Cited by 191Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesMemory Processes and InfluencesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Learning by imagining.

Cooper, Graham, Tindall-Ford, Sharon, Chandler, Paul, Sweller, John·2001·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Abstract

Five experiments were conducted to investigate the relative effectiveness of 2 alternative instructional strategies. Students who were engaged in studying worked examples that emphasized understanding and remembering procedures and concepts were compared with students who were engaged in imagining worked examples that emphasized imagining procedures and concepts. It was hypothesized that students who held prerequisite schemas would find imagining to have a beneficial effect on learning, compared with studying the material, whereas students who were less knowledgeable would find imagining to have a negative effect on learning, compared with studying. Experimental results were in accord with our hypotheses. It was concluded that, under specific circumstances, encouraging students to imagine procedures and concepts can substantially facilitate learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1076-898x.7.1.68

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once information can be adequately imagined, imagination instructions are superior to study instructions.

    “Once information can be adequately imagined, imagination instructions are superior to study instructions (Cooper et al. 2001).”

    From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Cooper et al. 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Published
2001
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
68-82
ISSN
  • 1076-898X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2192
OpenAlex
W2033679763
Cited by
191
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
imagination, worked examples, teaching methods, schema theory, prior knowledge, learning from examples, procedural knowledge, conceptual knowledge, learning facilitation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Computer Literacy, Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Practice, Psychological, Problem Solving, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review