The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the moral domain.
Open accessAbstract
The moral domain is broader than the empathy and justice concerns assessed by existing measures of moral competence, and it is not just a subset of the values assessed by value inventories. To fill the need for reliable and theoretically grounded measurement of the full range of moral concerns, we developed the Moral Foundations Questionnaire on the basis of a theoretical model of 5 universally available (but variably developed) sets of moral intuitions: Harm/Care, Fairness/Reciprocity, Ingroup/Loyalty, Authority/Respect, and Purity/Sanctity. We present evidence for the internal and external validity of the scale and the model, and in doing so we present new findings about morality: (a) Comparative model fitting of confirmatory factor analyses provides empirical justification for a 5-factor structure of moral concerns; (b) convergent/discriminant validity evidence suggests that moral concerns predict personality features and social group attitudes not previously considered morally relevant; and (c) we establish pragmatic validity of the measure in providing new knowledge and research opportunities concerning demographic and cultural differences in moral intuitions. These analyses provide evidence for the usefulness of Moral Foundations Theory in simultaneously increasing the scope and sharpening the resolution of psychological views of morality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“MFQ scores have been shown to vary between cultures (Graham et al., 2011) and between social groups within a single culture (Graham et al., 2009).”
From Exploring the psychology of LLMs’ moral and legal reasoning (2024) · cites this paper as Graham et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“When these three distance metrics were applied to our sample of self-reported GPT liberals, we found that first, according to each of the three distance metrics, self-reported GPT liberals had a lower distance to the human liberal sample and a higher distance to the human conservative sample than did the self-reported GPT conservatives.”
From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Graham et al. (2011)
In the citing paper
“Just like for self-reported GPT conservatives, the two human samples furthest away from the self-reported GPT liberals were always the liberal sample (furthest away from with respect to cosine similarity metric) and the libertarian sample (furthest away with respect to the L1 and L2 distance metrics).”
From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Graham et al. (2011)
In the citing paper
“Also, the L1 distance metric found that self-reported GPT liberals were – among human liberals, human moderates, human conservatives, and human libertarians – closest in response to human conservatives.”
From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Graham et al. (2011)
In the citing paper
“The second, arguably more surprising finding was that according to each of the three distance metrics, our sample of self-reported GPT liberals were still closer to the human conservative sample than it was to the human liberal sample.”
From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Graham et al. (2011)
In the citing paper
“All three distance metrics found our sample of self-reported GPT conservatives to be most similar to conservative participants of Graham et al. (2011). This was always followed relatively closely by the moderate sample. The two furthest away were always the liberal sample (furthest away with respect to cosine similarity metric) and the libertarian sample (furthest away with respect to the L1 and L”
From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Graham et al. (2011)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bhagat, R. S., & Hofstede, G. (2002) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389951 · Cited by 21,688
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 1×
“Second, we wanted to supplement the abstract relevance assessments—which, as selftheories about how one makes moral judgments, may be inaccurate with regard to actual moral judgments (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977)—with contextualized items that could more directly gauge actual moral judgments.”
BackgroundThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory And Women's Development
Gilligan, & Carol, C. (1982) · Cited by 10,877
(1976) · Cited by 10,423
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868 · Cited by 10,297
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Haidt J Kesebir S Fiske ST Gilbert D Lindzey G Morality Handbook of Social Psychology 2010 5th Edition Hoboken, NJ Wiley 797 832
- Hofstede G Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations 2001 New York Sage Publications
- James W Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking and The Meaning of Truth 1907/1998 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
- Mill JS On liberty 1859/2003 New Haven, CT Yale University Press
- Singer P Practical ethics 1979 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,006
Ellemers, N., & Chopova, T. (2021) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2022.100156 · Cited by 63
Moral Foundations and Attitudes Towards the Poor
Low, M. M., & Wui, M. G. L. (2015) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-015-9333-y · Cited by 63
Conspiracy Beliefs and Acceptance of COVID-Vaccine: An Exploratory Study in Italy
Pivetti, M., Melotti, G., Bonomo, M., & Hakoköngäs, E. J. (2021) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci10030108 · Cited by 67
Partner's perception of phubbing is more relevant than the behavior itself: A daily diary study
Frackowiak, M., Hilpert, P., & Russell, P. S. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107323 · Cited by 72
Employees’ Emotional and Behavioral Reactions to Corporate Social Irresponsibility
Hericher, C., & Bridoux, F. (2022) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221100178 · Cited by 62
Liao, Z., Yam, K. C., Lee, H. W., Johnson, R. E., & Tang, P. M. (2023) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063231154845 · Cited by 62
Hadarics, M., & Kende, A. (2017) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9544-x · Cited by 71
Cole, J. C., Gillis, A. J., van der Linden, S., Cohen, M. A., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2025) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231186409 · Cited by 61
Efferson, L. M., & Glenn, A. L. (2018) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.009 · Cited by 72
Laakasuo, M., Drosinou, M., Koverola, M., Kunnari, A., Halonen, J., Lehtonen, N., & Palomäki, J. (2018) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0124-6 · Cited by 66
Lee, S., Baumgartner, H., & Winterich, K. P. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1028 · Cited by 66
Infants expect leaders to right wrongs
Stavans, M., & Renée Baillargeon, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1820091116 · Cited by 62
Good Robots, Bad Robots: Morally Valenced Behavior Effects on Perceived Mind, Morality, and Trust
Banks, J. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00692-3 · Cited by 64
How Are Moral Foundations Associated with Climate-Friendly Consumption?
Vainio, A., & Mäkiniemi, J.-P. (2016) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-016-9601-3 · Cited by 67
Zakharin, M., & Bates, T. C. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258910 · Cited by 66
Silver, E., Goff, K., & Iceland, J. (2022) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12303 · Cited by 59
Moral Mimicry: Large Language Models Produce Moral Rationalizations Tailored to Political Identity
Simmons, G. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-srw.40 · Cited by 107
Activating analytic thinking enhances the value given to individualizing moral foundations
Yılmaz, O., & Sarıbay, S. A. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.009 · Cited by 67
The Problem with Morality: Impeding Progress and Increasing Divides
Kovacheff, C., Schwartz, S., Inbar, Y., & Feinberg, M. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12045 · Cited by 62
Gender essentialism and benevolent sexism in anti‐trans rhetoric
Atwood, S., Morgenroth, T., & Olson, K. R. (2023) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12099 · Cited by 58
Substance use to enhance academic performance among Australian university students
Mazanov, J., Dunn, M., Connor, J., & Fielding, M.-L. (2013) · Performance Enhancement & Health · doi:10.1016/j.peh.2013.08.017 · Cited by 65
Social Justice and Social Order: Binding Moralities across the Political Spectrum
Janoff‐Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152479 · Cited by 63
Empathy Mediates the Effects of Age and Sex on Altruistic Moral Decision Making
Rosen, J. B., Brand, M., & Kalbe, E. (2016) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00067 · Cited by 63
Predicting moral decision-making with dark personalities and moral values
Karandikar, S., Kapoor, H., Fernandes, S., & Jonason, P. K. (2018) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.048 · Cited by 69
Modeling Morality in 3‐D: Decision‐Making, Judgment, and Inference
Yu, H., Siegel, J. Z., & Crockett, M. J. (2018) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12382 · Cited by 65
Voters’ Partisan Responses to Politicians’ Immoral Behavior
Walter, A. S., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12582 · Cited by 58
Moral concerns are differentially observable in language
Kennedy, B., Atari, M., Davani, A. M., Hoover, J., Omrani, A., Graham, J., & Dehghani, M. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104696 · Cited by 67
Self-citationMoral foundations elicit shared and dissociable cortical activation modulated by political ideology
Hopp, F. R., Amir, O., Fisher, J. T., Grafton, S. T., Sinnott-Armstrong, W. P., & Weber, R. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01693-8 · Cited by 62
Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Predict Different Moral Signatures
Milojev, P., Osborne, D., Greaves, L. M., Bulbulia, J. A., Wilson, M., Davies, C., Liu, J. H.-F., & Sibley, C. G. (2014) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-014-0213-7 · Cited by 64
Disconfirming Moral Foundations Theory on Its Own Terms
Gray, K. J., & Keeney, J. E. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615592243 · Cited by 66
Harming Ourselves and Defiling Others: What Determines a Moral Domain?
Chakroff, A., Dungan, J. A., & Young, L. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074434 · Cited by 60
Children’s intention-based moral judgments of helping agents
Margoni, F., & Surian, L. (2016) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.12.001 · Cited by 59
Describing the ideal victim: A linguistic analysis of victim descriptions
Lewis, J. A., Hamilton, J. C., & Elmore, J. D. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00347-1 · Cited by 56
Two Measures for Cross-Cultural Research on Morality: Comparison and Revision
Zhang, Y., & Li, S. (2015) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/08.07.pr0.117c15z5 · Cited by 60
A Moral Theory of Public Service Motivation
Wang, T.-M., van Witteloostuijn, A. C., & Heine, F. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.517763 · Cited by 71
Prosocial responses to COVID-19: Examining the role of gratitude, fairness and legacy motives
Syropoulos, S., & Markowitz, E. M. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110488 · Cited by 63
Race, Ethnicity, and Culture in Jury Decision Making
Hunt, J. S. (2015) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121723 · Cited by 56
The Moral Foundations of Consumer Ethics
Chowdhury, R. M. M. I. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3676-2 · Cited by 62
On Disease and Deontology: Multiple Tests of the Influence of Disease Threat on Moral Vigilance
Murray, D. R., Kerry, N., & Gervais, W. M. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617733518 · Cited by 57
Compassionate Democrats and Tough Republicans: How Ideology Shapes Partisan Stereotypes
Clifford, S. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-019-09542-z · Cited by 59
Ecospirituality: The psychology of moral concern for nature
Billet, M. I., Baimel, A., Sahakari, S. S., Schaller, M., & Norenzayan, A. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102001 · Cited by 48
Moralization and the 2012 U.S. presidential election campaign
Brandt, M. J., Wisneski, D. C., & Skitka, L. J. (2015) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i2.434 · Cited by 56
Behavioral ethics for Homo economicus, Homo heuristicus, and Homo duplex
Kluver, J. R., Frazier, R. S., & Haidt, J. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.12.004 · Cited by 59
Self-citationAffective Beliefs Influence the Experience of Eating Meat
Anderson, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160424 · Cited by 61
Cruwys, T., Norwood, R., Chachay, V., Ntontis, E., & Sheffield, J. K. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12040970 · Cited by 58
Heerdink, M. W., Koning, L. F., van Doorn, E. A., & van Kleef, G. A. (2019) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2018.1476324 · Cited by 55
White, C. J. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2019) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.03.001 · Cited by 54
Bad guys suffer less (social pain): Moral status influences judgements of others’ social suffering
Riva, P., Brambilla, M., & Vaes, J. (2015) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12114 · Cited by 55
Wilhelm, C., & Joeckel, S. (2018) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0941-5 · Cited by 59
Miller, J. T., & Verhaeghen, P. (2022) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-022-00888-4 · Cited by 54
Ward, S. J., & King, L. A. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217744525 · Cited by 54
Milfont, T. L., Davies, C., & Wilson, M. (2019) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.v14i2.32633 · Cited by 58
Unbound: The Relationship Among Creativity, Moral Foundations, and Dark Personality
Kapoor, H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2021) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.523 · Cited by 55
Eager feelings and vigilant reasons: Regulatory focus differences in judging moral wrongs.
Cornwell, J. F. M., & Higgins, E. T. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000136 · Cited by 54
Uenal, F., Sidanius, J., Maertens, R., Hudson, S. T. J., Davis, G., & Ghani, A. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101783 · Cited by 53
The Moral Compass of Insecurity
Koleva, S. P., Selterman, D. F., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Graham, J. (2013) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550613490965 · Cited by 57
Self-citationWrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment
Simpson, A., Laham, S. M., & Fiske, A. P. (2016) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2016.1140118 · Cited by 58
Disgust sensitivity relates to moral foundations independent of political ideology.
van Leeuwen, F., Dukes, A., Tybur, J. M., & Park, J. H. (2016) · Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1037/ebs0000075 · Cited by 57
Does “Could” Lead to Good? On the Road to Moral Insight
Zhang, T., Gino, F., & Margolis, J. D. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0839 · Cited by 55
Egorov, M., Kalshoven, K., Verdorfer, A. P., & Peus, C. V. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04178-9 · Cited by 62
Milesi, P., Süssenbach, P., Bohner, G., & Megías, J. L. (2019) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2622 · Cited by 59
How Do U.S. Christians and Atheists Stereotype One Another’s Moral Values?
Simpson, A., & Morrison, K. R. (2016) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2016.1167419 · Cited by 53
Showing Data About People: A Design Space of Anthropographics
Morais, L., Jansen, Y., Andrade, N., & Dragicevic, P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2020.3023013 · Cited by 52
Ripoll, G., & Schott, C. (2020) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2020.1825576 · Cited by 55
Iten, G., Steinemann, S. T., & Opwis, K. (2018) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173915 · Cited by 53
Voelkel, J. G., & Brandt, M. J. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218798822 · Cited by 57
The Connection Between Moral Positions and Moral Arguments Drives Opinion Change
Strimling, P., Vartanova, I., Jansson, F., & Eriksson, K. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0647-x · Cited by 58
Monroe, A. E., & Plant, E. A. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000537 · Cited by 55
The physiological basis of psychological disgust and moral judgments.
Tracy, J. L., Steckler, C. M., & Heltzel, G. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000141 · Cited by 57
Moral Molecules: Morality as a Combinatorial System
Curry, O. S., Alfano, M., Brandt, M. J., & Pelican, C. (2021) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-021-00540-x · Cited by 58
Identifying Virtues and Values Through Obituary Data-Mining
Alfano, M., Higgins, A., & Levernier, J. (2017) · The Journal of Value Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s10790-017-9602-0 · Cited by 54
Reassessing the structure of presidential character
Clifford, S. (2018) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.006 · Cited by 52
Investigating the role of group-based morality in extreme behavioral expressions of prejudice
Hoover, J., Atari, M., Davani, A. M., Kennedy, B., Portillo-Wightman, G., Yeh, L., & Dehghani, M. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24786-2 · Cited by 55
Cultural similarity among coreligionists within and between countries
White, C., Muthukrishna, M., & Norenzayan, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2109650118 · Cited by 59
Influence of AI behavior on human moral decisions, agency, and responsibility
Salatino, A., Prével, A., Caspar, É. A., & Bue, S. L. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-95587-6 · Cited by 64
Moral foundations, worldviews, moral absolutism and belief in conspiracy theories
Leone, L., Giacomantonio, M., & Lauriola, M. (2017) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12459 · Cited by 59
Concept Creep and Psychiatrization
Haslam, N., Tse, J. S. Y., & Deyne, S. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2021.806147 · Cited by 43
Moral intensity and climate-friendly food choices
Mäkiniemi, J.-P., & Vainio, A. (2013) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.026 · Cited by 55
The study of behavioral ethics within organizations: A special issue introduction
Mitchell, M. S., Reynolds, S. J., & Treviño, L. K. (2019) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12381 · Cited by 55
Exchange, Identity Verification, and Social Bonds
Stets, J. E., Burke, P. J., & Savage, S. V. (2018) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0190272518785866 · Cited by 49
Smetana, M., & Onderčo, M. (2022) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/00220027221118815 · Cited by 51
Harnish, R. J., Bridges, K. R., & Gump, J. T. (2017) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9552-x · Cited by 57
Playing with Emotions: The Effect of Moral Appeals in Elite Rhetoric
Lipsitz, K. (2017) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9394-8 · Cited by 54
An Investigation of Moral Foundations Theory in Turkey Using Different Measures
Yalçındağ, B., Özkan, T., Cesur, S., Yılmaz, O., Tepe, B., Piyale, Z. E., Biten, A. F., & Sunar, D. G. (2017) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-017-9618-4 · Cited by 52
Almeida, P. R., Seixas, M. J., Ferreira‐Santos, F., Vieira, J. B., Paiva, T. O., Moreira, P. S., & Costa, P. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.012 · Cited by 62
Morality, moral order, and language conflict and aggression
Kádár, D. Z., Parvaresh, V., & Ning, P. (2019) · Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict · doi:10.1075/jlac.00017.kad · Cited by 49
Rubenstein, A. L., Kammeyer‐Mueller, J. D., & Thundiyil, T. G. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000492 · Cited by 53
Has the Study of Public Service Motivation Addressed the Issues That Motivated the Study?
Prebble, M. (2014) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074014554651 · Cited by 53
When Organizational Identification Elicits Moral Decision-Making: A Matter of the Right Climate
van Gils, S., Hogg, M. A., Quaquebeke, N. V., & van Knippenberg, D. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2784-0 · Cited by 56
Yılmaz, O., Sarıbay, S. A., Bahçekapılı, H. G., & Harma, M. (2016) · Turkish Studies · doi:10.1080/14683849.2016.1221312 · Cited by 49
Holler, S., Cramer, H., Liebscher, D., Jeitler, M., Schumann, D., Murthy, V., Michalsen, A., & Keßler, C. S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579700 · Cited by 57
Binding moral values gain importance in the presence of close others
Yudkin, D. A., Gantman, A. P., Hofmann, W., & Quoidbach, J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22566-6 · Cited by 47
The Benefits and Burdens of Work Moralization on Creativity
Kundro, T. (2022) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2021.0273 · Cited by 49
Ellemers, N., & van der Toorn, J. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.018 · Cited by 55
Liberals Condemn Sacrilege Too
Frimer, J. A., Tell, C. E., & Haidt, J. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615597974 · Cited by 49
Self-citationHughes, J. S. (2017) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12199 · Cited by 47
Trait Appreciation of Beauty: A Story of Love, Transcendence, and Inquiry
Diessner, R., Pohling, R., Stacy, S., & Güsewell, A. (2018) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000166 · Cited by 54
Raimi, K. T., Wolske, K. S., Hart, P. S., & Campbell-Árvai, V. (2019) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13414 · Cited by 47
Chang, S. M., Budhwar, P. S., & Crawshaw, J. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635106 · Cited by 58
The Sales Profession as a Subculture: Implications for Ethical Decision Making
Bush, V. D., Bush, A. J., Oakley, J., & Cicala, J. E. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2753-7 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 366-385
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- PMC
- PMC3116962
- OpenAlex
- W2096910467
- Cited by
- 2,666
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 169 · 2025: 254 · 2024: 245 · 2023: 242 · 2022: 269 · 2021: 245 · 2020: 212 · 2019: 215 · 2018: 174 · 2017: 157 · 2016: 137 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 92 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 37.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute of Education Sciences
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH68447)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Values and Moral Education
- Keywords
- moral foundations, Moral Foundations Questionnaire, moral intuitions, harm/care, ingroup loyalty, moral competence, empathy, justice, personality traits, cultural differences in morality, cross-cultural comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Morals, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Values, Reproducibility of Results, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
