The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering.
Abstract
Two experiments compared collaborative and individual recall. In Experiment 1, participants encoded pictures and words with a deep or shallow processing task, then recalled them twice either individually or collaboratively. Collaborative groups recalled more than individuals, but less than nominal groups (pooled individuals), thus exhibiting collaborative inhibition. However, group recall appeared to be more stable over time than individual recall. Groups and individuals both showed a picture-superiority effect, a level-of-processing effect, and hypermnesia. In Experiment 2, participants recalled the story "War of the Ghosts" (from F. C. Bartlett, 1932), and again collaborative groups recalled more than individuals, but less than nominal groups. Both the individual and collaborative recalls were highly organized. There was evidence that the collaborative groups tended to rely on the best individual to a greater extent in story than in list recall. Possible social and cognitive mechanisms are considered.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These findings are consistent with previous research on group versus individual learning which showed that group learning is superior to individual learning for relatively complex problem-solving tasks (Laughlin et al. 2002;Laughlin et al. 2006) and that individual learning is superior to group learning for relatively simple recall tasks (e.g., Andersson and Rönnberg 1995;Meudell et al. 1992;Weld”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Weldon and Bellinger 1997
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174 · Cited by 5,604
Toward a model of text comprehension and production.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.5.363 · Cited by 5,298
Halbwachs, M., & Coser, L. A. (1992) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226774497.001.0001 · Cited by 4,939
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Paivio, A. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315798868 · Cited by 4,184
Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic Memory
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 · Cited by 4,121
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Griffith, Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036531 · Cited by 829
How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups
Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1 · Cited by 697
“For example, Weldon and Bellinger (1997) compared the performance of three-person interactive and nominal groups on a free recall task. They found that interactive groups recalled fewer words (Experiment 1) and fewer propositional units from a story (Experiment 2) than did equivalent size nominal groups. They labeled…”
BackgroundResultThe social construction of the personal past and its implications for adult development.
Pasupathi, M. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.5.651 · Cited by 566
A Cognitive Load Approach to Collaborative Learning: United Brains for Complex Tasks
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2 · Cited by 547
“…with the expected performance of nominal groups, have shown that group recollection is either at or below the level that such pooling would predict (Hinsz, 1990; Hoppe, 1962; Meudell, Hitch, & Kirby, 1992; Perlmutter & De Montmollin, 1952; Stephenson, Clark, & Wade, 1986; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialCommunication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems
Hollingshead, A. B. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1358 · Cited by 471
Towards a psychology of collective memory
Hirst, W., & Manier, D. (2008) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210701811912 · Cited by 443
“…the burgeoning experimental research on social contagion is a good example of research from this perspective (Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997; Gabbert et al., 2003; Meade & Roediger, 2002; Weldon, 2001; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997; Weldon, Blair, & Huebsch, 2000; Wright, Self, & Justice, 2000).”
BackgroundRoediger, H. L., III, Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196174 · Cited by 423
“However, if the performance of 2 or 3 individuals who recalled alone is compared with that of the group in terms of total items recalled, the individuals do better (e.g., Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundRemembering in Conversations: The Social Sharing and Reshaping of Memories
Hirst, W. C., & Echterhoff, G. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100340 · Cited by 438
Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving
Graesser, A. C., Fiore, S. M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P. W., & Hesse, F. W. (2018) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618808244 · Cited by 390
“The superior memory performance of nominal groups relative to collaborating groups has been termed collaborative inhibition (Andersson, Hitch, & Meudell, 2006; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundThe psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering
Sutton, J. D., Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., & Barnier, A. J. (2010) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-010-9182-y · Cited by 398
“The robust finding is that collaborative groups recall more than individuals alone, but less than nominal groups (Weldon and Bellinger 1997; Basden et al. 2000; Harris et al. 2008).”
BackgroundMethodA comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?
Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., & L., I. T. R. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.23.5.1176 · Cited by 355
Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search
Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.012 · Cited by 351
“…to recall items together) are compared to those of ''nominal'' groups (formed by pooling products of the same number of individuals recalling alone, excluding duplicate items), nominal groups recall more than true groups (e.g., Lorge & Solomon, 1962; Ryack, 1965; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundMemory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person
Wright, D. B., Self, G., & Justice, C. (2000) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712600161781 · Cited by 326
Collaborative Memory: Cognitive Research and Theory
Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610388763 · Cited by 312
“In this—more appropriate—comparison, collaborative groups’ recall is significantly lower than that of nominal groups’ (B.H. Basden et al., 1997; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialKirschner, F., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.008 · Cited by 303
“…studies suggest that the collaboration process is detrimental for group-member performance even though the environment was constrained and communication and coordination were bound to rules and kept to a minimum (Andersson & Rönnberg, 1995; Meudell, Hitch, & Kirby, 1992; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundCollaborative fixation: Effects of others' ideas on brainstorming
Kohn, N. W., & Smith, S. M. (2010) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1699 · Cited by 292
When Is It Better to Learn Together? Insights from Research on Collaborative Learning
Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8 · Cited by 308
“…(Andersson and Rönnberg 1995), experiment 1; stories (Andersson and Rönnberg 1995 ), experiment 1; problem scenarios (Meade et al. 2009); pictures (Weldon and Bellinger 1997); and videos (Andersson and Rönnberg 1995), experiment 2), category learning (e.g., Voiklis and Corter 2012), and video…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCuc, A., Koppel, J., & Hirst, W. C. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01967.x · Cited by 244
Theiner, G., Allen, C., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.07.002 · Cited by 231
A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory
Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J. D., Harris, C. B., & Wilson, R. A. (2007) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.07.002 · Cited by 227
“Although the collaborative recall procedure was introduced by Weldon and Bellinger (1997) as a measure of ''collective memory'' and the emergent properties of group memory—the title of their paper was ''Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering''—the most commonly…”
MethodCollaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together?
Harris, C. B., Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2008) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210701811862 · Cited by 226
“This deficit is termed collaborative inhibition, and it is a robust effect that has been reported in numerous experiments (e.g., Basden, Basden, Bryber & Thomas, 1997; Basden, Basden & Henry, 2000; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1730 · Cited by 219
“…tasks (e.g., F. Kirschner et al., 2009b; Laughlin, Bonner, & Miner, 2002; Laughlin, Hatch, Silver, & Boh, 2006), and that individual learning is superior to group learning for relatively simple recall tasks (e.g., Andersson & Rönnberg, 1995; Meudell, Hitch, & Kirby, 1992; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundThe cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits
Smaldino, P. E. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13001544 · Cited by 211
We Remember, We Forget: Collaborative Remembering in Older Couples
Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., Sutton, J. D., Barnier, A. J., & McIlwain, D. J. F. (2011) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2010.541854 · Cited by 207
“Assessing group influence in this way reliably shows that collaborative groups recall less than nominal groups: this effect is termed collaborative inhibition (Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997; Basden, Basden, & Henry, 2000; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundBrennan, S. E., Galati, A., & Kuhlen, A. K. (2010) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(10)53008-1 · Cited by 222
Dinsmore, D. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9198-7 · Cited by 205
The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition.
Marsh, E. J., & Rajaram, S. (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001 · Cited by 186
Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x · Cited by 180
“These findings are consistent with previous research on group versus individual learning which showed that group learning is superior to individual learning for relatively complex problem-solving tasks (Laughlin et al. 2002; Laughlin et al. 2006) and that individual learning is superior to group learning for relativel…”
BackgroundResultBlumen, H. M., & Rajaram, S. (2008) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210701804495 · Cited by 163
“Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997 ; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997 ).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialExpertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task
Meade, M. L., Nokes, T. J., & Morrow, D. G. (2008) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210802524240 · Cited by 167
“…analysis, collaborative groups remember more than individuals (e.g., Dixon, 1999), there is also evidence that at the individual level of analysis, each individual remembers less when working in a group relative to working alone, a finding termed collaborative inhibition (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundMethodLanguage in dialogue: when confederates might be hazardous to your data
Kuhlen, A. K., & Brennan, S. E. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0341-8 · Cited by 172
Group remembering: Does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition?
Weldon, M. S., Blair, C., & Huebsch, P. D. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1568 · Cited by 153
Self-citationDifferential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes
Kirschner, F., PAAS, F. G. W. C., Kirschner, P. A., & Janssen, J. J. H. M. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.01.001 · Cited by 175
“Consequently, individual learners may have performed better than group learners because the latter could not profit from positive interdependence, but more likely suffered from working together with other group members (i.e., collaborative inhibition; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundOn the formation of collective memories: The role of a dominant narrator
Cuc, A., Ozuru, Y., Manier, D., & Hirst, W. C. (2006) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193423 · Cited by 149
“Interestingly, narrators are often, but not always, present in group recountings (Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997; Basden et al., 2000; Basden, Reysen, & Basden, 2002; Hirst & Manier, 1996; Hirst, Manier, & Apetroaia, 1997; Manier, 1997; Manier, Pinner, & Hirst, 1996; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997 ).”
Why does peer instruction benefit student learning?
Tullis, J. G., & Goldstone, R. L. (2020) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5 · Cited by 153
“While this might be interpreted as “process loss” (Steiner, 1972; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997), that would assume that there is sufficient information contained within the dyad to ascertain the correct answer.”
BackgroundMutual inhibition in collaborative recall: Evidence for a retrieval-based account.
Finlay, F., Hitch, G. J., & Meudell, P. R. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1556 · Cited by 149
Group Processes in Organizational Contexts
McGrath, J. E., & Argote, L. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch25 · Cited by 149
Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J. D., & Keil, P. G. (2014) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/1750698014530619 · Cited by 141
“Shared remembering in experimental psychology In cognitive psychology, the collaborative recall paradigm was developed to measure the impact of remembering with others (Weldon and Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundCongleton, A. R., & Rajaram, S. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0024308 · Cited by 142
“We specifically focused in the present research on collaborative remembering, defined as the recall output of a group of individuals working together to remember shared information or events (see Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBeyond Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups
Stroebe, W., Nijstad, B. A., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2010) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(10)43004-x · Cited by 142
“For example, Weldon and Bellinger (1997) and Basden et al. (1997) have found that interactive groups perform more poorly on recall tasks than nominal groups.”
BackgroundCo-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion
Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2005) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/10683160512331316334 · Cited by 130
Remembering as a social process
Weldon, M. S. (2000) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(00)80018-3 · Cited by 120
Self-citationSpinning the stories of our lives
Marsh, E. J., & Tversky, B. (2004) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1001 · Cited by 123
“…generally, memory must be considered within its social context; the presence, feedback, and goals of other people changes memory in numerous laboratory paradigms (e.g. Gabbert, Memon, & Allan, 2003; Loftus, 1997; Roediger, Meade, & Bergman, 2001; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997; Wells & Bradfield, 1998).”
BackgroundCollaboration Both Hurts and Helps Memory
Rajaram, S. (2011) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411403251 · Cited by 119
“…recall (in which no external retrieval cue is provided to aid recall and participants are asked to reproduce all the information they studied), either working once again alone or working in groups that are typically composed of strangers (e.g., Blumen & Rajaram, 2008; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
Stone, C. B., Coman, A., Brown, A. D., Koppel, J., & Hirst, W. C. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611427303 · Cited by 115
“Although one could examine how the concept of relatedness is used across experiments, we feel that it is well enough specified at present to be heuristically useful.”
Collaboration reduces the frequency of false memories in older and younger adults.
Ross, M., Spencer, S. J., Blatz, C. W., & Restorick, E. (2008) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.85 · Cited by 114
Pasupathi, M. (2007) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210701256456 · Cited by 112
“In social contexts, memory is negotiated in conversations, including agreement to hear a story as well as disputing details and interpretations (Hirst, Manier, & Apetroaia, 1997; Manier, Pinner, & Hirst, 1996; Ross, 1997; Ross & Holmberg, 1990; Weldon, 2000; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundResultMeegan, S. P., & Berg, C. A. (2002) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1080/01650250143000283 · Cited by 109
“…evidence suggesting that although collaborative groups frequently perform better than individuals, they rarely perform up to the levels of randomly pooled individual scores (Andersson & Ronnberg, 1995, 1996; Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997; Lamm & Trommsdorf, 1973; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundBarber, S. J., Harris, C. B., & Rajaram, S. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000037 · Cited by 108
“…members of collaborative groups typically have superior subsequent individual memory than individuals who were previously members of nominal groups (e.g., Basden, Basden, & Henry, 2000; Blumen & Rajaram, 2008; Harris et al., 2012; Rajaram & Pereira-Pasarin, 2007; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
When two is too many: Collaborative encoding impairs memory
Barber, S. J., Rajaram, S., & Aron, A. P. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.3.255 · Cited by 105
“Collaborative recall benefits later individual memory, because individuals are re-exposed to study stimuli in a collaborative-recall environment (see, e.g., Weldon & Bellinger, 1997 ); however, the present findings suggest that collaborative encoding impairs later individual (and collaborative) memory because of subop…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMarion, S. B., & Thorley, C. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000071 · Cited by 107
“…members (e.g., Finlay et al., 2000, Exp. 1 and 3; Meade & Roediger, 2009; Wright & Klumpp, 2004), several others have shown clear postcollaborative advantage effects (e.g., Barber & Rajaram, 2011a, 2011b; Blumen & Stern, 2011; Choi et al., 2014; Stephenson & Wagner, 1989; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
InfluentialThe Group-Member Mind Trade-Off
Waytz, A. G., & Young, L. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611423546 · Cited by 103
“These previous studies demonstrate that group memory capacity correlates with the memory capacity of a specific group member (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997), individual consumer preferences correlate with collective preferences (Goel, Hofman, Lahaie, Pennock, & Watts, 2010), and American individuals’…”
BackgroundTransactive Memory Systems: A Mechanistic Analysis of Emergent Group Memory
Theiner, G. (2013) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0128-x · Cited by 101
“In experimental memory research, the “reductionist” outcome described by Pavitt is known as collaborative inhibition (Weldon and Bellinger 1997; Basden et al. 1997).”
BackgroundA Dynamic Model of Individual and Collective Learning Amid Disruption
Anderson, E. G., & Lewis, K. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0854 · Cited by 102
“Other studies comparing recall by individuals and by groups also show that knowledge embedded in the social structures of groups is less prone to decay than knowledge embedded in individuals (Hinsz 1990, Weldon and Bellinger 1997).”
BackgroundGabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2006) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.009 · Cited by 98
“Such an effect has previously been demonstrated in tests of joint retrieval of word lists (see, Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997; Meudell, Hitch, & Boyle, 1995; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997; Wright & Klumpp, 2004).”
MethodDISENTANGLING COLLECTIVE IDENTITIES
Pratt, M. G. (2004) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(02)05007-7 · Cited by 98
Collective memories of three wars in United States history in younger and older adults
Zaromb, F. M., Butler, A. C., Agarwal, P. K., & Roediger, H. L., III (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0369-7 · Cited by 102
Going shopping and identifying landmarks: does collaboration improve older people's memory?
Ross, M., Spencer, S. J., Linardatos, L., Lam, K. C. H., & Perunovic, M. (2004) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1023 · Cited by 93
What people believe about memory
Magnussen, S. J., Andersson, J., Cornoldi, C., Béni, R. D., Endestad, T., Goodman, G. S., Helstrup, T., Koriat, A., Larsson, M. U., Melinder, A. M. D., et al. (2006) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210600646716 · Cited by 102
The Role of Repeated Retrieval in Shaping Collective Memory
Roediger, H. L., III, Zaromb, F. M., & Butler, A. C. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511626999.009 · Cited by 89
Collaborative false recall in the DRM procedure: Effects of group size and group pressure
Thorley, C., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2006) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440600872068 · Cited by 90
“Levels of false recall are then measured and compared to those of equivalent sized nominal groups (eg, Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997 ; Basden, Basden, Thomas, & Souphasith, 1998 ; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997 ).”
MethodWright, D. F. B., Mathews, S. A., & Skagerberg, E. M. (2005) · Journal of experimental psychology. Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.11.3.200 · Cited by 93
“The first type involves presenting people with the same set of stimuli and then having them free recall the items either individually or in groups (e.g., Basden, Basden, & Henry, 2000; Clark, Hori, Putnam, & Martin, 2000; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997; Wright & Klumpp, 2004).”
BackgroundCollaborative narration of the past and extraversion
McLean, K. C., & Pasupathi, M. (2006) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.006 · Cited by 88
“Further, talking about the past may provide more coherence and certainty in one’s stories (Pasupathi, 2001; Rimé et al., 1991; Thorne, 2000; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundCompensating strategies in collaborative remembering in very old couples
JOHANSSON, N. O., Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (2005) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00465.x · Cited by 86
Collective interviewing of suspects.
Vrij, A., Jundi, S., Hope, L., Hillman, J., Gahr, E., Leal, S., Warmelink, L., Mann, S. A., Vernham, Z., & Granhag, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.12.002 · Cited by 86
Your words are my words: Effects of acting together on encoding
Eskenazi, T., Doerrfeld, A., Logan, G. D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.725058 · Cited by 84
Benefits, costs, and challenges of collaboration for learning and memory.
Andrews‐Todd, J., & Rapp, D. N. (2015) · Translational Issues in Psychological Science · doi:10.1037/tps0000025 · Cited by 85
The effect of expertise on collaborative problem solving
Nokes‐Malach, T. J., Meade, M. L., & Morrow, D. G. (2012) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.642206 · Cited by 91
“The effect of expertise on collaborative problem solving”
BackgroundResultCollaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups
Wright, D. B., & Klumpp, A. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196740 · Cited by 82
“This is called collaborative inhibition ( Weldon & Bellinger, 1997 ) and has been shown in several papers for free recall (e.g., Andersson & Ronnberg, 1995, 1996; Meudell, Hitch, & Boyle, 1995; Weldon, Blair, & Huebsch, 2000; see Thompson, 2002, for a review).”
BackgroundFrom individual to collective memory: Theoretical and empirical perspectives
Barnier, A. J., & Sutton, J. D. (2008) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09541440701828274 · Cited by 89
“…produced by a group in remembering together * though more than any one of the members could have produced alone * is typically less than the pooled sum of information produced by the same number of individuals remembering alone (Basden, Basden, Bryber, & Thomas, 1997; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundCranney, J., Ahn, M., McKinnon, R., Morris, S., & Watts, K. (2009) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440802413505 · Cited by 80
“In laboratory experiments it has been shown that during initial group recall of study material, group performance is superior to individual but not to nominal group performance; however, the subsequent individual memory performance is better for those who initially recalled in a collaborative than in a nominal group (…”
BackgroundPasupathi, M., & Hoyt, T. (2010) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210902992917 · Cited by 80
Consensus Collaboration Enhances Group and Individual Recall Accuracy
Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., & Sutton, J. D. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.608590 · Cited by 77
“…others adopted idiosyncratic strategies, which made valid comparison of different collaboration styles difficult (see also 182 THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 65 (1) varying results for accuracy in free-for-all groups reported by Takahashi, 2007; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRecalling an event one year later: the impact of props, drawing and a prior interview
Salmon, K., & Pipe, M. (2000) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(200003/04)14:2 · Cited by 113
Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: Evidence from immediate and delayed tests
Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194034 · Cited by 77
“As was noted earlier, even though collaboration leads to reduction in group memory in free recall due to retrieval blocking, it nevertheless increases later individual recall (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
InfluentialDoes test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition?
Takahashi, M., & Saito, S. (2004) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210344000521 · Cited by 76
Congleton, A. R., & Rajaram, S. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0035974 · Cited by 74
“As such, we predict that the more times a group of people collaborate together (Multiple Collaboration), the more likely a strong group-level organization will emerge (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Collaboration Principle in Multimedia Learning
Jonassen, D. H., Lee, C. B., Yang, C.-C., & Laffey, J. M. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819.017 · Cited by 72
Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations
Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L., III (2009) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.37.7.962 · Cited by 70
“Steiner, 1972) for individuals working in collaborative groups is referred to as collaborative inhibition (Bouchard & Hare, 1970; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997 ).”
InfluentialShared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.
Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., & Sutton, J. D. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0028906 · Cited by 70
Sociocultural mediators of remembering: An extension of Bartlett's method of repeated reproduction
Wagoner, B., & Gillespie, A. (2013) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12059 · Cited by 71
Collaborative learning effects when students have complete or incomplete knowledge
Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2018) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3444 · Cited by 66
The Role of Familiarity Among Group Members in Collaborative Inhibition and Social Contagion
Peker, M., & Tekcan, A. Í. (2009) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335.40.3.111 · Cited by 65
Barber, S. J., Rajaram, S., & Fox, E. B. (2012) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.121 · Cited by 63
“This is the traditional analysis used to examine collaborative inhibition (e.g., Weldon & Bellinger, 1997), and thus we replicated the standard collaborative inhibition effect.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA review of the collective interviewing approach to detecting deception in pairs
Vernham, Z., & Vrij, A. (2015) · Crime Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/23744006.2015.1051756 · Cited by 63
“…than collaborative groups due to collaborative inhibition (the effect that occurs when a group of people working together remember and recall more than any one individual but recall less than their predicted potential) (Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas III, 1997; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
Backgroundvan der Land, S. F., Schouten, A. P., van den Hooff, B., & Feldberg, F. (2011) · Journal of Virtual Worlds Research · doi:10.4101/jvwr.v4i3.6126 · Cited by 62
Premo, J., Cavagnetto, A. R., Davis, W. B., & Brickman, P. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-08-0176 · Cited by 69
“There is also significant research noting a consistent negative effect (termed “collaborative inhibition”; Weldon and Bellinger, 1997; Barber et al., 2015) of collaborative performance of groups over individual performance (i.e., when combining the contribution of each individual student…”
BackgroundCollaborative remembering of emotional events: The case of Rabin's assassination
Antar, A. Y., & Nachson, I. (2005) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210444000502 · Cited by 59
“Moreover, because the participants do not want to slow down the reconstruction of the story, they tend to report only those details that can be easily and speedily retrieved from memory (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInvoking “collective memory”: mapping the emergence of a concept in archival science
Jacobsen, T. E., Punzalan, R. L., & Hedstrom, M. L. (2013) · Archives and Museum Informatics · doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9199-4 · Cited by 66
“Highly-cited in the WoS data, Weldon and Bellinger (1997) examined the social and cognitive mechanisms of individual and collaborative recall in the experimental tradition of Bartlett (1932). Neuroscientist Damasio (1994/2005, 1999) pioneered studies of the role of emotion in cognition. Kansteiner (2002) argues that r…”
BackgroundMaswood, R., Rasmussen, A. S., & Rajaram, S. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000468 · Cited by 64
“The most likely explanation for these discrepancies is that the past findings have been reported for different memory stimuli that were nonautobiographical in nature, such as word lists or emotional films presented by the experimenter (e.g., Weldon & Bellinger, 1997; Wessel et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialBogenstätter, Y., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Spychiger, M., Breuer, M., & Marsch, S. C. U. (2009) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720809336734 · Cited by 57
“…2008), with other studies finding a curvilinear effect (Tindale & Sheffey, 2002), inhibiting effects of collaboration on collective remembering (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997), reduced effort with shared responsibility (Weldon & Gargano, 1988), and that groups may leave the “burden of remembering”…”
BackgroundThe testing effect: The role of feedback and collaboration in a tertiary classroom setting
Vojdanoska, M., Cranney, J., & Newell, B. R. (2009) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1630 · Cited by 58
“This finding could be explained in terms of the indirect effects of collaborative inhibition during the initial test, as suggested by the trend towards superior nominal group performance compared to collaborative group performance ( Weldon & Bellinger, 1997 ).”
BackgroundResultThe effects of conformity on recognition judgements
Reysen, M. B. (2005) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210344000602 · Cited by 64
Cognition and the Creation of Ideas
Smith, S. M., & Ward, T. B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0023 · Cited by 57
Social suggestibility to central and peripheral misinformation
Dalton, A. L., & Daneman, M. (2006) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210500495073 · Cited by 57
Collaborative recall in married and unacquainted dyads
Gould, O. N., Osborn, C., Krein, H., & Mortenson, M. (2002) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1080/01650250143000292 · Cited by 55
“Type of recall task (word vs. story recall), and group size (dyads vs. larger groups) have also been shown, in at least some studies, to mediate process loss (e.g., Basden, Basden, & Henry, 2000; Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialPasupathi, M., Weeks, T. L., & Rice, C. (2006) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x06289425 · Cited by 31
Henkel, L. A., & Rajaram, S. (2011) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0023106 · Cited by 52
“This phenomenon, known as collaborative inhibition (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997), occurs when collaborative groups are compared with nominal groups (i.e., groups in name only that are composed of an equal number of individuals working alone).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialChoi, H., Kensinger, E. A., & Rajaram, S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000327 · Cited by 52
“Participants in collaborative conditions were instructed to collaborate in a freeflowing form (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997) where they were free to contribute in any order, discuss their recall and settle their disagreements as they wished.”
InfluentialDoes jury deliberation really improve jurors' memories?
Pritchard, M. E., & Keenan, J. M. (2002) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.816 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1160-1175
- ISSN
- 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1285
- OpenAlex
- W2018734806
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- collective memory, collaborative recall, collaborative inhibition, picture superiority effect, levels of processing, hypermnesia, story recall, memory organization, social memory
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Individuality, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Mental Recall, Verbal Behavior, Verbal Learning, Writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review