The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterizing age-related changes in remembering the past and imagining the future
Open accessAbstract
When remembering past events or imagining possible future events, older adults generate fewer episodic details than do younger adults. These results support the constructive episodic simulation hypothesis: deficits in retrieving episodic details underlie changes during memory and imagination. To examine the extent of this age-related reduction in specificity, we compared performance on memory and imagination tasks to a picture description task that does not require episodic memory. In two experiments, older adults exhibited comparable specificity reductions across all conditions. These findings emphasize the need to consider age-related changes in imagination and memory in a broader theoretical context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“such findings nonetheless suggest that non-episodic factors that similarly impact remembering, imagining, and describing, such as narrative style or cognitive control, are at least partly responsible for similarities between remembering past experiences and imagining future experiences on tasks such as the AI”
From Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions (2017) · cites this paper as [35]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Although this study also revealed effects of aging on memory and imagination above-and-beyond picture description performance”
From Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions (2017) · cites this paper as [35]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“procedures such as the AI can be influenced by non-episodic factors.”
From Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions (2017) · cites this paper as [35]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Older adults produced fewer internal but not external details on the memory and imagination tasks, replicating earlier results, but they also showed the same pattern on the picture description task.”
From Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions (2017) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Press, H. (1886) · Cited by 10,087
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950
Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language
Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,276
The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07001975 · Cited by 2,031
Addis, D. R., Wong, A. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.016 · Cited by 1,949
Self-citationThe cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2087 · Cited by 1,836
Self-citationAging and autobiographical memory: dissociating episodic from semantic retrieval
Levine, B., Svoboda, E., Hay, J. F., Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M. (2002) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.677 · Cited by 1,521
Episodic Simulation of Future Events: Concepts, Data, and Applications
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.001 · Cited by 840
Self-citationSzpunar, K. K. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610362350 · Cited by 663
Age-Related Changes in the Episodic Simulation of Future Events
Addis, D. R., Wong, A. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02043.x · Cited by 660
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N., & Szpunar, K. K. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.001 · Cited by 1,398
Self-citationEpisodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions
Schacter, D. L., Benoit, R. G., & Szpunar, K. K. (2017) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.06.002 · Cited by 771
“Although this study also revealed effects of aging on memory and imagination above-and-beyond picture description performance, such findings nonetheless suggest that non-episodic factors that similarly impact remembering, imagining, and describing, such as narrative style or cognitive control, are at least partly resp…”
BackgroundSelf-citationA taxonomy of prospection: Introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition
Szpunar, K. K., Spreng, R. N., & Schacter, D. L. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1417144111 · Cited by 539
Self-citationIs memory for remembering? Recollection as a form of episodic hypothetical thinking
Brigard, F. D. (2013) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0247-7 · Cited by 404
Benoit, R. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.034 · Cited by 366
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaesser, B., Sacchetti, D. C., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-84
- ISSN
- 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1498
- PMC
- PMC3062729
- OpenAlex
- W1971583221
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG08441)
- Royal Society of NZ
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- age-related memory decline, episodic memory, mental imagery, episodic specificity, older adults, picture description
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Imagination, Interviews as Topic, Male, Memory, Mental Recall, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
