Cited by 208Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

Constructive episodic simulation: dissociable effects of a specificity induction on remembering, imagining, and describing in young and older adults

Open access
Madore, Kevin P., Gaesser, Brendan, Schacter, Daniel L.·2014·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

According to the constructive episodic simulation hypothesis (Schacter & Addis, 2007), both remembered past and imagined future events rely heavily on episodic memory. An alternative hypothesis is that observed similarities between remembering and imagining reflect the influence of broader factors such as descriptive ability, narrative style, or inhibitory control. We attempted to distinguish between these 2 hypotheses by examining the impact of an episodic specificity induction on memory, imagination, and picture description in young and older adults. In Experiment 1, participants received the specificity induction or a control induction prior to the memory, imagination, and description tasks. Older adults provided fewer internal (i.e., episodic) and more external (i.e., semantic) details than young adults across the 3 tasks irrespective of induction. Critically, however, the specificity induction selectively increased internal but not external details for memory and imagination in both age groups compared with the control induction. By contrast, the induction did not affect internal (or external) details for picture description. Experiment 2 replicated these results in young adults using a different control induction. Our findings point to a dissociation between episodic processes involved in memory and imagination and nonepisodic processes involved in picture description.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034885

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous work showed that an episodic specificity induction selectively boosts the number of episodic details on subsequent remembering and future imagining tasks, with no effect on semantic details.

    “Previous work had shown that the specificity induction selectively boosts the number of episodic details that participants provide on subsequent tasks that require remembering past experiences and imagining future experiences, while having no effect on the number of semantic details that participants provide on such tasks ([73]; for review, see [74]).”

    From Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics (2016) · cites this paper as [73]

    Experiment 1 (Results) and Experiment 2 (Results and Discussion) report increased internal, episodic details on both memory and imagination tasks, with no significant change in external details. The Coding section defines external details as semantic, repetitive, or off-topic; because semantic details were not reported separately, the paper does not establish the claimed lack of effect on semantic details specifically. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several experiments have shown that an episodic specificity induction selectively dissociates the contributions of episodic retrieval to future imagining from non-episodic factors such as semantic retrieval and narrative style.

    “several experiments have shown that the ESI selectively dissociates the contributions of episodic retrieval to future imagining from such non-episodic factors as semantic retrieval and narrative style.”

    From Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions (2017) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zacks RT Hasher L Dagenbach D Carr TH Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language (pp. 241-264) 1994 Academic Press New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madore, K. P., Gaesser, B., & Schacter, D. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
2014-05
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
609-622
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2165012907
Cited by
208
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG08441)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory, mental imagery, picture description, age differences, older adults, semantic memory, narrative style, inhibitory control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Mental Recall, Semantics, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review