Cited by 514Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyTraffic and Road SafetyTransportation Systems and Logistics

Evolution of human cognitive architecture

Sweller, John·2003·Psychology of Learning and Motivation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-7421(03)01015-6

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 117 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sweller, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Sweller, John
Venue
Psychology of Learning and Motivation
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2003
Pages
215-266
ISSN
0079-7421 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1860905340
Cited by
511
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 34
FWCI
49.87
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Transportation Systems and Logistics
Keywords
driver information processing, situational awareness, visual load, route choice, driver behavior, human-computer interaction, autonomous vehicles, road safety, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review