Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 783

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis.

Open access
Hammond, Michelle M., Neff, Nicole L., Farr, James L., Schwall, Alexander R., Zhao, Xinyuan·2011·Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
DOI 10.1037/a0018556
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Numerous narrative reviews related to innovation in work organizations have been published, yet very few quantitative reviews have been conducted. The present meta-analysis investigates the relationships between four predictor types (individual differences, motivation, job characteristics, and contextual influences) and individual-level workplace innovation. Results indicated that individual factors, characteristics of the job, and factors of the environment were moderately associated with phases of the innovation process. Implications for future research opportunities are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0018556

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 783

Metadata

Authors
Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X.
Venue
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2011-02
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
90-105
ISSN
  • 1931-3896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-390X
DOI
10.1037/a0018556
OpenAlex
W1995284252
Cited by
783
References
16
FWCI
30.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.