 · Cited by 15
Enhancing the Comparability Between Part-List Cueing and Collaborative Recall
Garrido, M. V., Garcia‐Marques, L., & Hamilton, D. L. (2012) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000144 · Cited by 15
Hinds, J. M., & Payne, S. J. (2016) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3228 · Cited by 15
“These effects evidently counteract any benefits of collaboration, such as the inspiration or development of ideas, cueing of memories and so forth (Diehl & Stroebe, 1987; Hymes & Olson, 1992; Jablin & Seibold, 1978; Meudell, Hitch & Boyle, 1995; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundResultSutton, J. D. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816826.013 · Cited by 15
Graded Effects of Social Conformity on Recognition Memory
Axmacher, N., Gossen, A., Elger, C. E., & Fell, J. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009270 · Cited by 14
“While majority decisions are usually more accurate than those of individual subjects [12], multiple individuals in a group perform worse in free recall tasks than the joint individuals, probably due to a disruption of retrieval strategies [13–15].”
BackgroundObtaining representative nominal groups
Kelley, M. R., & Wright, D. B. (2010) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.42.1.36 · Cited by 14
“In our area of research— memory in groups—the general finding (e.g., Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997; Weldon, Blair, & Huebsch, 2000; Wright & Klumpp, 2004; but see also Andersson & Rönnberg, 1996; Meade, Nokes, & Morrow, 2009; Takahashi & Saito, 2004; Thorley &…”
Correcting socially introduced false memories: The effect of re-study.
McNabb, J. C., & Meade, M. L. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.05.007 · Cited by 14
Rajaram, S., & Barber, S. J. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370509-9.00169-8 · Cited by 14
“In this series of experiments, B. H. Basden and colleagues also reported the same pattern of results as Weldon and Bellinger (1997), showing that nominal recall was greater than collaborative recall.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHow does social competition affect true and false recognition?
Liu, Z., Liu, T., & Li, Y. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01807-7 · Cited by 12
Children's collaborative recall of shared and unshared information
Gummerum, M., Leman, P. J., & Hollins, T. S. (2012) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12006 · Cited by 13
Individual and group performance on insight problems: The effects of experimentally induced fixation
Smith, C. M., Bushouse, E., & Lord, J. (2009) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430209340276 · Cited by 12
Collaborative Inhibition in Group Recall: Cognitive Principles and Implications
Rajaram, S. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198737865.003.0004 · Cited by 13
“…nominal group recall is seven items: A, B, C, D, E, F, G. This comparison between collaborative and nominal groups reveals the counterintuitive outcome of collaborative inhibition— collaborative groups recall significantly less studied information than do nominal groups (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLet’s Talk it Out: The Effects of Calibration Meetings on Performance Ratings
Speer, A. B., Tenbrink, A. P., & Schwendeman, M. G. (2019) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2019.1609477 · Cited by 13
“…remember and consider more information than individuals (Martell & Borg, 1993; Martell & Leavitt, 2002; Roch, 2006, 2007) because they pool and utilize the memories of all members as opposed to a single member (Hinsz, 1990; Vollrath, Sheppard, Hinsz, & Davis, 1989; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundCollective memory: Collaborative recall synchronizes what and how people remember
Greeley, G. D., & Rajaram, S. (2023) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1641 · Cited by 15
“…focused on this measure, many experiments include such postcollaborative recall phases (e.g., Basden et al., 1997; Blumen & Rajaram, 2008; Blumen et al., 2014; Harris et al., 2008; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997; Weldon et al., 2000; Weldon, 2000; Wissman & Rawson, 2015; also see Rajaram, 2022).”
InfluentialMind the gap: Generations of questions in the early science of collaborative recall.
Barnier, A. J., Harris, C. B., & Congleton, A. R. (2013) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.05.002 · Cited by 13
Teams as technology: applying theory and research to model macrocognition processes in teams
Wallace, D. M., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639221003729201 · Cited by 13
“1992, Hinsz 1994, Weldon and Bellinger 1997, Basden et al .”
BackgroundThe joint influence of collaboration and part-set cueing
Kelley, M. R., Pentz, C. J., & Reysen, M. B. (2014) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.881405 · Cited by 13
Stewart, D. D., Stewart, C. B., & Walden, J. C. (2007) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207078693 · Cited by 13
“The few studies that have examined such a transfer suggest it occurs in a continuous manner (Badsen et al. 1997; Stewart & Stewart, 2001; Stewart, Stewart, Tyson, Vinci & Fioti, 2004; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialIssues in the Socio-Cultural Study of Memory
Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611162.036 · Cited by 13
Collaborative remembering reduces suggestibility: A study with the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale
Rossi‐Arnaud, C., Spataro, P., Bhatia, D., & Cestari, V. (2018) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2018.1542004 · Cited by 13
“The first result replicates the common finding that collaborative groups remember more than individuals (Meudell, Hitch, & Boyle, 1995; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997), although note that this effect has not been always observed with dyads (Finlay et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialCollaborative remembering in ethnically uniform and diverse group settings.
Pepe, N. W., Wang, Q., & Rajaram, S. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.08.001 · Cited by 14
Learning during a collaborative final exam
Dahlström, Ö. (2012) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2012.674689 · Cited by 13
Ferron, M., & Massa, P. (2011) · Iris (University of Trento) · Cited by 13
Exploring Online Social Interactions in the Remaking of Memory
Rajaram, S. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661260.003.0012 · Cited by 12
Sohrab, G., Uitdewilligen, S., & Waller, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2592 · Cited by 15
Crompton, C. J., Wolters, M. K., & MacPherson, S. E. (2022) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2022.2041038 · Cited by 16
“…memory aids, providing additional learning opportunities and cues for recall, similar to cross-cueing and re-exposure theories (Blumen et al., 2013; Blumen & Rajaram, 2008; Blumen & Stern, 2011; Congleton & Rajaram, 2011; Meudell et al., 1992; Meudell et al., 1995; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundAbel, M., & Bäuml, K. T. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105453 · Cited by 12
Collaborative learning of new information in older age: a systematic review
Wolfe, K., Crompton, C. J., Hoffman, P., & MacPherson, S. E. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211595 · Cited by 15
Collaborative Recall Reduces the Effect of a Misleading Post Event Narrative
Karns, T. E., Irvin, S. J., Suranic, S. L., & Rivardo, M. G. (2009) · North American journal of psychology · Cited by 12
Remembering Good and Bad Times Together: Functions of Collaborative Remembering
Pasupathi, M., & Wainryb, C. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198737865.003.0015 · Cited by 12
Silence is golden: The effect of verbalization on group performance.
Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000456 · Cited by 12
“Past studies have demonstrated negative effects of group interaction on memory recall (Basden et al., 1997; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
Browning, C., Harris, C. B., & Bergen, P. V. (2018) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2018.1541398 · Cited by 12
“…as collaborative inhibition (Andersson & Rönnberg, 1995; Basden et al., 1997; Basden, Basden, & Henry, 2000; Harris, Barnier, & Sutton, 2012; Harris, Barnier, Sutton, Keil, & Dixon, 2017; Rajaram & Pereira-Pasarin, 2010; Ross, Spencer, Linardatos, Lam, & Perunovic, 2004; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundResultPaine, A. R., & Knight, J. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-03-0054 · Cited by 12
“However, variation in the ways that students choose to interact can also have negative implications both within their current groups and on future individual performance (Weldon and Bellinger, 1997; Blumen et al. , 2014; Barber et al. , 2015; Marion and Thorley, 2016).”
Cognição Social: Fundamentos, formulaçõees actuais e perspectivas futuras
Garrido, M. V., Azevedo, C., & Palma, T. A. (1969) · Psicologia · doi:10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.282 · Cited by 18
“…pessoas e grupos (e.g., Garcia-Marques, Garrido, Hamilton, & Ferreira, 2012; Garrido, Garcia-Marques, & Hamilton, 2012a; Garrido, Garcia-Marques, & Hamilton, 2012b; Levine, Resnick, & Higgins, 1993; Wegner, 1986; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997; para uma revisão ver Rajaram & Pereira-Pasarin, 2010).”
From individual memories to oral history
Bernstein, D. M., Nourkova, V. V., & Loftus, E. F. (2008) · Cited by 11
Why and how do undergraduates study in groups?
McCabe, J. A., & Lummis, S. N. (2018) · Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology · doi:10.1037/stl0000099 · Cited by 11
“…2013); indeed, the retrieval disruption hypothesis states that group members’ responses alter each individual learner’s organizational knowledge structures in ways that impair retrieval and therefore subsequent learning (e.g., Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundInhibitory Process of Collaborative Inhibition: Assessment Using an Emotional Stroop Task
Zhang, H., Zhang, X., Liu, X., Yang, H., & Shi, J. (2018) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294118805007 · Cited by 11
“…mean differences was 0.103, standard error (SE)¼ 0.023, p¼ .001), demonstrating the stable effect of collaborative inhibition (Basden et al., 1997; Basden, Basden, & Henry, 2000; Finlay et al., 2000; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997); this conclusion was extended to emotional Chinese characters.”
BackgroundInfluentialEditors’ Introduction: Remembering With Others: Conversational Dynamics and Mnemonic Outcomes
Bietti, L. M., & Stone, C. B. (2019) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12443 · Cited by 11
Enhancing individual and collaborative eyewitness memory with category clustering recall
Thorley, C. (2018) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2018.1432058 · Cited by 11
“This decrement is known as collaborative inhibition (or CI: Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundKozlov, M. D., Engelmann, T., Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.029 · Cited by 11
Emergence and transmission of misinformation in the context of social interactions
Saraiva, M., Garrido, M. V., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01081-x · Cited by 10
Balancing Collaboration and Cognitive Load to Optimize Individual and Group Desirable Difficulties
Nihalani, P. K., & Robinson, D. H. (2021) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331211035188 · Cited by 12
“Sometimes having an individual brainstorm or recall in groups actually produces fewer unique instances than comparison groups who meet separately and pool their contributions (Peker & Tekcan, 2009; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997), often referred to as the collaborative inhibition effect.”
BackgroundSocial remembering in the digital age: Implications for virtual study, work, and social engagement
Greeley, G. D., Peña, T., & Rajaram, S. (2022) · Memory Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2022.3 · Cited by 10
“Consistent with previous work, we hypothesised that former Collaborators would recall more than their Nominal counterparts (Blumen and Rajaram 2008; Weldon and Bellinger 1997).”
BackgroundFischer, V. (2022) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.07.004 · Cited by 18
Mnemonic Diffusion: An Agent-Based Modeling Investigation of Collective Memory
Luhmann, C. C., & Rajaram, S. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 10
Roediger, H. L., III, Zaromb, F. M., & Goode, M. K. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370509-9.00047-4 · Cited by 10
Writing Alone or Together: Police Officers’ Collaborative Reports of an Incident
Vredeveldt, A., Kesteloo, L., & Koppen, P. J. V. (2018) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854818771721 · Cited by 10
“A consistent finding is that collaborative groups remember significantly less on average than nominal groups, an effect called collaborative inhibition (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundCollaborative learning methods and multimedia tools for the education and training of instructors
Armenteros, M., Benítez, A. J., Ruíz, M. F., Marcos, R. D. L. V., Sillero‐Quintana, M., & Cid, M. S. (2019) · International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-07-2017-0061 · Cited by 11
Collaborative inhibition effect: the role of memory task and retrieval method
Saraiva, M., Albuquerque, P. B., & Garrido, M. V. (2023) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-023-01821-z · Cited by 10
Collaboration during visual search
Malcolmson, K. A., Reynolds, M., & Smilek, D. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196825 · Cited by 10
“Weldon & Bellinger, 1997, Basden et al.,”
BackgroundInfluentialSwol, L. M. V. (2008) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210701810187 · Cited by 10
“al, 1989 ; Warnick & Sanders, 1980 ; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997 ).”
Detecting Deception within Small Groups: A Literature Review
Vernham, Z., Granhag, P. A., & Giolla, E. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01012 · Cited by 12
“Whilst the memory literature suggests that collaborative groups (group members recalling information together) recall significantly more information than individual group members (each group member recalling information alone), some studies show that nominal groups (pooled individuals whereby the group members recall…”
BackgroundCollaborative Retrieval Practice Reduces Mind-Wandering During Learning
Knopps, A. G., & Wissman, K. T. (2023) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000589 · Cited by 11
“Concerning recall, Figure 3 These outcomes provide evidence of collaborative inhibition during practice, which replicates prior research (Blumen & Rajaram, 2008; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundResultVisual Literacy as a tool to explore what lays behind and beyond our anticipations
Karaiskou, V. (2024) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2024.103350 · Cited by 10
Collaborative Remembering and Reminiscence in Older Adults
Henkel, L. A., & Kris, A. E. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198737865.003.0008 · Cited by 9
Investigation of collaborative inhibition for key‐term definitions
Wissman, K. T. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3606 · Cited by 11
Collaborative communication efficiency is linked to relationship satisfaction in dating couples
Bannon, S. M., Taggart, T. C., Kehoe, C. M., & O'Leary, K. (2020) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/pere.12319 · Cited by 8
Rousseau, L., & Kashur, N. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704433 · Cited by 11
Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs
Vredeveldt, A., & Koppen, P. J. V. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00284 · Cited by 9
“Collaborative inhibition refers to the finding that a group of individuals recalling together (i.e., a collaborative group) remembers less than the same number of individuals recalling on their own (i.e., a nominal group; Weldon and Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundCollaborative Memory Knowledge: A Distributed Reliabilist Perspective
Michaelian, K., & Arango‐Muñoz, S. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198737865.003.0013 · Cited by 9
“While research on SS- RIF is concerned with what individuals remember in social contexts, research on collaborative recall (Basden et al., 1997; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997) is in an important sense concerned with what social groups themselves remember.”
BackgroundFaul, L., Ford, J. H., & Kensinger, E. A. (2024) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2024.10.005 · Cited by 12
Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208565 · Cited by 8
Hinds, J. M., & Payne, S. J. (2017) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2017.1354997 · Cited by 8
“These findings therefore reflect typical findings of hypermnesia in episodic recall (e.g., Blumen & Rajaram, 2008; Meudell, Hitch, & Boyle, 1995; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997) and extend the effect to semantic collaborative retrieval.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe influence of members’ relationship on collaborative remembering
Zhang, H., Xin, W. A. N. G., Liu, Y., Cao, X., & Wu, J. (2021) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2021.00481 · Cited by 8
“…环 1,2,3 王 欣 2 刘一贝 2 曹贤才 1,2,3 吴 捷 1,2,3 (1 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院) (2 天津师范大学心理学部) (3 学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室, 天津 300387) 摘 要 当人们与搭档组成社会群体一起协作讨论某些已经发生的事件或经验时, 该社会群体中的成员关系对协 作提取成绩的影响仍不明确。本研究通过两项实验, 分别使用语词词单和情景故事作为实验材料, 考察成员关系 (包括关系类型和关系时长)对协作提取成绩的影响。研究结果表明, 当记忆的材料为语词词单时, 青年陌生组出现 了协作抑制;…”
InfluentialRetrieval Disruption in Collaborative Groups due to Brand Cues
Lindsey, C. D., & Krishnan, H. S. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/510220 · Cited by 8
Zhang, H., Fu, Y., Zhang, X., & Shi, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12177-x · Cited by 8
Elie, C. J., & Payne, D. G. (1999) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03207736 · Cited by 8
Wei, Y., Soderstrom, N. C., Meade, M. L., & Scott, B. G. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14111104 · Cited by 9
“First, individuals recalling information with other group members may suffer from collaborative inhibition, or worse recall in groups [7,8].”
A psicologia social da experiência – a relevância da memória
Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2006) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 7
Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Cui, Z., Wang, H., Liu, X., Wagner, U., & Echterhoff, G. (2023) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2023.2166963 · Cited by 7
“Weldon and Bellinger (1997) first demonstrated that, during remembering, individuals working together as a collaborative group performed much more poorly than did the same number of people remembering individually (nominal group).”
BackgroundMethodBlumen, H. M., Rajaram, S., & Henkel, L. A. (2013) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.05.004 · Cited by 7
Vernham, Z., Vrij, A., & Leal, S. (2018) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1111/lcrp.12136 · Cited by 7
Rossi‐Arnaud, C., Spataro, P., Mastroberardino, S., Lucaroni, E., Giannini, A. M., & Cestari, V. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01970-7 · Cited by 7
“FollowingWeldon and Bellinger (1997), participants received no instructions on how to sort out potential disagreements.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPositive and negative effects of collaboration on suggestibility and false memory in online groups
Rossi‐Arnaud, C., Spataro, P., Santirocchi, A., Pesola, C., Costantini, L., & Cestari, V. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04775-y · Cited by 7
“This finding aligns well with the predictions following from the retrieval disruption hypothesis (Basden et al., 1997; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
InfluentialCollaborative Remembering and Collective Memory
Rajaram, S. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190917982.013.75 · Cited by 7
Social contagion of correct and incorrect information in memory
Rush, R. A., & Clark, S. E. (2013) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.859268 · Cited by 7
Elimination of collaborative inhibition effect using the Method of Loci
Saraiva, M., Albuquerque, P. B., & Arantes, J. (2016) · Psicothema · doi:10.7334/psicothema2015.241 · Cited by 7
“This phenomenon is characterized by lower performance in collaborative group’s recall, when compared to the potential performance of the group members when they recall information individually, usually designated as nominal group (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundClustering Strategy in Intellectually Gifted Children
Zhang, H., Zhang, X., He, Y., & Shi, J. (2017) · Gifted Child Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0016986216687825 · Cited by 7
“Weldon and Bellinger (1997) first demonstrated that at the retrieval phase, when individuals worked together as a collaborative group, they performed poorly compared with the same number of people tested individually (nominal group).”
BackgroundInterfacing Body, Mind, the Physical, and the Social World: Socially Situated Cognition
Semin, G. R., Garrido, M. V., & Palma, T. A. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730018.013.0031 · Cited by 9
Making Visible the Invisible: Visuality, Narrativity, and Victimhood in Greek Cypriot Memorials
Karaiskou, V. (2016) · International Journal of Politics Culture and Society · doi:10.1007/s10767-016-9245-3 · Cited by 7
“That effective Bpicture-superiority effect^ (Weldon and Bellinger 1997, 1162) is the main reason why images hold such a crucial role in making tangible complex concepts and ideologies and in having a profound emotional impact.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1160-1175
- ISSN
- 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1285
- OpenAlex
- W2018734806
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- collective memory, collaborative recall, collaborative inhibition, picture superiority effect, levels of processing, hypermnesia, story recall, memory organization, social memory
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Individuality, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Mental Recall, Verbal Behavior, Verbal Learning, Writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
