Cited by 141Gastrointestinal motility and disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Provoking symptoms to relieve symptoms: a randomized controlled dismantling study of exposure therapy in irritable bowel syndrome

Ljótsson, Brjánn, Hesser, Hugo, Andersson, Erik, Lackner, Jeffrey M., El Alaoui, Samir, Falk, Lisa, Aspvall, Kristina, Fransson, Josefin +5 more·2014·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

An internet-delivered cognitive behavioral treatment (ICBT) based on systematic exposure exercises has previously shown beneficial effects for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Exposure exercises may be perceived as difficult for patients to perform because of the elicited short-term distress and clinicians may be reluctant to use these interventions. The aim of this study was to compare ICBT with the same protocol without systematic exposure (ICBT-WE) to assess if exposure had any incremental value. This randomized controlled dismantling study included 309 participants diagnosed with IBS. The treatment interventions lasted for 10 weeks and included online therapist contact. ICBT-WE comprised mindfulness, work with life values, acceptance, and encouraged reduced avoidance behaviors, while ICBT also included systematic exposure to IBS symptoms and related situations. Severity of IBS symptoms was measured with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale - IBS version (GSRS-IBS). The between-group Cohen's d on GSRS-IBS was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.23-0.70) at post-treatment and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.20-0.76) at 6-month follow-up, favoring ICBT. We conclude that the systematic exposure included in the ICBT protocol has incremental effects over the other components in the protocol. This study provides evidence for the utility of exposure exercises in psychological treatments for IBS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2014.01.007

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies focusing on internet-delivered therapy for patients with medical speciality functional somatic syndromes such as irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, non-cardiac chest pain, and somatic symptom distress have shown promising results compared with waiting list or active control conditions.

    “Studies focusing on internet-delivered therapy for patients with medical speciality FSSs such as irritable bowel syndrome [[24], [25], [26]], fibromyalgia [27], chronic pain [28,29] and non-cardiac chest pain [30], as well as somatic symptom distress [31] have shown promising results for internet-delivered treatments compared with waiting list or active control conditions.”
  • In Ljótsson et al. (2014), ICBT improved IBS-QOL (ES 0.31).

    “IBS-QOL: (ES: 0.31)”
  • Acceptance-based exposure therapy for IBS combines acceptance-based techniques, mindfulness training, and strict exposure training to produce consistently large effects, and the exposure element adds considerable effect.

    “Especially noteworthy here are the studies on acceptance-based exposure-based therapy for IBS (Ljótsson et al., 2010; Ljótsson et al., 2011), where acceptance-based techniques, mindfulness training and strict exposure training are combined to produce consistently large effects, and where the exposure element has been shown to add considerable effect (Ljótsson et al., 2014).”
  • In Ljótsson et al. (2014), ICBT improved IBS symptom severity (GSRS-IBS) (ES 0.44).

    “IBS symptom severity (GSRS-IBS): + (ES: 0.44)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ljótsson, B., Hesser, H., Andersson, E., Lackner, J. M., El Alaoui, S., Falk, L., Aspvall, K., Fransson, J., Hammarlund, K., Löfström, A., Nowinski, S., Lindfors, P., & Hedman, E.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Erie County Medical Center (US)
  • Sabbatsberg Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Ljótsson, Brjánn
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
55
Pages
27-39
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034003089
Cited by
141
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, exposure therapy, symptom provocation, mindfulness, acceptance and commitment therapy, avoidance behavior, gastrointestinal symptom severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review