Cited by 252Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Optimising worked example instruction: Different ways to increase germane cognitive load

Open access
Paas, Fred, van Gog, Tamara·2006·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.004

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The VR-STINAT was iteratively developed with the involvement of end-users (CBT therapists, psychiatrists, patients with depression, and healthy individuals), based on cognitive load theory and Mayer's cognitive theory of multimedia learning.

    “The VR-STINAT was iteratively developed with the involvement of end-users (CBT therapists, psychiatrists, patients with depression, and healthy individuals), based on cognitive load theory -learning from worked example (33), and Mayer’s cognitive theory of multimedia learning (34).”
  • Studying worked examples instead of solving conventional problems has been identified as an effective way of reducing extraneous load, because the learner can devote all available working memory capacity to studying a worked-out solution and constructing a schema for solving similar problems in long-term memory.

    “Studying worked examples (instead of solving conventional problems) has been identified as an effective way of reducing extraneous load, because the learner can devote all available WM capacity to studying a worked-out solution and constructing a schema for solving similar problems in LTM (e.g., Paas 1992; Paas and Van Gog 2006)”
  • The GCL items of our questionnaire are able to measure the GCL construct.

    “Assuming that high GCL is associated with engaged learners investing cognitive resources to learning-relevant activities (intrinsic load; Paas and van Gog, 2006), the GCL items of our questionnaire are able to measure this construct.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paas, F., & van Gog, T.
Affiliations
Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Corresponding author
Paas, Fred
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
87-91
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001269577
Cited by
252
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
worked examples, germane cognitive load, extraneous cognitive load, working memory, problem-solving instruction, transfer of learning, instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review