The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of oxytocin and vasopressin on partner preferences in male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
Abstract
This study compared the effects of centrally administered oxytocin (OT) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) on partner preference formation and social contact in male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). After 1 hr of cohabitation and pretreatment with either AVP or OT, both males and females exhibited increased social contact and significant preference for the familiar partner. After pretreatment with either an OT receptor antagonist (OTA) or an AVP (V1a) receptor antagonist (AVPA), neither OT nor AVP induced a partner preference. In addition, treatment with OT+OTA or AVP+AVPA was associated with low levels of social contact in both sexes. Either AVP or OT is sufficient to facilitate social contact if either the OT or AVP receptor is available. However, the formation of partner preferences may require access to both AVP and OT receptors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Infusion of oxytocin into the brains of female prairie voles and vasopressin in males, for instance, facilitated pair-bonding even in the absence of actual mating (Cho et al. 1999; Insel and Hulihan 1995; Williams et al. 1994; Winslow et al. 1993).”
From Natural Selection, Childrearing, and the Ethics of Marriage (and Divorce): Building a Case for the Neuroenhancement of Human Relationships (2012) · cites this paper as Cho et al. 1999
In the citing paper
“These findings are consistent with those reported for other mammals, particularly monogamous rodent species in which OT has shown to play a critical role in the formation of pair-bonds (Cho et al., 1999; Insel and Hulihan, 1995; Williams et al., 1994).”
From Oxytocin during the initial stages of romantic attachment: Relations to couples’ interactive reciprocity (2012) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“However, nonspecific intracerebroventricular administration of OXT can induce a partner preference and bonding in both males and females (10).”
From Oxytocin enhances brain reward system responses in men viewing the face of their female partner (2013) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This mutant has a deficit in OT secretion and is also impaired in its ability to recognize familiar conspecifics.”
From Oxytocin and the Neural Mechanisms Regulating Social Cognition and Affiliative Behavior (2009) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Expressing CD-38 in the hypothalamus using a lenti-viral vector or by infusing OT was able to rescue this deficit [21].”
From Oxytocin and the Neural Mechanisms Regulating Social Cognition and Affiliative Behavior (2009) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“In rodents, sex-specific regulation of partner preference in prairie voles, social recognition in rats, social play in rats, and aggression in hamsters has been found”
From Vasopressin and oxytocin receptor systems in the brain: Sex differences and sex-specific regulation of social behavior (2016) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“Because some of these sex-specific effects were dose-dependent and required a higher dose in one sex (i.e., role of VP on partner preference in prairie voles with higher doses required in females; Cho et al., 1999), this further suggests that such sex-specific effects may be the result of sex differences in sensitivity to VP or OT systems.”
From Vasopressin and oxytocin receptor systems in the brain: Sex differences and sex-specific regulation of social behavior (2016) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“Oxytocin (OT), a neuropeptide hormone found exclusively in mammals, is associated with maternal behavior (1,2) and adult pair-bond formation (partner preference) behavior (3,4) in rodents.”
From Chronic intranasal oxytocin causes long-term impairments in partner preference formation in male prairie voles (2013) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Adult males are also responsive to OT, but require higher dosages than females to induce a partner preference (4).”
From Chronic intranasal oxytocin causes long-term impairments in partner preference formation in male prairie voles (2013) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“In male prairie voles, AVP plays a critical role in the regulation of partner preferences, although it is likely that OT also plays a role [18, 19].”
From The prairie vole: An emerging model organism for understanding the social brain (2010) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Although exogenous central OT infusions facilitate partner preference formation in both sexes (Cho et al., 1999)”
From Central oxytocin receptors mediate mating-induced partner preferences and enhance correlated activation across forebrain nuclei in male prairie voles (2016) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“and central OT administration enhances partner preference formation in both females and males (Cho et al., 1999).”
From Central oxytocin receptors mediate mating-induced partner preferences and enhance correlated activation across forebrain nuclei in male prairie voles (2016) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“Finally, oxytocin can also bind to AVPR1A receptors25, which have also been linked to social functioning26.”
From Oxytocin pathway gene networks in the human brain (2019) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“Earlier work in voles has suggested that either OT or AVP may support a general tendency toward social contact (Cho et al., 1999).”
From Oxytocin and vasopressin systems in genetic syndromes and neurodevelopmental disorders (2014) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“For instance, ICV administration of oxytocin or injection of oxytocin directly into the nucleus accumbens can induce partner preferences in absence of mating (Cho et al., 1999).”
From Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine (2014) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“OT has been shown to regulate fundamental mechanisms underlying mate fidelity.”
From Oxytocin facilitates fidelity in well-established marmoset pairs by reducing sociosexual behavior toward opposite-sex strangers (2014) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“Blocking endogenous OT activity diminished a partner-preference and inhibited pair-bond formation in prairie voles (Cho et al., 1999).”
From Oxytocin facilitates fidelity in well-established marmoset pairs by reducing sociosexual behavior toward opposite-sex strangers (2014) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“This behavioral pattern is consistent with findings in prairie voles that OT increases preferential associations with a pair-mate (Williams et al., 1994; Cho et al., 1999).”
From Oxytocin facilitates fidelity in well-established marmoset pairs by reducing sociosexual behavior toward opposite-sex strangers (2014) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“In prairie voles, intracerebroventricular injections of OT induced a partner-preference in both males and females (Cho et al., 1999)”
From Oxytocin facilitates fidelity in well-established marmoset pairs by reducing sociosexual behavior toward opposite-sex strangers (2014) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 1999
Citations
Cites
Falk, J. L. (1973) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/0011818 · Cited by 2,288
Kleiman, D. G. (1977) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409721 · Cited by 1,436
Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love
Sue Carter, C. (1998) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(98)00055-9 · Cited by 1,425
A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles
Winslow, J. T., Hastings, N., Carter, C. S., Harbaugh, C. R., & Insel, T. R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365545a0 · Cited by 948 · cited 6×
“…development of partner preferences that typically follow prolonged cohabitation , mating, or both in either male (Insel, Preston, & Winslow, 1995; Winslow et al., 1993) or female prairie voles (Insel & Hulihan, 1995) and to antagonize the effects of exogenous peptides on pair bonding (Williams…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationOxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles
Insel, T. R., & Shapiro, L. E. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.13.5981 · Cited by 833
Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: The prairie vole model
Sue Carter, C., Courtney Devries, A., & Getz, L. L. (1995) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/0149-7634(94)00070-h · Cited by 615
A neurobiological basis of social attachment.
(1997) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.154.6.726 · Cited by 553
Insel, T. R., & Hulihan, T. J. (1995) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.109.4.782 · Cited by 528
Williams, J. R., Insel, T. R., Harbaugh, C. R., & Carter, C. S. (1994) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.1994.tb00579.x · Cited by 483
Self-citationWILLIAMS, J. (1992) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/0018-506x(92)90004-f · Cited by 471
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The oxytocin receptor system: structure, function, and regulation
Gimpl, G., & Fahrenholz, F. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.629 · Cited by 3,089
Why Does Social Exclusion Hurt? The Relationship Between Social and Physical Pain.
MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202 · Cited by 1,712
The neurobiology of pair bonding.
Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1327 · Cited by 1,523
Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love
Sue Carter, C. (1998) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(98)00055-9 · Cited by 1,425
The oxytocin receptor: from intracellular signaling to behavior
Jurek, B., & Neumann, I. D. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2017 · Cited by 999
Metadata
- Authors
- Cho, M. M., DeVries, A. C., Williams, J. R., & Carter, C. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Venue
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1071-1079
- ISSN
- 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0084
- OpenAlex
- W2071543008
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 13.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k05mh001050-03, 5r01hd032675-06)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH01050)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD32675)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Keywords
- oxytocin, vasopressin, mate preferences, Microtus ochrogaster, social contact, oxytocin receptor antagonist, sex differences, social bonding, neuropeptides
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arginine Vasopressin, Behavior, Animal, Arvicolinae, Female, Hormone Antagonists, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Pair Bond, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Vasoconstrictor Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review