The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction
Abstract
Would people exhibit similarity-attraction and consistency-attraction toward unambiguously computer-generated speech even when personality is clearly not relevant? In Experiment 1, participants (extrovert or introvert) heard a synthesized voice (extrovert or introvert) on a book-buying Web site. Participants accurately recognized personality cues in text to speech and showed similarity-attraction in their evaluation of the computer voice, the book reviews, and the reviewer. Experiment 2, in a Web auction context, added personality of the text to the previous design. The results replicated Experiment 1 and demonstrated consistency (voice and text personality)-attraction. To maximize liking and trust, designers should set parameters, for example, words per minute or frequency range, that create a personality that is consistent with the user and the content being presented.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much of the relevant research has focused on imbuing voice-based, embodied, and robot-based chatbots with personalities using nonverbal cues, such as gestures [20,21] gaze [22], voice tone and speed [23], and proximity [24].”
From Interacting with a Chatbot-Based Advising System: Understanding the Effect of Chatbot Personality and User Gender on Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3702 · Cited by 4,872
Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153 · Cited by 4,022
Self-citationA psychological taxonomy of trait‐descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain
Wiggins, J. S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395 · Cited by 1,596
Speech style and social evaluation
Giles, H., & Powesland, P. F. (1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,192
Aronson, E. (1972) · Cited by 931
The elements of computer credibility
Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/302979.303001 · Cited by 880
The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation
Thomas, F. R., & Johnston, O. (1995) · Cited by 738
Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x · Cited by 670
Self-citationCan computer personalities be human personalities?
Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B. B., & Dryer, D. C. (1995) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1042 · Cited by 621
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Fiske, 1991, Social cognition.
- Langer, 1989, Mindfulness.
- Scherer, 1979, Personality markers in speech., 147
- Slobin, 1979, Psycholinguistics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 522
Lee, E. (2008) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.07.009 · Cited by 80
Incorporating personality in user interface design: A review
Alves, T., Natálio, J., Henriques‐Calado, J., & Gama, S. P. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109709 · Cited by 88
The effect of voice and humour on users’ perceptions of personal intelligent agents
Moussawi, S., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2021) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2020.1772368 · Cited by 83
Product personality in physical interaction
Desmet, P., Nicolás, J. C. O., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2008) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.06.003 · Cited by 78
Torre, I., Goslin, J., White, L., & Zanatto, D. (2018) · Technology, Mind, and Society Conference (TechMindSociety) · doi:10.1145/3183654.3183691 · Cited by 77
A Review of Personality in Human‒Robot Interactions
Robert, L., Alahmad, R., Esterwood, C. T., Kim, S., You, S., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Systems · doi:10.1561/2900000018 · Cited by 78
Eliciting and Analysing Users’ Envisioned Dialogues with Perfect Voice Assistants
Volkel, S. T., Buschek, D., Eiband, M., Cowan, B. R., & Hussmann, H. (2021) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445536 · Cited by 95
User Personality Matching with a Hands-Off Robot for Post-stroke Rehabilitation Therapy
Tapus, A., & Matarić, M. J. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77457-0_16 · Cited by 77
Kim, K. J. (2016) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12177 · Cited by 79
Persuasive computing: Feeling peer pressure from multiple computer agents
Xu, K., & Lombard, M. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.043 · Cited by 76
Franke, C., & Groeppel‐Klein, A. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114916 · Cited by 87
Tsantani, M., Belin, P., Paterson, H., & McAleer, P. (2016) · Perception · doi:10.1177/0301006616643675 · Cited by 76
Automation in the Mining Industry: Review of Technology, Systems, Human Factors, and Political Risk
Rogers, W. P., Kahraman, M. M., Drews, F. A., Powell, K. M., Haight, J. M., Wang, Y., Baxla, K., & Sobalkar, M. (2019) · Mining Metallurgy & Exploration · doi:10.1007/s42461-019-0094-2 · Cited by 92
Al‐Natour, S., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00110 · Cited by 76
Lee, E. (2010) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650209356389 · Cited by 72
Schreibelmayr, S., & Mara, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.787499 · Cited by 75
Hu, P., Gong, Y. Y., Lu, Y., & Ding, A. W. (2022) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.04.006 · Cited by 85
Gender Ambiguous, not Genderless
Sutton, S. J. (2020) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3405755.3406123 · Cited by 70
The roles of spokes-avatars' personalities in brand communication in 3D virtual environments
Jin, S. A., & Sung, Y. (2009) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/bm.2009.18 · Cited by 68
Social Signal Processing: Understanding social interactions through nonverbal behavior analysis
Vinciarelli, A., Salamin, H., & Pantić, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2009.5204290 · Cited by 75
A Survey on perceived speaker traits: Personality, likability, pathology, and the first challenge
Schuller, B. W., Steidl, S., Batliner, A. M., Nöth, E., Vinciarelli, A., Burkhardt, F., van Son, R. J. J. H., Weninger, F. J., Eyben, F., Bocklet, T., et al. (2014) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2014.08.003 · Cited by 68
The Design of Implicit Interactions
Ju, W. G. (2015) · Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics · doi:10.2200/s00619ed1v01y201412hci028 · Cited by 97
Rosenberg‐Kima, R. B., Plant, E. A., Doerr, C. E., & Baylor, A. L. (2010) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01040.x · Cited by 67
Anthropomorphism of Robots: Study of Appearance and Agency
Crowell, C. R., Deska, J. C., Villano, M. A., Zenk, J. D., & Roddy, J. T. (2019) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/12629 · Cited by 65
Choice of Voices: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Text-to-Speech Voice Quality for Long-Form Content
Cambre, J., Colnago, J., Maddock, J., Tsai, J. Y., & Kaye, J. (2020) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376789 · Cited by 90
Similarity effects in online training: Effects with computerized trainer agents
Behrend, T. S., & Thompson, L. F. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.016 · Cited by 65
Socially Assistive Robotics for Stroke and Mild TBI Rehabilitation
Matarić, M. J., Tapus, A., Winstein, C. J., & Eriksson, J. (2009) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-018-6-249 · Cited by 63
Ravaja, N., Kallinen, K., Saari, T., & Keltikangas‐Järvinen, L. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.10.2.120 · Cited by 63
The Voice of Leadership: Models and Performances of Automatic Analysis in Online Speeches
Weninger, F. J., Krajewski, J., Batliner, A. M., & Schuller, B. W. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2012.15 · Cited by 62
Kim, J., Merrill, K., Xu, K., & Sellnow, D. D. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.1908671 · Cited by 61
Dash, T. K., Chakraborty, C., Mahapatra, S., & Panda, G. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2022.3197910 · Cited by 61
The Law of Attraction in Human-Robot Interaction
Park, E., Jin, D.-L., & del Pobil, A. P. (2012) · International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · doi:10.5772/50228 · Cited by 63
Exploring the differential effects of trust violations in human-human and human-robot interactions
Alarcon, G. M., Gibson, A. M., Jessup, S. A., & Capiola, A. (2021) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103350 · Cited by 64
The similarity-attraction effect in human-robot interaction
Bernier, E. P., & Scassellati, B. M. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) · doi:10.1109/devlrn.2010.5578828 · Cited by 60
Kuhail, M. A., Thomas, J., Alramlawi, S., Shah, S. J. H., & Thornquist, E. (2022) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics9040081 · Cited by 59
Impertinent mobiles - Effects of politeness and impoliteness in human-smartphone interaction
Carolus, A., Muench, R., Schmidt, C., & Schneider, F. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.030 · Cited by 58
Jin, E., & Eastin, M. S. (2022) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-03-2022-0089 · Cited by 66
Impact of Mailed and Automated Telephone Reminders on Receipt of Repeat Mammograms
DeFrank, J. T., Rimer, B. K., Gierisch, J. M., Bowling, J. M., Farrell, D. W., & Skinner, C. S. (2009) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.032 · Cited by 57
Im, H., Sung, B., Lee, G., & Kok, K. Q. X. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107791 · Cited by 55
Ochi, P., Rao, S., Takayama, L. A., & Nass, C. (2009) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.10.005 · Cited by 56
Self-citationTo Trust or Not To Trust: How a Conversational Interface Affects Trust in a Decision Support System
Gupta, A., Basu, D., Ghantasala, R., Qiu, S., & Gadiraju, U. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512248 · Cited by 61
Zhang, J., Lu, J., Wang, X., Liu, L., & Feng, Y. (2024) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114314 · Cited by 58
Liew, T. W., Zin, N. A. M., Ashaari, N. S., & Tan, S.-M. (2016) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2350 · Cited by 53
Lee, Y., Hsiao, C., & Ho, C.-H. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.041 · Cited by 63
Speech Versus Touch: A Comparative Study of the Use of Speech and DTMF Keypad for Navigation
Lee, K. M., & Lai, J. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1903_4 · Cited by 50
Self-citationCredibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
Brodsky, S. L., Neal, T. M. S., Cramer, R. J., & Ziemke, M. H. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 50
Designing for Health ChatbotsPreprint
Fadhil, A., & Schiavo, G. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.09022 · Cited by 61
Designing Personas for Expressive Robots
Whittaker, S., Rogers, Y., Petrovskaya, E., & Zhuang, H. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3424153 · Cited by 45
Acoustic-Prosodic Entrainment in Human-Human and Human-Computer Dialogue
Levitan, R. (2014) · doi:10.7916/d8gt5kch · Cited by 44
Towards Personalized Speech Synthesis for Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Mills, T., Bunnell, H. T., & Patel, R. (2014) · Augmentative and Alternative Communication · doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.924026 · Cited by 44
Stevens, C., Lees, N., Vonwiller, J. P., & Burnham, D. K. (2004) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2004.03.003 · Cited by 44
A comparison of speaking up behavior during conflict with real and virtual humans
Robb, A. C., White, C. B., Cordar, A., Wendling, A. L., Lampotang, S., & Lok, B. C. L. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.043 · Cited by 44
The media equation and team formation: Further evidence for experience as a moderator
Johnson, D. M., & Gardner, J. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.08.007 · Cited by 42
Voice-Based Agents as Personified Things: Assimilation and Accommodation as Equilibration of Doubt
Etzrodt, K., & Engesser, S. (2021) · Human-Machine Communication · doi:10.30658/hmc.2.3 · Cited by 44
Modelling personality features by changing prosody in synthetic speech
Trouvain, J., Schmidt, S., Schröder, M., Schmitz, M., & Barry, W. J. (2006) · Speech prosody · doi:10.21437/speechprosody.2006-202 · Cited by 43
Exploring the Alignment Space – Lexical and Gestural Alignment with Real and Virtual Humans
Bergmann, K., Branigan, H. P., & Kopp, S. (2015) · Frontiers in ICT · doi:10.3389/fict.2015.00007 · Cited by 42
The Design Space for Robot Appearance and Behaviour for Social Robot Companions
Walters, M. L. (2008) · University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) · Cited by 43
Concepts for life-like interactive objects
Schmitz, M. (2010) · International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI) · doi:10.1145/1935701.1935732 · Cited by 42
Linek, S. B., Gerjets, P. H., & Scheiter, K. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9115-8 · Cited by 48
Genie in the Bottle: Anthropomorphized Perceptions of Conversational Agents
Kuzminykh, A., Sun, J., Govindaraju, N., Avery, J., & Lank, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376665 · Cited by 41
Speech Synthesis for the Generation of Artificial Personality
Aylett, M. P., Vinciarelli, A., & Wester, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2017.2763134 · Cited by 41
Benbasat, I., Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P. A., & Qiu, L. (2019) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.09.001 · Cited by 44
The Perception and Analysis of the Likeability and Human Likeness of Synthesized Speech
Baird, A., Parada‐Cabaleiro, E., Hantke, S., Burkhardt, F., Cummins, N., & Schuller, B. W. (2018) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2018-1093 · Cited by 40
Aslan, S., Güdükbay, U., & Dibeklioğlu, H. (2021) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2021.104163 · Cited by 40
Synthesized speech intelligibility and persuasion: Speech rate and non-native listeners
Jones, C., Berry, L., & Stevens, C. (2007) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2007.03.001 · Cited by 42
Jeon, Y. A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.028 · Cited by 39
Modelling personality features by changing prosody in synthetic speech
Trouvain, J., Schmidt, S., Schröder, M., Schmitz, M., & Barry, W. J. (2006) · doi:10.22028/d291-25920 · Cited by 39
Human trust in otherware – a systematic literature review bringing all antecedents together
Saßmannshausen, T. M., Burggräf, P., Hassenzahl, M., & Wagner, J. (2022) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2022.2120634 · Cited by 42
Do (and Say) as I Say: Linguistic Adaptation in Human–Computer Dialogs
Koulouri, T., Lauria, S., & Macredie, R. D. (2014) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2014.934180 · Cited by 38
An Exploratory Study Toward the Preferred Conversational Style for Compatible Virtual Agents
Shamekhi, A., Czerwinski, M. P., Mark, G. J., Novotny, M., & Bennett, G. A. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_4 · Cited by 37
The Effects of a Self-Similar Avatar Voice in Educational Games
Kao, D., Ratan, R., Mousas, C., & Magana, A. J. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3474665 · Cited by 41
User Perceptions of Extraversion in Chatbots after Repeated Use
Völkel, S. T., Schoedel, R., Kaya, L., & Mayer, S. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3502058 · Cited by 41
Gong, L., & Lai, J. (2003) · International Journal of Speech Technology · doi:10.1023/a:1022382413579 · Cited by 37
Rosenberg‐Kima, R. B., Baylor, A. L., Plant, E. A., & Doerr, C. E. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_27 · Cited by 37
Instructing a Teachable Agent with Low or High Self-Efficacy – Does Similarity Attract?
Tärning, B., Silvervarg, A., Gulz, A., & Haake, M. (2018) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-018-0167-2 · Cited by 36
Trust influences perceptions of virtual humans, but not necessarily learning
Schroeder, N. L., Chiou, E. K., & Craig, S. D. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104039 · Cited by 36
Audio Matters Too: How Audial Avatar Customization Enhances Visual Avatar Customization
Kao, D., Ratan, R., Mousas, C., Joshi, A., & Melcer, E. F. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501848 · Cited by 39
Thomas, S., Ferstl, Y., McDonnell, R., & Ennis, C. (2022) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) · doi:10.1109/vr51125.2022.00018 · Cited by 37
More Personality in Personality Computing
Vinciarelli, A., & Mohammadi, G. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2014.2341252 · Cited by 36
Rodero, E. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.044 · Cited by 35
Noguchi, Y., Kamide, H., & Tanaka, F. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3377342 · Cited by 35
Virtual agents in e‐commerce: representational characteristics for seniors
Chattaraman, V., Kwon, W., Gilbert, J. E., & Shim, S. I. (2011) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/17505931111191492 · Cited by 34
The Effects of Emotion of Voice in Synthesized and Recorded Speech
Nass, C., Foehr, U. G., Brave, S., & Somoza, M. (2001) · Cited by 35
Self-citationCho, E., Motalebi, N., Sundar, S. S., & Abdullah, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555164 · Cited by 35
Using an Interactive Avatar's Facial Expressiveness to Increase Persuasiveness and Socialness
Hyde, J., Carter, E. J., Kiesler, S. B., & Hodgins, J. K. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702465 · Cited by 34
Gender Stereotyping of Computers: Resource Depletion or Reduced Attention?
Lee, E. (2008) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00386.x · Cited by 34
Kallinen, K., & Ravaja, N. (2003) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.09.002 · Cited by 34
Intelligent autonomous agents and trust in virtual reality
Sun, N., & Botev, J. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100146 · Cited by 36
KinVoices: Using Voices of Friends and Family in Voice Interfaces
Chan, S., Gunasekaran, T. S., Pai, Y. S., Zhang, H., & Nanayakkara, S. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479590 · Cited by 34
Anzabi, N., & Umemuro, H. (2023) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01008-x · Cited by 34
Using animated agents in learner‐controlled training: the effects of design control
Behrend, T. S., & Thompson, L. F. (2012) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2012.00413.x · Cited by 33
Mohammadi, G., & Vinciarelli, A. (2015) · International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops · doi:10.1109/acii.2015.7344614 · Cited by 31
Examining User Preference for Agreeableness in Chatbots
Völkel, S. T., & Kaya, L. (2021) · CUI 2021 - 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3469595.3469633 · Cited by 31
Trust in Vocal Human–Robot Interaction: Implications for Robot Voice Design
Torre, I., & White, L. (2020) · Prosody, phonology and phonetics · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-6627-1_16 · Cited by 31
Phonetic accommodation in interaction with a virtual language learning tutor: A Wizard-of-Oz study
Gessinger, I., Möbius, B., Maguer, S. L., Raveh, E., & Steiner, I. (2021) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101029 · Cited by 35
Aylett, M. P., Sutton, S. J., & Vazquez-Alvarez, Y. (2019) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3342775.3342806 · Cited by 31
Psychological responses to simulated displays of mismatched emotional expressions
Creed, C., & Beale, R. (2007) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2007.11.004 · Cited by 31
Tapus, A., Ţăpuş, C., & Matarić, M. J. (2007) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/robot.2007.363544 · Cited by 31
Bian, Y., Yang, C., Guan, D., Xiao, S., Gao, F., Shen, C., & Meng, X. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858351 · Cited by 31
The dark side of virtual agents: Ohhh no!
Mostafa, R. B., Lages, C. R., & Shaalan, A. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102721 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Nass, C., & Lee, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 171-181
- ISSN
- 1076-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2192
- OpenAlex
- W2164772857
- Semantic Scholar
- 97c709ce30c43e4333a89c78d4a48e7b4ce06693
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- similarity attraction, person perception, text-to-speech, trust, liking, online reviews, online auctions, extraversion-introversion, speech rate, frequency range
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Introversion, Psychological, Male, Social Perception, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review