Cited by 51Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Metacognition in monkeys during an oculomotor task

Open access
Middlebrooks, Paul G., Sommer, Marc A.·2011·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

This study investigated whether rhesus monkeys show evidence of metacognition in a reduced, visual oculomotor task that is particularly suitable for use in fMRI and electrophysiology. The 2-stage task involved punctate visual stimulation and saccadic eye movement responses. In each trial, monkeys made a decision and then made a bet. To earn maximum reward, they had to monitor their decision and use that information to bet advantageously. Two monkeys learned to base their bets on their decisions within a few weeks. We implemented an operational definition of metacognitive behavior that relied on trial-by-trial analyses and signal detection theory. Both monkeys exhibited metacognition according to these quantitative criteria. Neither external visual cues nor potential reaction time cues explained the betting behavior; the animals seemed to rely exclusively on internal traces of their decisions. We documented the learning process of one monkey. During a 10-session transition phase, betting switched from random to a decision-based strategy. The results reinforce previous findings of metacognitive ability in monkeys and may facilitate the neurophysiological investigation of metacognitive functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0021611

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have established the presence of metacognitive sensitivity in some non-human animals.

    “Several studies have established the presence of metacognitive sensitivity in some non-human animals (Hampton, 2001; Kornell et al., 2007; Middlebrooks and Sommer, 2011; Kepecs and Mainen, 2012).”

    From How to measure metacognition (2014) · cites this paper as Middlebrooks and Sommer, 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Benjamin AS Bjork RA Schwartz BL The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1998 127 55 68 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.127.1.55 9503651 · DOI
  2. Brewer WF Sampaio C Processes leading to confidence and accuracy in sentence recognition: A metamemory approach. Memory 2006 14 540 552 doi:10.1080/09658210600590302 16754240 · DOI
  3. Chandler CC Studying related pictures can reduce accuracy, but increase confidence, in a modified recognition test. Memory and Cognition 1994 22 273 280 8007831
  4. Chua EF Schacter DL Rand-Giovannetti E Sperling RA Understanding metamemory: Neural correlates of the cognitive process and subjective level of confidence in recognition memory. NeuroImage 2006 29 1150 1160 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.058 16303318 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Clifford CW Arabzadeh E Harris JA Getting technical about awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008 12 54 58 doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.009 18178511 · DOI
  6. Costermans J Lories G Ansay C Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992 18 142 150 doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.1.142 · DOI
  7. Cowey A Stoerig P Blindsight in monkeys [Letter]. Nature 1995 373 247 249 7816139
  8. Crapse TB Sommer MA Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008 9 587 600 doi: 10.1038/nrn2457 PMC5153363 18641666 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Foote AL Crystal JD Metacognition in the rat. Current Biology 2007 17 551 555 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.061 17346969 PMC1861845 · DOI
  10. Friston KJ Harrison L Penny W Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 2003 19 1273 1302 doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7 12948688 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Funahashi S Bruce CJ Goldman-Rakic PS Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 1989 61 331 349 2918358
  12. Fuster JM Alexander GE Neuron activity related to short-term memory. Science 13 8 1971 173 652 654 doi:10.1126/science.173.3997.652 4998337 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Goebel R Roebroeck A Kim DS Formisano E Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2003 21 1251 1261 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2003.08.026 14725933 · DOI
  14. Goldman-Rakic PS Cellular basis of working memory. Neuron 1995 14 477 485 doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90304-6 7695894 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Green DM Swets JA Signal detection theory and psychophysics 1966 Wiley New York
  16. Hays AV Richmond BJ Optican L Unix-based multiple-process system for real-time data acquisition and control. WESCON Conference Proceedings 1982 2 1 10
  17. Higham PA No Special K! A signal detection framework for the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007 136 1 22 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.1 17324082 · DOI
  18. Judge SJ Richmond BJ Chu FC Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: An improved method. Vision Research 1980 20 535 538 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(80)90128-5 6776685 · DOI
  19. Kepecs A Uchida N Zariwala HA Mainen ZF Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence. Nature 2008 455 227 231 doi:10.1038/nature07200 18690210 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kikyo H Ohki K Miyashita Y Neural correlates for feeling-of-knowing: An fMRI parametric analysis. Neuron 2002 36 177 186 doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00939-X 12367516 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kleitman S Stankov L Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences 2007 17 161 173 doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.004 · DOI
  22. Koriat A Lichtenstein S Fischhoff B Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1980 6 107 118 doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.107 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kubota K Niki H Prefrontal cortical unit activity and delayed alternation performance in monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology 1971 34 337 347 4997822
  24. Maril A Simons JS Mitchell JP Schwartz BL Schacter DL Feeling-of-knowing in episodic memory: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 2003 18 827 836 doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00014-4 12725759 · DOI
  25. Metcalfe J Dunlosky J Bjork RA Evolution of metacognition. Handbook of metamemory and memory 2008 29 46 Psychology Press New York, NY
  26. Nelson TO Narens L Bower GH Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. The psychology of learning and motivation 1990 26 125 171 doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Persaud N McLeod P Cowey A Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness. Nature Neuroscience 2007 10 257 261 doi:10.1038/nn1840 17237774 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Roberts WA Feeney MC McMillan N Macpherson K Musolino E Petter M Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2009 35 129 142 doi:10.1037/a0013722 19364222 · DOI
  29. Shields WE Smith JD Guttmannova K Washburn DA Confidence judgments by humans and rhesus monkeys. The Journal of General Psychology 2005 132 165 186 15871299 PMC4607308
  30. Smith JD Schull J Strote J McGee K Egnor R Erb L The uncertain response in the bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995 124 391 408 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.4.391 8530911 · DOI
  31. Smith JD Shields WE Allendoerfer KR Washburn DA Memory monitoring by animals and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1998 127 227 250 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.3.227 9742715 · DOI
  32. Sommer MA Wurtz RH Composition and topographic organization of signals sent from the frontal eye field to the superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000 83 1979 2001 10758109
  33. Son LK Kornell N Terrace HS Metcalfe J Meta-confidence judgments in rhesus macaques: Explicit versus implicit mechanisms. The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness 2005 296 320 Oxford University Press New York, NY
  34. Sutton JE Shettleworth SJ Memory without awareness: Pigeons do not show metamemory in delayed matching to sample. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes 2008 34 266 282 doi:10.1037/0097-7403.34.2.266 18426309 · DOI
  35. Thompson KG Schall JD The detection of visual signals by macaque frontal eye field during masking. Nature Neuroscience 1999 2 283 288 doi:10.1038/6398 10195223 · DOI
  36. Wang XJ Discovering spatial working memory fields in prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005 93 3027 3028 doi: 10.1152/classicessays.00028.2005 15911884 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Middlebrooks, P. G., & Sommer, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
2011
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
325-337
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W1977729048
Cited by
51
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31 MH087094)
  • National Eye Institute (Ey017592)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
metacognition, rhesus monkeys, saccades, signal detection theory, oculomotor tasks, nonhuman primate cognition
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Attention, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Cognition, Conditioning, Operant, Decision Making, Macaca mulatta, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Saccades, Statistics as Topic, Time Factors, Signal Detection, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review