The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction
Abstract
Would people exhibit similarity-attraction and consistency-attraction toward unambiguously computer-generated speech even when personality is clearly not relevant? In Experiment 1, participants (extrovert or introvert) heard a synthesized voice (extrovert or introvert) on a book-buying Web site. Participants accurately recognized personality cues in text to speech and showed similarity-attraction in their evaluation of the computer voice, the book reviews, and the reviewer. Experiment 2, in a Web auction context, added personality of the text to the previous design. The results replicated Experiment 1 and demonstrated consistency (voice and text personality)-attraction. To maximize liking and trust, designers should set parameters, for example, words per minute or frequency range, that create a personality that is consistent with the user and the content being presented.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much of the relevant research has focused on imbuing voice-based, embodied, and robot-based chatbots with personalities using nonverbal cues, such as gestures [20,21] gaze [22], voice tone and speed [23], and proximity [24].”
From Interacting with a Chatbot-Based Advising System: Understanding the Effect of Chatbot Personality and User Gender on Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3702 · Cited by 4,872
Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153 · Cited by 4,022
Self-citationA psychological taxonomy of trait‐descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain
Wiggins, J. S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395 · Cited by 1,596
Speech style and social evaluation
Giles, H., & Powesland, P. F. (1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,192
Aronson, E. (1972) · Cited by 931
The elements of computer credibility
Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/302979.303001 · Cited by 880
The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation
Thomas, F. R., & Johnston, O. (1995) · Cited by 738
Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x · Cited by 670
Self-citationCan computer personalities be human personalities?
Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B. B., & Dryer, D. C. (1995) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1042 · Cited by 621
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Fiske, 1991, Social cognition.
- Langer, 1989, Mindfulness.
- Scherer, 1979, Personality markers in speech., 147
- Slobin, 1979, Psycholinguistics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 522
Polkosky, M. D., & Bryant, J. B. (2005) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 14
Factors that affect younger and older adults’ causal attributions of robot behaviour
Pak, R., Crumley-Branyon, J. J., de Visser, E. J., & Rovira, E. M. (2020) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2020.1734242 · Cited by 16
Johnson, D. M., & Gardner, J. (2007) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-007-0193-9 · Cited by 13
Warta, S. F. (2015) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931215591244 · Cited by 13
The outcomes and the mediating role of the functional triad: The users' perspective
Xu, D. J., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2018) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12183 · Cited by 13
CUSTOMER WEB INTERACTION:FUNDAMENTALS AND DECISION TREE
Senger, E., Gronover, S., & Riempp, G. (2002) · Cited by 13
Williams, B. A. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2575897 · Cited by 15
When in doubt, lay it out: Over vs. under-accommodation in human-robot interaction
Edwards, C. C., Edwards, A. P., & Rijhwani, V. (2023) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101561 · Cited by 12
Deviation from typical organic voices best explains a vocal uncanny valley
Diel, A., & Lewis, M. B. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100430 · Cited by 14
Digital Lyrebirds: Experimental Evidence That Voice-Based Deep Fakes Influence Trust
Schanke, S., Burtch, G., & Ray, G. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03316 · Cited by 14
User-centred design of humanoid robots’ communication
Thunberg, S., & Tom Ziemke, B. (2020) · Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.1515/pjbr-2021-0003 · Cited by 12
Caballero, J. A., Mauchand, M., Jiang, X., & Pell, M. D. (2021) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2021.1938667 · Cited by 16
Urakami, J., Sutthithatip, S., & Moore, B. A. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49062-1_17 · Cited by 12
Personalised Chats with Voice Assistants
Völkel, S. T., Kempf, P., & Hußmann, H. (2020) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3405755.3406156 · Cited by 12
Factors of attraction in human-machine communication
Edwards, A. P., Gambino, A., & Edwards, C. C. (2022) · Publizistik · doi:10.1007/s11616-022-00756-6 · Cited by 12
Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2005) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120504900358 · Cited by 12
Jonsson, I.-M. (2009) · DiVA (Linkoping University) · Cited by 12
Gain-loss separability in human- but not computer-based changes of mind
Lin, Y., Xu, P., Fan, J., Gu, R., & Luo, Y. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107712 · Cited by 15
Developing Autonomous Robot-Mediated Behavior Coaching Sessions with Haru
Jelínek, M., Nichols, E., & Gómez, R. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610978.3640583 · Cited by 14
Emotional speech-based personality prediction using NPSO architecture in deep learning
Rangra, K., Kadyan, V., & Kapoor, M. (2023) · Measurement Sensors · doi:10.1016/j.measen.2022.100655 · Cited by 11
Pucher, M., Zillinger, B., Toman, M., Schabus, D., Valentini-Botinhao, C., Yamagishi, J., Schmid, E., & Woltron, T. (2017) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2017.05.010 · Cited by 11
Student Evaluations of a (Rude) Spoken Dialogue System Insights from an Experimental Study
Jucks, R., Linnemann, G. A., & Brummernhenrich, B. (2018) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/2018/8406187 · Cited by 11
Fank, J., Richardson, N. T., & Diermeyer, F. (2019) · Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces · doi:10.1007/s12193-019-00296-w · Cited by 10
Inferring Human Personality Traits in Human-Robot Social Interaction
Shen, Z., Elibol, A., & Chong, N. Y. (2019) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2019.8673124 · Cited by 11
A Two-Layered Approach to Adaptive Dialogues for Robotic Assistance
Benedictis, R. D., Umbrico, A., Fracasso, F., Cortellessa, G., Orlandini, A., & Cesta, A. (2020) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man47096.2020.9223605 · Cited by 11
Building trust in the untrustable
Cioroaica, E., Bühnová, B., Kuhn, T. S., & Schneider, D. (2020) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS) · doi:10.1145/3377815.3381378 · Cited by 10
Wasinger, R., Oliver, D., Heckmann, D., Braun, B., Brandherm, B., & Stahl, C. (2003) · eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) · Cited by 10
Social Signal Processing: Understanding social interactions through nonverbal behavior analysis
Vinciarelli, A., Salamin, H., & Pantić, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5204290 · Cited by 10
Affective Information in Human-Computer Interaction
Partala, T. (2009) · Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) · Cited by 10
Whang, C. H. (2018) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 10
Choi, T. R., & Choi, J. H. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13050431 · Cited by 11
Zhang, X., & Lee, S. K. (2024) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-01-2022-0058 · Cited by 10
Xie, C., Zhu, J., Xie, Y., Yan, J., & Liang, C. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.70008 · Cited by 9
de Kloet, M., & Yang, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.831046 · Cited by 10
Nuñez, T. R., Jakobowsky, C., Prynda, K., Bergmann, K., & Pütten, A. M. R.-V. D. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103093 · Cited by 12
Jonsson, I.-M., & Dahlbäck, N. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07230-2_40 · Cited by 9
Wang, Z., & Nelson, M. R. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.041 · Cited by 9
Stojnić, A. (2015) · Performance Research · doi:10.1080/13528165.2015.1026733 · Cited by 9
Nonverbal Behavior Cue for Recognizing Human Personality Traits in Human-Robot Social Interaction
Shen, Z., Elibol, A., & Chong, N. Y. (2019) · International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM) · doi:10.1109/icarm.2019.8834279 · Cited by 9
Kumar, P., & Jhawar, A. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2426913 · Cited by 11
AI-determined similarity increases likability and trustworthiness of human voices
Jaggy, O., Schwan, S., & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318890 · Cited by 11
Design for Human-Automation and Human-Autonomous Systems
Lee, J. D., & Seppelt, B. (2023) · Springer handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_19 · Cited by 8
Crawford, J. R., Goh, Y., & Hubbard, E.-M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3076681 · Cited by 9
A Review of Personality in Voice-Based Man Machine Interaction
Metze, F., Black, A. W., & Polzehl, T. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21605-3_40 · Cited by 8
Tapie, J., Terrier, P., Perron, L., & Cellier, J. (2005) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-005-0028-z · Cited by 8
Jonsson, I.-M., & Dahlbäck, N. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39262-7_66 · Cited by 8
Voice Control System and Multiplatform Use: Specialist Vs. Generalist?
Jung, S., Lee, K. M., & Biocca, F. A. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20612-7_57 · Cited by 8
Self-citationConceptual Model of Game Aesthetics for Perceived Learning in Narrative Games
Bakar, J. A. A., Bahrin, A. S., Ahmad, M. K., & Zulkifli, A. N. (2017) · International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.18517/ijaseit.7.3.2201 · Cited by 9
Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 8
Lombard, M., Lee, S., Sun, W., Xu, K., & Yang, H. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0087 · Cited by 8
Beccanulli, A., Biraghi, S., & Gambetti, R. (2024) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2024.2404870 · Cited by 3
Computer assessment of interrogative suggestibility
Gorassini, D. R., Harris, J. A., Diamond, A., & Flynn-Dastoor, E. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.003 · Cited by 7
Negotiating over Mobile Phones: Calling or Being Called Can Make the Difference
Vinciarelli, A., Salamin, H., & Polychroniou, A. (2014) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-014-9267-y · Cited by 7
Bartosiak, M. (2020) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2020.1765749 · Cited by 7
It’s not What It Speaks, but It’s How It Speaks: A Study into Smartphone Voice-User Interfaces (VUI)
Jeong, J.-Y., & Shin, D. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20916-6_27 · Cited by 7
Towards a Natural Language Driven Automated Help Desk
Knapp, M., & Woch, J. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45715-1_8 · Cited by 7
Covering: Mutable Characteristics and Perceptions of Voice in the U.S. Supreme CourtPreprint
Chen, D. L., Halberstam, Y., & Yu, A. C. L. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2816241 · Cited by 7
Older adults’ user experience with introvert and extravert humanoid robot personalities
Zedda, E., Manca, M., Paternò, F., & Santoro, C. (2023) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-023-01054-2 · Cited by 6
The Impact of Virtual Human Vocal Personality on Establishing Rapport
Maxim, A., Zalake, M. S., & Lok, B. C. L. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3570945.3607318 · Cited by 6
Lee, J., You, J. S., & Lee, D. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2307695 · Cited by 8
Kuhail, M. A., Al-Shamaileh, O., Thomas, J., Thornquist, E., & Shah, S. J. H. (2025) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-12-2023-1286 · Cited by 6
Exploring Effects of Dialect on User Perception of Conversational Agents
Jeong, Y., Park, D.-E., Yoon, J., & Jang, M.-K. (2019) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2019.20.7.1439 · Cited by 6
Bilal, D., & Barfield, J. K. (2021) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.431 · Cited by 8
Makady, H. (2023) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-023-00351-0 · Cited by 8
Lee, H., Lee, K., Lee, K. M., & Choo, H. (2012) · International Conference on Information Networking · doi:10.1109/icoin.2012.6164429 · Cited by 6
Self-citationGronover, S., Senger, E., & Riempp, G. (2002) · i-com · doi:10.1524/icom.2002.1.1.025 · Cited by 6
Receptive to bad reception: Jerky motion can make persuasive messages more effective
Patel, H., Bayliss, L. C., Ivory, J., Woodard, K., McCarthy, A., & MacDorman, K. F. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.012 · Cited by 6
Emotional Intelligence: Giving Computers Effective Emotional Skills to Aid Interaction
Creed, C., & Beale, R. (2008) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78293-3_5 · Cited by 6
Branyon, J., & Pak, R. (2015) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931215591335 · Cited by 5
Argumentation is More Important than Appearance for Designing Culturally Tailored Virtual Agents
Murali, P., Shamekhi, A., Parmar, D., & Bickmore, T. (2020) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.65109/jlbq1454 · Cited by 6
Effects of Team-Based Computer Interaction: The Media Equation and Game Design Considerations
Johnson, D. M., & Gardner, J. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11558651_45 · Cited by 6
Predicting user attitudes toward smartphone ads using support vector machine
Lee, K. W., & Choo, H. (2016) · International Journal of Mobile Communications · doi:10.1504/ijmc.2016.076272 · Cited by 6
Self-citationHautasaari, A., Yamashita, N., & Gao, G. (2017) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2017.1323184 · Cited by 6
Regionalized Text-to-Speech Systems: Persona Design and Application Scenarios
Pucher, M., Schuchmann, G., & Fröhlich, P. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00525-1_21 · Cited by 6
Evaluation and context for in-car speech systems for older adults
Zajicek, M., & Jonsson, I.-M. (2005) · Latin American conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/1111360.1111364 · Cited by 6
Design Methods for Personified Interfaces
Pinhanez, C. S. (2017) · International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications (CHIRA) · doi:10.5220/0006487500270038 · Cited by 5
Personality prediction from task-oriented and open-domain human–machine dialogues
Guo, A., Hirai, R., Ohashi, A., Chiba, Y., Tsunomori, Y., & Higashinaka, R. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53989-y · Cited by 5
Faur, C., Martin, J., & Clavel, C. (2015) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 5
Impact of human-robot interaction on user satisfaction with humanoid-based healthcare
Kwon, O., Kim, J., Jin, Y., & Lee, N. (2018) · International Journal of Engineering & Technology · doi:10.14419/ijet.v7i2.12.11038 · Cited by 5
What Robots Could Teach Us about Perspective-Taking
Torrey, C., Fussell, S. R., & Kiesler, S. B. (2018) · KiltHub Repository · doi:10.1184/r1/6470672 · Cited by 5
Linek, S. B., Schwarz, D., Hirschberg, G., Kickmeier-Rust, M., & Albert, D. (2007) · Cited by 5
Automatic Attribution of Personality Traits Based on Prosodic Features
Mohammadi, G., & Vinciarelli, A. (2012) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 5
Emotion-Related Responses to Audio News with Rising versus Falling Background Tone Sequences
Kallinen, K., & Ravaja, N. (2003) · Musicae Scientiae · doi:10.1177/10298649040070s105 · Cited by 5
Agents and Decision Support Systems
Tolk, A., Madhavan, P., Tweedale, J. W., & Jain, L. C. (2009) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527627783.ch14 · Cited by 5
Perceived Masculinity Predicts U.S. Supreme Court OutcomesPreprint
Chen, D. L., Halberstam, Y., & Yu, A. C. L. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2816252 · Cited by 5
Kim, J., Lee, K., Kim, W., Jeong, N., Kim, J., & Song, H. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2425881 · Cited by 4
Self-citationIncreasing Accountability and Compliance with Robot Advice
Holthöwer, J., van Doorn, J., & Noble, S. M. (2025) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429251370268 · Cited by 4
Xu, X., Xian, X., Zhang, M., & Shi, S. (2025) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2025.2523914 · Cited by 4
Bartsch, S., Fuchs, S., & Meyer, A. (2009) · Gabler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-9407-3_23 · Cited by 4
Voice Switching in Voice-Enabled Digital Assistants (VDAs)
Bilal, D., & Barfield, J. K. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78462-1_39 · Cited by 5
Anthropomorphic Perceptions of Simple Text-Based Interfaces
Sobel, B. M., & Sims, V. K. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05412-9_17 · Cited by 4
Animacy perception of agents: Their effects on users behavior and variability between age groups
Hasegawa, R., Harada, E. T., Kayano, W., & Ōsawa, H. (2015) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2015.7333631 · Cited by 4
Pucher, M., Toman, M., Schabus, D., Valentini-Botinhao, C., Yamagishi, J., Zillinger, B., & Schmid, E. (2015) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2015-376 · Cited by 4
Human-Machine Trust Interaction
Liu, C. (2010) · International Journal of Dependable and Trustworthy Information Systems · doi:10.4018/jdtis.2010100104 · Cited by 4
Gender and Personality in Media Rich Interfaces: Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together?
Hess, T. J., Fuller, M. A., & Mathew, J. (2003) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 4
The Effect of Personality Traits and Perceived Cultural Similarity on Attraction
Pornpitakpan, C. (2003) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1300/j046v15n03_02 · Cited by 4
A complex relationship: Older people and in-car message systems
Zajíček, M., & Jonsson, I.-M. (2007) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2007.06.02.002.00 · Cited by 4
Human and Humanoid Don’t Match: Consistency Preference and Impact on Users ’ Trust
Gong, L. (2008) · Cited by 4
van Ledden, S., Lisetschko, A., Jansen, N., Jendrusch, D., Hermann, J., & Doğangün, A. (2024) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3679318.3685346 · Cited by 3
Affiliation in human-AI interactions is based on shared psychological traits
Castiello, S., Pitliya, R. J., Lametti, D. R., & Murphy, R. A. (2026) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-026-00433-8 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Nass, C., & Lee, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 171-181
- ISSN
- 1076-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2192
- OpenAlex
- W2164772857
- Semantic Scholar
- 97c709ce30c43e4333a89c78d4a48e7b4ce06693
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- similarity attraction, person perception, text-to-speech, trust, liking, online reviews, online auctions, extraversion-introversion, speech rate, frequency range
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Introversion, Psychological, Male, Social Perception, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review