Cited by 483Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Oxytocin Administered Centrally Facilitates Formation of a Partner Preference in Female Prairie Voles (Microtus ochrogaster)

Williams, Jessie R., Insel, Thomas R., Harbaugh, Carroll R., Carter, C. Sue·1994·Journal of Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are monogamous mammals that form male‐female pair bonds. Partner preference formation, one component of the pair bond in prairie voles, occurs following male‐female cohabitation and is facilitated by mating. The peptide hormone oxytocin is released during physical contact and particularly following vaginal stimulation. Oxytocin has been implicated in mother‐infant bond formation. The present study tested the hypothesis that oxytocin participates in the partner preference component of pair bond formation in adult prairie voles. Ovariectomized female prairie voles were implanted with osmotic mini‐pumps releasing oxytocin (1–100 ng/h) or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Pumps were implanted intracerebroventricularly or subcutaneously and females then were housed for 6 h with a male partner, followed by a preference test in which females could elect to spend time with either the partner or an unfamiliar male. Females in groups that received centrally‐administered oxytocin (10 or 100 ng/h), but not CSF, exhibited a significant preference for the partner present during infusion. The induction of a partner preference after oxytocin administration appeared specific for central oxytocin pathways as peripheral oxytocin administration was ineffective. Moreover, central administration of a selective oxytocin receptor antagonist inhibited the behavioral effect of exogenous oxytocin. These results suggest that oxytocin may be one factor contributing to the development of partner preferences in this monogamous rodent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1994.tb00579.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infusion of oxytocin into the brains of female prairie voles and vasopressin in males facilitated pair-bonding even in the absence of actual mating.

    “Infusion of oxytocin into the brains of female prairie voles and vasopressin in males, for instance, facilitated pair-bonding even in the absence of actual mating (Cho et al. 1999; Insel and Hulihan 1995; Williams et al. 1994; Winslow et al. 1993).”
  • The hormone-driven process of dopamine imprinting might be possible to trigger artificially, as has been demonstrated in voles.

    “This hormone-driven process might be possible to trigger artificially, as has been demonstrated in voles (Williams et al. 1994).”
  • In rats, 1-2 ng of oxytocin given intracerebroventricularly facilitates suckling-induced bursting, while maternal behavior requires about 400 ng; partner preference in voles requires 10-100 ng/h, and maternal behavior in sheep requires 5 μg intracerebroventricularly.

    “In lactating rats, suckling evokes bursts of action potentials in oxytocin cells that result in pulsatile oxytocin secretion, and this bursting is facilitated by 1-2ng oxytocin i.c.v.(26).Effects on maternal behavior in the rat need much higher doses (~400ng) (4).Partner preference effects in voles require infusions of oxytocin at 10-100ng/h (5), and, to stimulate maternal behavior in sheep, it”

    From Intranasal Oxytocin: Myths and Delusions (2016) · cites this paper as [5]

  • The findings are consistent with those in other mammals, particularly monogamous rodent species where oxytocin plays a critical role in pair-bond formation.

    “These findings are consistent with those reported for other mammals, particularly monogamous rodent species in which OT has shown to play a critical role in the formation of pair-bonds (Cho et al., 1999; Insel and Hulihan, 1995; Williams et al., 1994).”
  • OT fibers are present in the NAcc of the naked mole rat.

    “A recent study in the naked mole rat has shown OT fibers are present in the NAcc of this eusocial species as well [136].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, J. R., Insel, T. R., Harbaugh, C. R., & Carter, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-06
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
247-250
ISSN
  • 0953-8194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2826
OpenAlex
W1976495588
Cited by
483
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 26
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh045836-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH MH45836)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
oxytocin, mate preferences, pair bonding, Microtus ochrogaster, monogamy, intracerebroventricular administration, oxytocin receptor antagonist, social bonding
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Arvicolinae, Female, Injections, Intraventricular, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Ovariectomy, Oxytocin, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Receptors, Oxytocin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review