Cited by 106Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Causal neural network of metamemory for retrospection in primates

Miyamoto, Kentaro, Osada, Takahiro, Setsuie, Rieko, Takeda, Masaki, Tamura, Keita, Adachi, Yusuke, Miyashita, Yasushi·2017·Science

Abstract

Are you aware how well you remember?: Self-monitoring and evaluation of our own memory is a mental process called metamemory. For metamemory, we need access to information about the strength of our own memory traces. The brain structures and neural mechanisms involved in metamemory are completely unknown. Miyamoto et al. devised a test paradigm for metamemory in macaques, in which the monkeys judged their own confidence in remembering past experiences. The authors combined this approach with functional brain imaging to reveal the neural substrates of metamemory for retrospection. A specific region in the prefrontal brain was essential for meta mnemonic decision-making. Inactivation of this region caused selective impairment of metamemory, but not of memory itself. Science , this issue p. 188

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aal0162

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-memory is associated with prefrontal structures whose pharmacological inactivation leads to a metacognitive impairment while sparing memory performance itself.

    “Meta-memory is associated with prefrontal structures whose pharmacological inactivation leads to a metacognitive impairment while sparing memory performance itself ( 56 ).”

    From What is consciousness, and could machines have it? (2017) · cites this paper as [56]

  • Inactivation of the prefrontal cortex can induce a specific deficit in second-order (metacognitive) judgements while sparing performance on the first-order task.

    “Inactivation of the prefrontal cortex can induce a specific deficit in second-order (metacognitive) judgements while sparing performance on the first-order task ( 56 , 58 ).”

    From What is consciousness, and could machines have it? (2017) · cites this paper as [56]

  • MRI studies in humans and physiological recordings in primates and rats have linked confidence processing to the prefrontal cortex.

    “Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in humans and physiological recordings in primates and even in rats have specifically linked such confidence processing to the prefrontal cortex ( 55 -57 ).”

    From What is consciousness, and could machines have it? (2017) · cites this paper as [56]

  • Changes in confidence formation and metacognition (but not first-order task performance) are observed following temporary disruption or lesions to rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann areas 46 and 10) in humans and monkeys.

    “Changes in confidence formation and metacognition (but not first-order task performance) are observed following temporary disruption or lesions to rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann areas 46 and 10) in humans and monkeys (Fleming et al. 2014;Kwok et al. 2019;Miyamoto et al. 2017Miyamoto et al. , 2018;;Shekhar & Rahnev 2018)”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Miyamoto et al. 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyamoto, K., Osada, T., Setsuie, R., Takeda, M., Tamura, K., Adachi, Y., & Miyashita, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Juntendo University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Setsuie, Rieko
  • Takeda, Masaki
  • Miyashita, Yasushi
Venue
Science
Published
2017-01-13
Volume
355
Issue
6321
Pages
188-193
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2574976425
Cited by
106
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K21042, 16H01281, 24220008, 14J05926, 16K18367)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
metamemory, prefrontal cortex, area 6, remote memory, recent memory, reversible inactivation, recognition memory, neural correlates, macaque
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Animals, Brain, Female, Judgment, Macaca, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Short-Term, Nerve Net, Mental Recall, Recognition, Psychology, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review