Cited by 1,821Resilience and Mental HealthReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 267 of the 268 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meaning in the Context of Stress and Coping

Park, Crystal L., Folkman, Susan·1997·Review of General Psychology

Abstract

Although theoretical and empirical work on topics related to meaning and meaning making proliferate, careful evaluation and integration of this area have not been carried out. Toward this end, this article has 3 goals: (a) to elaborate the critical dimensions of meaning as it relates to stressful life events and conditions, (b) to extend the transactional model of stress and coping to include these dimensions, and (c) to provide a framework for understanding current research and directions for future research within this extended model. First, the authors present a framework for understanding diverse conceptual and operational definitions of meaning by distinguishing 2 levels of meaning, termed global meaning and situationalmeaning. Second, the authors use this framework to review and synthesize the literature on the functions of meaning in the coping process and propose a definition of meaningmaking that highlights the critical role of reappraisal. The authors specify the roles of attributions throughout the coping process and discuss implications for future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.115

Cites

267 of 267 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 268 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1037/0022-006X.55.1.29 · DOI
  2. Affleck G., 1985, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 653
  3. Andreason N. J. C., 1977, Coping with physicalillness, 149
  4. Batson C. D., 1993, Religion and the individual: A social-psychological approach
  5. Bowlby J., 1969, Attachment
  6. Breznitz S., 1983, Denial of stress
  7. Brown J. D., 1993, Cognitive coping, families and disability, 123
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.184 · DOI
  9. Epstein S., 1980, Personality: Basic issues and current research, 89
  10. Fiske S. T., 1991, Social cognition
  11. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992 · DOI
  12. Folkman S., Coping with chronicstress
  13. Furlong R. C. S., 1982, Personalmeanings, 141
  14. Gilovich T., 1995, Psychological Bulletin, 102, 379
  15. Horowitz M. J., 1982, Handbook of stress, 711
  16. Janoff-Bulman R., 1991, Perspectives in personality: A research annual, 99
  17. Lerner M. J., 1970, Altruism and helping behaviors, 205
  18. Maes S., 1996, Handbook ofcoping: Theory, research, and application, 221
  19. Martin L. L., 1989, Unintended thought, 306
  20. Martin L. L., 1993, Handbookof mental control, 552
  21. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.919 · DOI
  22. McCubbin H. I., 1993, Cognitive coping, families and disability, 239
  23. McIntoshD. N. (1991, August). Religion as schema: Implications for the relation between religion and coping. In HillP. C., Promising cognitive models foran empirical psychology of religion Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
  24. Monroe S. M., 1995, Measuring stress: A guide for health and socialscientists
  25. Montada L., 1992, Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood, 133
  26. Moos R. H., 1993, Handbook of stress, 234
  27. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.579 · DOI
  28. Pargament K. I., God help me: The psychology of religion and coping
  29. Patterson J. M., 1993, Cognitive coping, families and disability, 221
  30. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.528 · DOI
  31. Reker G. T., 1988, Emergingtheories of aging, 214
  32. 10.1037/0022-006X.57.3.344 · DOI
  33. Shrimali S., 1987, Clinical Studies, 3, 135
  34. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.916 · DOI
  35. Stein N. L., 1993, Handbook ofemotions, 279
  36. Tait R., 1989, Unintended thought, 351
  37. Taylor S. E., 1981, Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium, 1, 89
  38. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.489 · DOI
  39. Tennen H., Post-traumatic growth: Theory and research on processes of change in the aftermath of crises
  40. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.540 · DOI
  41. 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.293 · DOI
  42. Tunis S. L., 1991, Person schemas and maladaptive interpersonal patterns, 261
  43. 10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.132 · DOI
  44. Wills T. A., 1992, Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood, 196
  45. Wortman C. B., 1992, Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood, 341
  46. Wurf E., 1991, Perspectives in personality: A research annual, 39

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Park, C. L., & Folkman, S.
Affiliations
  • Miami University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Park, Crystal L.
Venue
Review of General Psychology
Published
1997-06
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
115-144
ISSN
  • 1089-2680 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1552
OpenAlex
W2069826700
Cited by
1,821
References
268
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 79
FWCI
9.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of General Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
meaning in life, meaning-making, stress coping, transactional model of stress and coping, life events, global meaning, situational meaning, cognitive reappraisal, attribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review