Cited by 543Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Evidence for Cognitive Load Theory

Sweller, John, Chandler, Paul·1991·Cognition and Instruction

Abstract

Dixon (1991) and Goldman (1991) have provided thoughtful commentaries on Chandler and Sweller (1991). The general issue they raise concerns the scientific procedures we should use when conducting research in cognition and instruction. It is an issue of great importance, and we welcome the opportunity provided by their criticisms to discuss the techniques we use. To clarify the findings based on cognitive load theory, we begin by indicating the essential characteristics of a theory concerned with cognition and instruction, followed by a brief history of cognitive load theory to make clear that it has these characteristics. These statements will then be used to address specific comments made by Goldman and Dixon.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532690xci0804_5

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Cognition and Instruction
Published
1991-12
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
351-362
ISSN
  • 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-690X
OpenAlex
W2077546866
Cited by
543
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
cognitive load theory, research methodology, instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review