The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Researchers Misunderstand Confidence Intervals and Standard Error Bars.
Abstract
Little is known about researchers' understanding of confidence intervals (CIs) and standard error (SE) bars. Authors of journal articles in psychology, behavioral neuroscience, and medicine were invited to visit a Web site where they adjusted a figure until they judged 2 means, with error bars, to be just statistically significantly different (p < .05). Results from 473 respondents suggest that many leading researchers have severe misconceptions about how error bars relate to statistical significance, do not adequately distinguish CIs and SE bars, and do not appreciate the importance of whether the 2 means are independent or come from a repeated measures design. Better guidelines for researchers and less ambiguous graphical conventions are needed before the advantages of CIs for research communication can be realized.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Through estimating statistically significant differences and 95% CIs among studies97, in comparison to interventions for stress, our findings suggest that breathwork might be associated with similar—and non-significantly different—effects.”
From Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials (2023) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“However, CIs are not immune to incorrect interpretations either (Belia et al., 2005; Hoekstra et al., 2014; Miller and Ulrich, 2016).”
From Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian Academic Psychologists (2016) · cites this paper as Belia et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
Things I have learned (so far).
Cohen, J. (1990) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.12.1304 · Cited by 1,781
Inference by Eye: Confidence Intervals and How to Read Pictures of Data.
Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.2.170 · Cited by 1,449 · cited 20×
“In fact, when sample sizes are similar and not small, and CI widths are similar, then if 95% CIs on independent means just touch, the two-tail p value is about .006 ( Cumming & Finch, 2005; Payton, Greenstone, & Schenker, 2003), not .05 as many believe.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStatistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines.
JOLLIFFE, F. R., Gardner, M. J., & Altman, D. G. (1990) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2982808 · Cited by 1,319
On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals.
Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313001317097960 · Cited by 1,218
Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy
Nickerson, R. S. (2000) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.5.2.241 · Cited by 1,090
Schmidt, F. L. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.115 · Cited by 1,044
Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research.
Kline, R. B. (2004) · doi:10.1037/10693-000 · Cited by 1,034
Payton, M. E., Greenstone, M. H., & Nathaniel Schenker, A. (2003) · Journal of Insect Science · doi:10.1093/jis/3.1.34 · Cited by 858
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 2001, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association
- 10.1177/00131640121971374 · DOI · Paper page
- Smithson, 2002, Confidence intervals.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
D'Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001 · Cited by 1,738
Inference by Eye: Confidence Intervals and How to Read Pictures of Data.
Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.2.170 · Cited by 1,449
Self-citationVariables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses.
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000098 · Cited by 1,347
Best Practices for Estimating, Interpreting, and Presenting Nonlinear Interaction Effects
Mize, T. D. (2019) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v6.a4 · Cited by 1,019
Error bars in experimental biology
Cumming, G., Fidler, F., & Vaux, D. L. (2007) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200611141 · Cited by 940
Self-citationMccarthy, M. A. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802454 · Cited by 758
Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I., & Hayes, T. L. (2008) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711007x255327 · Cited by 729
Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals
Cumming, G. (2008) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3471 · Cited by 673
Self-citationTrust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates.
De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K. T., & Gillespie, N. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000110 · Cited by 616
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals
Hoekstra, R., Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0572-3 · Cited by 425
A Comparison of Expert and Nonexpert Raters Using the Consensual Assessment Technique
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton∗, J. D. (2008) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400410802059929 · Cited by 374
Chronic Ankle Instability: Evolution of the Model
Hiller, C. E., Kilbreath, S. L., & Refshauge, K. M. (2011) · Journal of Athletic Training · doi:10.4085/1062-6050-46.2.133 · Cited by 373
The Science of Visual Data Communication: What Works
Franconeri, S., Padilla, L. M. K., Shah, P., Zacks, J. M., & Hullman, J. (2021) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/15291006211051956 · Cited by 394
Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines
Padilla, L., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Hegarty, M., & Stefanucci, J. K. (2018) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-018-0120-9 · Cited by 393
Cavina‐Pratesi, C., Monaco, S., Fattori, P., Galletti, C., Figley, T. D., Quinlan, D. J., Goodale, M. A., & Culham, J. C. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2023-10.2010 · Cited by 335
Krzywinski, M. I., & Altman, N. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2659 · Cited by 294
Meaningful Mediation Analysis: Plausible Causal Inference and Informative Communication
Pieters, R. G. M. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx081 · Cited by 289
Error Bars Considered Harmful: Exploring Alternate Encodings for Mean and Error
Correll, M., & Gleicher, M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2014.2346298 · Cited by 258
Editors Can Lead Researchers to Confidence Intervals, but Can't Make Them Think
Fidler, F. M., Thomason, N. R., Cumming, G., Finch, S. J., & Leeman, J. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502008.x · Cited by 244
Self-citationKay, M., Kola, T., Hullman, J. R., & Munson, S. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858558 · Cited by 239
Sotos, A. E. C., Vanhoof, S., Noortgate, W. V. D., & Onghena, P. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.04.001 · Cited by 246
Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials
Fincham, G. W., Strauss, C., Montero-Marin, J., & Cavanagh, K. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-27247-y · Cited by 224
Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA
Baguley, T. S. (2011) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0123-7 · Cited by 217
Psychology's Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological Science
Tackett, J. L., Brandes, C. M., King, K. M., & Markon, K. E. (2019) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095710 · Cited by 221
Hullman, J., Resnick, P., & Adar, E. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142444 · Cited by 194
Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle.
Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/a0014164 · Cited by 191
In Pursuit of Error: A Survey of Uncertainty Visualization Evaluation
Hullman, J., Qiao, X., Correll, M., Kale, A., & Kay, M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2864889 · Cited by 187
Schubert, E. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00837 · Cited by 203
Why Authors Don't Visualize Uncertainty
Hullman, J. R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934287 · Cited by 195
Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules
Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013) · Advances in Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.5709/acp-0133-x · Cited by 173
Replication and Researchers' Understanding of Confidence Intervals and Standard Error Bars
Cumming, G., Williams, J., & Fidler, F. M. (2004) · Understanding Statistics · doi:10.1207/s15328031us0304_5 · Cited by 175
Self-citationConfidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules.
Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0133-x · Cited by 166
Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects
Snow, J. C., Pettypiece, C. E., Figley, T. D., McLean, A. D., Stroman, P. W., Goodale, M. A., & Culham, J. C. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00130 · Cited by 165
fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex
Quinlan, D. J., & Culham, J. C. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.029 · Cited by 155
Ethical Dimensions of Visualization Research
Correll, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300418 · Cited by 150
Kim, S. S. Y., Liao, Q. V., Vorvoreanu, M., Ballard, S., & Vaughan, J. W. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658941 · Cited by 147
“While numerical expressions and visualizations allow for high precision, they are notoriously difficult for people to understand and are often misinterpreted, even by experts [9, 40, 43, 86].”
BackgroundInside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment
Correll, S. J., Weisshaar, K., Wynn, A. T., & Wehner, J. D. (2020) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122420962080 · Cited by 151
Factors Associated with Teacher Wellbeing: A Meta-Analysis
Zhou, S., Slemp, G. R., & Vella‐Brodrick, D. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09886-x · Cited by 275
Non-expert interpretations of hurricane forecast uncertainty visualizations
Ruginski, I. T., Boone, A. P., Padilla, L., Liu, L., Heydari, N. D., Kramer, H., Hegarty, M., Thompson, W. B., House, D. H., & Creem-Regehr, S. H. (2016) · Spatial Cognition and Computation · doi:10.1080/13875868.2015.1137577 · Cited by 134
Framing and Blame Attribution in Populist Rhetoric
Busby, E. C., Gubler, J. R., & Hawkins, K. A. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/701832 · Cited by 150
Curran‐Everett, D., & Benos, D. J. (2007) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00022.2007 · Cited by 125
Hypothetical Outcome Plots Help Untrained Observers Judge Trends in Ambiguous Data
Kale, A., Nguyen, F., Kay, M., & Hullman, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2864909 · Cited by 122
Confidence intervals and replication: Where will the next mean fall?
Cumming, G., & Maillardet, R. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.3.217 · Cited by 122
Self-citationConceptualizing personal web usage in work contexts: A preliminary framework
Kim, S. J., & Byrne, S. E. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.006 · Cited by 125
The Box Plots Alternative for Visualizing Quantitative Data
Nuzzo, R. L. (2016) · PM&R · doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.02.001 · Cited by 119
Visual Reasoning Strategies for Effect Size Judgments and Decisions
Kale, A., Kay, M., & Hullman, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2020.3030335 · Cited by 109
Ecological effects on metabolic scaling: amphipod responses to fish predators in freshwater springs
Glazier, D. S., Butler, E. M., Lombardi, S., Deptola, T. J., Reese, A. J., & Satterthwaite, E. V. (2011) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/11-0264.1 · Cited by 104
Authorship Bias in Violence Risk Assessment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072484 · Cited by 104
Effects of ensemble and summary displays on interpretations of geospatial uncertainty data
Padilla, L., Ruginski, I. T., & Creem-Regehr, S. H. (2017) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-017-0076-1 · Cited by 105
Mebane, C. A., Schmidt, T. S., Miller, J. L., & Balistrieri, L. S. (2020) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.4663 · Cited by 105
Monaco, S., Cavina-Pratesi, C., Sedda, A., Fattori, P., Galletti, C., & Culham, J. C. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01069.2010 · Cited by 104
Taylor, H., Strauss, C., & Cavanagh, K. (2021) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102078 · Cited by 102
Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice
Diong, J. H. L., Butler, A. A., Gandevia, S. C., & Héroux, M. E. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202121 · Cited by 98
Strengthening statistical usage in marine ecology
Beninger, P., Boldina, I., & Katsanevakis, S. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2012.05.020 · Cited by 85
Learning About Statistical Inference
Makar, K., & Rubin, A. (2017) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_8 · Cited by 102
Confidence intervals for dependent data: Equating non-overlap with statistical significance
Afshartous, D. R., & Preston, R. A. (2010) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2010.04.011 · Cited by 86
Padilla, L., Kay, M., & Hullman, J. R. (2021) · Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat08296 · Cited by 87
Prabhudesai, S., Yang, L., Asthana, S., Huan, X., Liao, Q. V., & Banovic, N. (2023) · Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3581641.3584033 · Cited by 82
Alhadad, S. S. J. (2018) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2018.52.5 · Cited by 92
Tryon, W. W., & Lewis, C. (2008) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0013158 · Cited by 79
Methodology in Our Education Research Culture
Henson, R. K., Hull, D. M., & Williams, C. S. (2010) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x10365102 · Cited by 79
Coulson, M. (2010) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00026 · Cited by 77
Padilla, L., Powell, M., Kay, M., & Hullman, J. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579267 · Cited by 82
Fritz, A., Scherndl, T., & Kühberger, A. (2012) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354312436870 · Cited by 77
Why Figures with Error Bars Should Replace p Values
Fidler, F. M., & Loftus, G. R. (2009) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.1.27 · Cited by 77
Self-citationToward improved statistical reporting in the journal of consulting and clinical psychology.
Fidler, F., Cumming, G., Thomason, N., Pannuzzo, D., Smith, J., Fyffe, P., Edmonds, H., Harrington, C., & Schmitt, R. (2005) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.73.1.136 · Cited by 67
Self-citationSakaluk, J. K. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.013 · Cited by 76
Improving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk
Brewer, N. T., Richman, A. R., DeFrank, J. T., Reyna, V. F., & Carey, L. (2011) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1791-9 · Cited by 69
Human Performance Benefits of The Automation Transparency Design Principle
Skraaning, G., & Jamieson, G. A. (2019) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720819887252 · Cited by 75
Explorations in statistics: confidence intervals
Curran‐Everett, D. (2009) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00006.2009 · Cited by 67
Varieties of Confidence Intervals
Cousineau, D. (2017) · Advances in Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.5709/acp-0214-z · Cited by 67
Maximum Likelihood for Social Science
Ward, M. D., & Ahlquist, J. S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316888544 · Cited by 110
Looks Good To Me: Visualizations As Sanity Checks
Correll, M., Li, M., Kindlmann, G., & Scheidegger, C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2864907 · Cited by 72
Murtonen, M. (2015) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1072152 · Cited by 70
Inference by Eye: Pictures of Confidence Intervals and Thinking About Levels of Confidence
Cumming, G. (2007) · Teaching Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9639.2007.00267.x · Cited by 62
Self-citationIs the call to abandon p-values the red herring of the replicability crisis?
Savalei, V., & Dunn, E. W. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00245 · Cited by 65
Carpenter, R. W., Wood, P. K., & Trull, T. J. (2015) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi_2015_29_197 · Cited by 61
In the Eye of the Beholder: Differences Across Ethnicity and Gender in Evaluating Creative Work
Kaufman, J. C., Niu, W., Sexton, J. D., & Cole, J. C. (2010) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00584.x · Cited by 59
Asian Countries in the Global Rice Market
Milovanovic, V., & Smutka, Ľ. (2017) · Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis · doi:10.11118/actaun201765020679 · Cited by 60
Epp, C. D., & Bull, S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2015.2411604 · Cited by 55
The effects of newcomer proactive behaviours on socialization outcomes: A meta‐analysis
Zhao, T., Liu, J., Zawacki, A. M., Michel, J. S., & Li, H. (2022) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12407 · Cited by 72
der Giessen, D. V., Hollenstein, T., Hale, W. W., Koot, H. M., Meeus, W., & Branje, S. (2014) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-014-9910-9 · Cited by 58
The Perception of Visual UncertaintyRepresentation by Non-Experts
Tak, S., Toet, A., & van Erp, J. B. F. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2013.247 · Cited by 57
Kalinowski, P., & Fidler, F. M. (2010) · Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews · doi:10.1053/j.nainr.2009.12.007 · Cited by 61
Self-citationHullman, J., Kay, M., Kim, Y.-S., & Shrestha, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2017.2743898 · Cited by 55
Lane, D. M., & Sándor, A. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0016620 · Cited by 54
The Use of Control Charts to Interpret Environmental Monitoring Data
Morrison, L. W. (2008) · Natural Areas Journal · doi:10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[66:tuocct]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 53
Uncertainty Visualization: Concepts, Methods, and Applications in Biological Data Visualization
Weiskopf, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2022.793819 · Cited by 50
Type II error and statistical power in reports of small animal clinical trials.
Giuffrida, M. (2014) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.244.9.1075 · Cited by 45
Fidler, F. M. (2018) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/7xdpq · Cited by 48
Self-citationAssessing the effectiveness of different visualizations for judgments of positional uncertainty
McKenzie, G., Hegarty, M., Barrett, T. J., & Goodchild, M. F. (2015) · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1082566 · Cited by 47
STATISTICAL COGNITION: TOWARDS EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN STATISTICS AND STATISTICS EDUCATION
Marom, T., Fidler, F. M., & Cumming, G. (2008) · Statistics Education Research Journal · doi:10.52041/serj.v7i2.468 · Cited by 46
Self-citationPadilla, L., Fygenson, R., Castro, S. C., & Bertini, E. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2022.3209457 · Cited by 45
Maximum likelihood for social science strategies for analysis
Ward, M. D., & Ahlquist, J. S. (2018) · Cited by 48
Moving Beyond the Bar Plot and the Line Graph to Create Informative and Attractive Graphics1
Larson‐Hall, J. (2017) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12386 · Cited by 45
Beyond ‘significance’: principles and practice of the Analysis of Credibility
Matthews, R. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.171047 · Cited by 47
Interpretation of the p value: A national survey study in academic psychologists from Spain
Badenes-Ribera, L., Frías-Navarro, D., Monterde-i-Bort, H., & Pascual-Soler, M. (2015) · Psicothema · doi:10.7334/psicothema2014.283 · Cited by 41
Approaching a fair deal for significance and other concerns
Giner‐Sorolla, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.010 · Cited by 44
Development of the Statistical Reasoning in Biology Concept Inventory (SRBCI)
Deane, T., Nomme, K., Jeffery, E., Pollock, C. A., & Bírol, G. (2016) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.15-06-0131 · Cited by 48
Boone, A. P., Gunalp, P., & Hegarty, M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000166 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Belia, S., Fidler, F., Williams, J., & Cumming, G.
- Affiliations
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 389-396
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2110405340
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- confidence intervals, error bars, statistical significance, repeated measures designs, scholarly communication
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Research, Confidence Intervals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review