Cited by 182Memory Processes and InfluencesEducational Assessment and PedagogyDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Effects of goal specificity on means–ends analysis and learning.

Sweller, John, Levine, Marvin·1982·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-7393.8.5.463

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conventional problems are typically solved by means-ends analysis, a process that is exceptionally expensive of working memory capacity.

    “are typically solved by means-ends analysis, a process that is exceptionally expensive of working memory capacity”

    From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Sweller and Levine 1982

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sweller, J., & Levine, M.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
1982-09
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
463-474
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2052702538
Cited by
182
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
goal specificity, means-ends analysis, learning, goal-directed behavior, problem solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review