The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance.
Abstract
Theory at both the micro and macro level predicts that investments in superior human capital generate better firm-level performance. However, human capital takes time and money to develop or acquire, which potentially offsets its positive benefits. Indeed, extant tests appear equivocal regarding its impact. To clarify what is known, we meta-analyzed effects drawn from 66 studies of the human capital-firm performance relationship and investigated 3 moderators suggested by resource-based theory. We found that human capital relates strongly to performance, especially when the human capital in question is not readily tradable in labor markets and when researchers use operational performance measures that are not subject to profit appropriation. Our results suggest that managers should invest in programs that increase and retain firm-specific human capital.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation
Grant, R. M. (1991) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166664 · Cited by 9,699
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630102700601 · Cited by 3,451
Self-citationUnderstanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2004.12736076 · Cited by 2,996
How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm‐level performance
Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.459 · Cited by 497
Involvement in knowledge-acquisition activities by venture team members and venture performance
Chandler, G. N., & Lyon, D. W. (2009) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00317.x · Cited by 98
Cited by
Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?
DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000085 · Cited by 677
Learning in the Twenty-First-Century Workplace
Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321 · Cited by 539
Busch, T., & Friede, G. (2018) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1480 · Cited by 345
Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: The road traveled and the path ahead
Harvey, P., Madison, K., Martinko, M., Crook, T. R., & Crook, T. A. (2014) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0175 · Cited by 293
Self-citationMiao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.056 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 443-456
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2161345121
- Cited by
- 1,205
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 42.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
