Cited by 100Media Influence and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

How self-affirmation reduces defensive processing of threatening health information: Evidence at the implicit level.

van Koningsbruggen, Guido M., Das, Enny, Roskos-Ewoldsen, David R.·2009·Health Psychology

Abstract

Objective Self-affirmation reduces defensive responses to threatening health information, but little is known about the cognitive processes instigated by self-affirmation. This study tested whether self-affirmation increases responsiveness to threatening health information at the implicit level. Design In an experimental study (N = 84), the authors presented high- (coffee drinkers) and low-relevance (noncoffee drinkers) participants with threatening health information linking caffeine consumption to health problems. Prior to reading this information, the authors manipulated self-affirmation. Main outcome measures Participants completed an unobtrusive lexical decision task to measure the accessibility of threat-related cognitions and reported their perceptions of message quality and intentions to take precautions. Results Among high-relevance participants, self-affirmation increased the accessibility of threat-related cognitions, increased perceptions of message quality, and promoted adaptive behavioral intentions. Conclusion The findings suggest that self-affirmation can increase implicit responsiveness to threatening health information among a target audience, that is, people for whom the health information is highly relevant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0015610

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • However, providing them with the opportunity to reflect on important values before reviewing the information decreased their denigration of the health message and increased their likelihood of agreeing to take a screening test.

    “However, providing them with the opportunity to reflect on important values before reviewing the information decreased their denigration of the health message and increased their likelihood of agreeing to take a screening test (see also Howell & Shepperd 2012).”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as van Koningsbruggen & Das 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Das, E., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2009-09
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
563-568
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2098041157
Cited by
100
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
118.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
self-affirmation, defensive processing, implicit cognition, message quality, behavioral intention, caffeine consumption, health risk communication, message relevance
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude to Health, Beverages, Caffeine, Coffee, Decision Making, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Health Education, Humans, Judgment, Life Style, Male, Self Care, Social Values, Health Behavior, Self Efficacy, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review