Cited by 161Memory Processes and InfluencesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Neural Correlates for Feeling-of-Knowing

Open access
Kikyo, Hideyuki, Ohki, Kenichi, Miyashita, Yasushi·2002·Neuron

Abstract

The "feeling-of-knowing" (FOK) is a subjective sense of knowing a word before recalling it, and the FOK provides us clues to understanding the mechanisms of human metamemory systems. We investigated neural correlates for the FOK based on the recall-judgment-recognition paradigm. Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging with a parametric analysis was used. We found activations in left dorsolateral, left anterior, bilateral inferior, and medial prefrontal cortices that significantly increased as the FOK became greater, and the activations remained significant even when the potentially confounding factor of the response latency was removed. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the FOK region in the right inferior frontal gyrus and a subset of the FOK region in the left inferior frontal gyrus are not recruited for successful recall processes, suggesting their particular role in metamemory processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00939-x

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The insula has a meta-memory function in comparing feelings in the present moment with those of the past and anticipation of the future.

    “The insula has been shown to have a meta-memory function in comparing feelings in the present moment with those of the past and anticipation of the future (Kikyo et al., 2002; Preuschoff et al., 2008).”

    From Mindfulness, Interoception, and the Body: A Contemporary Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as Kikyo et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kikyo, H., Ohki, K., & Miyashita, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • National Institute for Physiological Sciences (JP)
Corresponding author
Miyashita, Yasushi
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
177-186
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064166058
Cited by
161
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
feeling of knowing, metamemory, neural correlates, recognition memory, prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior prefrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review