Cited by 464Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesMathematics Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Guidance during mathematical problem solving.

Open access
Tarmizi, Rohani A., Sweller, John·1988·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Experiments using circle geometry problems were carried out to investigate the consequences of presenting various forms of guidance to problem solvers.As had been suggested from previous research, having students study worked examples, under many circumstances, resulted in superior learning compared to active problem solving.It has been hypothesized that the guidance provided by worked examples directs attention appropriately and reduces cognitive load compared to that imposed by a means-ends strategy used by most novice problem solvers.Guidance in turn, may assist solvers in acquiring problem solving schemas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.424

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The split-attention effect was first reported by Tarmizi and Sweller (1988).

    “The split-attention effect stems from research on worked examples and was first reported by Tarmizi and Sweller (1988).”

    From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Tarmizi and Sweller (1988)

  • The split-attention effect can be prevented by physically integrating the diagram and solution statements, making mental integration superfluous and reinstating the positive effects of worked examples.

    “This split-attention effect can be prevented by physically integrating the diagram and the solution statements, making mental integration superfluous and reinstating the positive effects of worked examples.”

    From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Tarmizi and Sweller (1988)

  • Design of high-quality worked examples is challenging, particularly if they require integration of multiple information sources, which could lead to higher extraneous cognitive load.

    “Second, the design of high-quality worked examples is challenging, particularly if these require integration of multiple information sources, which could lead to a higher extraneous cognitive load (Sweller et al., 1990, 1998; Tarmizi & Sweller, 1988; Ward & Sweller, 1990).”
  • The worked-example effect is not obtainable when the worked examples are themselves structured in a manner that imposes a heavy cognitive load.

    “First, it is not obtainable when the worked examples are themselves structured in a manner that imposes a heavy cognitive load.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tarmizi, R. A., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
1988-12
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
424-436
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2088730954
Cited by
464
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 36
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney)
Funders
NSW Department of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
worked examples, mathematical problem solving, guidance, circle geometry, cognitive load, attention, active problem solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review