Cited by 139Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchStress Responses and Cortisol

Electrolytic lesions of the amygdala block acquisition and expression of fear-potentiated startle even with extensive training but do not prevent reacquisition.

Kim, Munsoo, Davis, Michael·1993·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Lesions of the amygdala have been shown to block the expression of fear-potentiated startle (increased acoustic startle in the presence of a cue previously paired with shock). In the present study, bilateral lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala given after extensive training totally blocked the expression of fear-potentiated startle but did not prevent reacquisition. In contrast, when the lesions were made before any training, the lesioned rats did not show potentiated startle even with extensive training. Thus, the central nucleus of the amygdala normally seems to be required for the initial acquisition and expression of potentiated startle regardless of the degree of learning. However, reacquisition of potentiated startle can occur without the central nucleus, which implies the presence of a secondary brain system that can compensate for the loss of the central nucleus of the amygdala under some circumstances.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.107.4.580

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, M., & Davis, M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
1993
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
580-595
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2038679538
Cited by
139
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 25642, MH 47840, MH 00004, P01MH025642)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
amygdala, central amygdala, fear-potentiated startle, fear conditioning, acoustic startle response, reacquisition, learning acquisition, electrolytic lesions, rats
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Arousal, Brain Mapping, Brain Stem, Conditioning, Classical, Efferent Pathways, Fear, Male, Retention, Psychology, Reflex, Startle, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review